Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Search  |  Index  |  Home  |  Glossary  |  Contact Us  
 

 

Case Studies in Environmental Medicine

Pediatric CSEM CoverCase Studies in Environmental Medicine: Pediatric Environmental Health is ATSDR’s newest case study. It has been accredited and will soon be online on the case study home page (www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HEC/CSEM). Continuing medical education (CME) credits, continuing nursing education (CNE) credits, continuing health education specialist (CHES) credits, and continuing education unit (CEU) credits are available. Following is an excerpt from the case study.


A mother brings her 2½-year-old son to you for consultation. She explains that her family moved to your community about 7 months ago when her husband changed jobs. Over the past month and a half, the boy has developed progressive loss of appetite and weight loss. He has also suffered from an increasingly severe and itchy rash. Although usually very active and pleasant, he has become ill-tempered and, for the past couple of days, he refuses to walk around, preferring to lie in bed or be carried. He rubs his knees and cries periodically throughout the day. Neither the parents nor the child’s grandmother, who lives with them, has been ill.

The boy’s medical history has been unremarkable. His height and weight have been consistently in the 25th percentile for his age. He is on a regular toddler diet, and all developmental milestones have been appropriately met. He is not taking any medications. The mother denies any family use of dietary supplements or herbal medicines. The family history is negative for blood transfusions and use of illicit drugs, human immunodeficiency (HIV) infection, and metabolic or genetic diseases. A review of systems and a brief assessment of how the family functions are negative. No one in the family has been traveling in a foreign country.

During the day, the child stays at home with his mother or grandmother. The mother works part-time as a bookkeeper-clerk in a local dry-cleaning facility. The father works as a production manager in a thermometer factory. The mother states that both parents are concerned about environmental contaminants, specifically those that might be associated with their workplaces, and whether or not hese contaminants can put their family at risk. The parents have heard neighbors’ and co-workers’ comments about ailments associated with mercury exposures. The parents also mention reports of teenagers in the community taking mercury from the local high school chemistry lab over the past several months. These incidents resulted in an ongoing investigation by the environmental division of the state health department. One of the teenagers who reportedly took mercury from the lab helped with odd jobs around the parents’ house, including indoor housecleaning.

Questions To Consider

1. What additional information should you gather by interview?

2. What would you include in this patient’s problem list?

3. What is the differential diagnosis for this patient?

For the answers to these questions and the complete Case Studies in Environmental Medicine: Pediatric Environmental Health, visit the case studies home page (www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HEC/CSEM).

After completion of this educational activity, the reader should be able to

  • describe how and why children differ from adults in their susceptibility to environmental hazards,
  • incorporate knowledge of environmental medicine in the evaluation of well and sick children,
  • consider parental occupation and hobbies as a part of the environmental history, and
  • identify additional sources of environmental health information.


[Table of Contents]


School Locations

Characteristics of Schools Sited On or Near Hazardous Waste Sites in Brownfields Communities

Healthy schools are an essential part of healthy communities. The physical location and siting of schools are important issues in many communities, especially in population-dense areas in the Northeast and in major cities where land for schools is scarce. ATSDR is using geographic information systems (GIS), a spatial analysis approach, to estimate the number and sociodemographic characteristics of public and private elementary and secondary schools located on or near the approximately 1,550 National Priorities List (NPL) or Superfund hazardous waste sites in the United States.

 

 

Many students attend schools on or near NPL sites. However, school-specific exposure assessments must be done to determine whether environmental hazards affect the school population.

In an initial analysis using 1999 school data, we found that 438 schools were built on or within 1 mile of 61 NPL sites in 16 brownfields showcase communities designated by EPA. One hundred thirty-eight of these schools (with a total enrollment of more than 92,000 students) had been built directly on an NPL site. Seventy-six percent of these on-site schools were built above contaminated groundwater plumes. Because of remediation efforts, none of the schools above the plumes are currently exposed to contaminated groundwater.

An additional 189,366 children attended schools within 1 mile of an NPL site. Although most of these students attended schools that were close to only one NPL site, one-fifth of the children (N=55,956) attended schools built on or within 1 mile of two or more NPL sites. Many of these 55,956 students were  

Proximity does not equal exposure.

very young children—more than one-third were in prekindergarten through third grade. Proportionately more minority and poor children attended these schools than would be expected.

