Research
Tools
ReviewsJournal
Collection
News &
Comment
Books &
Labware
Science
Jobs
Web
Links
journals.bmn.comLatest
Updates
A-Z listTrends
Guides
My E-mail
Alerts
MEDLINESection
Search
My BMN My BMN Exit Exit
Send Feedback to BMN Feedback Help System Help

Current Opinion in Biotechnology
 Latest Issue
 Browse Issues
 Browse by Topic
 Search this Journal
 Prices & Subscriptions
 About this Journal
 Publishers Site

Quick Site Search


Advanced site search


Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Full A-Z Journal ListIssues ListFull Text Record


Recombinase-directed chromosome engineering in plants
[Review article]
David W Ow
Current Opinion in Biotechnology 1996, 7:181-186.

Text only, + full figures
Publications by
David W Ow
Related fulltext articles on BioMedNet
Fulltext articles on BioMedNet that cite this article


 Outline 
 Abstract 


Directed recombination of specific sequences can be utilized to bring about profound changes in gene expression and genome organization. In past years, the deployment of site-specific recombination systems in the plant genome has produced site-directed excision and inversion of transgenes, integration of exogenous DNA into genomic recombination sites, and the rearrangement of chromosome segments. In particular, the rearrangement events that involve large segments of host DNA represent a novel approach to genome engineering and show promise for precise, predictable and reproducible restructuring of higher eukaryotic genomes. In the light of recent reports of plant genome synteny, the concept of reshuffling blocks of chromosome information into new combinations may lead to exciting opportunities for creating new plant varieties for basic research and practical applications.

 Abbreviations 

Ac—activator element;
Ds—dissociation element;
HygR—hygromycin resistance.
 Introduction 

There are many well described site-specific recombination systems, but none is operationally simpler than systems that rely on a single-polypeptide recombinase to cause the specific reciprocal exchange between two short identical DNA sequences [1] [2]. Three such systems currently being deployed in plant research are known as Cre-lox, FLP-FRT, and R-RS, where Cre, FLP and R are the recombinases, and lox, FRT and RS are the recombination sites. All are of microbial origin: Cre-lox is from bacteriophage P1, FLP-FRT is from the 2µ plasmid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and R-RS is from the pSR1 plasmid of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii. To be functional, lox and FRT sites require, at the minimum, an 8thinspacethinspace bp core sequence between 13thinspacethinspace bp inverted repeats, and RS sites must have a 7thinspace bp core flanked by 12thinspacethinspace bp inverted repeats. The asymmetric core sequence determines the site's orientation, and thus the types of recombination product.

Many applications of site-specific recombination have been reviewed recently [3•] [4•]. In this update, I make brief mention of the application of recombinases to transgene engineering; however, greatest emphasis is placed on the current trend for the use of site-specific recombination in plants, the manipulation of chromosomes.

 Rearrangement of transgenes 

Regardless of whether recombination sites are placed within the same DNA molecule in direct or opposite orientation, or placed on unlinked linear or circular DNA molecules, the corresponding recombinase can catalyze the reciprocal exchange to produce a deletion, inversion, translocation or co-integration event. The reactions are reversible, but the recombination of linked sites is kinetically more favorable than that of sites that are unlinked. Thus, the excision and inversion of transgenes are inherently easier to obtain than the stable co-integration of two molecules. The kinetic argument also predicts that the probability of a recombination reaction would be higher between closely linked sites than between sites separated by great distances. Consequently, site-specific deletion and inversion of transgenes harboring closely linked recombination sites were the first reactions to be demonstrated in higher eukaryotes.

In plants, many variations of site-specific deletion/inversion of transgenes to activate or deactivate gene expression have been described using the Cre-lox [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10•] [11], the FLP-FRT [12] [13] [14•] [15] or the R-RS system [16] [17]. More recently, site-specific integration of circular DNA into the tobacco genome through Cre-lox recombination has also been reported [18••]. Pairs of different mutant lox sequences were used such that the recombination reaction produced one non-functional product site. The lack of two fully functional lox sequences impedes subsequent excision of the integrated molecule.

