Posted by Frederick Jones on Oct 23, 2007 - 03:53 PM
![The United Nations headquarters is seen in New York, Friday, July 27, 2007. [AP file photo]](http://blogs.state.gov/images/UNGA/field/2007_1023_un_bh_m.jpg)
Does the United Nations continue to effectively fulfill its mission?
|
Home Videos Photos Welcome About Legal Search Archive |
Share This Post
Recent Posts
Young Europeans React to Secretary Clinton’s VisitWhat Actions Should the International Community Take To Resolve the Situation in Darfur?
Spring Break: Have Fun, Stay Safe
Secretary Clinton Responds to Your Text Messages
Secretary’s 2009 International Women of Courage Awards
Question of the Week: Does the UN Effectively Fulfill its Mission?
Posted by Frederick Jones on Oct 23, 2007 - 03:53 PM
By Presidential Proclamation, the United States celebrated October 24th as "United Nations Day." Many today question the relevance of the United Nations. Founded to maintain international security and help solve economic, social, and humanitarian problems...
Does the United Nations continue to effectively fulfill its mission?
Posted by Frederick Jones on Oct 23, 2007 - 03:53 PM
Does the United Nations continue to effectively fulfill its mission?
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Follow Entry's Comments Via RSS
Do you want to know when a comment is added to this entry? Stay up-to-date:
Comments
Follow Entry's Comments Via RSS
Do you want to know when a comment is added to this entry? Stay up-to-date:
Comments
Juan in U.S.A. writes:
Yes, if only people would be really and truly aware of what the UN's achievements are, some of the reactions of this blog would be completely different. Just read the annex of the report below where some of the results of the UN and its different agencies are clearly shown and then you will realize that given the very little money we give them, they are doing a whole lot.
http://www.un.org/depts/oios/mecd/ppr2004_2005.htm
Posted on Tue Oct 30, 2007
Yes, if only people would be really and truly aware of what the UN's achievements are, some of the reactions of this blog would be completely different. Just read the annex of the report below where some of the results of the UN and its different agencies are clearly shown and then you will realize that given the very little money we give them, they are doing a whole lot.
http://www.un.org/depts/oios/mecd/ppr2004_2005.htm
Posted on Tue Oct 30, 2007
Kashif in America writes:
@ Eric in New Mexico -- Yes, well the last comment by Eric in N.M. was eloquent while at the same time it helped defend America's position in the global context of things. The problem i do have is that America is praised as being the center of democracy and freedom and so forth. Yet these idioms lose their validity when actions taken across the globe by this promoter of democracy occur. If you listen to conversations of Nixon with Kissinger mocking countries like India's boasts about being "the world's biggest democracy" and Kissinger's attempts to overthrow a democratically elected communist in Chile (Allende) then the phrase "you talk a big talk but do you walk a big walk" begins to apply. Nationalistic agendas of self-interest are characteristic of the UN as Eric mentioned so if that is true then countries are left using dubious means to gaining patronage and so forth by member states. To be able to determine whether a U.N. member is acting out of self-interest can be difficult and leads to more dilemmas if so. So being able to look for humanistic values over nationalistic values might be the solution, however, being able to put that into practical use is not easy at all. Any nation lecturing other countries about doing this while they themselves are guilty of putting their national interest or self-interest above others is someone who cannot be taken seriously and should not be taken seriously at all.
Posted on Tue Oct 30, 2007
@ Eric in New Mexico -- Yes, well the last comment by Eric in N.M. was eloquent while at the same time it helped defend America's position in the global context of things. The problem i do have is that America is praised as being the center of democracy and freedom and so forth. Yet these idioms lose their validity when actions taken across the globe by this promoter of democracy occur. If you listen to conversations of Nixon with Kissinger mocking countries like India's boasts about being "the world's biggest democracy" and Kissinger's attempts to overthrow a democratically elected communist in Chile (Allende) then the phrase "you talk a big talk but do you walk a big walk" begins to apply. Nationalistic agendas of self-interest are characteristic of the UN as Eric mentioned so if that is true then countries are left using dubious means to gaining patronage and so forth by member states. To be able to determine whether a U.N. member is acting out of self-interest can be difficult and leads to more dilemmas if so. So being able to look for humanistic values over nationalistic values might be the solution, however, being able to put that into practical use is not easy at all. Any nation lecturing other countries about doing this while they themselves are guilty of putting their national interest or self-interest above others is someone who cannot be taken seriously and should not be taken seriously at all.
Posted on Tue Oct 30, 2007
Daniel in New York writes:
Not even close. Like a few people have mentioned before, the ideal is a noble one, but the actual UN falls far short of having any effectiveness. No organization that gives petty dictators and totalitarian regimes a platform for their demagoguery as well as a method for mucking up true benevolent action, can claim to have real import. The need to remain impartial at all costs has led to the UN tacitly allowing the Rwandan genocide, the Srebrenica massacre and the ongoing debacle in Sudan, to name a few, to occur. If you are really interested in this topic I recommend reading "the Tower of Babble" by Dore Gold. As he concludes, the world would be much better served by the establishment of a Union of Democratic States, that nations have to earn a right to join. Maybe then the UN can focus on humanitarian relief only.
Posted on Tue Oct 30, 2007
Not even close. Like a few people have mentioned before, the ideal is a noble one, but the actual UN falls far short of having any effectiveness. No organization that gives petty dictators and totalitarian regimes a platform for their demagoguery as well as a method for mucking up true benevolent action, can claim to have real import. The need to remain impartial at all costs has led to the UN tacitly allowing the Rwandan genocide, the Srebrenica massacre and the ongoing debacle in Sudan, to name a few, to occur. If you are really interested in this topic I recommend reading "the Tower of Babble" by Dore Gold. As he concludes, the world would be much better served by the establishment of a Union of Democratic States, that nations have to earn a right to join. Maybe then the UN can focus on humanitarian relief only.
Posted on Tue Oct 30, 2007
Janet in Connecticut writes:
YES! The UN most certainly does fulfill its mission.
No organization is perfect. But the UN is the only international organization we have that brings together representatives from 193 countries to discuss and try to resolve the world's problems. The UN, through its many partnerships with NGO's and Civil Society, as well as its own subsidiaries like UNAID, UNICEF and UNESCO, work to bring education, health care, peace and financial aid in countries and people around the globe who need help. No other organization does that.
The day we stop trying to work together as a global community is the day human kind is doomed. The UN is as valuable as the people willing to support it. I, for one, support it.
Posted on Tue Oct 30, 2007
YES! The UN most certainly does fulfill its mission.
No organization is perfect. But the UN is the only international organization we have that brings together representatives from 193 countries to discuss and try to resolve the world's problems. The UN, through its many partnerships with NGO's and Civil Society, as well as its own subsidiaries like UNAID, UNICEF and UNESCO, work to bring education, health care, peace and financial aid in countries and people around the globe who need help. No other organization does that.
The day we stop trying to work together as a global community is the day human kind is doomed. The UN is as valuable as the people willing to support it. I, for one, support it.
Posted on Tue Oct 30, 2007
Opio in Sudan writes:
There is need to step up diplomatic security for all diplomats in Sudan. Osama Bin Labin warn to attack the peacekeepers in Darfur. The Details of threat massage is available with the Head of UN Volunteers in Sudan. Let step up security at all corners to avoid consequences. The UN still mattter and support from United state to build free world of Terrorism.These are typically human rights violation threads.
Best wishes.
Posted on Tue Oct 30, 2007
There is need to step up diplomatic security for all diplomats in Sudan. Osama Bin Labin warn to attack the peacekeepers in Darfur. The Details of threat massage is available with the Head of UN Volunteers in Sudan. Let step up security at all corners to avoid consequences. The UN still mattter and support from United state to build free world of Terrorism.These are typically human rights violation threads.
Best wishes.
Posted on Tue Oct 30, 2007
David in Arizona writes:
I think that the idea of the UN is a noble one. But there are fundemental flaws in the structure of the United Nations. Because of the one nation one vote 10 percent of the worlds population can get a 2/3 vote on any issue.
Vote trading is common weak nations recieve aid in exchange for votes. Because of these flaw Cuba which has a long and doccumented history of human rights violations goes unpunished. Acts of naked aggression such as North Korea invading South Korea Iraq invading Kuwait are not condemn by the UN because of its flaws in the basic structure.
Posted on Tue Oct 30, 2007
I think that the idea of the UN is a noble one. But there are fundemental flaws in the structure of the United Nations. Because of the one nation one vote 10 percent of the worlds population can get a 2/3 vote on any issue.
Vote trading is common weak nations recieve aid in exchange for votes. Because of these flaw Cuba which has a long and doccumented history of human rights violations goes unpunished. Acts of naked aggression such as North Korea invading South Korea Iraq invading Kuwait are not condemn by the UN because of its flaws in the basic structure.
Posted on Tue Oct 30, 2007
Al Ohio writes:
Yes, the UN is effectively fulfilling its mission.
However, it can be more effective if the USA and other developed nations increase their support of the UN.
It can be more effective if the UN reflects changes that have occurred since it was founded, especially in the Security Council. The veto should be eliminated because it is undemocratic. A system should be devised that is more democratic in nature. No one nation should have veto power. Every nation should feel that its power in the UN is similar to its role in the world.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Yes, the UN is effectively fulfilling its mission.
However, it can be more effective if the USA and other developed nations increase their support of the UN.
