[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IGSREPORT-1063] Wk 0753 JPL Analysis Report
- Subject: [IGSREPORT-1063] Wk 0753 JPL Analysis Report
- From: D.C. Jefferson
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 1994 17:59:16 PDT
******************************************************************************
IGS Electronic Report Thu Jun 30 17:59:16 PDT 1994 Message Number 1063
******************************************************************************
Author: D.C. Jefferson
Subject: Wk 0753 JPL Analysis Report
******************************************************************************
JPL ANALYSIS REPORT GPS-WEEK 0753 (DAYS 163-169, DATES 1994 Jun 12 - Jun 18)
******************************************************************************
Submitted by the JPL IGS/FLINN Analysis Team:
J F Zumberge, D C Jefferson, M B Heflin, M M Watkins, F H Webb
all at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA 91109.
Files listed below are available in Unix compressed format and can be
retrieved using anonymous ftp to sideshow.jpl.nasa.gov (128.149.70.41),
directory pub/jpligsac/0753. These files have also been sent to the CDDIS.
______________________________________________________________________________
filename contents
______________________________________________________________________________
jpl07537.sum This text file.
jpl07537.erp Earth rotation parameters for GPS week 753.
jpl0753[0-6].sp3 GPS ephemerides for GPS week 753, sp3 format.
______________________________________________________________________________
In jpl07507.sum, we outlined our new strategy of including pseudorange data
from a chosen set of TurboRogue ground stations. This week, beginning with
day 167 (Jun 16), we incorporate psuedorange measurements from ALL TurboRogue
sites used. These are marked with a '#' in the ground station table.
According to the file nanu1994.mes obtained from the IGS CBIS, PRN12 is
unusable beginning day 168 for an indefinite period. We have deleted this
satellite from our processing on this day and the following day as well.
PRN09 was not well-modeled for the latter days of the week; we have therefore
excluded data from this satellite on these two days also. Furthermore,
we chose to exclude data from GPS15 on day 169 as atypically large post-fit
residuals were realized for this satellite on this day.
Additionally, because of interactions with recent changes in software
associated with the new GPS attitude model, we have excluded results for
prn's 9 and 12 from several sp3 files as follows:
PRN09: removed from jpl07532.sp3, jpl07533.sp3, jpl07534.sp3
(days 165-167)
PRN12: removed from jpl07531.sp3, jpl07533.sp3, jpl07534.sp3
(days 164,166,167)
According to IGS Mail Message 651, there was a significant gap in the data
from ALGO on day 169. We have changed our reference clock to FAIR on this
day only.
Beginning with day 168, we include data from a new station, MAS1. This site
will be replacing MASP; see IGS Mail Message 625 for details. The following
nominal coordinates were assumed, and the station locations were estimated
(unconstrained) each day:
X = 5439198.6444 m, Y = -1522053.5282 m, Z = 2953456.0952 m
We have discovered that although our analysis reports for weeks 729-752
indicate that TIDB was used as a fiducial (constrained) site, this is not
actually the case, due to a bug in one of our scripts. We have corrected the
problem, and beginning with this week's report, this site appears correctly
in our ground station table (it was NOT constrained). We apologize for the
misinformation.
Lastly, various sites caused excessive outliers in our solutions on several
days. These are noted in the warnings below.
WARNING: Data from PRN09 and PRN12 excluded days 168 and 169 (Jun 17,18).
WARNING: Data from PRN15 excluded day 169.
WARNING: Data from MATE excluded days 163, 165, and 166 (Jun 12, 14, 15).
WARNING: Data from QUIN and STJO exclcuded day 163.
WARNING: Data from ONSA excluded days 168 and 169.
WARNING: Data from HOBA excluded day 169.
WARNING: FAIR (not ALGO) used as reference clock for day 169.
In the following table, UT1R-UTC are the assumed nominal values from IERS
Bulletin-B predicts; estimated LODR values are also included. See IGS Mail
Message 97 for details.
