Fact Sheet  
Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management
 
Scientists around the world agree that an underground repository is a feasible and safe method for disposing of nuclear waste.

Radioactive waste: an international concern

All countries with high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel plan to eventually dispose of the materials deep underground in a geologic disposal facility.

What makes radioactive waste an international concern?

Many other countries in addition to the United States generate electrical power using nuclear fuel. Altogether, there are 436 nuclear power plants around the world, operating in 31 countries. All countries using nuclear power must contend with radioactive waste, regardless of the number of reactors they have in service. Nuclear energy production eventually creates waste in the form of spent nuclear fuel. Spent nuclear fuel is depleted or used fuel from nuclear power plants and research facilities.

Spent nuclear fuel is highly radioactive, and remains so for thousands of years. Isolating this high-level waste from people and the environment is an important and challenging issue for countries that use nuclear power. Social, economic, political, technical, and geographic considerations shape a country’s radioactive waste management decisions.


Basic types of radioactive waste

Generally speaking, radioactive waste can be either long-lived or short-lived. Long-lived radioactive waste decays at a much slower rate than short-lived waste, and therefore retains its radioactivity longer. The opposite is true for short-lived wastes. Radioactive waste can also be categorized as low-level or high-level, according to the amount of radiation given off.


Low-level radioactive waste

Approximately 90 percent of the radioactive waste produced in the world is low-level, yet contains only about five percent of all the radioactivity in low- and high-level waste combined. It can be either short- or long-lived, but most is short-lived. This type of waste consists of lightly contaminated trash and debris, such as paper, clothing, cleaning materials, metal and glass equipment, and tools used in commercial and medical nuclear industries. It also results when nuclear power plants are shut down.

Any radioactive waste that is not spent nuclear fuel, high-level radioactive waste, uranium mining residues, or transuranic waste falls into the low-level waste category.

Many countries bury their low-level, short-lived waste in protected shallow trenches or concrete-lined bunkers, but some countries choose other options. In the United States, low-level radioactive waste is sent to disposal sites licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Each state, or group of states, is responsible for disposing of and managing low-level waste. Low-level radioactive waste from United States Department of Energy (DOE) facilities is buried on the Nevada Test Site.


Spent nuclear fuel

Spent nuclear fuel is fuel that has been withdrawn from a nuclear reactor following irradiation, has undergone at least one year’s decay since being used as a source of energy in a power reactor, and has not been chemically separated into its constituent elements by reprocessing. Spent fuel includes the special nuclear material, byproduct material, source material, and other radioactive materials associated with fuel assemblies.


High-level radioactive waste

High-level waste makes up the smallest volume of radioactive waste, around three percent of the world’s total, but it contains approximately 95 percent of all the radioactivity in low- and high-level waste combined. In the United States, high-level radioactive waste primarily comes from defense-related reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel. All countries with high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel plan to eventually dispose of these materials deep underground, in a geologic disposal facility called a repository.


International consensus on high-level radioactive waste: deep geologic disposal

Underground disposal has been determined by the international scientific community as the best option for permanently separating high-level radioactive waste from people and the accessible environment. Scientists and researchers around the world agree that deep geologic disposal is technically feasible, provides a waste disposal solution that keeps the public safe, provides for security from intrusion, prevents the diversion of nuclear materials for harmful purposes, and protects the environment for both the short and long term.

In addition to the United States, Belgium, Canada, China, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom have invested significant resources in their radioactive waste management programs because of their historic or anticipated reliance on nuclear energy. Despite some differences in their programs, they all support deep geologic disposal as the best method for isolating highly radioactive, long-lived waste.

Of these countries, Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States have all performed detailed studies, or characterizations, drilling numerous boreholes and exploratory shafts and ramps in underground research laboratories. The data are useful in determining the predicted safety performance of future nuclear waste repository sites.

Common elements of potential repository systems include the radioactive waste, the containers enclosing the waste, the tunnels housing the containers, and the geologic makeup, or type of rock, of the surrounding area. Some countries are individualizing their repository systems, and many are working in collaboration with other countries to develop shared technologies.

Country Operating plants Nuclear power reliance Percent of world total Projected repository operation
Belgium 7 58% 2% between 2035-2080
Canada 14 12% 3% after 2034
China 3 1.2% 0.6% at earliest 2040
Finland 4 33% 0.9% emplacement in 2020
France 59 75% 16% after 2020
Germany 19 31% 7% no projected date
Japan 53 36% 14% at earliest 2035
Russia 29 14% 4% TBD
Spain 9 31% 2% TBD
Sweden 11 47% 3% around 2015
Switzerland 5 36% 1% after 2050
United Kingdom 35 29% 4% TBD

Sources of data for this table include:
Department of Energy (DOE), Systems Engineering and International Division, 2000
Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Information Administration, International Energy Database, 1999
United States Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Trip Report, China’s High-level Nuclear Waste Management Program, 2000



International collaboration: sharing radioactive waste management concerns

International cooperation ensures that scientific advances in radioactive waste management are shared among all countries. Participation in international programs provides opportunities for developing, obtaining, testing, and sharing deep geologic disposal technology. Additionally, cooperation among countries promotes a better understanding of waste management programs and develops international consensus regarding common waste management concerns.

The Department of Energy is the agency responsible for radioactive waste management in the United States. The department has been committed to collaborating with other countries on nuclear waste activities for more than 20 years, and maintains cooperative agreements with Canada, France, Japan, Russia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.

The DOE is an active member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD/NEA). The DOE, the NRC, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provide technical experts to IAEA conferences, and the DOE sponsors participation in the Radioactive Waste Management Committee of the OECD/NEA. The DOE and the NRC also provide expertise in the field of computer modeling, which is used to study the calculated behavior of radioactive material in geologic disposal facilities.

On October 31, 1999, the DOE convened an international conference addressing global efforts to dispose of spent nuclear materials in geologic repositories. Its purpose was to highlight international progress in and provide a forum for discussing ongoing and planned activities in geologic repository development. More than 20 nations maintaining commercial nuclear power programs attended the conference, along with the IAEA and OECD/NEA. Many of these nations and international organizations met to finalize and agree to a Joint Declaration pledging to work together to address the safe management of nuclear waste. As a result, a second international conference addressing these global efforts is currently being planned through the IAEA to be convened in St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, during the year 2002.


Public voice in radioactive waste management programs

To date, no country has built a high-level radioactive waste repository. Public opposition can and has slowed repository development in many countries. Despite the opposition, no country has yet withdrawn its decision to pursue deep geologic disposal. Instead, more countries have recognized the importance of public, or transparent, decision making in their radioactive waste management programs. The insight and approval of people outside scientific communities is becoming more important to national policy-makers regarding radioactive waste disposal.

 

Yucca Mountain Project