Figure 1 Balanced chromosomal translocation in tobacco and Arabidopsis. (a) Gametes from two parent transgenic lines, lox–hpt and P–lox–cre, which are to be crossed. (b) The resultant progeny contain both lox–hpt and P–lox–cre chromosomes and are sensitive to hygromycin (HygS). (c) Site-specific recombination moves the promoter from cre to hpt, which terminates cre expression and confers a hygromycin resistant phenotype (HygR). (d) Meiosis produces gametes with balanced (1 and 2) or imbalanced genomes (3 and 4) from alternate or adjacent segregation, respectively. The lox recombination site and centromere (cen) are depicted as a filled arrowhead and shaded/unshaded circle, respectively.

Return to text reference [1] [2]
 Rearrangement of chromosomes 

Chromosomal rearrangements are most often revealed by aberrant phenotypes resulting from anomalous expression of the displaced genes. These aberrations have important genetic, evolutionary and medical consequences. Induced chromosomal rearrangements can be obtained by radiation or chemical mutagenesis. Identification of aberrant chromosome structures requires cytogenetic analysis, which makes the screening of large numbers difficult. Moreover, this method of inducing rearrangements lacks predictability and often causes additional mutations. A different approach to manipulating genome structure makes use of site-specific recombination systems. Recombination sites within a host genome provide targets for chromosomal recombination and molecular tags for analysis. This approach was first described in S. cerevisiae diploids, where R-RS site-specific recombination produced a translocation, an inversion and a deletion [19]; large chromosomal aberrations were not tolerated in haploid cells. It is possible that plants with high ploidy levels may be more tolerant of chromosomal rearrangements.

 Inter-chromosomal recombination 

In higher plants, recombinase-mediated chromosomal translocations have been produced in the tobacco Nicotiana tabacum [20••]. With Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, transgenic lines hemizygous for either a lox–hpt or a P–lox–cre construct were generated. The lox–hpt transgene has a 34thinspace bp lox site incorporated into the transcriptional leader of a promoterless hpt, the coding region for hygromycin phosphotransferase. The P–lox–cre construct expresses cre from P, a plant viral promoter. The two types of transgenic line were crossed to produce progeny containing both the lox–hpt chromosome and the P–lox–cre chromosome. Cre causes a reciprocal exchange of chromosome arms at the lox sites, resulting in new transgenes: P–lox–hpt and lox–cre. The fusion of P to hpt confers a hygromycin-resistant (HygR) phenotype, and a promoterless lox–cre minimizes reversal of the reaction by terminating cre expression. Providing that the two lox sites are situated in the same direction with respect to the centromeres, this exchange results in a balanced translocation (Fig. 1). As genetic material is conserved, these plants are likely to be viable. On the other hand, if the two lox sites are oriented in an opposing direction with respect to the centromeres, the translocation produces dicentric and acentric chromosomes and inviability is the likely result.

Figure 2 Generic scheme for generating a chromosomal deletion or inversion. (a) A plant line containing a construct of a Ds transposable element interrupting expression of a selectable marker sm1. (b) Excision of Ds fuses P to sm1 to generate a selectable phenotype, and relocation of Ds to a nearby site separates the two lox recombination sites in a direct or indirect orientation. (c) Recombination of the two sites produces a deletion or an inversion, where the fusion between P and the marker sm2 produces another detectable phenotype. The lox recombination site is depicted as a filled arrowhead.

