Table of contents for Understanding torts / John L. Diamond, Lawrence C. Levine, M. Stuart Madden.

Bibliographic record and links to related information available from the Library of Congress catalog.

Note: Contents data are machine generated based on pre-publication provided by the publisher. Contents may have variations from the printed book or be incomplete or contain other coding.


Counter
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Chapter 1. INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH
PERSONS AND PROPERTY
? 1.01 INTENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
[A] Overview and Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
[B] Intent as ?Desire? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
[C] Intent as ?Substantial Certainty? . . . . . . . . . . 3
[D] Transferred Intent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
[E] The Mistake Doctrine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
[F] Insanity and Infancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
? 1.02 BATTERY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
[A] Overview and Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
[B] Intent Requirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
[C] Harmful or Offensive Contact . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
[D] Causation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
[E] Policy Rationale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
? 1.03 ASSAULT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
[A] Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
[B] Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
[1] Intent Requirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
[2] Apprehension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
[3] Imminent Harmful or Offensive Contact . . . . 11
[4] Reasonable Apprehension . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
[5] Fear versus Apprehension . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
[6] Conditional Assault . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
[7] Source of the Contact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
[C] Justifications for the Tort . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
[1] Moral Justifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
[2] Compensation Rationale . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
[3] Deterrence Rationale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
? 1.04 FALSE IMPRISONMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
ix
0009 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 57
Page
[A] Overview and Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
[B] Bounded Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
[C] Means of Confinement or Restraint . . . . . . . . . 15
[1] Physical Barrier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
[2] Force or Threat of Immediate Force . . . . . . 15
[3] Omissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
[4] Improper Assertion of Legal Authority
(False Arrest) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
[D] Contrast With Malicious Prosecution and
Abuse of Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
[E] Consciousness of Confinement . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
[F] No Minimum Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
[G] Transferred Intent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
[H] Policy Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
? 1.05 TRESPASS TO CHATTEL AND CONVERSION . . . 18
[A] Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
[B] Definition of Trespass to Chattel . . . . . . . . . . 19
[1] Bad Faith Not Required . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
[2] Actual Damage, Substantial Deprivation, or
Dispossession Required . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
[3] Transferred Intent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
[C] Definition of Conversion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
? 1.06 INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF MENTAL
DISTRESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
[A] Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
[B] History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
[C] Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
[1] Extreme and Outrageous Conduct . . . . . . . 23
[a] Sexual Harassment and Racial
Epithets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
[b] Constitutional Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
[2] Intent or Recklessness to Cause Severe Mental
Distress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
[3] Severe Mental Distress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
[D] Third-Party Recovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
[E] Exception for Innkeepers, Common Carriers, and
Other Public Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
x TABLE OF CONTENTS
0010 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 87
Page
[F] Policy Rationales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Chapter 2. DEFENSES TO INTENTIONAL TORTS
? 2.01 CONSENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
[A] Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
[B] Express and Implied Manifestations
of Consent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
[C] Consent by Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
[D] Invalidating Manifestations of Consent . . . . . . . 31
[1] Incapacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
[2] Action Beyond Scope of Consent . . . . . . . . 31
[3] Fraud . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
[4] Duress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
[5] Illegality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
? 2.02 SELF-DEFENSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
[A] Overview and Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
[B] The Threat Must Be Immediate . . . . . . . . . . . 33
[C] The Victim?s Response Must Be Reasonable . . . . 34
[D] The Obligation to Retreat From
Deadly Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
? 2.03 DEFENSE OF OTHERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
[A] Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
[B] Limited Privilege Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
[C] Restatement Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
[D] Competing Policy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . 36
? 2.04 DEFENSE AND RECOVERY OF PROPERTY . . . . . 36
[A] Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
