An Italian Language translation
of this English Language document
has been kindly provided by the Italian Trade Commission.
For additional information, please
contact Mr. Martin Stutsman.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration, Washington, DC
PREAMBLE: Ethyl carbamate (EC, urethane) is a naturally occurring component of all fermented foods and beverages. Because EC has shown a potential for carcinogenity when administered in high doses in animal tests, the wine industry is interested in reducing EC levels in their products. This advisory contains recommendations drawn from scientific research that are designed to help all winegrape growers, winemakers, and other industry members to minimize the levels of EC in wine. These recommendations are advisory only, and not intended to restrict the freedom and diversity of winemaking styles. |
FORMATION OF EC:
To better understand the possible actions we can take to minimize levels of EC in wine, it is
necessary to review the basics of the major formation pathway and kinetics: Arginine, usually
one of the most abundant yeast available amino acids in grape juice, is taken up by wine yeast as
a nutrient and may be metabolized yielding urea if present in excess amounts. If the urea can
not be further metabolized and accumulates above a critical concentration, yeast strains release it
from their cells into the wine during or at the end of fermentation. Urea can spontaneously react
with the alcohol in wine to form EC. The chemical reaction between urea and ethanol is
exponentially accelerated at elevated temperatures. To a lesser extent citrulline,
an amino acid
which is not incorporated into yeast protein, and is formed during arginine biosynthesis, can
serve as an EC precursor. Lactic acid bacteria can also be a source of
citrulline under winemaking conditions.
However, the key reaction for EC formation in wine is between urea and ethanol.
PREVENTATIVE ACTIONS:
We have developed the following recommendations towards aspects of EC formation in
wine:
1. Vineyard Fertilization
*
Nitrogen (N) fertilization in the vineyard has direct influence on the nitrogen contents of the
grape berry and the resulting must. Excessive fertilization with urea, ammonia and other
N-fertilizers in the past is considered partly responsible for generally higher EC levels found in
wines from traditional wineproducing countries.
*
The following OIV Expert Committee on
Vine Physiology method for sampling of leaves to determine the nutritional status of grapevines
in order to provide sufficient, but not excessive, nutrients for vine growth has been developed
(Resolution Viti 4/95).
There appears to be a growing opinion among viticulturists that
nitrate-N in petioles at bloom has little if any relationship to growth, fruitset or general N status
of the vine or N status of the berries and resulting juice.
Operation | Leaf Blade | Petiole |
Timing | - Berry set - Véraison |
- Véraison |
Minimum number of vines1 | 50-100 | 100 |
Position of the leaf on the shoot | Leaf blade opposite the first basal cluster | Petioles opposite the cluster |
Position of the shoot on the cordon or cane2 | Fruitful shoot in the middle | Fruitful shoot in the middle |
Minimum number of leaves | 50-100 leaf blades | 100 petioles |
Treatment of the leaves | Wash quickly in distilled water3 and then dry | Wash quickly in distilled water and then dry |
1In relation to the size of the vineyard.
2The position according to the training system. The text of
the Resolution includes illustrations of the correct sampling point for the major training systems
in Europe.
3Only for the determination of copper, zinc and
manganese.
* In general, grapevines have a very low nitrogen requirement relative to most other crops. For example, 10 tons of grapes remove only about 25 lbs. of nitrogen from the vineyard.
* Growing grapes in soils previously used for vegetables, and thus, heavily fertilized, can result in excessive nitrogen contents of juice and EC levels in wine.
* The concentration of nitrogenous components such as arginine in juice and urea in wine increases proportionally with increasing nitrogen fertilization in the vineyard. If arginine concentrations in juice exceed 1000 mg/L, the vineyard must be considered over-fertilized.
*
In a nitrogen deficient soil, an application of 100 lbs N/acre would achieve a level of about
150 mg of yeast available nitrogen/L of juice. This is considered sufficient for completion of
fermentation. However, application of such high fertilizer rates can lead to excessive canopy
growth and delayed fruit maturation.
>Potential nitrogen deficiencies in juices in regard to yeast nutrition should not be addressed
through vineyard fertilization.
2. Cover Crops
*
Growers need to be aware that they may be adding a significant amount of nitrogen to their
vineyards when they disk under winter legumes used as cover crops in the vineyard. The
legumes include vetches (Vichia ssp.), clover (Trifolium ssp.), and pea
(Pisum spp.). Use of these cover crops can increase vine nitrogen to excessively high
levels. For example, clover tissue contains about 2.5% nitrogen, vetch tissue about 4%.
Growing vetch can accumulate up to 75 lbs of nitrogen per acre, compared to an average of 25
-50 lbs. per acre applied through commercial fertilizer additions. If legumes are used as cover
crops, soil and vine nitrogen status should be monitored in order to avoid excessive arginine
levels in juices. If additional nitrogen fertilization of the soil is to be avoided, plowing-under of
winter legumes should not be practiced.