Return to text reference [1]

Crosses between lox–hpt and P–lox–cre lines yielded progeny that gave rise to HygR plants [20••]. Molecular analyses indicated that the HygR plants have the newly acquired P–lox–hpt and lox–cre junctions and lack the parental P–lox–cre and lox–hpt junctions. DNA hybridization analysis showed the exchange of flanking DNA. Transmission of the chromosomes containing the translocations was determined in the progeny of an outcross to wild-type plants. As translocation results in heterozygotes, the first meiotic division produces gametes that harbor both normal chromosomes, both translocated chromosomes, or a normal chromosome with a translocated chromosome in a 1:1:2 ratio (see Fig. 1). The last class, with its associated duplications and deficiencies, would less likely be viable. Transmission of the two transgenes, lox–cre and P–lox–hpt, and by inference their respective chromosomes, was determined by DNA hybridization. Consistent with balanced genomes having higher viability rates, co-transmission rates were 67%, 80%, 90% and 100% in the translocation lines. Cases where co-transmission frequencies were below 100% may result from the allotetraploid nature of N. tabacum, which can tolerate the loss of certain chromosomes.

Recombinase-mediated chromosomal translocations have also been generated in animal cell culture. Smith et al. [21••] and Van Deursen et al. [22••] have reported Cre-lox-mediated reciprocal chromosomal translocations in mouse embryonic stem cells. A major advantage of animal over plant model systems is the availability of homologous recombination, which can direct the placement of recombination sites to cause the pre-determined genome aberration.

 Intra-chromosomal recombination 

To generate internal chromosomal inversions and deletions, the intervening DNA must be flanked by a pair of recombination sites. This is difficult to achieve through the random placement of transgenes. Unlike some fungal and animal systems, the insertion of transgenes through homologous recombination in plants is currently not a practical option. Therefore, a rather elaborate scheme has been devised to place two recombination sites in cis [23]. The generic scheme is illustrated in Fig. 2. A dissociation element (Ds), a non-autonomous derivative of the plant activator element transposon (Ac) [24], is used to carry a recombination site. A second recombination site is located outside the Ds element. To facilitate detection of Ds transposition, the Ds derivative is inserted between the promoter and the coding region of a selectable marker such that excision allows marker expression. Ac transposase is introduced through a sexual cross to transactivate excision of Ds. Because Ac and Ds transpose preferentially to linked sites, transposition of the Ds element to a nearby location will flank a DNA segment with recombination sites. Depending on the relative orientation of the two recombination sites, deletion or inversion of the intervening DNA segment will occur when the recombinase is introduced through sexual hybridization.

Variations of this generic scheme have been tested by several laboratories using the Cre-lox system ([25••] [26]; M van Haaren, personal communication) or the R-RS system [27••]. In N. tabacum, our group [25••] has detected a deletion and three independent inversion events. Yet, only an inversion between two lox sites ~ 10thinspace cM apart passed to progeny without the co-transmission of a cre gene. A second inversion was passed to progeny, but only when co-transmitted with an unlinked cre gene. This suggests that the inversion was not viable in the gamete, but could be somatically generated again in the next generation by Cre-mediated recombination. The remaining inversion and deletion lines failed to transmit the rearrangement to the next generation. The strategy used by Osborne et al.[26] detects only rearrangements that transmit to progeny. In their work on Arabidopsis, two inversions, flanked by lox sites separated by 5.6thinspace cM and 16.5thinspace cM, were obtained. Machida et al. [27••] have employed a strategy in Arabidopsis where two RS sites of opposite orientation are placed at the origin and in the Ds element. Consequently, only deletions (not inversions) can be generated stably. In 18 out of 38 lines, the Ds element was found transposed within 800thinspace kb of the origin. So far, one deletion spanning 12thinspace kb of DNA has been obtained, but this failed to transmit to progeny.

 Chromosomal recombination in vitro 

Cre-catalyzed and FLP-catalyzed reactions in vitro on small DNA substrates are well documented. The concept of manipulating megabase-sized DNA segments through site-specific recombination is thus tempting. Parental lines leading to deletions and inversions are marked by flanking recombination targets. Theoretically, it should be possible to excise the intervening DNA through recombination between chromosomally situated and exogenously provided recombination sites.