JPL ERP TABLE GPS week 753 (1994 Jun 12 - Jun 18)
MJD XPole Ypole UT1R-UTC LODR Xsig Ysig UTsig LODsig Nr Nf Nt Xrt Yrt
10**-5" usec us/d 10**-5" us us/d 10**-5"/d
49515.50 16209 24776 -195055 1738 8 8 0 11 37 12 25 -150 -289
49516.50 16106 24572 -197073 1786 8 9 0 10 43 12 25 -123 -240
49517.50 16069 24365 -199077 1726 8 8 0 10 40 12 25 -106 -292
49518.50 16026 24136 -201069 1682 8 8 0 10 41 12 25 -184 -233
49519.50 15933 23950 -203050 1643 8 8 0 10 43 12 25 -187 -200
49520.50 15838 23823 -205019 1672 8 8 0 9 43 12 23 -80 -200
49521.50 15772 23661 -206976 1661 10 11 0 12 38 11 22 -97 -207
END ERP TABLE
The following table indicates the "3-dimensional orbit repeatability", as
defined in IGS Mail Message 37, for GPS week 753:
["3d rss" = sqrt(xrms**2 + yrms**2 + zrms**2)]
JPL ORBIT REPEATABILITY TABLE GPS week 753 (1994 Jun 12 - Jun 18)
94 6 12 94 6 13 94 6 14 94 6 15 94 6 16 94 6 17 94 6 18
prn 3d rss (m)
1 0.76 0.39 0.61 0.73 0.43 1.11 0.5
2 0.52 0.58 0.69 0.85 0.56 0.56 0.6
4 0.85 0.62 0.80 0.87 0.91 0.72 0.7
5 0.58 0.49 0.48 0.49 0.89 0.61 0.6
6 0.39 0.49 0.45 0.45 0.41 0.46 0.4
7 0.95 0.63 0.61 0.62 0.73 0.73 1.5
9 1.04 1.25 2.20 4.87 2.8
12 0.49 3.42 1.79 4.03 8.7
14 0.39 0.52 0.42 0.61 0.47 0.49 0.6
15 1.30 1.27 0.90 0.94 1.38 1.4
16 0.36 0.25 0.50 0.71 0.83 0.45 0.3
17 0.64 0.57 1.07 1.22 0.67 1.07 0.3
18 0.29 0.36 0.50 0.65 0.42 0.39 0.3
19 0.46 0.67 0.61 0.82 0.50 0.53 0.6
20 0.66 0.49 0.40 0.35 0.52 0.42 0.6
21 0.84 0.53 0.71 0.69 0.61 0.99 0.9
22 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.97 0.98 0.86 0.5
23 0.38 0.38 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.33 0.4
24 0.86 0.80 0.95 0.87 0.69 0.64 0.6
25 0.53 0.91 0.57 1.62 1.44 0.48 0.7
26 0.52 0.48 0.43 0.39 0.60 0.35 0.3
27 0.53 0.61 0.64 0.83 0.73 0.49 0.6
28 0.78 0.79 0.66 0.61 0.56 0.55 0.4
29 0.37 0.39 0.49 0.59 0.28 0.34 0.5
31 0.67 0.54 0.48 0.53 0.34 0.37 0.5
_______________________
END ORBIT REPEATABILITY TABLE
As described in IGS Mail Message 37, the following table compares the JPL
precise ephemerides with those from the broadcast ephemeris:
JPL COMPARISON OF BROADCAST NAVIGATION MESSAGE WITH PRECISE EPHEMERIDES
94 6 12 94 6 13 94 6 14 94 6 15 94 6 16 94 6 17 94 6 18
prn 3d rss (m)
1 9.4 6.3 8.9 7.4 7.8 6.8 8.5
2 4.3 2.9 3.4 6.4 9.0 5.7 2.8
4 20.5 7.7 6.1 8.2 9.8 7.2 6.3
5 9.2 9.3 9.8 8.7 8.3 8.3 8.8
6 6.4 6.5 7.8 8.0 5.2 5.0 5.8
7 7.9 8.0 7.5 7.4 8.9 8.0 6.9
9 8.7 9.2 10.7 9.7 10.7
12 5.2 4.6 13.5 34.7 55.4
14 4.4 5.5 4.7 4.1 3.9 3.8 3.5
15 3.7 6.9 8.0 6.3 9.7 9.0
16 12.0 9.6 9.5 11.7 9.9 10.1 12.1
17 7.0 6.7 4.9 4.0 4.9 7.1 10.0
18 8.3 7.3 7.8 9.6 9.6 7.5 8.2
19 7.4 7.6 9.2 8.1 11.2 12.6 10.3
20 5.3 3.2 3.3 6.3 3.8 4.1 5.1