[B] Reasonable Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
[C] Force Against a Privileged Party . . . . . . . . . . 37
[D] Defense of Habitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
[E] Mechanical Devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
[F] Recovery of Personal Property . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
? 2.05 NECESSITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
[A] Overview and Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
[B] Private Necessity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
TABLE OF CONTENTS xi
0011 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 117
Page
[C] Public Necessity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
[D] Intentional Injury and Killing . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Chapter 3. THE NEGLIGENCE CONCEPT AND THE
REASONABLE PERSON STANDARD OF
CARE
? 3.01 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
? 3.02 HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
? 3.03 THE STANDARD OF CARE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
? 3.04 THE REASONABLE PERSON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
[A] The Characteristics of the Reasonable Person . . . 47
[B] Flexibility in the Reasonable Person
Standard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
[1] Emergency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
[2] Physical Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
[3] Mental Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
[4] The Effect of Superior Abilities, Skill,
or Knowledge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
[C] Gender Bias in the Reasonable Person
Standard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
? 3.05 THE CHILD STANDARD OF CARE . . . . . . . . . . 56
? 3.06 DEGREES OF NEGLIGENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Chapter 4. THE DETERMINATION OF
UNREASONABLENESS: BREACH OF DUTY,
CUSTOM, AND THE ROLE OF THE JURY
? 4.01 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
? 4.02 THE RISK CALCULUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
[A] Probability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
[B] Magnitude of the Loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
[C] Burden of Avoidance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
[D] Value of the Hand Formula . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
? 4.03 THE ROLE OF CUSTOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
[A] Deviation from Custom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
[B] Compliance with Custom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
xii TABLE OF CONTENTS
0012 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 149
Page
? 4.04 THE ROLE OF THE JURY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Chapter 5. PROOF OF BREACH
? 5.01 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
? 5.02 KINDS OF EVIDENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
? 5.03 SLIP AND FALL CASES AND THE ROLE OF
CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
? 5.04 RES IPSA LOQUITUR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
[A] Byrne v. Boadle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
[B] Probably Negligence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
[C] Probably the Defendant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
[D] The Outer Reaches of Res Ipsa Loquitur ?
Ybarra v. Spangard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
[E] The Effect and Value of Res Ipsa Loquitur . . . . 79
[F] The Role of the Defendant?s Superior
Knowledge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
Chapter 6. STATUTORY STANDARDS OF CARE?
?NEGLIGENCE PER SE?
? 6.01 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
? 6.02 FACTORS USED FOR DETERMINING THE
PROPRIETY OF ADOPTING A STATUTE AS THE
STANDARD OF CARE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
[A] Type of Harm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
[B] Plaintiff in Protected Class . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
[C] Licensing Statutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
? 6.03 EFFECTS OF NON-ADOPTION AND OF ADOPTION
OF STATUTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
[A] Effects of Non-Adoption of a Statute . . . . . . . . 87
[B] Effects of Adoption of the Statute and
Statutory Violation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
? 6.04 THE ROLE OF EXCUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
? 6.05 NEGLIGENCE PER SE AND CHILDREN . . . . . . . 88
? 6.06 COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
? 6.07 CRITICISMS OF THE NEGLIGENCE PER SE
DOCTRINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
TABLE OF CONTENTS xiii
0013 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 175
Page
Chapter 7. PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE
? 7.01 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
? 7.02 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
[A] Alternative Approaches to the Practice of
Medicine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
[B] Proof Issues in Medical Malpractice . . . . . . . . . 94
[1] Expert Witnesses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
[2] The Common Knowledge Exception and
Res Ipsa Loquitur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
? 7.03 INFORMED CONSENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
[A] Battery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
[B] Negligence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
[1] The Physician Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
[2] The Patient Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
[C] Extensions of the Informed Consent Doctrine . . . 101
? 7.04 ATTORNEY MALPRACTICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
Chapter 8. DUTY IN NEGLIGENCE CASES
? 8.01 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
? 8.02 NONFEASANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
[A] Duty to Rescue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
[1] Creating the Peril . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
[2] Special Relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
[3] Undertaking to Act and Reliance . . . . . . . . . 112
[4] Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
[5] Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
[B] Duty to Control and to Protect . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
[1] Duty to Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
[A] Tarasoff v. Regents of University
of California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
