Statement of

Dr. Arden L. Bement, Jr.

Director
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Technology Administration
U.S. Department of Commerce

Before the

Committee on Science

House of Representatives
United States Congress

“FY 2003 Budget Request for the Technology Administration and
the National Institute of Standards and Technology”
 

March 14, 2002



    Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee. I appreciate this opportunity to bring you up to date on our work at the National Institute of Standards and Technology and to discuss the President’s budget request for NIST for Fiscal Year 2003.

    As we enter our second century of service to the Nation, NIST remains committed to our core mission to provide the scientific and technological support – particularly in measurement science – essential to the security needs of the Nation, the research needs of our scientists, and the commercial needs of our industry.

    Whether it is working to ensure the accuracy of new clinical lab tests, developing performance models to help architects and engineers create safer buildings, supporting the critical measurement needs of America’s high-tech industries, or providing secure data encryption standards to safeguard the Nation’s information infrastructure, our broad-based expertise in the physical and computing sciences promotes technological innovation—the driving force for about 50 percent of U.S. economic growth and a key to national security.

    Through the Baldrige National Quality Program we have helped make quality a national priority and enhanced the competitiveness and productivity of U.S industry. Thousands of organizations of all sizes and in all sectors of the economy have benefited by using the Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence as the foundation for performance management and quality improvement programs.

    Through our Advanced Technology Program we reach out directly to industry’s entrepreneurs, accelerating the development of innovative new technologies strengthening the Nation’s industrial base and our economy.

    To make these impacts more concrete, Mr. Chairman, I would like to share with this committee a few examples of our accomplishments over the past year.

    As this committee is well aware, the NIST Laboratories are the oldest part of the agency and form the scientific and technical core that supports our wide-ranging services to the Nation’s industry, its scientific research community, and the government. Over the past year, NIST’s Laboratories have maintained their century-old tradition of excellence in support of the science and industry:

    Those were a few highlights, Mr. Chairman. I could cite more, but there is also the day-to-day work that over the years has earned NIST its place in the Nation’s scientific and technological communities. A few examples: FY 2003 Budget Request for NIST Laboratories

    Mr. Chairman, if there is a single most important theme to our budget request for FY 2003, it is to strengthen the NIST Laboratories to ensure our continued ability to meet the Nation’s measurement, standards, and data needs. In the on-going war against terrorism, we are seeing clear evidence that technological superiority is changing the rules of war – in our favor. Technology also holds the key to meeting the Nation’s goals in ensuring homeland security and long-term economic growth. And technological innovation, Mr. Chairman, walks hand in hand with measurement science.

    I want to start out by emphasizing – indeed, I could not possibly over-emphasize – the critical importance of our request this year for funding for special instrumentation and the construction of research facilities. We are requesting:

    In 2003, we will complete construction in Gaithersburg of the new NIST Advanced Measurement Laboratory, a project which is both on schedule and on budget. The AML will be the world’s best measurement laboratory, carrying out stringent measurements required by the semiconductor, biotechnology, telecommunications, and other high-technology industries. This work requires not only environments that precisely control vibration, temperature, humidity, and air cleanliness, but also new and highly sophisticated scientific equipment for making fundamental measurements and ever more precise standards, and advanced “clean rooms.” The AML will support the U.S. semiconductor industry in manufacturing new generations of devices that are smaller and faster, including development of new materials for a wide range of applications and certification of length measurements to an accuracy of 1.5 nanometers or better.

    For the Nation to reap the benefits of this new facility, it must be outfitted with modern equipment and instrumentation. Ultimately, we will need about 40 major equipment systems. This $35 million would buy the first 15 systems so that the equipment will be in place as the building is occupied beginning next year. The new equipment will support industrial and scientific needs such as lithography at feature sizes of 100 nanometers and less; electron beam processing that can make even smaller feature sizes and can be used to make standards for nanotechnology; one-nanometer resolution comparisons of surface morphologies and crystal structures at low beam voltages; determination of the unit of mass in terms of quantum standards; and very precise measurements of electrical quantities.

    We also are requesting a total of $54.5 million in our construction budget, including two significant increases:

    In addition, $15 million is requested as part of the construction budget for final lab-by-lab fit-up and relocation into the AML. This is the lab-by-lab process of the design, installation, and extension of mechanical and electrical services to allow researchers to hook up their equipment and to relocate equipment and furnishings from old laboratories.     The NIST Boulder Laboratories house several of our key facilities, including our Time and Frequency and Quantum Physics divisions, as well as labs devoted to optoelectronics, radio-frequency electronics, electromagnetics, and materials properties. The majority of the buildings in Boulder are almost 50 years old.

