|
Ask A Scientist
Chemistry Archive
|
|
Nickle vs. cobalt
Question:
Why does cobalt have a higher atomic mass (58.93) than
nickle (58.63) even though it has a lower atomic number
(27 vs. 28 for nickle)?
al gawt
Answer 1:
The atomic masses you see on a periodic table are not the exact masses
of the element. They're actually a weighted average of all the isotopes
of the element. An example I know off the top of my head is for carbon:
It has two isotopes...C12 and C13. The natural abundance of C12 is
98.89% and that of C13 is 1.11%. So, (0.9889x12.00000) + (0.0111x13.00335)
is equal to 12.0 (3 sig figs). So cobalt probably has a higher percentage
of higher mass isotopes than does nickel thereby giving it a larger
average atomic mass.
-joe
Answer 2:
Joe is, of course, absolutely correct. Just a few numbers
from Kenneth Krane's "Modern Physics" (1983);
Only 5 isotopes of Co are known to exist at all, and 4 of them
have only been created in the laboratory. Naturally
occuring samples of cobalt are 100% Co(59), which weighs
58.933198 amu. Naturally occuring Ni, however, exists in
5 isotopes...
N
Isotope atomic mass (amu) abundance
Ni58 57.935347 68.3 %
Ni60 59.930789 26.1 %
Ni61 60.931059 1.13%
Ni62 61.928346 3.59%
Ni64 63.927968 0.91%
There are, in addition, 5 radioactive isotopes of Ni listed.
Two of them last a LONG time, as measured by their half-lives...
Isotope atomic mass (amu) halflife
Ni59 58.934350 0.075 x 10^6 years
Ni63 62.929670 100 years
(actually that last half-life is pretty short). -topper
NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators.
Argonne National Laboratory, Division of Educational Programs, Harold Myron, Ph.D., Division Director.