It can be more effective if the UN reflects changes that have occurred since it was founded, especially in the Security Council. The veto should be eliminated because it is undemocratic. A system should be devised that is more democratic in nature. No one nation should have veto power. Every nation should feel that its power in the UN is similar to its role in the world.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Maria in U.S. writes:
Yes. Anytime the U.S. devotes it energy, time, and/or money to alleviate the suffering of humanity throughout the world it is in keeping with the mission of the UN. Could we do more? Some administrations are more disposed than others to help. I think we are currently under one adminstration that talks the talk but certainly does not walk the talk. We can only hope that the next administration is more humane and less political, greedy, and elitist.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Yes. Anytime the U.S. devotes it energy, time, and/or money to alleviate the suffering of humanity throughout the world it is in keeping with the mission of the UN. Could we do more? Some administrations are more disposed than others to help. I think we are currently under one adminstration that talks the talk but certainly does not walk the talk. We can only hope that the next administration is more humane and less political, greedy, and elitist.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Sean in Georgia writes:
This question is moot as the UN plays no part int he decision making of the axis of idots in the White House. The UN had itts time and place, but the current admin. has ruined and ignored UN authority to keep Chaney happy. A new world authority/deciision making body is required immediately. Please clear any participation with Chaney (the real scaremonger-in-chief) before signing us up.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
This question is moot as the UN plays no part int he decision making of the axis of idots in the White House. The UN had itts time and place, but the current admin. has ruined and ignored UN authority to keep Chaney happy. A new world authority/deciision making body is required immediately. Please clear any participation with Chaney (the real scaremonger-in-chief) before signing us up.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Ronald in New York writes:
Yes, The United Nations continues to effectively fulfill its mission. The UN exists to maintain a peaceful and meaningful institution to address the world's economic and social concerns. The United States is the most influential member state and should be setting the best example for cooperation with the UN and its agencies and mission. Right now, so much can be accomplished, in Darfur, Iraq, Iran North Korea, Palestine, Israel, and Africa. The UN Convention Against Corruption, and the provision for stolen asset restoration, can provide desparately needed funds to meet a broad range of global challenges specified in the MDG's. The U.S.A. can be the prime mover for UN success in meeting its mission; and these goals are congruent with United States goals for Democracy and free markets.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Yes, The United Nations continues to effectively fulfill its mission. The UN exists to maintain a peaceful and meaningful institution to address the world's economic and social concerns. The United States is the most influential member state and should be setting the best example for cooperation with the UN and its agencies and mission. Right now, so much can be accomplished, in Darfur, Iraq, Iran North Korea, Palestine, Israel, and Africa. The UN Convention Against Corruption, and the provision for stolen asset restoration, can provide desparately needed funds to meet a broad range of global challenges specified in the MDG's. The U.S.A. can be the prime mover for UN success in meeting its mission; and these goals are congruent with United States goals for Democracy and free markets.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Taylor in Illinois writes:
If the mission of the UN is benevolence and providing a safe way to have peaceful unbiased discussion and debate, then yes, the UN is fufilling its mission. However, if the mission is extended to being able to actuall do something about conflicts around the world, other than sit by and watch, then no, the UN is not fufilling its mission. They way the UN is built makes it impossible for any treaty or agreement to be enforced, regardless of how many signatures there are. I strongly support the UN and its humanitarian work, but once the UN enters the political world, it fails miserably. Now the question is: is that a good thing? What is more important, world peace, or national sovereignty?
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
If the mission of the UN is benevolence and providing a safe way to have peaceful unbiased discussion and debate, then yes, the UN is fufilling its mission. However, if the mission is extended to being able to actuall do something about conflicts around the world, other than sit by and watch, then no, the UN is not fufilling its mission. They way the UN is built makes it impossible for any treaty or agreement to be enforced, regardless of how many signatures there are. I strongly support the UN and its humanitarian work, but once the UN enters the political world, it fails miserably. Now the question is: is that a good thing? What is more important, world peace, or national sovereignty?
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Lucian in Massacusetts writes:
Hopefully, the UN can prevent a group of individuals from collectively destroying the planet.
I'd say, the UN exists to minimize the self destructive force of humanity. But the UN has no current enforcement capability, and the main problem we have are all problems we create for ourselves. We decide to reward corporations and individuals who get rich off destroying life, environment, community, society, etc. We could always decide to make responsibility pay more than irresponsibility.
The UN has a role, but ultimately we individuals have a role as well. It's not going to get better until you as an individual decide that you've had enough and are going to dedicate yourself to engineering/raising quality of life.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Hopefully, the UN can prevent a group of individuals from collectively destroying the planet.
I'd say, the UN exists to minimize the self destructive force of humanity. But the UN has no current enforcement capability, and the main problem we have are all problems we create for ourselves. We decide to reward corporations and individuals who get rich off destroying life, environment, community, society, etc. We could always decide to make responsibility pay more than irresponsibility.
The UN has a role, but ultimately we individuals have a role as well. It's not going to get better until you as an individual decide that you've had enough and are going to dedicate yourself to engineering/raising quality of life.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
John in California writes:
Multilateral diplomacy within the established United Nations principals is the way to be effective and just.
Impeach Cheney and his unilateral corporate criminals!
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Multilateral diplomacy within the established United Nations principals is the way to be effective and just.
Impeach Cheney and his unilateral corporate criminals!
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Chadwick in Ohio writes:
The United Nations System has made significant progress since its founding, evolving from responding to disruptive conflict after it happens to an emphasis on long-term peacebuilding. As a result, organizations in the UN System provide a wide array of opportunities for peacebuilding for member states. But the UN System faces two overwhelming challenges. First, the most powerful member state, economically and militarily, is not offering its creative participation. Second, the budget of the entire UN System equals three percent of the US military budget. My future security, and that of my children and grandchildren, desperately need the creative participation of the United States in the opportunities provided for long-term peacebuilding today by the UN System. Sadly, U.S. unilateralism today is ever more similar to that in the days of the League of Nations.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
The United Nations System has made significant progress since its founding, evolving from responding to disruptive conflict after it happens to an emphasis on long-term peacebuilding. As a result, organizations in the UN System provide a wide array of opportunities for peacebuilding for member states. But the UN System faces two overwhelming challenges. First, the most powerful member state, economically and militarily, is not offering its creative participation. Second, the budget of the entire UN System equals three percent of the US military budget. My future security, and that of my children and grandchildren, desperately need the creative participation of the United States in the opportunities provided for long-term peacebuilding today by the UN System. Sadly, U.S. unilateralism today is ever more similar to that in the days of the League of Nations.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Patty in Texas writes:
Urge continued and increased support to the United Nations including full funding and in a timely fashion,
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Urge continued and increased support to the United Nations including full funding and in a timely fashion,
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Janice in Massachusetts writes:
Of course the UN can be improved - it must be to fulfill its mission, but it needs US involvement and leadership.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Of course the UN can be improved - it must be to fulfill its mission, but it needs US involvement and leadership.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Rita in California writes:
The nature of the question suggests that it expects a NO answer. The question could be phrased:
"Which of the many valuable UN-connected agencies would you rate as indispensable for maintaining peace, human rights, and development:
UN High Commissioner for Refugees
World Food Program
UNICEF
UN Development Program (UNDP)
UN Women's Development Fund (UNIFEM)
Other....
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
The nature of the question suggests that it expects a NO answer. The question could be phrased:
"Which of the many valuable UN-connected agencies would you rate as indispensable for maintaining peace, human rights, and development:
UN High Commissioner for Refugees
World Food Program
UNICEF
UN Development Program (UNDP)
UN Women's Development Fund (UNIFEM)
Other....
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Minkail in Texas writes:
Yes! The United nNations has been helping the world greatly. And i personnelly thank the organization, but I need the UN to pay attendtion to the write things now because it seem like the UN is losing their focus and the world is going mad.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Yes! The United nNations has been helping the world greatly. And i personnelly thank the organization, but I need the UN to pay attendtion to the write things now because it seem like the UN is losing their focus and the world is going mad.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
David in Washington writes:
The UN's "Charter for Global Democracy" concerns me. Why is it necessary to have One World Government under the UN? Human beings are such that the archetypes of "evil" and "good," of "us" and "them" will always exist -- this is what makes us human. These are constructs of the human mind.
One World Government cannot possibly eradicate the natural condition of being human. Archetypes are nothing to fear, since they are perfectly natural. They do not need to be controlled or repressed in any way.
A better solution for dealing with one's "enemies" is to protect them as your enemies, while at the same time making an egreement with them to ritualistically act out war and other disputes. This is how it is handled in some primitive tribes around the world. Such agreements allow hatred and differences to co-exist side by side, without eradicating each other. These types of agreed, mock displays are necessary for mutual survival.
Note that no one dies from such ritualistic displays. Wounds make occur, but no deaths.
Eradicating enemies is like trying to remove the left side of a stick. You break off the left side and it comes back again, instantly. If you break off all of the left part of the stick, the right side no longer remains. In the same way, creating lasting agreements with enemies is the path to mutual survival. If you continually seek to destroy your enemies, eventually you end up destroying yourself.
Peace.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
The UN's "Charter for Global Democracy" concerns me. Why is it necessary to have One World Government under the UN? Human beings are such that the archetypes of "evil" and "good," of "us" and "them" will always exist -- this is what makes us human. These are constructs of the human mind.
One World Government cannot possibly eradicate the natural condition of being human. Archetypes are nothing to fear, since they are perfectly natural. They do not need to be controlled or repressed in any way.
A better solution for dealing with one's "enemies" is to protect them as your enemies, while at the same time making an egreement with them to ritualistically act out war and other disputes. This is how it is handled in some primitive tribes around the world. Such agreements allow hatred and differences to co-exist side by side, without eradicating each other. These types of agreed, mock displays are necessary for mutual survival.
Note that no one dies from such ritualistic displays. Wounds make occur, but no deaths.
Eradicating enemies is like trying to remove the left side of a stick. You break off the left side and it comes back again, instantly. If you break off all of the left part of the stick, the right side no longer remains. In the same way, creating lasting agreements with enemies is the path to mutual survival. If you continually seek to destroy your enemies, eventually you end up destroying yourself.
Peace.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Maria in Arizona writes:
Better than any other government body.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Better than any other government body.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Porter in Pennsylvania writes:
The UN is humanity's hope for peace with honor. That is,peace through diplomacy and negotiation rather than war, death and surrender. All wars end in diplomacy and negotiation anyway. Why not just skip the killing and deal with the problem. Like so many others, I think the US should use the tools the UN can provide to help solve problems. Corruption in the UN? Perhaps. But it doesn't come close to the corruption of the U.S. government over the past 27 years. The U.S. should pays its back dues and its current dues on time. Having the UN in this country is an honor. I just wish this country was more worthy of it.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
The UN is humanity's hope for peace with honor. That is,peace through diplomacy and negotiation rather than war, death and surrender. All wars end in diplomacy and negotiation anyway. Why not just skip the killing and deal with the problem. Like so many others, I think the US should use the tools the UN can provide to help solve problems. Corruption in the UN? Perhaps. But it doesn't come close to the corruption of the U.S. government over the past 27 years. The U.S. should pays its back dues and its current dues on time. Having the UN in this country is an honor. I just wish this country was more worthy of it.
Posted on Mon Oct 29, 2007
Don in Kentucky writes:
I believe that the United Nations is doing an effective job!
It provides a means for multilateral negotations.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
I believe that the United Nations is doing an effective job!
It provides a means for multilateral negotations.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Rosemary in The Netherlands writes:
Yes, it does. It is trully amazing how much it accomplishes throughout the world with so little money - the main body functions on an annual budget smaller than that of the city of New York Fire Department. The host of UN agencies and specialised agencies reach out across the world affecting our everyday lives every time we mail a letter, take a plane or ship, hear international weather forecasts or use international communications. New UN programs are introduced as needs change in humanitarian and development programs.
Thanks to UN initiatives a higher number of boys and girls are enrolled in school than ever before in the history of that country; thanks to the UN World Health Organisation (WHO)millions of children are protected against preventable diseases such as measles; thanks to UN involvement millions of lives have been saved in countries of conflict: the UN reaches out to business through the Global Compact. Both the UN Peacekeeping Forces and the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have received Nobel Peace prizes. And the UN body of 192 country members continally reaches out to help humanity through its universal Declarations and the Millenium Development Goals, a set of eight measures intended to reduce poverty and spur growth by 2015.