    Facility-related problems at the Boulder campus include severe temperature fluctuations and power interruptions that often threaten the quality of NIST data; power outages, spikes, and brownouts that damage sensitive equipment; and poor heating and air conditioning controls that have prevented the on-time delivery of specialized superconducting chips to defense contractors, instrument makers, and other NIST customers.

    Mr. Chairman, I recently asked the Boulder staff to give me a conservative estimate of the productivity impact caused by the deteriorating state of the facilities there- as an example, laboratory “down time” due to the loss of a critical computer or power supply because of power surges.  It costs NIST approximately $7.3 million per year in lost staff productivity, maintenance and repair of facilities and equipment just to keep up with deteriorating condition of the entire facilities.  Providing adequate funding to upgrade the Boulder Laboratories starts to pay back with an immediate boost in productivity, and should result in an immediate payback of the investment in less than 5 years.

    We have conducted thorough assessments of the situation and prepared a master facilities plan to guide the replacement, renovation, or repair of these buildings so that we can continue to provide the best possible services to our clients. The requested FY 2003 appropriation includes $11.8 million for the first phase of construction of a new central utility plant to supply filtered power, heating, and cooling to the laboratories; and $5.5 million for a new primary electrical service.

    Turning to our research agenda, for FY 2003 we are requesting $396.4 million for the NIST Laboratories. Besides the funding to begin instrumenting the AML, we have several other initiatives in our laboratories.

    An additional $6 million would go to enhance another world-class facility at NIST, our Center for Neutron Research.

    Because of their unique properties, neutrons have become one of the essential measurement tools of materials science, biology, chemistry, physics and engineering. Low energy neutrons are used as probes to study atomic and molecular structure. They have a unique ability to illuminate the structures of large macromolecules such as polymers, composite materials, and biological molecules such as proteins; and they can probe magnetic structures, an application of particular interest to the electronics and semiconductor industries.

    Unfortunately, producing and using neutrons for measurement is highly complex and requires specialized – and expensive – facilities and skilled, experienced staff. The NIST Center for Neutron Research is at present the only U.S. neutron center competitive with facilities in Europe and Japan and is the most cost-effective such center in the world. We are proud of the Center’s record, but in a sense business has been too good. The use of neutrons for measurements in chemistry, materials science, biology, physics, and engineering has expanded into new areas unforeseen when the Center was designed. Over the past decade, the number of researchers using the NIST facility has more than quadrupled. In fact, although there are three other operating neutron research facilities in the U.S., all operated by the Department of Energy, almost the entire growth in neutron research in the U.S. over that period occurred at NIST.

    An Interagency Working Group under the President’s Office of Science and Technology Policy has examined the status and needs of neutron research in the U.S. and is preparing a report to be issued shortly. One key finding of that report is that U.S. scientists are at a distinct disadvantage in comparison to their colleagues in Western Europe and Japan in this rapidly growing research area because of the relative lack of available facilities in the U.S.

    The $6 million increase we are requesting for FY 2003 will allow us to take some steps to meet this demand for what is a truly unique resource for U.S. science. NIST will build staff expertise for the development of new instruments and capabilities that will allow us to increase the number of users by a minimum of 25 percent, from approximately 1,750 to 2,300 per year, and strengthen key program areas, including:

    The balance of our proposed research initiatives directly impact two of the President’s top priorities for FY 2003, protection of our homeland and revitalizing our economy.

    NIST is playing a key role in enhancing the Nation’s ability to prevent and respond to terrorism. Through more than 75 projects, NIST is helping law enforcement, military, science, emergency services, information technology, airport and building security, and other personnel protect the American public from terrorist threats. Three initiatives for FY 2003, totaling $5 million, address additional issues in homeland security:

    Last week, I testified before this Committee on the collapse of the World Trade Center towers.  I discussed the possible NIST investigation and broader research program.  One clear fact is that current building design standards and practices are not adequate to protect the occupants from such unprecedented events.     The requested $2M funding increase in the President’s FY03 budget will enable us to support a portion of the research needs in this area, including:     In addition to designing buildings that are better able physically to withstand major disasters, more intelligent buildings could significantly affect the outcome in terms of lives saved.

    This $2 million increase for the Program for Accelerating Critical Information Technologies will support the development of networked systems of embedded devices (“EmNets”) to detect, prevent, and respond to natural and human-caused disasters. As computing device costs decline and capabilities increase, devices and sensors will be embedded in buildings, office spaces, manufacturing floors, transportation medians, and appliances and will be interconnected using wired or wireless networks. EmNets could offer enormous benefits to personnel responding to a disaster, providing substantial amounts of information in real time that could help to save lives and resources.