21 6.4 5.8 7.0 5.0 4.9 5.2 7.4
22 4.5 4.0 5.6 4.5 3.7 5.5 4.9
23 3.6 2.8 4.7 4.4 3.1 4.2 4.9
24 8.3 8.6 7.7 7.7 7.9 7.9 9.9
25 8.6 6.2 8.2 7.6 8.1 6.7 7.5
26 7.6 5.1 3.7 5.7 6.7 5.6 5.1
27 9.5 8.4 9.2 10.2 11.7 14.1 10.1
28 7.3 6.6 8.5 4.7 7.0 8.7 10.1
29 7.0 6.2 5.7 3.5 4.6 5.3 4.8
31 7.4 5.5 6.0 4.9 5.3 6.9 7.6
_______________________
END COMPARISON OF BROADCAST NAVIGATION MESSAGE WITH PRECISE EPHEMERIDES
The following tables, as explained in IGS Report Nos. 99 and 295, indicate the
amount of global network tracking data used in this week's analysis:
JPL SITE SUMMARY TABLE (no. stations) GPS week 753 (1994 Jun 12 - Jun 18)
94 6 12 94 6 13 94 6 14 94 6 15 94 6 16 94 6 17 94 6 18
Fiducial 12.1 12.0 12.0 12.4 11.8 12.4 10.8
Total 0.0 36.8 39.8 37.7 41.8 41.8 39.5
END SITE SUMMARY TABLE
JPL GROUND STATION INCLUSION TABLE GPS week 753 (1994 Jun 12 - Jun 18)
94 6 12 94 6 13 94 6 14 94 6 15 94 6 16 94 6 17 94 6 18
site % data
ALBH # 104 106 105 106 106 109 110
ALGO*# 102 103 103 103 104 105 68
AREQ # 107 107 104 107 104 103 103
BRMU # 84 85 90 83 99 89 94
CHTP # 0 0 32 91 96 98 96
DRAO # 0 104 104 104 105 105 109
FAIR* 101 99 99 103 100 108 105
FORT # 90 102 99 85 86 102 104
GODE # 104 105 99 99 101 107 109
GOLD* 80 75 70 76 74 81 82
GRAZ 60 105 106 105 105 106 107
HART* 89 88 82 81 77 86 84
HARV # 107 109 109 106 106 0 113
HERS 85 74 80 91 88 94 95
HOBA # 102 101 102 101 101 103 0
JPLM # 108 87 61 109 109 98 107
KIRU # 103 103 101 103 0 101 0
KOKB* 110 111 111 110 107 110 110
KOSG* 88 86 88 103 104 89 104
KOUR 98 99 99 100 99 104 106
MADR* 82 74 77 72 69 82 76
MAS1 # 0 0 0 0 0 107 104
MASP 105 103 104 104 99 104 101
MATE 0 106 0 0 107 108 108
MCMU # 0 115 116 114 108 110 0
MDO1 # 106 107 107 106 106 109 111
METS 100 102 100 0 99 103 104
NYAL 113 108 95 109 114 118 0
ONSA # 98 84 0 92 94 0 0
PAMA 68 61 73 71 59 43 71
PIE1 # 101 105 105 105 105 105 106
QUIN # 0 100 104 106 106 108 108
RCM5 # 104 105 104 105 106 108 109
SANT* 78 90 109 110 77 86 70
STJO # 0 94 0 95 106 97 96
TAIW 106 105 107 107 106 112 111
TIDB* 86 78 78 85 81 90 82
TROM* 81 83 82 81 81 82 83
TSKB # 103 102 103 102 99 103 106
USUD # 100 102 100 96 96 103 102
WEST # 95 92 97 103 104 106 108
WETT* 103 103 94 105 104 106 0
YAR1* 105 106 107 108 102 109 106
YELL*# 105 107 102 104 104 107 108
_______________________
*Indicates fiducial site; #indicates TurboRogue psuedo-range used
END GROUND STATION INCLUSION TABLE
As described in IGS Report No. 634, the table below indicates the repeatability
of clock solutions for all satellites and stations used in this week's analysis:
JPL CLOCK REPEATABILITY TABLE GPS week 753 (1994 Jun 12 - Jun 18)