[b] Suppliers of Liquor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
[c] Negligent Entrustment . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
[2] Duty to Protect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
xiv TABLE OF CONTENTS
0014 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 200
Page
[a] Landlord Duty to Protect . . . . . . . . . . 120
[b] Business Duty to Protect . . . . . . . . . . . 121
[c] Police Duty to Protect and the Public
Duty Doctrine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
[i] Police Duty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
[ii] The Public Duty Doctrine in
Other Contexts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
? 8.03 THE LIMITS OF THE MISFEASANCE/
NONFEASANCE DISTINCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
? 8.04 THE FORESEEABLE PLAINTIFF
REQUIREMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
? 8.05 CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
Chapter 9. LAND OCCUPIER DUTY
? 9.01 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
? 9.02 THE COMMON LAW STATUS APPROACH . . . . . . 132
[A] Trespassers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
[1] Frequent or Known Trespassers . . . . . . . . . 133
[2] Child Trespassers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
[B] Licensees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
[C] Invitees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
[D] Determining Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
? 9.03 THE UNITARY STANDARD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
? 9.04 LAND POSSESSOR DUTY TO THOSE OUTSIDE
THE LAND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
? 9.05 LANDLORD-TENANT RELATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . 143
Chapter 10. DUTY LIMITED BY KIND OF HARM
? 10.01 NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL
DISTRESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
[A] Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
[B] Direct Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
[1] The Impact Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
[2] Risk of Impact Rule?The Zone
of Danger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
TABLE OF CONTENTS xv
0015 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 229
Page
[3] Special Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
[4] Broadest Direct Recovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
[5] Recovery for Fear of Future Physical
Harm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
[6] Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
[C] Bystander Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
[1] Zone of Danger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
[2] Dillon v. Legg: Minority Rule . . . . . . . . . . 152
[3] The Second Restatement Position . . . . . . . . 154
[4] Policy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
? 10.02 WRONGFUL CONCEPTION, WRONGFUL BIRTH,
AND WRONGFUL LIFE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
[A] Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
[B] Wrongful Conception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
[C] Wrongful Birth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
[D] Wrongful Life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
[E] Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
? 10.03 LOSS OF CONSORTIUM, WRONGFUL DEATH, AND
SURVIVAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
[A] Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
[B] Loss of Consortium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
[C] Wrongful Death . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
[1] Who May Recover . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
[2] Recoverable Damages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
[3] Proof Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
[4] Defenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
[D] Survival Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
? 10.04 NEGLIGENTLY INFLICTED ECONOMIC
LOSS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
[A] Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
[B] Pure Economic Loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
[C] Liability for Negligent Information
Suppliers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
[1] Quasi-Privity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173
[2] Restatement Section 552 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
[3] Foreseeability Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
xvi TABLE OF CONTENTS
0016 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 255
Page
[4] Debating Which Approach Is Best . . . . . . . 176
[D] Attorney Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
Chapter 11. CAUSE-IN-FACT
? 11.01 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
? 11.02 ?BUT FOR? ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
? 11.03 SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR TEST . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183
? 11.04 PROOF PROBLEMS IN CAUSE-IN-FACT . . . . . . . 184
[A] Shifting the Burden of Proving Causation . . . . . 184
[B] Market Share Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
[C] Medical Uncertainty Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188
[D] Statistical Evidence of Causation . . . . . . . . . . 189
[E] Future Developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
Chapter 12. PROXIMATE OR LEGAL CAUSE
? 12.01 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191
? 12.02 THE PROBLEM PROXIMATE CAUSE
ADDRESSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192
? 12.03 PROXIMATE CAUSE TESTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
[A] Foreseeability Test?Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
[1] The Wagon Mound Cases and the
Requirement of Reasonably
Foreseeable Consequences . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
[2] Type of Harm Versus Manner
and Extent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
[3] Superseding Intervening Forces . . . . . . . . . 196
[B] ?Egg-shell? Plaintiff Personal Injury Rule . . . . . 198
[C] Direct Causation Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
[D] ?Practical Politics? and ?Rough Sense of
Justice? Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
[E] Restatement Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202
? 12.04 POLICY OBJECTIVES ADDRESSED BY
PROXIMATE CAUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
TABLE OF CONTENTS xvii
0017 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 286
Page
Chapter 13. JOINT & SEVERAL LIABILITY