    As part of this program, NIST will work with emergency response organizations to develop an effective prototype implementation of emerging standards for EmNets with a focus on critical infrastructure protection for cybernetic building systems; develop EmNet technologies and testbed and simulation tools; accelerate the development of relevant critical application techniques such as structured data mining; and lay the groundwork for the development of appropriate “lightweight” cryptographic algorithms.

    We also are requesting a $1 million increase for the Computer Security Expert Assist Team. This team is based at NIST and provides assistance to other federal agencies on a cost-reimbursable basis. The complex information systems used to ensure military security, enable financial transactions, and conduct essentially all government functions require protection from both natural and purposeful disruptions. Federal agencies are taking action to improve security, but most do not understand what actions to take or in what order. NIST staff members are recognized as world leaders in all aspects of information security issues. The funding supports the administrative cost of maintaining a small team, the methodology, and Web page.

    We are proposing initiatives to significantly strengthen our laboratory capabilities in two key areas for the Nation’s economy: nanotechnology and health care.

    As this committee is well aware, nanotechnology is not so much a discipline as a cross-cutting way of looking at fundamental technological advances in a whole range of disciplines – fields as diverse as biotechnology, semiconductors, and even information technology. It is an area with tremendous potential for technological advance and the new capabilities, products, and jobs that means.

    In some fields, such as semiconductor manufacturing, it is becoming an absolute necessity. Integrated circuits have been shrinking to the point today where nanoscale measurements are critical to further success. The difficulty inherent in making those measurements is impeding progress in semiconductor manufacturing.

    NIST is a partner in the National Nanotechnology Initiative, a coordinated effort of 10 federal agencies to advance nanoscience and facilitate its incorporation into a broad range of beneficial technologies. The FY 2002 budget for the National Nanotechnology Initiative is about $592 million, and the President’s request for FY 2003 is about $707 million.

    Against the backdrop of that investment – and of course a sizeable effort in private industry – NIST plays a relatively small but unique role. This new frontier of science and technology is critically dependant on accurate measurements. Advances in measurement science are needed to analyze phenomena, to control processes, and to turn discoveries into products.
Measurement, of course, is NIST’s special skill, and a relative small investment in measurement research at NIST is highly leveraged in its impact on the rest of the nanotechnology community. Or more simply put, you can not control what you can’t measure.

    This $4 million budget increase will be used to support the development of nanotechnologies in fields such as health care, semiconductors, information technology, national security, biotechnology, and magnetic data storage. Standard reference materials, data, and measurement systems developed by NIST for the nanoworld will enable the private sector to develop and commercialize innovative nanotech products.

    Health care, of course, represents an enormous segment of the national economy, estimated at $1.15 trillion in 1999, or about 13.5 percent of the gross domestic product. It is a field that is developing and changing rapidly with regular advances in biotechnology, information systems, and nanoscale devices.

    These advanced technologies have the potential to significantly improve health care and lower costs, but turning them into marketable products and services requires advances in measurements, standards, and data to help ensure the accuracy of diagnoses, improve manufacturing efficiency and market acceptance, and hasten regulatory approval.

    To help meet this need, we are requesting an increase of $3 million to expand our measurement support in two particularly important areas:

    We also are proposing a $4.7 million increase to speed the development of cutting-edge measurement capabilities. Our advanced measurements competence program is used to support basic research to develop and maintain state-of-the-art knowledge in areas of science and engineering related to measurement techniques and data. It is one of our principal mechanisms for initiating new programs, including world-class facilities and Nobel Prize-winning science. New funds are needed to develop additional and interdisciplinary projects to respond to FY 2003 Budget Request for Baldrige National Quality Program, the Advanced Technology Program, and the Manufacturing Extension Partnership
      Last week, I watched President Bush present the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award to the 2001 winners, included the first-ever winners in the education category – the Chugach School District in Anchorage, Alaska, the Pearl River School District in Pearl River, New York, and the University of Wisconsin-Stout in Menomonie, Wisconsin. It was a landmark day both for American education and the Baldrige Award.

    A partnership between NIST and the private sector, the Baldrige National Quality Award is an unqualified success story. In fact, an economic study released last fall by researchers from the University of North Carolina and Dartmouth College, estimated that the total economic benefits to the U.S. economy provided by the Baldrige program since its inception came to almost $25 billion. That is a benefit-to-cost ratio of 207 to 1. And the study inflates the cost of the program by assuming that we have to pay for time that is actually volunteered by industry executives.