Reforms are regularly introduced but sadly sometimes stymied as in the recent abject failure of nations to form a credible new human rights council, out of fear of too much scrutiny. Much more could be done, and less time wasted, if only the U.S.A. and all other member nations would pay their dues on time and in full.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Yes, it does. It is trully amazing how much it accomplishes throughout the world with so little money - the main body functions on an annual budget smaller than that of the city of New York Fire Department. The host of UN agencies and specialised agencies reach out across the world affecting our everyday lives every time we mail a letter, take a plane or ship, hear international weather forecasts or use international communications. New UN programs are introduced as needs change in humanitarian and development programs.
Thanks to UN initiatives a higher number of boys and girls are enrolled in school than ever before in the history of that country; thanks to the UN World Health Organisation (WHO)millions of children are protected against preventable diseases such as measles; thanks to UN involvement millions of lives have been saved in countries of conflict: the UN reaches out to business through the Global Compact. Both the UN Peacekeeping Forces and the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have received Nobel Peace prizes. And the UN body of 192 country members continally reaches out to help humanity through its universal Declarations and the Millenium Development Goals, a set of eight measures intended to reduce poverty and spur growth by 2015.
Reforms are regularly introduced but sadly sometimes stymied as in the recent abject failure of nations to form a credible new human rights council, out of fear of too much scrutiny. Much more could be done, and less time wasted, if only the U.S.A. and all other member nations would pay their dues on time and in full.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Rosemary in The Netherlands writes:
Yes!
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Yes!
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Eric in New Mexico writes:
It has been said that finding consensus in the U.S. Congress is like "herding cats". If true, then it may be that in the UN's case it's like trying to herd the entire zoo.
When consensus is manifest in resolution among nations having varied nationalistic interest, often times the crisis at hand is approached with less that is required to solve it simply because consensus produces a "lowest common denominator" resolution, and in cases result in insuficiant timely response.
When it comes to humanity's common good, nationalism must go the way of the dinosaur, as an extinct mindset.
Or at the least, give way to common sense.
Living in the wild, wild West has taught me that "cowboy diplomacy" is essentially about mending fences and leading the herd to greener pastures.
Considering the fact that the US is providing 22% of the total UN budget, UN reform should indeed be in our interests, nationalisticly and otherwise.
Those that complain about the US being what's wrong with the UN, or bemoan the US even being host nation may wish to ask themselves whether nationalistic intrests would have turned this planet into something resembling Mars by now, without a means of group therapy for the dysfunctional family of nations.
The birth of the bomb and the birth of the UN being both born by war to end war, the US takes steps to make sure another one isn't dropped by anyone, including us.
Perhaps especially by us. "Atoms for Peace", the IAEA, the Marshall plan...American ideas that made common sense.
Looking at Germany and Japan today, I see possibilities for the Iraqi and Afghan people to achive their hopes for peace, prosperity, and a good life.
The EU would not exist today without D-day, Russians would be speaking German had lend lease not been US policy, and China probably fondly remembers Chennault's "Flying Tigers" in Burma.
American isolationism ended long ago. In an interdependant world of today, it is not this nation's place to be the "world's cop", nor would we seek to be such as it is self evident that peace and stability are all nation's task.
As well, it is historicly self evident that the US has enboldend internationalism in many fora, multilateralism in action, and consensus building in general.
When it comes to self defense as a nation, it's not the UN's place to deny that to any nation. However, it can influence pre and post conflict issues and debate, and encorage conflict resolution.
That's in fact why humanity probably owes its very existance to the UN. "Effective" may be an understatement.
Does the UN live up to its true potential? Better to ask, will mankind?
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
It has been said that finding consensus in the U.S. Congress is like "herding cats". If true, then it may be that in the UN's case it's like trying to herd the entire zoo.
When consensus is manifest in resolution among nations having varied nationalistic interest, often times the crisis at hand is approached with less that is required to solve it simply because consensus produces a "lowest common denominator" resolution, and in cases result in insuficiant timely response.
When it comes to humanity's common good, nationalism must go the way of the dinosaur, as an extinct mindset.
Or at the least, give way to common sense.
Living in the wild, wild West has taught me that "cowboy diplomacy" is essentially about mending fences and leading the herd to greener pastures.
Considering the fact that the US is providing 22% of the total UN budget, UN reform should indeed be in our interests, nationalisticly and otherwise.
Those that complain about the US being what's wrong with the UN, or bemoan the US even being host nation may wish to ask themselves whether nationalistic intrests would have turned this planet into something resembling Mars by now, without a means of group therapy for the dysfunctional family of nations.
The birth of the bomb and the birth of the UN being both born by war to end war, the US takes steps to make sure another one isn't dropped by anyone, including us.
Perhaps especially by us. "Atoms for Peace", the IAEA, the Marshall plan...American ideas that made common sense.
Looking at Germany and Japan today, I see possibilities for the Iraqi and Afghan people to achive their hopes for peace, prosperity, and a good life.
The EU would not exist today without D-day, Russians would be speaking German had lend lease not been US policy, and China probably fondly remembers Chennault's "Flying Tigers" in Burma.
American isolationism ended long ago. In an interdependant world of today, it is not this nation's place to be the "world's cop", nor would we seek to be such as it is self evident that peace and stability are all nation's task.
As well, it is historicly self evident that the US has enboldend internationalism in many fora, multilateralism in action, and consensus building in general.
When it comes to self defense as a nation, it's not the UN's place to deny that to any nation. However, it can influence pre and post conflict issues and debate, and encorage conflict resolution.
That's in fact why humanity probably owes its very existance to the UN. "Effective" may be an understatement.
Does the UN live up to its true potential? Better to ask, will mankind?
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Glen in Europe writes:
The United Nations is an excellent venue for exploring international conflicts and finding solutions. Some of the UN's achievements in health in developing counries are very important and impressive. In some recent cases, international military conflicts would have been worse without the UN's intervention. It needs to become less bureaucratic in order to be even more effective. the U.S. needs to pay its arrears and become an active and positive contributor.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
The United Nations is an excellent venue for exploring international conflicts and finding solutions. Some of the UN's achievements in health in developing counries are very important and impressive. In some recent cases, international military conflicts would have been worse without the UN's intervention. It needs to become less bureaucratic in order to be even more effective. the U.S. needs to pay its arrears and become an active and positive contributor.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Phil in Pennsylvania writes:
As the UN Mission seems to be to sow extreme deceit and destruction, then it has performed admirably.
The UN is nothing more than a Marxist front created by the communists and embraced by the socialists in FDR's and all continuing administrations. It's main purpose is to undermine the sovereignty of all nations and ensure that none of them can survive its ministrations.
"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries." -- Wnston Churchill
Close and expel the General Assembly, and ship the 'Security' Council to North Korea.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
As the UN Mission seems to be to sow extreme deceit and destruction, then it has performed admirably.
The UN is nothing more than a Marxist front created by the communists and embraced by the socialists in FDR's and all continuing administrations. It's main purpose is to undermine the sovereignty of all nations and ensure that none of them can survive its ministrations.
"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries." -- Wnston Churchill
Close and expel the General Assembly, and ship the 'Security' Council to North Korea.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Kirk in California writes:
In many ways the United Nations continues to effectively fulfill its mission. Its biggest problem in the way of fulfilling its mission more effectively is that the United States doesn't pay its full dues.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
In many ways the United Nations continues to effectively fulfill its mission. Its biggest problem in the way of fulfilling its mission more effectively is that the United States doesn't pay its full dues.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Jim in Indiana writes:
@ Mary Ellen in Kentucky -- Sorry Mary Ellen in Kentucky...The Union does not speak for everyone. The organization's uselessness is only surpassed by its corruption.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
@ Mary Ellen in Kentucky -- Sorry Mary Ellen in Kentucky...The Union does not speak for everyone. The organization's uselessness is only surpassed by its corruption.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Zharkov writes:
The founding mission of the UN was to provide a forum to resolve problems before the problems led to war, nothing more. There was no task to "maintain security". In that mission it has been a complete failure. The world is far less secure today as a result of U.S. failures to guard atomic weapons secrets, among other matters. "Mission creep" has set into the U.N. organization and it now attempts to style itself as a "world government", however ill-suited it is for that mission.
The UN is not a country with sovereignty, therefore, it cannot grant or withdraw diplomatic immunity (despite its attempt to do so. The UN representatives are not elected officials, it does not represent the will of the people, and therefore is unacceptable as a world government. The UN borrows the military of other nations but fails to properly control its troops. The UN borrows vaccines from other nations but fails to assure the quality and safety of the vaccine. The UN acts as a governing body without assuming responsibility or liability for its negligence.
The UN is not authorized by the U.S. Constitution as a branch of government and payments to it are nothing less than an illegal gift of taxpayer funds. The UN repeatedly overrules U.S. foreign policy in violation of U.S. laws, and the UN constitutes a nuisance and infringement on the President's constitutional power over U.S. foreign policy. The presence and voting of the UN on U.S. soil is an apparent violation of the Logan Act as the constitutional authority to make U.S. foreign policy is the exclusive domain of the President of the United States.
The U.S. no longer has the unconditional sovereign right to declare war, or to prosecute a war declared by Congress, in the face of strong UN opposition which includes the potential for arrest for conducting such wars by U.S. officials. Arrest warrants have been issued against former U.S. Secretaries of State and CIA employees, in Germany, France, Italy, and other nations resulting from undeclared wars.
The mission of the UN to remove sovereignty from the U.S. and foreign members, to hinder U.S. foreign policy, and to diminish the power of the presidency, is a success, obviously, as long as the respective governments and their public officials desire to submit themselves as subjects of the UN.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
The founding mission of the UN was to provide a forum to resolve problems before the problems led to war, nothing more. There was no task to "maintain security". In that mission it has been a complete failure. The world is far less secure today as a result of U.S. failures to guard atomic weapons secrets, among other matters. "Mission creep" has set into the U.N. organization and it now attempts to style itself as a "world government", however ill-suited it is for that mission.
The UN is not a country with sovereignty, therefore, it cannot grant or withdraw diplomatic immunity (despite its attempt to do so. The UN representatives are not elected officials, it does not represent the will of the people, and therefore is unacceptable as a world government. The UN borrows the military of other nations but fails to properly control its troops. The UN borrows vaccines from other nations but fails to assure the quality and safety of the vaccine. The UN acts as a governing body without assuming responsibility or liability for its negligence.
The UN is not authorized by the U.S. Constitution as a branch of government and payments to it are nothing less than an illegal gift of taxpayer funds. The UN repeatedly overrules U.S. foreign policy in violation of U.S. laws, and the UN constitutes a nuisance and infringement on the President's constitutional power over U.S. foreign policy. The presence and voting of the UN on U.S. soil is an apparent violation of the Logan Act as the constitutional authority to make U.S. foreign policy is the exclusive domain of the President of the United States.
The U.S. no longer has the unconditional sovereign right to declare war, or to prosecute a war declared by Congress, in the face of strong UN opposition which includes the potential for arrest for conducting such wars by U.S. officials. Arrest warrants have been issued against former U.S. Secretaries of State and CIA employees, in Germany, France, Italy, and other nations resulting from undeclared wars.