? 13.01 OVERVIEW AND DEFINITION . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
? 13.02 JOINT TORTFEASORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206
[A] Acting in Concert . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206
[B] Independent Acts Causing a Single
Indivisible Injury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206
[C] Vicarious Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
[D] ?Joint and Several Liability? . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
? 13.03 SPECIAL PROBLEMS AFTER COMPARATIVE
FAULT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
[A] Allocations of Liability Among
Joint Tortfeasors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
[B] Impact of Settlement on Percentage Shares . . . . 209
[C] Contribution and Indemnification . . . . . . . . . . 211
[D] Policy Debate and Reform Statutes . . . . . . . . . 213
Chapter 14. DAMAGES
? 14.01 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
? 14.02 PROPERTY DAMAGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216
? 14.03 PERSONAL INJURY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
[A] Medical Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
[B] Lost Wages or Diminished Earning
Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
[C] Incidental Economic Consequences . . . . . . . . . 219
[D] Reduction to ?Present Value? . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
[E] Pain and Suffering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
? 14.04 MITIGATION OR DOCTRINE OF AVOIDABLE
CONSEQUENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221
? 14.05 PUNITIVE DAMAGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222
[A] Overview and Constitutionality . . . . . . . . . . . 22
[B] Policy Arguments For and Against
Punitive Damages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224
[C] Insurance Liability for Punitive Damages . . . . . 225
[D] Respondeat Superior and Punitive Damages . . . . 225
xviii TABLE OF CONTENTS
0018 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 311
Page
? 14.06 COLLATERAL SOURCE RULE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226
Chapter 15. DEFENSES
? 15.01 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230
? 15.02 CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . 231
[A] Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231
[B] Last Clear Chance Doctrine . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
[C] Plaintiffs Unable to Exercise Self-Protection . . . . 234
? 15.03 COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234
[A] Pure Comparative Negligence . . . . . . . . . . . . 234
[B] Modified Comparative Negligence . . . . . . . . . . 235
[1] Greater than 50 Percent Approach . . . . . . . 235
[2] 50 Percent or Greater Approach . . . . . . . . . 235
[3] ?Slight? Comparative Negligence . . . . . . . . 235
[C] Determining the Percentage of Fault
Attributable to the Plaintiff . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235
[D] Comparison Between Different Systems . . . . . . 236
[1] Contributory Negligence versus
Comparative Negligence . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236
[2] Comparison Between Pure and Modified
Systems of Comparative Fault . . . . . . . . . . 237
? 15.04 ASSUMPTION OF RISK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
[A] Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
[1] Knowledge of a Particular Risk . . . . . . . . . 238
[2] Voluntariness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
[3] Assuming the Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
[B] Classifications of Assumption of Risk . . . . . . . . 239
[1] Express versus Implied Assumption
of Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
[2] Express Assumption of Risk . . . . . . . . . . . 239
[3] Implied Assumption of Risk . . . . . . . . . . . 240
[a] Approach One: Assumption of Risk
Remains a Complete Defense . . . . . . . . 240
[b] Approach Two: Questioning the
Reasonableness of the
Assumed Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
TABLE OF CONTENTS xix
0019 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 338
Page
[c] Approach Three: Absorption of
Assumption of Risk into
Comparative Negligence . . . . . . . . . . . 242
[C] The ?Firefighter?s Rule? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244
? 15.05 IMMUNITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244
[A] Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244
[B] Charitable Immunity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244
[C] Spousal Immunity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245
[D] Parent-Child Immunity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246
[E] Governmental Immunity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247
Chapter 16. STRICT LIABILITY
? 16.01 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251
? 16.02 STRICT LIABILITY FOR INJURIES CAUSED BY
ANIMALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253
[A] Livestock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253
[B] Domestic Animals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254
[C] Wild Animals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254
[D] Defenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255
? 16.03 STRICT LIABILITY FOR ABNORMALLY
DANGEROUS ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256
[A] Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256
[B] Restatement (Second) ?? 519?520 . . . . . . . . . . 259
[1] Danger Unavoidable Even With the
Exercise of Due Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261
[2] Requirement of an Activity Under
Defendant?s Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261
[3] Type of Hazard Contemplated . . . . . . . . . . 263
[C] Application of the Doctrine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264
[D] Defenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264
265
CHAPTER 17. PRODUCTS LIABILITY
? 17.01 PRODUCTS LIABILITY: GENERALLY . . . . . . . . . 268
xx TABLE OF CONTENTS
0020 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 366
Page
? 17.02 PRODUCTS LIABILITY IN TORT . . . . . . . . . . . . 270
[A] Negligence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270
[B] Strict Tort Product Liability: Restatement (Second)
of Torts ? 402A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271
[1] Generally . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271
[2] Necessity of Showing a Defect . . . . . . . . . . 273
[a] The Consumer Expectations Test . . . . . . 274
[b] The Risk/Utility Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274
[c] The Hybrid Barker v.