3. Cultivars & Rootstocks
*
Different grape cultivars exhibit variations in
nitrogen uptake, with some varieties being generally lower in level of arginine than others.
However, low nitrogen status of cultivars is largely related to own-root characteristics and will
change with the use of different rootstocks. Total bloom petiole nitrogen can vary by more than
40% on average, while nitrate-nitrogen may even vary 10-12 fold depending on the
rootstock-scion combination used. Rootstocks can therefore have a profound impact on vineyard
nitrogen status and fertilizer management. Local viticulture farm advisors can provide
information on nitrogen uptake by different rootstocks.
RECOMMENDATION:
Growers should be aware of vine and grape nitrogen status and modify vineyard
procedures if juice arginine concentrations are significantly greater than 1000 mg/L.
Return to Table of Contents
*
To correctly determine the nutritional status of an individual grape juice, it may be necessary to
measure the level of nitrogen compounds actually available to the yeast for its metabolic activity.
Nitrogen status of grapes varies widely with vineyard site, soil, irrigation and fertilization
practices, vintage weather, scion and rootstock, and grape maturity. The two major sources for
nitrogen in must are ammonia and amino acids with the exception of proline. Proline cannot be used as
a yeast nitrogen source without molecular oxygen, which is not present in an anaerobic grape juice
fermentation.
Both available nitrogen sources can be analyzed in a winery lab or at
contract laboratories. Ammonia assays include enzymatic/photometric tests or use of an
ammonia probe. Yeast available amino acids may be measured rapidly by a colorimetric
OPA/NAC test (Dukes & Butzke 1996), which requires a spectrophotometer. Analysis by
HPLC determines all nitrogen sources simultaneously but requires highly skilled personnel and
yields delayed results under winemaking conditions. It is necessary to obtain analytical results
within a few hours after yeast inoculation in order to make decisions about nutrient additions to
deficient musts.
* It would also be desirable to determine critical arginine levels through a simple analytical procedure which can be applied in a winery lab. There is currently no rapid analysis for arginine in juice available to wineries today. Development of a procedure has been proposed by UC Davis.
* To avoid sluggish or stuck fermentations, it is permitted by BATF to add up to 8 lbs of diammonium phosphate (DAP) per 1,000 gal (960 mg/L) to a nitrogen deficient must, which translates into ca. 200 mg of nitrogen/L. However, excessive levels of nitrogen may contribute to urea formation and excretion by yeast. Although some nutrients are required to accomplish an optional malolactic fermentation, high nutrient levels at the end of fermentation can contribute to microbial instability of a wine (see lactic acid bacteria).
* Yeast food preparations may add an unidentified level of yeast available nitrogen to a juice. It is recommend that winemakers request the supplier to specify the different nitrogen sources.
* The use of urea as a fermentation supplement is prohibited. BATF has found that the use of urea is not considered acceptable in good commercial practice among wine producers and has rescinded the listing of urea as an authorized treatment (Federal Register, Vol. 55, No. 118, 24974-24982, 06/19/90).
RECOMMENDATION:
Winemakers should know the nitrogen status of their juices and not over-supplement with
diammonium phosphate.
Return to Table of Contents
* Wine yeast strains differ in their ability to rapidly catabolize urea during fermentation. When excess urea accumulates in the cell s cytoplasm, it is released into its environment, the must. High urea producing yeasts are those that have a high capacity to degrade arginine to urea, but a low urea metabolizing ability. Low urea metabolizing ability may result from low activity of urea amidolyase, inhibition of amidolyase activity by the presence of high levels of ammonia, deficiencies of cofactors required by amidolyase, or apparently low activity due to hyperactive arginase. Genetic as well as environmental factors influence the amount of urea released by the cells. Some commercial yeast strains such as Lallemand 71B® , Red Star SC1120® and Premier Cuvée (PdM)® have been described as producing relatively low levels of urea. Yeast companies will be able to recommend their lowest urea excreting strains for each specific winemaking application, and it is suggested that they be consulted.
* Spontaneous fermentations with undefined yeast strains will necessitate monitoring of arginine in juices and urea and EC levels in every fermentation. It is not clear what impact natural fermentations will have on EC levels as this has not been thoroughly investigated. However, it is anticipated that indigenous yeast strains will display a similar variability in urea catabolism as observed in commercial strains.
RECOMMENDATION:
If juice is high in arginine content, fermentation
should be inoculated with known low-urea producing strains of yeast appropriate for the
winemaking application.
Return to Table of Contents
*
Certain wine lactic acid bacteria are capable of forming small
amounts of citrulline, a precursor of ethyl carbamate, from the amino acid arginine, and excreting
this precursor into the wine. Routine nitrogen supplement of juices with unknown nutritional
status can increase the potential for bacteria available nitrogen after primary fermentation.