94 6 12 94 6 13 94 6 14 94 6 15 94 6 16 94 6 17 94 6 18
comp log10(rms/ps)
PRN01 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.2 2.8 5.5 6
PRN02 3.2 3.6 4.2 4.3 3.9 5.5 6
PRN04 2.9 2.9 2.8 3.1 3.1 5.5 6
PRN05 2.9 3.0 2.6 2.9 3.5 5.5 6
PRN06 3.1 2.9 2.9 3.2 3.1 5.5 6
PRN07 2.9 3.7 3.1 3 4.0 5.5 6
PRN09 3.4 3.0 3.0 3.7 4
PRN12 3.2 3.9 3.5 4.1 4
PRN14 3.1 4.1 4.0 3.3 3.7 5.5 6
PRN15 3.1 4.1 3.9 3.2 3.1 3
PRN16 2.9 2.7 3.1 3.2 2.9 5.5 6
PRN17 3.3 3.0 3.4 3.4 3.4 5.5 6
PRN18 3.5 3.6 4.1 4.1 3.2 5.5 6
PRN19 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.3 5.5 6
PRN20 3.2 2.8 3.2 3.2 3.2 5.5 6
PRN21 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.1 2.7 5.5 6
PRN22 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.0 5.5 6
PRN23 3.0 3.3 2.9 2.9 3.0 5.5 6
PRN24 4.2 2.8 2.9 4.3 3.0 5.5 6
PRN25 3.1 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.0 5.5 6
PRN26 2.8 3.1 2.6 3.1 2.6 5.5 6
PRN27 3.1 3.2 2.9 3.1 3.6 5.5 6
PRN28 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.1 5.5 6
PRN29 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.3 2.8 5.5 6
PRN31 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 2.9 5.5 6
ALBH 3 3.2 3.4 2.9 2.9 5.5 6
AREQ 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 5.5 6
BRMU 4 3.1 3.3 3.7 3.3 5.5 6
CHTP 3 3.1 3.2 5.5 6
DRAO 3 3.5 3.0 2.7 5.5 6
FAIR 3.4 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.8 3
FORT 3 2.8 3.0 3 3.4 5.5 6
GODE 4 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.3 5.5 6
GOLD 3.6 3.7 4 3.3 3.7 5.5 6
GRAZ 4 3.9 4.2 3.7 3.5 5.5 6
HART 3.6 3.8 4.1 3.8 3.8 5.5 6
HARV 3 3.5 3.5 3.5 3
HERS 3 3.7 4.0 4.0 3.6 5.5 6
HOBA 3.3 3.3 3.1 3.2 2.7 3
JPLM 3.5 4 3 3.1 2.9 5 6
KIRU 4 3.3 3.6 4
KOKB 3.7 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.6 5.5 6
KOSG 3.5 3.4 3.8 3.6 3.4 5.5 6
KOUR 4.1 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.3 5.5 6
MADR 3.7 3.8 4 3.8 3.3 5.5 6
MAS1 6 6
MASP 4 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.1 5.5 6
MATE 4 5.5 6
MCMU 3 3.0 3.0 3.1 3
MDO1 3 3.4 3.4 3.0 2.9 5.5 6
METS 4 3.8 3 4 5.5 6
NYLL 4.4 4.2 4.1 4.3 4.1 4
ONSA 2.9 3 3 3
PAMA 4.0 3.9 4.5 3.7 4.1 5.5 6
PIE1 3 3.3 3.8 3.6 2.9 5.5 6
QUIN 3 3.2 3.5 3.2 5.5 6
RCM5 3 3.3 3.6 3.8 3.3 5.5 6
SANT 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.8 3.8 5.5 6
STJO 3 3.2 5.5
TAIW 3 4.0 3.9 3.7 3.2 5.5 6
TIDB 3.6 3.6 3 3.5 3.4 5.5 6
TROM 4.0 4.2 3.9 4.0 4.2 5.5 6
TSKB 3.1 2.8 2.9 3.3 2.6 5.5 6
USUD 3 3.5 3.2 3.6 2.9 5.5 6
WEST 4 3.4 3.3 3.6 3.4 5.5 6
WETT 3.0 3.4 3.6 3.4 3.2 3
YAR1 3.8 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.9 5.5 6
YELL 3.0 2.9 2.7 3.0 2.7 5.5 6
_______________________
END CLOCK REPEATABILITY TABLE