Lull Engineering Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274
[3] Necessity of Showing Unreasonable
Danger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276
[4] Effect of Changes After Leaving
Control of Defendant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278
[C] Defenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279
[1] Contributory Negligence and Assumption
of the Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279
[2] Comparative Fault . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280
? 17.03 PRODUCTS LIABILITY RESTATEMENT: THE
FUNCTIONAL APPROACH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280
[A] MAnufacturing Defects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280
[B] Design Defects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281
[C] Inadequate Warnings or Instructions . . . . . . . 281
[1] Generally . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281
[2] The Effect of Obviousness of Danger . . . . . . 284
[3] The Effect of Unintended or
Unforeseeable Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285
[4] Causation and Disregard of Warnings . . . . . 287
[5] The Duty of the
Non-Manufacturing Seller . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290
[6] Persons to Be Warned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291
[a] The Allergic or Idiosyncratic User . . . . . . 292
[b] The Professional User . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293
[7] The Adequacy of a Warning . . . . . . . . . . . . 295
[8] The Continuing Duty to Warn . . . . . . . . . . 298
[9] Recall or Retrofit Obligations . . . . . . . . . . . 299
TABLE OF CONTENTS xxi
0021 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 391
Page
? 17.04 PRODUCTS LIABILITY IN TORT: ISSUES IN
APPLICABILITY AND PROOF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327
[A] Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300
[1] Generally . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300
[2] Non-Manufacturing Sellers . . . . . . . . . . . . 300
[3] Sellers of Used Products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
[B] Proof . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
[1] The Accident Itself . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
[2] Other Accidents or Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . 302
[3] Subsequent Product Changes . . . . . . . . . . . 302
[4] Violation of or Compliance with a Statute,
Ordinance, or Regulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 303
[5] Res Ipsa Loquitur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 303
[6] Statutes of Repose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304
? 17.05 PRODUCTS LIABILITY IN TORT: APPLICABILITY
TO CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304
[A] Prescription Products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304
[1] The Unavoidably Unsafe Product . . . . . . . . 304
[2] Blood and Biological Products . . . . . . . . . . 305
[B] Persons and Transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306
[1] Non-Manufacturing Sellers . . . . . . . . . . . . 306
[2] Sellers of Used Products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307
[3] Lessors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308
[4] Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 309
[5] Sellers of Real Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311
? 17.06 STRICT PRODUCTS LIABILITY FOR
MISREPRESENTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312
[A] Restatement (Second) ? 402B . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312
[B] Statements Used in Advertising and
Promotion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314
? 17.07 PRODUCTS LIABILITY IN WARRANTY . . . . . . . . 316
[A] Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316
[B] Express Warranty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316
[1] Representation of Fact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
[2] Basis of the Bargain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318
[C] Implied Warranty of Merchantability . . . . . . . . 318
xxii TABLE OF CONTENTS
0022 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 419
Page
[D] Implied Warranty of Fitness for a
Particular Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320
[E] Warranty Disclaimers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321
[1] Conspicuousness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322
[2] ?As Is? Disclaimers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323
[F] Warranty Limitations of Remedy . . . . . . . . . . 321
[G] To Whom Warranties Run . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324
Chapter 18. NUISANCE AND TRESPASS
? 18.01 NUISANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325
[A] Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325
[B] Nuisance and Trespass Distinguished . . . . . . . . 326
[C] Private Nuisance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328
[1] Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328
[a] Unreasonable Interference . . . . . . . . . . 328
[b] Current Possessory Interest . . . . . . . . . 329
[c] Intentional or Unintentional Conduct . . . 329
[2] Nature of the Interest Interfered With . . . . . 330
[3] Corrective Justice and Utilitarianism . . . . . 332
[D] Public Nuisance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336
[1] Generally . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336
[2] Proper Complainants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336
[3] Special Injury Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337
[4] Environmental Harm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339
[5] Economic Loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339
[6] Prospective Nuisance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340
? 18.02 TRESPASS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
[A] Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
[B] The Requirement of Intent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342
[C] The Requisite Physical Invasion and Harm . . . . 343