This concept has been tested on the 5.7 Mb chromosome I of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe [28••]. Homologous recombination was used to place lox sites at ade2 and swi4 (Fig. 3). Spheroplasts embedded in agarose beads were lysed to release the chromosomes, and Cre protein and lox-DNA were infused into the beads. The products of recombination between the lox-DNA and the genomic lox sites were resolved by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. When the reaction was performed on a strain that harbored lox sites in both loci, the 0.92thinspacethinspace Mb ade2-to-telomere segment, the 3.0thinspacethinspace Mb swi4-to-telomere segment, and the 1.8thinspace Mb ade2-to-swi4 intervening segment were detected.

Figure 3 Chromosomal cleavage in vitrovia site-specific recombination. The 5.7thinspace Mb chromosome I of S. pombe is 'cleaved' in vitroby Cre-mediated intermolecular recombination of genomic lox sites (at swi4 and ade2) and exogenously provided lox oligonucleotides. Sizes indicated inthinspace Mb at top. The lox recombination site is depicted as a filled arrowhead.

Return to text reference [1]
 Conclusions and prospects 

The proof-of-concept studies described above represent a modest beginning for manipulating plant chromosomes through site-specific recombination. Unlike some fungal and animal systems, where targeted insertions are practical for the site-specific introduction of recombination sites, plant biologists do not currently have the option of selecting the exact rearrangement to generate. Until DNA insertion via homology becomes practicalthinspacethinspace and progress has recently been made in this area [29] [30] [31] [32•]thinspacethinspace exploitation of the powers of recombinase-directed genome restructuring will be restricted. Recombination sites in the genome would be most useful if a large collection of plant lines harboring mapped sites existed, such that suitable sites for a particular rearrangement could be chosen. As transgenic plants can be generated in large numbers, it is possible to imagine libraries of random rearrangements in a plant genome.

For the past two years, our group has been assessing whether the construction of a translocation library in a model plant is a realistic goal. A. thaliana was chosen as the model because of its rapid generation time, small genome size, and small number of chromosomes. A large number of lox–hpt and P–lox–cre transgenic lines were generated. As recombination between unlinked sites is infrequent, the F1 progeny bearing both the P–lox–cre and the lox–hpt chromosomes were selfed to provide an additional generation for germline recombination. Thus far, from nine P–lox–cre and 20 lox–hpt transgenic lines, 39 crosses have produced HygR F2 progeny that harbor the P–lox–hpt junction. Mapping of the breakpoints of these putative translocation lines is under way. On the basis of progress thus far, it appears that a modest translocation library in a model plant will be achieved within the year. All indications suggest that the generic strategy can be readily adopted for crop plants.

The frequency of generating inversions or deletions is very low. Partly, this is the result of the time and labor associated with using a combination of transposon and recombination systems. Construct designs could be improved, but an inherent problem is that certain rearrangements, particularly deletions, may be difficult to transmit through gametes. This may be less of a problem with species having high ploidy levels.

Site-specific cleavage of chromosomes in vitrocan be readily achieved through the use of rare-cutting endonucleases. However, site-specific recombination may allow the insertion of a retrieved DNA segment directly into a carrier molecule, such as a bacterial artificial chromosome vector. A speculative, but most exciting, possibility is chromosomal cleavage in vivo at selected times during development. For example, plants harboring the P–lox–cre transgene contain Cre. If lox oligonucleotides were introduced into these plants, endogenously supplied Cre could recombine the genomic and exogenously provided lox sequences to split the chromosome. The phenotype associated with the cell lineage dependent loss of a particular chromosome arm could then be observed.