This initial analysis suggests that, across the country, a substantial number of students attend schools near or built on top of an NPL site. However, proximity is not equivalent to exposure. A school-specific exposure assessment must be done to determine whether any chemical hazards from nearby NPL sites have affected the school population (see pilot exposure assessment section).
—Robin Wagner, PhD, MS

Pilot Exposure Assessment of Schools Sited On or Near Hazardous Waste Sites in Brownfields Communities

Because it is possible that site conditions or the availability of information on exposures might have changed since the date of release of a public health assessment (PHA) on a National Priorities List (NPL) site, ATSDR initiated a pilot field project in summer/fall 2001 to evaluate whether specific exposure pathways exist for school populations near these sites. ATSDR selected a subset of NPL sites in the United States for follow-up examination through this pilot project.

For the pilot study, we used 16 brownfields showcase communities and 61 NPL sites in those communities. From these 61 NPL sites, we chose a subset of 13 that

1. were categorized as indeterminate public health hazard or public health hazard (defined in box) in their PHA documents and

2. had schools within 1 mile of the site boundary.

The sites selected were in Florida, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Washington. More than 50 schools are located on or within 1 mile of these 13 sites.

Public health assessment (PHA) categories

Indeterminate public health hazard: Term used in a PHA when a professional judgment on the level of health hazard cannot be made because information critical to such a decision is lacking.

Public health hazard: Term used in a PHA for sites that pose a public health hazard because of long-term exposures (longer than 1 year) to sufficiently high levels of hazardous substances that could result in harmful health effects.


Findings from this pilot study indicate that no current pathways of exposure exist for schoolchildren in relation to the sites evaluated. We found that any school-related exposure concerns are being addressed by the PHA process, which includes a review of new environmental data and pathway issues by ATSDR and our state partners. We also found that a 1-mile radius seems to be too far away to assess potential exposure pathways related to a given site. ATSDR should continue to prepare geographic information system (GIS) databases related to NPL site boundaries and school locations. The school location data, based on Department of Education databases, will be useful to ATSDR and state partners as new sites are identified. A careful review of the site-specific environmental data is needed before any public health conclusions can be made on (a) the presence of exposures to school populations and (b) further evaluation of any potential adverse health effects related to the population.  

Key findings of the field project

  • No current pathways of exposure exist for schoolchildren in relation to the sites evaluated.
  • A 1-mile radius may be too far away to assess potential exposure pathways associated with a given site. This is particularly true for older, inactive NPL sites.
—Leslie C. Campbell, MS

[Table of Contents]

The Impact of ADHD May Be Underestimated

The public health impact of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may be greatly underestimated by school and public health officials, say scientists at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS).

In a recently published study, the NIEHS scientists and their colleagues at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine in Chapel Hill reported that when they queried parents in a “typical” county of rural and suburban homes (Johnston County, North Carolina), the parents reported more than 15% of boys in grades one through five had been diagnosed with ADHD and about 10% (or two-thirds of those diagnosed) were taking medication for the condition. Asking the parents was a key to the higher figures, the researchers thought, because school nurses might not be aware of children who were receiving medication treatment entirely at home.

“Treatment rates are usually viewed as abnormally high if they exceed the 3% to 5% prevalence estimate for ADHD cited in an American Psychiatric Association manual in 1994,” the authors said. “Therefore, the national public health impact of ADHD may be greatly underestimated by both educators and public health officials.”

The study used parental and teacher reports of 6,099 children in 17 public elementary schools in the semirural county. Because Johnston County has a racial/ethnic and educational profile similar to North Carolina as a whole, the authors of the study said they thought that medication treatment rates are probably similar in many other counties in North Carolina and elsewhere. The researchers said similar data need to be collected nationally to better understand ADHD medication treatment patterns.

The research appears online in the February issue of the American Journal of Public Health, a publication of the American Public Health Association. The journal is accessible at www.apha.org.Exiting the ATSDR Web site

 

The principal investigator, Dr. Andrew S. Rowland, may be reached for interviews at 505-272-1391. Dr. Dale P. Sandler, the senior investigator, is available at 919-541-4668. (Dr. Rowland is now with the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center.)