The mission of the UN to remove sovereignty from the U.S. and foreign members, to hinder U.S. foreign policy, and to diminish the power of the presidency, is a success, obviously, as long as the respective governments and their public officials desire to submit themselves as subjects of the UN.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Florence in Connecticut writes:
As a member of the UN Study Group to Vienna and Rome this past May, I learned how very important the UN is in solving World problems. Without it, I believe the individual countries are left to their own devices. In more cases than not, they are not able to do it and fall prey to dictators, drug lords, etc.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
As a member of the UN Study Group to Vienna and Rome this past May, I learned how very important the UN is in solving World problems. Without it, I believe the individual countries are left to their own devices. In more cases than not, they are not able to do it and fall prey to dictators, drug lords, etc.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Cornelia in Texas writes:
Yes, the United Nations continues to fulfill its mission, giving all countries large and small a voice to make this world a better place. It worries me very much that the United States seems to think it should "go it alone"--that it apparently knows better than the rest of the world. We need to hear from everyone on this planet and work together. The UN is the organization to do that, and needs all countries working together to make it the best organization it can be.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Yes, the United Nations continues to fulfill its mission, giving all countries large and small a voice to make this world a better place. It worries me very much that the United States seems to think it should "go it alone"--that it apparently knows better than the rest of the world. We need to hear from everyone on this planet and work together. The UN is the organization to do that, and needs all countries working together to make it the best organization it can be.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Opio in Sudan writes:
I sincerely thank the work of the united nation in bringing peace to he people of south Sudan. I acknowledge UN work on peacekeeping, conflict resolution, political negotiations and peace full settlement of problem.I accept that the UN system spent 60% of its time on prevention of conflicts.Thanks to better world campaign for mobilization of resources.
I addition reconstruction, reintegration, repatriation, health, diseases surveillance, maintenance ,development, climate change and the sharing the global burden of maintenance of peace and international security. I look forward to support reforms agenda of UN, HIV/AIDS, malaria, poverty eradication, strategies to eliminate global threat on terrorism.
Thank you,
I continue to support UN.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
I sincerely thank the work of the united nation in bringing peace to he people of south Sudan. I acknowledge UN work on peacekeeping, conflict resolution, political negotiations and peace full settlement of problem.I accept that the UN system spent 60% of its time on prevention of conflicts.Thanks to better world campaign for mobilization of resources.
I addition reconstruction, reintegration, repatriation, health, diseases surveillance, maintenance ,development, climate change and the sharing the global burden of maintenance of peace and international security. I look forward to support reforms agenda of UN, HIV/AIDS, malaria, poverty eradication, strategies to eliminate global threat on terrorism.
Thank you,
I continue to support UN.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Jack in California writes:
It could do better if the U.S. followed through with its commitments such as paying its dues on time!
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
It could do better if the U.S. followed through with its commitments such as paying its dues on time!
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Mercedes in California writes:
Yes, the UN is our only hope to bring together all countries for the benefit of mankind and all living species on Earth.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Yes, the UN is our only hope to bring together all countries for the benefit of mankind and all living species on Earth.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Susan in California writes:
The United Nations performs outstandingly considering the money and the number of staff they have working to bring about peacekeeping, upholding human rights, rule of law, treaties on women, the sea, etc. (all the many functions of the UN). There is no more important organization in the world than the United Nations for bringing together such disparate forms of government and problems for solving within their countries.
Each country, including the United States, has an obligation as a member of the General Assembly to pay its dues and to cooperate with the workings of this vital international organization.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
The United Nations performs outstandingly considering the money and the number of staff they have working to bring about peacekeeping, upholding human rights, rule of law, treaties on women, the sea, etc. (all the many functions of the UN). There is no more important organization in the world than the United Nations for bringing together such disparate forms of government and problems for solving within their countries.
Each country, including the United States, has an obligation as a member of the General Assembly to pay its dues and to cooperate with the workings of this vital international organization.
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Penny in Washington writes:
Yes, of course the UN fulfills its mission. It could do a better job if the U.S. of America would pays its dues and if we would listen when the other members want to wait and investigate before rushing off to war in Iraq. It would also work better if China and Russia were to allow more effective intervention done in Burma and Darfur. But as it stands, the UN is the best chance we have to avoid international conflicts!
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Yes, of course the UN fulfills its mission. It could do a better job if the U.S. of America would pays its dues and if we would listen when the other members want to wait and investigate before rushing off to war in Iraq. It would also work better if China and Russia were to allow more effective intervention done in Burma and Darfur. But as it stands, the UN is the best chance we have to avoid international conflicts!
Posted on Sun Oct 28, 2007
Janet in Illinois writes:
If the United Nations is not maintaining international security, it is because the United States refuses to work within the framework of the UN.
And while agencies of the UN: UNICEF, UNESCO, WHO, IAEA and many others accomplish much, they too have to deal with lack of cooperation from the U.S.
I am so relieved to see that many Americans seem aware of the role of the UN.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
If the United Nations is not maintaining international security, it is because the United States refuses to work within the framework of the UN.
And while agencies of the UN: UNICEF, UNESCO, WHO, IAEA and many others accomplish much, they too have to deal with lack of cooperation from the U.S.
I am so relieved to see that many Americans seem aware of the role of the UN.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Donna in Idaho writes:
I believe that the UN does a very effective job. Our experience has been mostly with UNICEF and we have seen thousands of children receive better health care as a result of the UN's work.
My husband volunteered for a month in the Rwandan refugee camps and said that the UN, by providing shelter and water was the only thing keeping these people alive.
The peace keeping efforts are also very important.
The UN definitely does very good work.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
I believe that the UN does a very effective job. Our experience has been mostly with UNICEF and we have seen thousands of children receive better health care as a result of the UN's work.
My husband volunteered for a month in the Rwandan refugee camps and said that the UN, by providing shelter and water was the only thing keeping these people alive.
The peace keeping efforts are also very important.
The UN definitely does very good work.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Gayle in Oregon writes:
The UN does many many useful things around the world. I hear every day about something it is involved with - actions about peace, children, efforts to resolve wars and differences among nations, to help people in dire situations whether because of wars, famines or other situations. I believe the US should be more supportive of the UN so that it will be even more effective.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
The UN does many many useful things around the world. I hear every day about something it is involved with - actions about peace, children, efforts to resolve wars and differences among nations, to help people in dire situations whether because of wars, famines or other situations. I believe the US should be more supportive of the UN so that it will be even more effective.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Paul in Oregon writes:
The United Nations has provided many life-saving programs around the world in health care and other programs.
I regret that my country has refused to accept the jurisdiction of the world court. We cannot continue to be " a law to ourselves " -- we must fully join the world community.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
The United Nations has provided many life-saving programs around the world in health care and other programs.
I regret that my country has refused to accept the jurisdiction of the world court. We cannot continue to be " a law to ourselves " -- we must fully join the world community.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Gordon in Illinois writes:
It is wonderful to see the U.S.A honor an institution it reveres as much as the UN. I see a bright future partnership for both entities as long as the UN continues to kowtow to the lies and manipulations of a benevolent and peace-loving Uncle Sam.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
It is wonderful to see the U.S.A honor an institution it reveres as much as the UN. I see a bright future partnership for both entities as long as the UN continues to kowtow to the lies and manipulations of a benevolent and peace-loving Uncle Sam.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Jean in North Carolina writes:
think the UN effectively fulfills it's very difficult mission from promoting development in under developed nations to combating terrorism, to clearing land mines, to promoting women's rights and much more. The UN deserves our continued support.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
think the UN effectively fulfills it's very difficult mission from promoting development in under developed nations to combating terrorism, to clearing land mines, to promoting women's rights and much more. The UN deserves our continued support.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Don in Ohio writes:
The UN is an institution that should be supported, not used!
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
The UN is an institution that should be supported, not used!
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
John in California writes:
We believe that the UN is most effective although struggling.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
We believe that the UN is most effective although struggling.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Dana in Oregon writes:
YES!!!! The UN fulfills its missions wonderfully!!!
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
YES!!!! The UN fulfills its missions wonderfully!!!
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
D writes:
The UN Charter. Let's go back in time and see just who co-authored the UN Charter.
*shock* *gasp* *horror*
Alger Hiss, Soviet spy and also the first UN Secretary General. State Department, he worked for y'all, didn't he? Those who followed read like a who's who - socialist Secretary General -- Trygve Lie (Norway), Dag Hammersjold (Sweden), U Thant (Burma), Kurt Waldheim (Austria), were also communist sympathizers.
Until 1995, fourteen of the last fifteen that held the UN's highest military post,
Under-Secretary-General for Political and Security Council Affairs were from the U.S.S.R.
The UN is nothing but a ponzi scheme.
The UN produces nothing. It only takes in.
Sink L.O.S.T. why give the UN 70% of the Earths surface.
U.S. out of UN.
UN out of U.S.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
The UN Charter. Let's go back in time and see just who co-authored the UN Charter.
*shock* *gasp* *horror*
Alger Hiss, Soviet spy and also the first UN Secretary General. State Department, he worked for y'all, didn't he? Those who followed read like a who's who - socialist Secretary General -- Trygve Lie (Norway), Dag Hammersjold (Sweden), U Thant (Burma), Kurt Waldheim (Austria), were also communist sympathizers.
Until 1995, fourteen of the last fifteen that held the UN's highest military post,
Under-Secretary-General for Political and Security Council Affairs were from the U.S.S.R.
The UN is nothing but a ponzi scheme.
The UN produces nothing. It only takes in.
Sink L.O.S.T. why give the UN 70% of the Earths surface.
U.S. out of UN.
UN out of U.S.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Nazim in United Arab Emirates writes:
The UN is a vital organization for providing some checks on the hot infernal politics of the present time. The United Nations has shown remarkable approach on various issues that could have blown out of proportions and would have created more problems. The UN is doing great job through its wings like UNDP, WHO, FAO, UNESCO, ILO, WTO and others who are bringing the world closer in terms of human resources, justice, alleviation of poverty, preventing war crimes,and now is trying to save the world from a nuclear fall out as some countries are becoming nuclear oriented and trying to take short cuts by many means. The role of U.N., has become more important under the present environment across the globe. The United States should and must support the UN, as it is not only a super power but is looked upon as a responsible nation that believes in peace and universal understanding. The UN has to live or it may be too late to lament the destruction of this planet we call Earth if the world goes wild and law of the jungle takes place. The UN must also be supported by the Member States according to the UN Charter and follow the policy of live and let live in peace and harmony.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
The UN is a vital organization for providing some checks on the hot infernal politics of the present time. The United Nations has shown remarkable approach on various issues that could have blown out of proportions and would have created more problems. The UN is doing great job through its wings like UNDP, WHO, FAO, UNESCO, ILO, WTO and others who are bringing the world closer in terms of human resources, justice, alleviation of poverty, preventing war crimes,and now is trying to save the world from a nuclear fall out as some countries are becoming nuclear oriented and trying to take short cuts by many means. The role of U.N., has become more important under the present environment across the globe. The United States should and must support the UN, as it is not only a super power but is looked upon as a responsible nation that believes in peace and universal understanding. The UN has to live or it may be too late to lament the destruction of this planet we call Earth if the world goes wild and law of the jungle takes place. The UN must also be supported by the Member States according to the UN Charter and follow the policy of live and let live in peace and harmony.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Mary in Kentucky writes:
The United Nations accomplishes much good through its various organs and programs.