The random shuffling of large blocks of genomic DNA has evolutionary consequences, much the same as those described for the pioneering work on Drosophila ananassae, where inversions and translocations are associated with speciation [33]. Similar to findings in animals, plant genome research is revealing an amazing amount of structural conservation. Plant genomes also appear to be organized into a number of discrete blocks of genetic information, where the order of markers and genes within these linkage blocks are conserved in distantly related species [34] [35] [36]. The major cereals, for instance, appear to be put together with the same set of basic linkage blocks, but in different arrangements [37••]. It is as though primary differences among them lie more so in the order of these genomic blocks than in the novelty of particular genes. This begs the following question: does the shuffling of genomic blocks through site-specific recombination, within and maybe even between plant species, facilitate the evolution of plant diversity?

 References and recommended reading 

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest.
•• of outstanding interest.
  1. Craig NL :
    The mechanism of conservative site-specific recombination.
    Annu Rev Genet 1988, 22: 77–105. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  2. Sadowski PD :
    Site-specific genetic recombination: hops, flips, and flops.
    FASEB J 1993, 7: 760–767. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  3. • Sauer B :
    Site-specific recombination: developments and applications.
    Curr Opin Biotechnol 1994, 5: 521–527. Full text MEDLINE Cited by
    A review of site-specific recombination, with an emphasis on animal systems.
    Return to citation reference [1]

  4. • Ow DW , Medberry SL :
    Genome manipulation through site-specific recombination.
    Crit Rev Plant Sci 1995, 14: 239–261. Cited by
    A review of site-specific recombination, with an emphasis on plant systems.
    Return to citation reference [1]

  5. Dale EC , Ow DW :
    Intra-thinspace and intermolecular site-specific recombination in plant cells mediated by bacteriophage P1 recombinase.
    Gene 1990, 91: 79–85. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  6. Odell J , Caimi P , Sauer B , Russell S :
    Site-directed recombination in the genome of transgenic tobacco.
    Mol Gen Genet 1990, 223: 369–378. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  7. Dale EC , Ow DW :
    Gene transfer with subsequent removal of the selection gene from the host genome.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991, 88: 10558–10562. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  8. Bayley CC , Morgan M , Dale EC , Ow DW :
    Exchange of gene activity in transgenic plants catalyzed by the Cre-lox site-specific recombination system.
    Plant Mol Biol 1992, 18: 353–361. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  9. Russell SH , Hoopes JL , Odell JT :
    Directed excision of a transgene from the plant genome.
    Mol Gen Genet 1992, 234: 49–59. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  10. • Odell JT , Hoopes JL , Vermerris W :
    Seed-specific gene activation mediated by the Cre/lox site-specific recombination system.
    Plant Physiol 1994, 106: 447–458. MEDLINE Cited by
    Describes the developmental and tissue-specific control of recombination. Seed-specific promoters are used to drive the expression of cre. Marker gene activity, activated through Cre-mediated recombination, shows temporal-specific and tissue-specific patterns corresponding to seed-specific promoter activity.
    Return to citation reference [1]

  11. Morgan MK , Ow DW : Polyethylene glycol-mediated transformation of tobacco leaf mesophyll protoplasts: an experiment in the study of Cre-lox recombination. In Methods in Plant Molecular Biology, a Laboratory Manual. Edited by Maliga P, Klessig D, Cashmore A, Gruissem W, Varner J. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Press, 1995, 1–17.
    Return to citation reference [1]

  12. Lloyd AM , Davis RW :
    Functional expression of the yeast FLP/FRT site-specific recombination system in Nicotiana tabacum.
    Mol Gen Genet 1994, 242: 653–657. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  13. Lyznik LA , Mitchell JC , Hirayama L , Hodges T :
    Activity of yeast FLP recombinase in maize and rice protoplasts.
    Nucleic Acids Res 1993, 21: 969–975. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  14. • Lyznik LA , Hirayama L , Rao KV , Abad A , Hodges TK :
    Heat-inducible expression of FLP gene in maize cells.
    Plant J 1995, 8: 177–186. MEDLINE Cited by
    Describes the control of FLP/FRT recombination through the heat-inducible expression of FLP from a soybean heat-shock promoter. This is also the first report of site-specific recombination of chromosomally situated recombination sites in maize.
    Return to citation reference [1]