[Table of Contents]


Internet Resources Seminar

Last year the Mid-Atlantic Center for Children’s Health and the Environment (MACCHE), in conjunction with ATSDR Region 3, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 3, and the National Library of Medicine, held a 1-day seminar on The Use of the Internet for Children’s Environmental Health. MACCHE is the Region 3 Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Unit (PEHSU) and is located at George Washington University in Washington, D.C.

The seminar educated professionals about available Internet resources on children’s health and introduced them to the new PEHSU. The seminar will be repeated at several locations throughout the region in the coming year. Persons from Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia who might be interested in having this course presented to their organization should contact MACCHE at 202-994-1166 or toll-free at 1-866-MACCHE1 (1-866-622-2431).—Lora S. Werner, MPH

[Table of Contents]


BAM! Answers to Your Questions

Visit the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s BAM! (Body and Mind), an e-zine for kids, at www.bam.gov.Exiting the ATSDR Web site BAM! was created to answer kids’ questions on health issues and recommend ways to make their bodies and minds healthier and stronger. BAM! is aimed at youth aged 9–13 years and is published quarterly. BAM! also serves as an aid to teachers, providing them with interactive activities to support their health and science curricula.

[Table of Contents]


Children's Environmental Health Case Study

Visit the interactive online pediatric toxicology case study on the Great Lakes Center for Children’s Environmental Health Web page (www.uic.edu/sph/glakes/kids;Exiting the ATSDR Web site select the “Education and Training” link).

[Table of Contents]


Visit CHEC's HealtheHouse

HealtheHouse (www.checnet.org/healthehouse/home/index.asp)Exiting the ATSDR Web site is an interactive resource for information on environmental health risks children face in the home. The site features a virtual house you can tour room by room and a personalized home profiler that can offer suggestions on how to make your home safer.

[Table of Contents]


A Pledge to Protect Children

The Bangkok Statement

More than 300 participants from 35 countries attended the World Health Organization’s international conference on “Environmental Threats to the Health of Children” in Bangkok on March 3–7, 2002. A full report of the meeting can be requested from Dr. Peter Van den Hazel (P.J.van.den.Hazel@inter.NL.net).

At the meeting, participants pledged to promote the protection of children’s environmental health. An excerpt from the Pledge To Promote the Protection of Children’s Environmental Health follows:
“We affirm

  • That the principle ‘children are not little adults’ requires full recognition and a preventive approach. Children are uniquely vulnerable to the effects of chemical, biological, and physical agents. Every child should be protected from injury, poisoning, and hazards in the different environments where they are born, live, learn, play, develop, and grow to become the adults of tomorrow and citizens in their own right.
  • That every child with no exception should have the right to safe, clean, and supportive environments that ensure his/her survival, growth, development, healthy life, and well being. The recognition of this right is especially important as the world moves forward towards adopting sustainable development practices.
  • That it is the responsibility of professionals, community workers, local and national authorities and policy-makers, and organizations dealing with health, environment, and education issues to ensure that actions are initiated, developed, and sustained in all countries to promote the recognition, assessment, and mitigation of physical, chemical, and biological hazards that threaten children’s health and quality of life.”

[Table of Contents]


Calendar

October 12, 2002
In Harm’s Way: Toxic Threats to Child Development, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Hosted by the University of Minnesota School of Public Health. Contact Kathleen Schuler, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, by e-mail: kschuler@iatp.org or telephone: 612-870-3468.

October 18–20, 2002
International Symposium on Children’s Health and the Environment, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hosted by the Association of Physicians for the Environment of Turkey. Contact Gunay Can by e-mail: alpincan@yahoo.fr or telephone: ++90-212-586-1549.

October 28–29, 2002
3rd European Conference on Pediatric Asthma, London.
Contact Castle House Medical Conferences by telephone: +44 (0)1892-539606; e-mail: asthma@castlehouse.co.uk; or Web site: www.castlehouse.co.uk.Exiting the ATSDR Web site

November 4–5, 2002
Research, Technologies, and Applications in Biodefense, McLean, Virginia.
Contact Mary Addonizio by telephone: 617-630-1373 or e-mail: addonizio@healthtech.com.

