September 11 Web Archive Collection This is an archived Web site from the Library of Congress. | ||||||||||||
Back to previous page |
http://www.adventlu.org/pastor_dick.htm Archived: Dec 07, 2001 at 12:52:07 |
|||||||||||
Note: External links, forms and search boxes may not function within this collection |
|
Sisters and brothers,
In light of the events on September 11, I offer this article by Dr. Gerald May
of the Shalem Institute. Many words have been spoken, but I have found his to be
very helpful in seeking to discern God’s will and desire in our response. I
welcome any discussions and conversations.
Shalom!
Pr. Dick
The Vengeance Reflex
Gerald May
Shalem Institute
Twenty years ago I wrote in Will and Spirit that vengeance is the paradigm of
human evil. My reasoning was that other forms of destructive willfulness can be
traced to some motive of self-preservation or defense, but vengeance seemed to
serve no such purpose. Revenge certainly does not prevent recurrence of injury;
it only increases violence. Nor could I find any other way, no matter how
depraved, in which revenge might be seen as self-serving. It exists, I
concluded, for no other reason than to get even.
Yet revenge is an almost universal human reaction. Its role is obvious in all
levels of human conflict, from ugly divorces through feuds within and between
families, to the great ethnic atrocities that have so scarred our world. I had
seen it first-hand in Vietnam and in Bosnia, and I had to admit I'd felt its
ugly movement within myself in my reactions to affronts by others.
The dynamics are obvious. One person injures another, who in turn tries to get
even, and the conflict escalates. The destruction can become extreme and
complex, but the vengeance that drives it is an utterly simple reflex. From the
time we first develop self-identity as little children, our capacity for revenge
is in place. It is horrifyingly natural.
Then I learned about some psychological studies of children from Bosnia and from
American inner cities who had been terribly traumatized by violence. The
findings haunt me to this day. In short, they showed that the children who
functioned the best, those who were least paralyzed by depression, were the ones
who had adopted a mentality of revenge.
As much as I hated to face that observation, it began to show me that vengeance
does indeed have a function. It is a way of avoiding the reality of one’s own
injury. When one has been so terribly wronged that the depths of devastation are
too much to bear, vengeance stands ready to occupy one’s mind and heart,
consuming attention with rage. When one has been beaten so low as to feel
utterly degraded, vengeance offers the energy to strike out in the hope of
regaining a sense of power and control.
In the absence of revenge, we are left with the bare pain of our loss, the sheer
awful fact of it. Without revenge, we must try to bear what may seem unbearable:
bottomless grief and despair. And if we do not retaliate, we are left with
self-images that seem ruined. We are weak, humiliated, degraded victims.
Can this really be what God asks of us? Does turning the other cheek mean we
must fully experience our own devastation and humiliation? As terrible as it may
seem, I think it is true. I think God wants us to bear the truth of every
situation, to be immersed in the reality of our woundedness to the full extent
of our being. Only in this way can we discover and discern how we are called to
respond. If instead we let revenge take us away from our pain and into
retaliation, we act on reflex alone. There is no space for Wisdom to light a
path towards real justice and lasting peace. Getting even is all that counts.
If we are to respond effectively to cruelty, I think we must go without
anesthesia as much as we can. We need to feel our pain and grief and
humiliation—and our rage—before taking action. As unbearable as it may seem,
there is immense possibility in that precious time between the shock of injury
and the reflex of retaliation. Wisdom can come in that moment, guiding an
accurate response to what really is. Compassion may rise then too, and even a
realization of communion. That moment is precious, but it is also very delicate.
To even glimpse it, we cannot give in to the vengeance reflex. I believe that at
the very time we feel most wounded, we are called to remain vulnerable.
The word vulnerable means "able to be wounded." It is hard—sometimes seemingly
impossible—to even consider remaining vulnerable when everything in us wants to
strike out. Yet the moment is always offering itself, in every breath, in the
slightest pause of self-defense. I think God calls us in each of those moments,
inviting us to feel. The call is to feel our own woundedness, the woundedness of
others, the woundedness of God. If God is ultimately loving, then God must also
be ultimately vulnerable—a Divine Heart embracing both the joy and the suffering
of all creation. I think God desires, needs us to share that vulnerability.
Sometimes, in that precious moment between injury and retaliation when we most
feel our own vulnerability, we realize communion. The tears we shed and the
emptiness we feel flow with the suffering of others into God's own broken heart.