Additionally, even strains not able to degrade arginine may produce small increases in ethyl
carbamate, suggesting that nitrogenous precursors other than those derived from arginine may be
involved.
Research results indicate the need for caution in the selection of starter cultures for
conducting malolactic fermentation in wine, since citrulline formation from arginine degradation
could result in elevated levels of ethyl carbamate, even at normal temperatures, during prolonged
storage. In addition, spontaneous malolactic fermentation by undefined strains should be
avoided, as this may lead to formation of ethyl carbamate precursors.
RECOMMENDATION:
If malolactic fermentation is desired, winemakers
should either use a commercial strain that does not produce high levels of citrulline or monitor
juice for citrulline content post-fermentation.
Return to Table of Contents
*
Since urea is the major precursor for EC in wine,
enzymatic hydrolysis of urea to ammonia and CO2 appears to be a suitable way
to eliminate formation from this source. Preparations of urease enzyme are commercially
available and permitted by BATF for the treatment of wine.
However, urease activity is
severely limited under normal wine conditions, specifically with respect to low pH and ethanol.
Urease is especially inhibited by high concentrations of malic acid, and fluoride residues (from
cryolite® application in the vineyard) in excess of 1 mg/L. Any combination of these
factors can make it practically impossible to reach the desired low urea levels in reasonable time,
even at a very high enzyme dosage. A complete elimination of EC is not possible.
RECOMMENDATION:
If wine is high in residual urea, winemakers may be
able to use a urease treatment to reduce urea levels. However, the effectiveness of the urease
addition must be evaluated for each wine to confirm the enzyme is active.
Return to Table of Contents
*
It is a common winemaking style to age
wine sur lie (on the yeast lees) after primary fermentation in order to impact the wine's
organoleptic properties. Aging on the lees leads to the liberation of nitrogenous compounds,
amino acids and protein, into wine: a rapid excretion from the intracellular pool of the yeast cells
during the first weeks of storage, and a slow increase during further storage due to autolysis of
the yeast.
However, it has been reported that, in wines made from grapes of low amino
acid concentration, after extended lees contact, no increase in ethyl carbamate concentration was
found, and that no additional ethyl carbamate precursors were released from the yeast during
extended lees contact Therefore, under above conditions, the practice of extended yeast lees
contact appears not to raise ethyl carbamate potentials.
No data are available to document
an influence of sur lie aging on urea concentrations of wine made from grapes with excessive
concentrations of yeast assimilable nitrogen.
* Similarly, no data are available regarding the production of sparkling wine and the evolution of levels of urea and other EC precursors during yeast autolysis, e.g., during long- term aging of tirage-bottled wines.
RECOMMENDATION:
Sur lie aging has not been shown to dramatically
impact ethyl carbamate levels, but this has not been thoroughly tested.
Return to Table of Contents
* Although urea is not volatile and EC itself possesses a poor volatility, EC may still be found in wine distillates. It can be formed post-distillation via the reaction of a volatile precursor, isocyanate, and ethanol both at ambient and elevated temperatures.
* Producers of fruit wine distillates have to be aware of another precursor for ethyl carbamate, in the form of cyanides. Stone-fruits, especially such as cherries, apricots or plums, contain sugar-bound cyanides in their seeds, which can be released during fermentation. Removal of stones prior to fermentation, and a secondary distillation are essential to avoid high concentrations of volatile EC precursors in this type of spirit.
* Producers of fortified wines have to take the same considerations into account as table winemakers, since fortification itself may aggravate the problem of urea excretion by yeast. Urea is often formed during the early and middle stages of fermentation with subsequent yeast generations utilizing it during the later stages. Maximum excretion occurs frequently, but with exceptions, at about 12 to 16 Brix. Arresting fermentation at this stage will lead to high urea concentrations in the fortified wine. It is recommended to perform a test fortification in the winery lab and to analyze both the fermenting wine and the resulting dessert wine for urea.
* In addition, the fortifying grape spirit or brandy can serve as the primary source for EC taint in fortified wines, and should be monitored for EC and potential EC.
RECOMMENDATION:
Since isocyanate is formed by break-down of
urea, the same recommendation as for table wine production applies. No recommendation can be
given at this point regarding the fractionation of distillates due to lack of data regarding the
distillation behavior of volatile EC precursors.
Return to Table of Contents
* The chemical reaction between urea and ethanol increases exponentially with temperature. It is therefore essential that a wine containing elevated levels of urea is not exposed to elevated temperatures (above 100°F) during storage or shipment.
RECOMMENDATION:
Since long-term exposure of wine to heat is also
detrimental to its sensory properties and visual stability, wineries should educate and encourage
the shipper, distributor, wholesaler, and retailer to minimize heat exposure by use of appropriate
insulated containers, shipping schedules and storage facilities.
Return to Table of Contents
Last updated by frf 1998-FEB-19