November 6–9, 2002
American Evaluation Association Annual Conference, Arlington, Virginia.
Contact Susan Kistler by telephone: 1-888-232-2275 or e-mail: aea@eval.org.

November 7–8, 2002
Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis, Atlanta.
Contact Paulette Ford-Knights by telephone: 404-639-8008 or e-mail: pbf7@cdc.gov.

November 7–9, 2002
9th Annual Minority Health Conference: Healthy Texans 2010, Irving, Texas.
Contact Linda Freeman by telephone: 972-721-3629; e-mail: healthtx@ci.irving.tx.us; or Web site: www.ci.irving.tx.us/healthtx.Exiting the ATSDR Web site

November 8–9, 2002
Society for Public Health Education (SOPHE) 53rd Annual Meeting, Philadelphia: Declaring Our Interdependence: United for Health Education.
Contact: Society for Public Health Education, 750 First Street NE, Suite 910, Washington, DC 20002-4242; telephone: 202-408-9804; e-mail: info@sophe.org; or Web site: www.sophe.org.Exiting the ATSDR Web site

November 9–12, 2002
Association of Schools of Public Health 62nd Annual Meeting, Philadelphia.
Contact: Mary Stickley by e-mail: mes@asph.org.

November 9–13, 2002
American Public Health Association 130th Annual Meeting, Philadelphia: Putting the Public Back into Public Health.
Contact: APHA Meeting Coordinator Edward Shipley by telephone: 202-777-2478; fax: 202-777-2530; e-mail: edward.shipley@apha.org; or Web site: www.apha.org/meetings.Exiting the ATSDR Web site

November 13–15, 2002
Brownfields 2002: Investing in the Future, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Contact: Brownfields 2002,
c/o Engineers’ Society of Western Pennsylvania, 337 Fourth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15222; telephone: 412-261-0710, ext. 32; e-mail: brownfields@eswp.com; or Web site: www.brownfields2002.org.Exiting the ATSDR Web site

November 16–20, 2002
2001 Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Conference.
Contact: SETAC North America Office, 1010 North 12th Avenue, Pensacola, FL 32501-3367; telephone: 850-469-1500; fax: 850-469-9778; e-mail setac@setac.org; or Web site: www.setac.org.Exiting the ATSDR Web site

November 18–21, 2002
20th International Neurotoxicology Conference, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Hosted by the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. Contact Dr. Joan Cranmer by telephone: 501-320-2986 or e-mail: CranmerJoan@uams.edu.

November 19–21, 2002
2002 Conference on Tobacco or Health, San Francisco.
For more information, contact the National Conference on Tobacco or Health by telephone: 301-294-5664; e-mail: registrar@feddata.com; or Web site: www.tobaccocontrolconference.org.Exiting the ATSDR Web site

December 1–3, 2002
Hope 2002—Second International Conference on HIV and Substance Abuse, Mumbai, India.
Contact Dr. Yusuf Merchant by telephone: 009122-3453253; e-mail: info@hopeconference.org; or Web site: www.hopeconference.org.Exiting the ATSDR Web site

December 6–8, 2002
Primary Care Research Methods and Statistics Conference, San Antonio.
Hosted by the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. Contact Susan Duncan, Director of CME, by telephone: 210-567-4446 or e-mail: duncan@uthscsa.edu.

December 11–13, 2002
The 8th Annual Maternal and Child Health Epidemiology Conference, Clearwater, Florida.
Jointly sponsored by the University of South Florida Colleges of Medicine and Public Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Lawton and Rhea Chiles Center for Healthy Mothers and Babies. Contact Erica Thomas by telephone: 813-974-6695 or e-mail: contend@hsc.usf.edu.

 


Table of Contents | PHE Newsletter Home Page | ATSDR Home Page


This page last updated on October 24, 2003
Contact Name: Wilma López/ WLópez@cdc.gov



ATSDR Home  |  Search  |  Index  |  Glossary  |  Contact Us
About ATSDR  |  News Archive  |  ToxFAQs  |  Public Health Assessments
Privacy Policy  |  External Links Disclaimer  |  Accessibility
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services