[D] Statutes of Limitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345
[1] Permanent Trespass; Continuing
Trespass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345
[2] ?Discovery? Statutes of Limitation . . . . . . . . 345
TABLE OF CONTENTS xxiii
0023 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 450
Page
Chapter 19. ECONOMIC TORTS
? 19.01 FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION . . . . . . . . 347
[A] Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347
[B] Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 348
[1] Material Misrepresentation by
Defendant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 348
[2] Scienter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350
[3] Intent to Induce Reliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351
[4] Causation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351
[5] Justifiable Reliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352
[6] Damages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353
? 19.02 INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT
AND INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH
PROSPECTIVE ECONOMIC RELATIONS . . . . . . . 354
[A] Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354
[B] Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355
[1] Valid Contract or Economic Expectancy . . . . 356
[2] Knowledge of Valid Contract or an
Economic Expectancy by
the Defendant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 356
[3] Intent by the Defendant to Interfere
With the Contract or
Economic Expectancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 356
[4] Interference Caused by the Defendant . . . . . 357
[5] Damages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357
[C] Justifications for Interference . . . . . . . . . . . . 357
? 19.03 TORTIOUS BREACH OF THE COVENANT OF
GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING . . . . . . . . . . 359
Chapter 20. MISUSE OF LEGAL PROCESSES
? 20.01 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363
? 20.02 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND MALICIOUS
INSTITUTION OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS:
DEFINITION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364
xxiv TABLE OF CONTENTS
0024 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 481
Page
[A] Institution or Continuation of Criminal or
Civil Proceedings Against
the Plaintiff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364
[B] Termination of the Proceeding in Favor
of the Plaintiff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365
[C] Absence of Probable Cause . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366
[D] Improper Purpose or Malice of the Accuser . . . . 366
[E] Damages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367
? 20.03 IMMUNITY OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS . . . . . . . . . . 367
? 20.04 INTERACTION BETWEEN FALSE IMPRISONMENT
AND MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND MALICIOUS
INSTITUTION OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS . . . . . . . 368
? 20.05 ABUSE OF PROCESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 368
Chapter 21. DEFAMATION
? 21.01 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371
? 21.02 COMMON LAW DEFAMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372
[A] Defamatory Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372
[1] Defamatory to Whom? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373
[2] Statements Not Facially Defamatory:
Inducement and Innuendo . . . . . . . . . . . . 374
[B] Of and Concerning the Plaintiff . . . . . . . . . . . 375
[1] Group Defamation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375
[2] Corporate Plaintiffs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375
[C] Publication and Republication . . . . . . . . . . . . 376
[D] Damages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377
[1] The Libel/Slander Distinction . . . . . . . . . . 377
[2] Slander and Slander Per Se . . . . . . . . . . . 378
[3] Libel and Libel Per Quod . . . . . . . . . . . . . 378
[E] Common Law Defenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379
[1] Substantial Truth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379
[2] Absolute Privileges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379
[3] Qualified Privileges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380
? 21.03 CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS . . . . . . . . . . 381
[A] Public Officials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382
[B] Public Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 384
TABLE OF CONTENTS xxv
0025 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 504
Page
[C] Private Persons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385
[1] Public Concern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386
[2] Private Concern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386
[D] Actual Malice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387
[E] Falsity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387
[F] Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387
Chapter 22. INVASION OF PRIVACY
? 22.01 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389
? 22.02 INTRUSION UPON SECLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . 389
? 22.03 APPROPRIATION OF NAME OR PICTURE
AND THE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY . . . . . . . . . . . 391
? 22.04 FALSE LIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392
? 22.05 PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF PRIVATE FACTS . . . . . 394
Table of Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TC-1
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-1
xxvi TABLE OF CONTENTS
0026 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) ? COMPOSE2 (4.43) 02/12/07 (16:02)
Perfect-Bound Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs
J:\VRS\DAT\00582\FRONTMAT.GML --- PUB#_FM.STY --- POST 533

Library of Congress Subject Headings for this publication:

Torts -- United States.