To the extent that it is less effective than it could be is largely a function of various Member States, sometimes our own U.S.A., focusing only on national or moneyed interests and not the global common good.
We will never know how much more troubled our world would be without this amazing institution these 62 years!
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
The United Nations accomplishes much good through its various organs and programs.
To the extent that it is less effective than it could be is largely a function of various Member States, sometimes our own U.S.A., focusing only on national or moneyed interests and not the global common good.
We will never know how much more troubled our world would be without this amazing institution these 62 years!
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Donald in Pennsylvania writes:
Yes, the UN continues to effectively fulfill its mission.
It's mission, defined by the UN Charter,is to promote peace, human rights, justice, tolerance, security, and the economic ans social advancement of all peoples. These are American goals because the American people believe in them and because we are an interdependent world. Many UN programs bring economic advancement particularly in underdeveloped countries. WHO helps stop epidemics that do not stop at national borders. The UN feeds and shelters people in natural disasters, and enables the costs to be be shared by all of the world instead of being borne by a single nation.
Of course the UN can only do what its sovereign member nations decide that it should do and for which they provide the resources. Thus the UN is not always able to solve problems or can only partially solve them. The UN needs more help from all nations, including the U.S.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Yes, the UN continues to effectively fulfill its mission.
It's mission, defined by the UN Charter,is to promote peace, human rights, justice, tolerance, security, and the economic ans social advancement of all peoples. These are American goals because the American people believe in them and because we are an interdependent world. Many UN programs bring economic advancement particularly in underdeveloped countries. WHO helps stop epidemics that do not stop at national borders. The UN feeds and shelters people in natural disasters, and enables the costs to be be shared by all of the world instead of being borne by a single nation.
Of course the UN can only do what its sovereign member nations decide that it should do and for which they provide the resources. Thus the UN is not always able to solve problems or can only partially solve them. The UN needs more help from all nations, including the U.S.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Randall in Texas writes:
The UN as a relief organization does its job fairly well. The UN as a diplomatic organization does not do its job fairly well. The UN as a world security agency fails badly. Despite all of that there are non-profits that do a better relief job than the UN.
As it stands the UN is essentially dependent on the US to handle a majority of its issues as well as its funding and donations. I dare you to find one other country willing to let the UN stage its HQ on its soil.
Darfur is a prime example of what the UN is capable of without U.S. assistance. There is a whole list of country names that can follow that one easily. We've seen major corruption and mis-appropriation of what little funds they have for projects having nothing to do with world peace.
The UN needs a major overhaul. At the moment its just a convenient place for all of the world diplomats to meet face to face.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
The UN as a relief organization does its job fairly well. The UN as a diplomatic organization does not do its job fairly well. The UN as a world security agency fails badly. Despite all of that there are non-profits that do a better relief job than the UN.
As it stands the UN is essentially dependent on the US to handle a majority of its issues as well as its funding and donations. I dare you to find one other country willing to let the UN stage its HQ on its soil.
Darfur is a prime example of what the UN is capable of without U.S. assistance. There is a whole list of country names that can follow that one easily. We've seen major corruption and mis-appropriation of what little funds they have for projects having nothing to do with world peace.
The UN needs a major overhaul. At the moment its just a convenient place for all of the world diplomats to meet face to face.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Don in Louisiana writes:
Too bad we can't ask all the millions who have been slaughtered if they thought the un was doing a good job. The UN dithered as genocide and ethnic cleansing in Rwanda and Darfur were taking place. How about in Guatemala and Bosnia? Or say in Cambodia - remember the killing fields? Yeah, the un is just peachy at saving millions of lives.
Nobel Peace prize? Do you mean the same prize that Gore won on his discredited global warming hog wash?
Yasser Arafat? Mohamed ElBaradei? Jimmy Carter? Kofi Annan? Nelson Mandella? Desmond Tutu? Amnesty International?
Someone needs to tell the Nobel Peace Prize committee that when you lay down with dogs you get up with fleas. Their award is nothing more than a laughing stock now.
U.S. out of the UN.
UN out of the U.S.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Too bad we can't ask all the millions who have been slaughtered if they thought the un was doing a good job. The UN dithered as genocide and ethnic cleansing in Rwanda and Darfur were taking place. How about in Guatemala and Bosnia? Or say in Cambodia - remember the killing fields? Yeah, the un is just peachy at saving millions of lives.
Nobel Peace prize? Do you mean the same prize that Gore won on his discredited global warming hog wash?
Yasser Arafat? Mohamed ElBaradei? Jimmy Carter? Kofi Annan? Nelson Mandella? Desmond Tutu? Amnesty International?
Someone needs to tell the Nobel Peace Prize committee that when you lay down with dogs you get up with fleas. Their award is nothing more than a laughing stock now.
U.S. out of the UN.
UN out of the U.S.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Albert in Virginia writes:
YES, The UN effectively fulfills its mission. The UN is enormously important for both world peace and development and for the United States. The UN would be even more effective if it had the full support of the United States, so I urge the U.S. and the State Department to give the UN full support.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
YES, The UN effectively fulfills its mission. The UN is enormously important for both world peace and development and for the United States. The UN would be even more effective if it had the full support of the United States, so I urge the U.S. and the State Department to give the UN full support.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Raye in New York writes:
There is no doubt that the UN is effective. Just ask the millions who are alive today thanks to their relief efforts throughout the world.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
There is no doubt that the UN is effective. Just ask the millions who are alive today thanks to their relief efforts throughout the world.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Pamela in Wisconsin writes:
The UN has won the Nobel Peace prize again, large numbers of Afghan schoolchildren are in school, million os children protected from infectious diseases, largest number of peacekeepers ever deployed, and new technology enables faster disaster relief in humanitarian crises. Yes, the United Nations is effective. It could be more effective if the United States paid its dues and did whatever it could to ensure removal of obstacles in the making of Security Council decisions.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
The UN has won the Nobel Peace prize again, large numbers of Afghan schoolchildren are in school, million os children protected from infectious diseases, largest number of peacekeepers ever deployed, and new technology enables faster disaster relief in humanitarian crises. Yes, the United Nations is effective. It could be more effective if the United States paid its dues and did whatever it could to ensure removal of obstacles in the making of Security Council decisions.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Martha in Colorado writes:
UN Wins Nobel Peace Prize, Again. The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and Al Gore together won the Nobel Peace Prize for their work to educate the world on catastrophic climate change. This is the third time in the past seven years that a UN entity has been recognized with the Nobel Peace Prize.
Highest Number of Afghan Children Enrolled in School in Country's History
Aided by the UN's work in Afghanistan, more children are attending school than ever before in the country's history, especially girls. This is turning the tide for the educational future of an entire generation of young Afghans.
Largest Number of Peacekeepers Ever Deployed. In the past year, more than 110 countries sent troops to serve in 18 UN peacekeeping missions in places like Liberia, Sudan, Lebanon, and Haiti, contributing to the largest deployment of UN peacekeepers in history.
Millions of Children Protected Against Preventable Disease. The Measles Initiative, which includes the World Health Organization, the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), and the UN Foundation, has helped vaccinate over 372 million children, reducing measles deaths in Africa by 75% (compared to 1999). By partnering with campaigns like Nothing But Nets, they also distribute life saving mosquito nets that protect children from malaria. New Technology Enables Disaster Relief to Arrive Faster in Humanitarian Crises. In partnership with the UN's disaster relief organization (OCHA), the UN's Children Fund (UNICEF) and other UN agencies, the NGO Telecoms Sans Frontieres (TSF), also known as Telecoms Without Borders, deployed seven times this year to support emergency relief efforts in places like Darfur's refugee camps, and coastal areas of Peru devastated by the 8.1 magnitude earthquake this summer.
Only through continued support from all UN Member States will the United Nations continue to be able to carry out its invaluable work.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
UN Wins Nobel Peace Prize, Again. The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and Al Gore together won the Nobel Peace Prize for their work to educate the world on catastrophic climate change. This is the third time in the past seven years that a UN entity has been recognized with the Nobel Peace Prize.
Highest Number of Afghan Children Enrolled in School in Country's History
Aided by the UN's work in Afghanistan, more children are attending school than ever before in the country's history, especially girls. This is turning the tide for the educational future of an entire generation of young Afghans.
Largest Number of Peacekeepers Ever Deployed. In the past year, more than 110 countries sent troops to serve in 18 UN peacekeeping missions in places like Liberia, Sudan, Lebanon, and Haiti, contributing to the largest deployment of UN peacekeepers in history.
Millions of Children Protected Against Preventable Disease. The Measles Initiative, which includes the World Health Organization, the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), and the UN Foundation, has helped vaccinate over 372 million children, reducing measles deaths in Africa by 75% (compared to 1999). By partnering with campaigns like Nothing But Nets, they also distribute life saving mosquito nets that protect children from malaria. New Technology Enables Disaster Relief to Arrive Faster in Humanitarian Crises. In partnership with the UN's disaster relief organization (OCHA), the UN's Children Fund (UNICEF) and other UN agencies, the NGO Telecoms Sans Frontieres (TSF), also known as Telecoms Without Borders, deployed seven times this year to support emergency relief efforts in places like Darfur's refugee camps, and coastal areas of Peru devastated by the 8.1 magnitude earthquake this summer.
Only through continued support from all UN Member States will the United Nations continue to be able to carry out its invaluable work.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Martha in Colorado writes:
The United Nations does fulfill its mission to the extent it can. With a too small budget, no standing peace force available on fast notice, and nations striking out on there own to create war, the UN can not do the job it was intended to do.
Most people have no idea how small the UN budget is. Perhaps it would help if this information became well known.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
The United Nations does fulfill its mission to the extent it can. With a too small budget, no standing peace force available on fast notice, and nations striking out on there own to create war, the UN can not do the job it was intended to do.
Most people have no idea how small the UN budget is. Perhaps it would help if this information became well known.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Don in Louisiana writes:
Does the UN effectively fulfill its mission?
Let's see, where do I start?
I guess that would depend on just what your definition of fulfill is.
Is the UN a parasitic corrupt organization - yes --mission fulfilled.
Is the UN filled with anti-U.S. and Israel delegates - yes --mission fulfilled.
Has the UN prevented any wars - no --mission fulfilled.
Does the UN support terrorist states - yes --mission fulfilled.
Do UN peace keepers rape children - yes --mission fulfilled.
Is the UN involved in food for sex scandals - yes --mission fulfilled.
Did the UN steal billions in the Oil For Food program - yes --mission fulfilled.
Does the UN have terrorist states Iran, Syria and Libya on the Human Rights Council - yes --mission fulfilled.