    The Baldrige National Quality Program helps U.S. businesses and other organizations continuously improve their competitiveness and productivity by adopting performance and quality management practices. The program helps many types of companies and organizations deliver ever-improving value to customers, while improving overall organizational effectiveness. It creates a performance excellence standard that fosters communications and sharing in the private sector, building networks to deliver performance and quality management information and services and to share lessons learned with other economic sectors.

    Baldrige award applicants receive between 300 to 1,000 hours of review by at least six experts on the board of examiners, giving the applicants valuable insights. The experts provide a detailed feedback report on the organization’s strengths and opportunities for improvement. Since 1988, 41 organizations have received the Baldrige award, which is given in the categories of manufacturing, service, small business, education, and health care. Many thousands of organizations use the Baldrige criteria internally to assess and improve their performance.

    The proposed FY 2003 appropriation of $5.8 million will be used to manage the annual award competition, conduct a conference at which Baldrige award winners will share their performance excellence strategies, maintain a comprehensive database on state and local quality awards, and facilitate information sharing among all sectors of the U.S. economy.

    Our FY 2003 budget request includes two decreases from previous years. In both cases, these decreases reflect not so much a judgment on the effectiveness of the programs in question as the need to make hard – and prudent – fiscal choices in today’s budget environment.

    The Advanced Technology Program was established to help foster path-breaking technological innovations by U.S. industry. The program co-funds with industry early stage R&D in technically challenging, high-risk projects with the potential for significant impacts on the Nation’s economy, the global competitiveness of our industries, and the health and well-being of our people.

    The program actively promotes partnerships among companies of all sizes, universities, and other organizations to undertake research that is too costly or risky for individual companies.

    And, indeed, it has had its share of successes. ATP-funded technologies have enabled industry to develop products and processes such as a new method for fabricating large, amorphous silicon devices for medical imaging systems that enable better and faster X-ray exams; a bench-top bioreactor capable of growing large amounts of human cells for cell replacement therapy; and prototype bridge beams made of fiber-reinforced polymer composites—lightweight, corrosion resistant, and less expensive to fabricate and install—that will improve bridge durability.

    The economically important field of “DNA chips” – ultra-miniaturized DNA analysis laboratories that are revolutionizing DNA research – owe much of their early technology to ATP projects.

    And just last June Discover Magazine awarded an ATP project one of its 2001 Innovation Awards for the development of the first commercially viable process for producing polymers from plant sugars – the first polymers derived from an annually renewable resource to compete head-to-head in the market with polymers made from coal or oil.

    More than 580 projects, including 185 joint ventures, have been announced since the inception of the ATP, involving a commitment of over $1.8 billion in NIST funds and $1.75 billion in private funds. More than 1,200 organizations have been involved as leads or formal participants, and another 1,200 as subcontractors. More than 160 universities have participated in 310 projects. More than 60 percent of all ATP-funded projects are led by small businesses.

    Despite its technical successes, and a strict selection process that makes awards on the basis of peer-reviewed competitions that considers the scientific and technical merit of each proposal and its potential benefits to the U.S. economy, the ATP has suffered from continuing controversy.

    Mindful of this history, and mindful too of the program’s potential benefits to the economy, the Secretary of Commerce has subjected the ATP to review of its mission, procedures, and design. Based on that review, Secretary Evans has proposed changes to the ATP to:

    This committee has been provided with copies of the Secretary’s report, which was released last month. The Department of Commerce is working on proposed draft legislative language that would implement the Secretary’s changes.

    While the Congress is considering these changes, we are requesting that the ATP be funded at $107.9 million for FY 2003. When combined with carry-over funds from FY 2002, we anticipate this will allow the ATP to meet all of its obligations to on-going projects and permit an estimated additional $34.7 million in new awards next year.

    The original blueprint for the MEP called for NIST to provide cost-share support to new centers in the network during their crucial start-up years, after which the Federal funding would be slowly phased out and the centers would become self-sufficient. The $12.9 million FY 2003 budget request would return the MEP to this original plan, which called for the phase out of federal monies to centers after six years of funding.

    The budget will continue NIST cost-share funding for two centers that are less than six years old and allow the MEP will focus on providing a central coordination role. The centers currently recover roughly one-third of their annual operating budgets of the centers through fees collected from client companies. Approximately another one-third of their operating budgets come from state and local funding.

    As part of this plan, the MEP will continue to pursue mechanisms that encourage and promote revenue generation to minimize the overall federal investment while ensuring that the mission of serving small manufacturers is not compromised.

    Mr. Chairman, the President’s requested budget for NIST for FY 2003 represents true stewardship of our resources. It required some difficult decisions, yes, but it takes a clear look at our Nation’s priorities for the coming year and marshals our talents, capabilities and means to the maximum effect.

    Thank you. I would be happy to answer any questions the committee may have.