Does the UN prevent genocide - no --mission fulfilled.
Like I said, it depends on what your definition of fulfilled is. I could go on and on but I'm sure you catch my drift.
U.S. out of the UN
UN out of the U.S.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Does the UN effectively fulfill its mission?
Let's see, where do I start?
I guess that would depend on just what your definition of fulfill is.
Is the UN a parasitic corrupt organization - yes --mission fulfilled.
Is the UN filled with anti-U.S. and Israel delegates - yes --mission fulfilled.
Has the UN prevented any wars - no --mission fulfilled.
Does the UN support terrorist states - yes --mission fulfilled.
Do UN peace keepers rape children - yes --mission fulfilled.
Is the UN involved in food for sex scandals - yes --mission fulfilled.
Did the UN steal billions in the Oil For Food program - yes --mission fulfilled.
Does the UN have terrorist states Iran, Syria and Libya on the Human Rights Council - yes --mission fulfilled.
Does the UN prevent genocide - no --mission fulfilled.
Like I said, it depends on what your definition of fulfilled is. I could go on and on but I'm sure you catch my drift.
U.S. out of the UN
UN out of the U.S.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Ruby in Kentucky writes:
The United Nations is our only means of working effectively together and solving problems by diplomatic rather than military means. It also enables nations to work together to address environmental, social, economic and humanitarian issues.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
The United Nations is our only means of working effectively together and solving problems by diplomatic rather than military means. It also enables nations to work together to address environmental, social, economic and humanitarian issues.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Linda in Florida writes:
Of course the UN could be more effective in the area of peacekeeping. The U.S., for one, should support its mission rather than obstructing it at every turn. But of course we need the UN in this time of interdependence. The various agencies are indeed effective.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Of course the UN could be more effective in the area of peacekeeping. The U.S., for one, should support its mission rather than obstructing it at every turn. But of course we need the UN in this time of interdependence. The various agencies are indeed effective.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Dave in Kentucky writes:
Yes, the UN fulfills its mission to the extent it can with its limited budget. It's peacekeeping role alone makes it a bargain for United States foreign policy.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Yes, the UN fulfills its mission to the extent it can with its limited budget. It's peacekeeping role alone makes it a bargain for United States foreign policy.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Oji in Nigeria writes:
Everything about the UN is OK. It's just that I need a job. I want to work with the UN. It has been my dream. Please, any one in charge should help me.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Everything about the UN is OK. It's just that I need a job. I want to work with the UN. It has been my dream. Please, any one in charge should help me.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Syed in Pakistan writes:
Yes it is fulfilling its job. Every now and then their is a gray area but on the whole I am satisfied with the efforts. I remember UN's effort during the October 8 2005 earthquake where I was working as a volunteer and it was UN which helped me going from Islamabad to Bagh AJK. God Bless you All
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Yes it is fulfilling its job. Every now and then their is a gray area but on the whole I am satisfied with the efforts. I remember UN's effort during the October 8 2005 earthquake where I was working as a volunteer and it was UN which helped me going from Islamabad to Bagh AJK. God Bless you All
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Lisa in Washington writes:
Dear Sirs and Madams:
I am soooo proud of our United Nations and the work they have done and continue to do in our complex and difficult world. I know there is room for improvement and that there is more need than has been addressed, but the work and commitment of the UN is essential to peace and to a United World with the end to poverty and war.
When I was a young girl my family spent two years in Micronesia as part of the VISTA program. There we celebrated UN day as the most important holiday of the year. My vision is that UN day will someday be just as important to the people of the US as it was and is to the people of Yap. Thank you.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Dear Sirs and Madams:
I am soooo proud of our United Nations and the work they have done and continue to do in our complex and difficult world. I know there is room for improvement and that there is more need than has been addressed, but the work and commitment of the UN is essential to peace and to a United World with the end to poverty and war.
When I was a young girl my family spent two years in Micronesia as part of the VISTA program. There we celebrated UN day as the most important holiday of the year. My vision is that UN day will someday be just as important to the people of the US as it was and is to the people of Yap. Thank you.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Karen in California writes:
An international entity formed to maintain security and help solve international problems in the economic, social, and humanitarian areas is a necessity. The UN deserves our continued support and commitment.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
An international entity formed to maintain security and help solve international problems in the economic, social, and humanitarian areas is a necessity. The UN deserves our continued support and commitment.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Teena in Kentucky writes:
Yes, the UN does its work and does a great job!
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Yes, the UN does its work and does a great job!
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Amit in Massachusetts writes:
Yes! There is always something that requires UN's attention. We are a better nation and planet because of UN!
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Yes! There is always something that requires UN's attention. We are a better nation and planet because of UN!
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Robert in California writes:
I feel the U N does fulfill its missions, although it would be even more effective if the U.S. gave it more support.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
I feel the U N does fulfill its missions, although it would be even more effective if the U.S. gave it more support.
Posted on Sat Oct 27, 2007
Claire in Kentucky writes:
I think that the United Nations is our best hope for a peaceful and just world. Some components of the United Nations work very effectively, e.g., UNICEF, UNESCO, and the FAO. Others are undemocratic and should be reconfigured with democracy in mind, e.g., the WTO and the Security Council.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
I think that the United Nations is our best hope for a peaceful and just world. Some components of the United Nations work very effectively, e.g., UNICEF, UNESCO, and the FAO. Others are undemocratic and should be reconfigured with democracy in mind, e.g., the WTO and the Security Council.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Richard in Wisconsin writes:
Yes; the UN does fulfill its' mission effectively, GIVEN it's minimal budget, the power politics of the "major powers" on the Security Council; the petty politics of too many minor powers in the General Assembly; the cavalier attitude toward the UN by the Bush Administration during the past seven years; the understrength and poorly equipped UN peacekeepers who put their lives on the line. Those "Papa Kilos" have a really tough job, trying to be policemen in a combat zone, facing heavily armed and well-supported opponents. . . .
If even half of these limitations were decreased or even eliminated, the UN could be even more effective in its work!!! It's long past time for America's government (regardless of party affiliation) to provide strong leadership and support for the UN.
One final thought: If the world did not have the United Nations today, we would have to create something similar to replace it anyway. So, let's get to work and begin the long, hard, tedious and tough journey to build a bigger and better United Nations that can and will be much more effective. . . for the sake of my grandchildren and great grandchildren and all the other grandchildren and great grandchildren to be all over the world.
The concept behind the creation of the United Nations is critical to keep moving mankind toward some kind of world governance system eventually. Otherwise, we are condemning future generations to more of the "same old, same old" ways and means of settling their disputes and conflicts!!
This is absurd and wholly unacceptable to normal, rational and civilized people anywhere; regardless of their age, gender, religious beliefs, ethnic group, etc.
As a citizen (and taxpayer!!!) of these United States, I expect and demand that my government do much, much more to support and strengthen the UN.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Yes; the UN does fulfill its' mission effectively, GIVEN it's minimal budget, the power politics of the "major powers" on the Security Council; the petty politics of too many minor powers in the General Assembly; the cavalier attitude toward the UN by the Bush Administration during the past seven years; the understrength and poorly equipped UN peacekeepers who put their lives on the line. Those "Papa Kilos" have a really tough job, trying to be policemen in a combat zone, facing heavily armed and well-supported opponents. . . .
If even half of these limitations were decreased or even eliminated, the UN could be even more effective in its work!!! It's long past time for America's government (regardless of party affiliation) to provide strong leadership and support for the UN.
One final thought: If the world did not have the United Nations today, we would have to create something similar to replace it anyway. So, let's get to work and begin the long, hard, tedious and tough journey to build a bigger and better United Nations that can and will be much more effective. . . for the sake of my grandchildren and great grandchildren and all the other grandchildren and great grandchildren to be all over the world.
The concept behind the creation of the United Nations is critical to keep moving mankind toward some kind of world governance system eventually. Otherwise, we are condemning future generations to more of the "same old, same old" ways and means of settling their disputes and conflicts!!
This is absurd and wholly unacceptable to normal, rational and civilized people anywhere; regardless of their age, gender, religious beliefs, ethnic group, etc.
As a citizen (and taxpayer!!!) of these United States, I expect and demand that my government do much, much more to support and strengthen the UN.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
David in Japan writes:
The UN does some good work, but it is either incapable or unwilling to perform many of the roles that its supporters praise it for. UNIFIL sits idly while Hezbollah smuggles thousands of rockets from Syria. UN peacekeepers in Sudan, Somalia, Rwanda, and countless other hot spots are ordered to stand on the side and watch as innocents are murdered in front of them. The idea that peace can be kept by the mere presence of blue helmets is naive. If it is going to be effective, it needs to stop pretending to be neutral and become a force squarely on the side of good. The UN ought to enforce human rights, not give abusers a forum to spread their filth, if it is going to be relevant. Otherwise it needs to shut up about stupid "resolutions" and "mandates" and let the U.S. Marines do the job.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
The UN does some good work, but it is either incapable or unwilling to perform many of the roles that its supporters praise it for. UNIFIL sits idly while Hezbollah smuggles thousands of rockets from Syria. UN peacekeepers in Sudan, Somalia, Rwanda, and countless other hot spots are ordered to stand on the side and watch as innocents are murdered in front of them. The idea that peace can be kept by the mere presence of blue helmets is naive. If it is going to be effective, it needs to stop pretending to be neutral and become a force squarely on the side of good. The UN ought to enforce human rights, not give abusers a forum to spread their filth, if it is going to be relevant. Otherwise it needs to shut up about stupid "resolutions" and "mandates" and let the U.S. Marines do the job.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Kathleen in New York writes:
I feel that the UN is more important today than ever and I would like to see it take a more active and official role in peacekeeping, debt relief, programs to end extreme poverty and fight disease in underdeveloped countries, fair trade, negotiating between groups and countries that are at odds, etc.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
I feel that the UN is more important today than ever and I would like to see it take a more active and official role in peacekeeping, debt relief, programs to end extreme poverty and fight disease in underdeveloped countries, fair trade, negotiating between groups and countries that are at odds, etc.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Gail in California writes:
The UN represents a unique assembly of nations whose goals are to improve the well-being of the world's citizens, protect the world's environment, and to maintain the peace.
In a multitude of ways, through organizations such as UNESCO, the Population Fund, and the UN peacekeepers the UN strives to meet these challenging goals.
Given the diversity of cultures, languages, and objectives among the family of UN members, there are constant challenges within this world body. However, in spite of these challenges, the UN provides a unique structure for diffusing tensions in the world.
Is it perfect? No! Is the Bush Administration perfect? Hardly. The United States is in a position to play a constructive role in improving the UN. However, it appears too often to want to manipulate the UN for its own selfish purposes.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
The UN represents a unique assembly of nations whose goals are to improve the well-being of the world's citizens, protect the world's environment, and to maintain the peace.
In a multitude of ways, through organizations such as UNESCO, the Population Fund, and the UN peacekeepers the UN strives to meet these challenging goals.
Given the diversity of cultures, languages, and objectives among the family of UN members, there are constant challenges within this world body. However, in spite of these challenges, the UN provides a unique structure for diffusing tensions in the world.
Is it perfect? No! Is the Bush Administration perfect? Hardly. The United States is in a position to play a constructive role in improving the UN. However, it appears too often to want to manipulate the UN for its own selfish purposes.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Jared in California writes:
The UN fulfills its mission.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
The UN fulfills its mission.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Margaret in Michigan writes:
Yes, the UN fulfills its mission. It's the only forum the world has where the 192 members can meet and address world issues.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Yes, the UN fulfills its mission. It's the only forum the world has where the 192 members can meet and address world issues.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Richard in Washington writes:
Yes! The UN is relevant and more necessary that ever, and it will fulfill its mission better if the U.S. will pay full dues and support it better!
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Yes! The UN is relevant and more necessary that ever, and it will fulfill its mission better if the U.S. will pay full dues and support it better!
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
[FILTERED: Vulgarity] The UN is an anti-Jewish organization whose main mission is to fulfill the obligation of murdering all jews in the world. Although the UN was begun to prevent the complete destruction of the world in the madness of jew killing, it has become the main instrument in promoting jew hate around the world. The leaders belonging to the UN are there to suck the teet of the organization and the wealth created by productive members of a the only free capitalist country in the world, the United States. These third world dictators and their slave states cannot be productive so they wish to steal the wealth of others.
Once good people wake up to this madness, that is when the insanity of the UN will finally be over.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Once good people wake up to this madness, that is when the insanity of the UN will finally be over.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Paula in Washington writes:
Absolutely! They do, promote, or assist in starting businesses to sell products that sustain villages. They do or support others in providing food, clothing, supplies, medical attention, and protection. They provide hope to millions that representatives of 192 nations are concerned about individuals. There are many agencies under the UN umbrella working diligently to make a difference in the lives of many, many people around the world.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Absolutely! They do, promote, or assist in starting businesses to sell products that sustain villages. They do or support others in providing food, clothing, supplies, medical attention, and protection. They provide hope to millions that representatives of 192 nations are concerned about individuals. There are many agencies under the UN umbrella working diligently to make a difference in the lives of many, many people around the world.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Romona in Alabama writes:
I believe the mission is a global challenge and the method of eliminating the diverse issues is being dealth with. Continuation of defeating these challenges will make the global world a better place.Yes the UN is on the right path and is fullfilling it's mission effectively.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
I believe the mission is a global challenge and the method of eliminating the diverse issues is being dealth with. Continuation of defeating these challenges will make the global world a better place.Yes the UN is on the right path and is fullfilling it's mission effectively.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Barbara in California writes:
I cannot imagine being without the United Nations. Please keep up the good work and continue to fight for peace, against global warming, etc., and keep our world's countries talking to one another.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
I cannot imagine being without the United Nations. Please keep up the good work and continue to fight for peace, against global warming, etc., and keep our world's countries talking to one another.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Harjaap in U.S. writes:
I never understood how the world revolved. The Scientists say that the globe revolves due to an axis, but then what axis aids all of mankind in achieving sustainable progress. As I have continued to view history, nothing can compare to the grand entrance of the United Nations. Long ago we had many clans fight among each other to create nations that continued to hunger for more power. They wanted to see progress, but progress was made by a few nations not by the world. The United Nation allows for progress to be made by its philosophy of promoting negotiations through its forum which helps to create equality and resolve disputes. I have read many works of critics exclaiming that the United Nations has no power and therefore is another bureaucratic wall that one nation must deal with. I can understand those points, but I wish to remind them and the world that the United Nations is a new theory just like the many other theories, such as, capitalism, democracy, etc, that have become a reality. The United Nations is like a seed that needs time to blossom into a remarkable flower. Many people would disagree with my analogy, stating that the United Nations has been in existence for more then 60 years. I can comprehend this point, but we must not also forget that many members began to join over that period of time, so as anyone can imagine the expansion of membership evolved the theory and created new ideas. I hope that the world shall begin to grasp that the United Nations is not an organization wanting to seize power of all nations, but is an organization that is transforming into an international forum who desire peace and progress through cooperation within the infrastructure the United Nations provides. I have faith in the United Nations and I sincerely hope that despite my disappointments, the United Nations as a theory shall become reality and aid in the struggle of creating an environment of nations capable of dealing with any issue brought before the international community. I hope one day instead of continuing to see the endless fog that encompasses our world, that one day we shall be able to navigate through that fog and by navigating it, there shall be no more fog.
I apologize for any grammar errors or any incorrect analogies I have made! I hope my point is taken from not a literal perspective, but from a perspective of creating a new theory that is trying to be shaped into reality.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
I never understood how the world revolved. The Scientists say that the globe revolves due to an axis, but then what axis aids all of mankind in achieving sustainable progress. As I have continued to view history, nothing can compare to the grand entrance of the United Nations. Long ago we had many clans fight among each other to create nations that continued to hunger for more power. They wanted to see progress, but progress was made by a few nations not by the world. The United Nation allows for progress to be made by its philosophy of promoting negotiations through its forum which helps to create equality and resolve disputes. I have read many works of critics exclaiming that the United Nations has no power and therefore is another bureaucratic wall that one nation must deal with. I can understand those points, but I wish to remind them and the world that the United Nations is a new theory just like the many other theories, such as, capitalism, democracy, etc, that have become a reality. The United Nations is like a seed that needs time to blossom into a remarkable flower. Many people would disagree with my analogy, stating that the United Nations has been in existence for more then 60 years. I can comprehend this point, but we must not also forget that many members began to join over that period of time, so as anyone can imagine the expansion of membership evolved the theory and created new ideas. I hope that the world shall begin to grasp that the United Nations is not an organization wanting to seize power of all nations, but is an organization that is transforming into an international forum who desire peace and progress through cooperation within the infrastructure the United Nations provides. I have faith in the United Nations and I sincerely hope that despite my disappointments, the United Nations as a theory shall become reality and aid in the struggle of creating an environment of nations capable of dealing with any issue brought before the international community. I hope one day instead of continuing to see the endless fog that encompasses our world, that one day we shall be able to navigate through that fog and by navigating it, there shall be no more fog.
I apologize for any grammar errors or any incorrect analogies I have made! I hope my point is taken from not a literal perspective, but from a perspective of creating a new theory that is trying to be shaped into reality.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
William in Arizona writes:
If we had more countries like the Scandinavian ones the UN could be even more effective. The United States is holding it back from doing its best because the politicians do not support it.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
If we had more countries like the Scandinavian ones the UN could be even more effective. The United States is holding it back from doing its best because the politicians do not support it.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Paul in California writes:
Our current administration has underplayed the position of the United Nations, but, it is a viable and effective source for diplomacy and peace efforts throughout the world and we need to recognize it as such.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Our current administration has underplayed the position of the United Nations, but, it is a viable and effective source for diplomacy and peace efforts throughout the world and we need to recognize it as such.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Elizabeth in Washington, DC writes:
Yes!
The UN provides a forum for nations to come together and collaborate on global problems like terrorism and climate change. Its specialized agencies fill pressing humanitarian needs and try to help governments respond better to the needs of their citizens.
I hope our leaders can find a way to more consistently explain the value of the United Nations to their constituents.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Yes!
The UN provides a forum for nations to come together and collaborate on global problems like terrorism and climate change. Its specialized agencies fill pressing humanitarian needs and try to help governments respond better to the needs of their citizens.
I hope our leaders can find a way to more consistently explain the value of the United Nations to their constituents.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Linda in Arizona writes:
The UN does excellent work, given the difficult circumstances of too little funding (and nations like US failing to pay their allotment) and too much horror going on in the world (much of it caused by an aggressive, expansive America).
Large nations need to do more to assist in de-weaponizing the world.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
The UN does excellent work, given the difficult circumstances of too little funding (and nations like US failing to pay their allotment) and too much horror going on in the world (much of it caused by an aggressive, expansive America).
Large nations need to do more to assist in de-weaponizing the world.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Gloria writes:
The United Nations is as effective as it can possibly be within the constraints of its small budget. No other Entity on our planet is considering right relationships for all of humanity and ways to solve all problems. We can make it better and better with time and dedication on the part of all nations involved. Those who question relevance are clearly uninformed of all it has accomplished throughout its existence, and they certainly have not come forward with a better idea.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
The United Nations is as effective as it can possibly be within the constraints of its small budget. No other Entity on our planet is considering right relationships for all of humanity and ways to solve all problems. We can make it better and better with time and dedication on the part of all nations involved. Those who question relevance are clearly uninformed of all it has accomplished throughout its existence, and they certainly have not come forward with a better idea.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Ruth in Maryland writes:
The UN provides the only forum where all countries can come together to discuss and deliberate international issues. In addition, the UN performs invaluable peacekeeping and peacebuilding functions and is working hark to reduce poverty and to improve health and educational services around the world. The UN is are only hope. We need to strengthen it and provide it with adequate financial resources.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
The UN provides the only forum where all countries can come together to discuss and deliberate international issues. In addition, the UN performs invaluable peacekeeping and peacebuilding functions and is working hark to reduce poverty and to improve health and educational services around the world. The UN is are only hope. We need to strengthen it and provide it with adequate financial resources.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Ruth in Missouri writes:
Yes, I think the United Nations continues to effectively fulfill its mission.
Thanks for enumerating on five of them. It's so easy to just not see when something good is happening around you, we need to be reminded, and to remind others that the UN is working.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Yes, I think the United Nations continues to effectively fulfill its mission.
Thanks for enumerating on five of them. It's so easy to just not see when something good is happening around you, we need to be reminded, and to remind others that the UN is working.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Judith in Pennsylvania writes:
Yes. Some recent UN achievements are worth highlighting:
* UN Wins Nobel Peace Prize, Again
The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and Al Gore together won the Nobel Peace Prize for their work to educate the world on catastrophic climate change. This is the third time in the past seven years that a UN entity has been recognized with the Nobel Peace Prize.
* Highest Number of Afghan Children Enrolled in School in Country's History
Aided by the UN's work in Afghanistan, more children are attending school than ever before in the country's history, most especially girls. This is turning the tide for the educational future of an entire generation of young Afghans.
* Largest Number of Peacekeepers Ever Deployed
In the past year, more than 110 countries sent troops to serve in 18 UN peacekeeping missions in places like Liberia, Sudan, Lebanon, and Haiti, contributing to the largest deployment of UN peacekeepers in history.
* Millions of Children Protected Against Preventable Disease
The Measles Initiative, which includes the World Health Organization, the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), and the UN Foundation, has helped vaccinate over 372 million children -- reducing measles deaths in Africa by 75% (compared to 1999). By partnering with campaigns like Nothing But Nets, they also distribute life saving mosquito nets that protect children from malaria.
* New Technology Enables Disaster Relief to Arrive Faster in Humanitarian Crises
In partnership with the UN's disaster relief organization (OCHA), the UN's Children Fund (UNICEF) and other UN agencies, the NGO Telecoms Sans Frontieres (TSF), also known as Telecoms Without Borders, deployed seven times this year to support emergency relief efforts in places like Darfur's refugee camps, and coastal areas of Peru devastated by the 8.1 magnitude earthquake this summer.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Yes. Some recent UN achievements are worth highlighting:
* UN Wins Nobel Peace Prize, Again
The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and Al Gore together won the Nobel Peace Prize for their work to educate the world on catastrophic climate change. This is the third time in the past seven years that a UN entity has been recognized with the Nobel Peace Prize.
* Highest Number of Afghan Children Enrolled in School in Country's History
Aided by the UN's work in Afghanistan, more children are attending school than ever before in the country's history, most especially girls. This is turning the tide for the educational future of an entire generation of young Afghans.
* Largest Number of Peacekeepers Ever Deployed
In the past year, more than 110 countries sent troops to serve in 18 UN peacekeeping missions in places like Liberia, Sudan, Lebanon, and Haiti, contributing to the largest deployment of UN peacekeepers in history.
* Millions of Children Protected Against Preventable Disease
The Measles Initiative, which includes the World Health Organization, the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), and the UN Foundation, has helped vaccinate over 372 million children -- reducing measles deaths in Africa by 75% (compared to 1999). By partnering with campaigns like Nothing But Nets, they also distribute life saving mosquito nets that protect children from malaria.
* New Technology Enables Disaster Relief to Arrive Faster in Humanitarian Crises
In partnership with the UN's disaster relief organization (OCHA), the UN's Children Fund (UNICEF) and other UN agencies, the NGO Telecoms Sans Frontieres (TSF), also known as Telecoms Without Borders, deployed seven times this year to support emergency relief efforts in places like Darfur's refugee camps, and coastal areas of Peru devastated by the 8.1 magnitude earthquake this summer.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
William in Texas writes:
The question assumes that the United Nations has ever effectively fulfilled its mission. The answer is absolutely no - not since the beginning of the Korean War. It is a thoroughly corrupt, anti-Semitic, anti-American gang of thugs.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
The question assumes that the United Nations has ever effectively fulfilled its mission. The answer is absolutely no - not since the beginning of the Korean War. It is a thoroughly corrupt, anti-Semitic, anti-American gang of thugs.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Roger in Florida writes:
Without the UN the world would be in much worse condition. We now live in an "intermestic" world and all the links need thoughtful control for the4 benefit of all. Our future rests in making the UN the most effective in all spheres of action as we can -working with others naturally. The is NO place for unilateralism and bullying!. If we want to be a model for the world, we too must behave properly!!
Thank you - Retired U.S. Foreign Service Officer, with 38 years of service -
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Without the UN the world would be in much worse condition. We now live in an "intermestic" world and all the links need thoughtful control for the4 benefit of all. Our future rests in making the UN the most effective in all spheres of action as we can -working with others naturally. The is NO place for unilateralism and bullying!. If we want to be a model for the world, we too must behave properly!!
Thank you - Retired U.S. Foreign Service Officer, with 38 years of service -
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
William in Kentucky writes:
The UN is absolutely essential to the US, in particular, and the world in general. UN peacekeeping is both cheaper and more effective than similar US military/peacekeeping operations. Also, the UN is spearheading major initiatives to eliminate polio, reverse climate change, assist American businesses to export and American farmers to sell their produce, move aircraft, ships, mail and weather information worldwide, etc. Ironically, the U.S. earns more money off of the UN than it invests in the UN, not to mention that the UN helps carry out a wide range of U.S. foreign policies, e.g. promote democracy and encourage private market approaches. The US should increase its contributions by at least 10% to every UN agency and the Secretariat. We currently do not pay our fair share based upon our international wealth.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
The UN is absolutely essential to the US, in particular, and the world in general. UN peacekeeping is both cheaper and more effective than similar US military/peacekeeping operations. Also, the UN is spearheading major initiatives to eliminate polio, reverse climate change, assist American businesses to export and American farmers to sell their produce, move aircraft, ships, mail and weather information worldwide, etc. Ironically, the U.S. earns more money off of the UN than it invests in the UN, not to mention that the UN helps carry out a wide range of U.S. foreign policies, e.g. promote democracy and encourage private market approaches. The US should increase its contributions by at least 10% to every UN agency and the Secretariat. We currently do not pay our fair share based upon our international wealth.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Kashif in America writes:
@ Eric in New Mexico -- Response to Eric in N.M., ha ha it seems like our little back and forth is going to end up becoming a debate but nonetheless it is interesting. As to your comments on whether the Palestinians achieved anything by committing suicide bombings on Israel and Ahmedinejad calling dying a martyr one of the highest or noblest of expressions a human can commit. Well we all know that committing acts like these against other people is not right yet even though it is not right a person eventually must wonder why a person is willing to take away his life which is probably the most important thing a person can offer a god or supernatural force or anything else. Taking other peoples lives is repugnant but obviously that can't be used as a reason for discarding a person's motivation for doing so. If someone was threatening to take your home away from you, you would probably defend your property with your life or call the police. Now if you take this situation into an international context where the U.N. or the forces behind the U.N. are the "police" and these police don't take any action against a country like Israel for example and instead of condemning the country they offer it money and defend this country with all it's strength even when it is obvious that what they are doing is not right, how would you feel? Would you march around to protest against a stranger taking away your home or would you take physical action if you felt the "police" aimed at protecting you were negligent to say the least in this scenario. A person's life is the best thing, in my opinion, a person can offer anybody or thing, yet in the West in general, such a concept might be hard to digest since the "police" are everywhere and our or your security is already being taken care of for you.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
@ Eric in New Mexico -- Response to Eric in N.M., ha ha it seems like our little back and forth is going to end up becoming a debate but nonetheless it is interesting. As to your comments on whether the Palestinians achieved anything by committing suicide bombings on Israel and Ahmedinejad calling dying a martyr one of the highest or noblest of expressions a human can commit. Well we all know that committing acts like these against other people is not right yet even though it is not right a person eventually must wonder why a person is willing to take away his life which is probably the most important thing a person can offer a god or supernatural force or anything else. Taking other peoples lives is repugnant but obviously that can't be used as a reason for discarding a person's motivation for doing so. If someone was threatening to take your home away from you, you would probably defend your property with your life or call the police. Now if you take this situation into an international context where the U.N. or the forces behind the U.N. are the "police" and these police don't take any action against a country like Israel for example and instead of condemning the country they offer it money and defend this country with all it's strength even when it is obvious that what they are doing is not right, how would you feel? Would you march around to protest against a stranger taking away your home or would you take physical action if you felt the "police" aimed at protecting you were negligent to say the least in this scenario. A person's life is the best thing, in my opinion, a person can offer anybody or thing, yet in the West in general, such a concept might be hard to digest since the "police" are everywhere and our or your security is already being taken care of for you.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Isabel in Connecticut writes:
The most visible aspects of the United Nations remain in disaster relief, to help solving humanitarian problems, environment and to keep peace among nations. As a matter of fact, peacekeeping missions have certain objectives such as implementing peace agreements, monitoring cease-fires, and creating buffer zones (before engaging in war) The United Nations is the only Institution that brings leaders of all countries together -the "good guys" and the "bad guys"- in order to dialogue and reach peaceful solutions rather than to engage in war! We need it!
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
The most visible aspects of the United Nations remain in disaster relief, to help solving humanitarian problems, environment and to keep peace among nations. As a matter of fact, peacekeeping missions have certain objectives such as implementing peace agreements, monitoring cease-fires, and creating buffer zones (before engaging in war) The United Nations is the only Institution that brings leaders of all countries together -the "good guys" and the "bad guys"- in order to dialogue and reach peaceful solutions rather than to engage in war! We need it!
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Mary Ellen in Kentucky writes:
The UN serves the world as the only organization that can speak for everyone. It coordinates many great programs. The weak nations get a chance to speak the strong ones.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
The UN serves the world as the only organization that can speak for everyone. It coordinates many great programs. The weak nations get a chance to speak the strong ones.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Jack in Florida writes:
The UN is horribly corrupt and a hotbed of nepotism as the oil for food program and Kofi Annan's own family's involvement shows. As long as the UN gives an equal voice to the regimes that commit the worst human rights abuses and commit the worst atrocities, how could it ever challenge them? About the only good the UN does is through the WHO, not much to show for its overall budget.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
The UN is horribly corrupt and a hotbed of nepotism as the oil for food program and Kofi Annan's own family's involvement shows. As long as the UN gives an equal voice to the regimes that commit the worst human rights abuses and commit the worst atrocities, how could it ever challenge them? About the only good the UN does is through the WHO, not much to show for its overall budget.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Louise in Georgia writes:
I believe the United Nations is crucial to keeping nations from going to war and helping to keep people healthy.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
I believe the United Nations is crucial to keeping nations from going to war and helping to keep people healthy.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Dirk in Illinois writes:
Yes the UN fulfills its mission. There is no other world body equiped to create and maintain an open dialog amongst countries and peoples. Despite all its faults, the UN is a valuable and virtually exclusive avenue for world understanding and peace. The U.S.A. should begin to utilize it better to promote peace.
Thank you for listening.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Yes the UN fulfills its mission. There is no other world body equiped to create and maintain an open dialog amongst countries and peoples. Despite all its faults, the UN is a valuable and virtually exclusive avenue for world understanding and peace. The U.S.A. should begin to utilize it better to promote peace.
Thank you for listening.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Benjamin in South Carolina writes:
Not even close. But, as the maxim goes, if we didn't have the UN we would have to invent it. Because the one thing it does do is provide an "orderly" forum for leaders to publicly exchange information. Even if the "purposes and principles" outlined in the charter are thrown out the window and the UNSC is an almost worthless body the UN does have an important role to play.
Sadly it is a dated institution too sluggish and bloated to invoke real change and reform.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Not even close. But, as the maxim goes, if we didn't have the UN we would have to invent it. Because the one thing it does do is provide an "orderly" forum for leaders to publicly exchange information. Even if the "purposes and principles" outlined in the charter are thrown out the window and the UNSC is an almost worthless body the UN does have an important role to play.
Sadly it is a dated institution too sluggish and bloated to invoke real change and reform.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Julie in Florida writes:
The United Nations is one of the most important multi-national organizations in the world. The UN fulfills its mission on a daily basis and does the best job it possibly can do while faced with the conflicting values of its members, contentious issues, and often, lack of respect. I am delighted to read the intelligent and well informed opinions of those who have posted before me, and I hope that this newest Nobel Prize win will help garner additional support for the important work in which the UN engages on a daily basis.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
The United Nations is one of the most important multi-national organizations in the world. The UN fulfills its mission on a daily basis and does the best job it possibly can do while faced with the conflicting values of its members, contentious issues, and often, lack of respect. I am delighted to read the intelligent and well informed opinions of those who have posted before me, and I hope that this newest Nobel Prize win will help garner additional support for the important work in which the UN engages on a daily basis.
Posted on Fri Oct 26, 2007
Page 1 of 6 pages 1 2 3 Next Last »