  15. Sonti RV , Tissier AF , Wong D , Viret J-F , Signer ER :
    Activity of the yeast FLP recombinase in Arabidopsis.
    Plant Mol Biol 1995, 28: 1127–1132. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  16. Onouchi H , Yokoi K , Machida C , Matsuzaki H , Oshima Y , Matsuoka K , Nakamura K , Machida Y :
    Operation of an efficient site-specific recombination system of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii in tobacco cells.
    Nucleic Acids Res 1991, 19: 6373–6378. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  17. Onouchi H , Nishihama R , Kudo M , Machida Y , Machida C :
    Visualization of site-specific recombination catalyzed by a recombinase from Zygosaccharomyces rouxii in Arabidopsis thaliana.
    Mol Gen Genet 1995, 247: 653–660. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  18. •• Albert H , Dale EC , Lee E , Ow DW :
    Site-specific integration of DNA into wild type and mutant lox sites placed in the plant genome.
    Plant J 1995, 7: 649–659. MEDLINE Cited by
    Describes the use of pairs of mutant lox sites that promote unidirectional recombination. Demonstrates precise single-copy integration of DNA in plants. This is the first report of transgenic higher eukaryotic organisms derived from site-specific integration of DNA into genomic recombination targets.
    Return to citation reference [1]

  19. Matsuzaki H , Nakajima R , Nishiyama J , Araki H , Oshima Y :
    Chromosome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by using a site-specific recombination system of a yeast plasmid.
    J Bacteriol 1990, 172: 610–618. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  20. •• Qin M , Bayley C , Stockton T , Ow DW :
    Cre recombinase-mediated site-specific recombination between plant chromosomes.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91: 1706–1710. MEDLINE Cited by
    First example of recombinase-mediated chromosomal translocation in higher eukaryotes. The transmission genetics are shown to be consistent with preferential viability of balanced-genome gametes.
    Return to citation reference [1] [2]

  21. •• Smith AJH , DeSousa MA , Kwabi-Addo B , Heppell-Parton A , Impey H , Rabbitts P :
    A site-directed chromosomal translocation induced in embryonic stem cells by Cre-loxP recombination.
    Nature Genet 1995, 9: 376–385. MEDLINE Cited by
    This paper and [22••] are the first reports detailing recombinase-mediated chromosomal translocation in animal cells. Homologous recombination is used to introduce recombination sites into designated chromosome locations. Cytogenetic confirmation is provided by chromosome painting.
    Return to citation reference [1] [2]

  22. •• Van Deursen J , Fornerod M , Van Rees B , Grosveld G :
    Cre-mediated site-specific translocation between nonhomologous mouse chromosomes.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92: 7376–7380. MEDLINE Cited by
    As in [21••], recombinase-mediated chromosomal translocation is reported in animal cells. The lox sites are introduced into the genome through homologous recombination.
    Return to citation reference [1] [2]

  23. Van Haaren MJJ , Ow DW :
    Prospects of applying a combination of DNA transposition and site-specific recombination in plants: a strategy for gene identification and cloning.
    Plant Mol Biol 1993, 23: 525–533. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  24. Fedoroff NV :
    About maize transposable elements and development.
    Cell 1989, 56: 181–191. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  25. •• Medberry SL , Dale EC , Qin M , Ow DW :
    Intra-chromosomal rearrangements generated by site-specific recombination.
    Nucleic Acids Res 1995, 23: 485–490. MEDLINE Cited by
    First report of the generation of internal chromosomal deletions and inversions in higher eukaryotes by site-specific recombination. Discusses problems of gamete transmission.
    Return to citation reference [1] [2]

  26. Osborne BI , Wirtz U , Baker B :
    A system for insertional mutagenesis and chromosomal rearrangement using the Ds transposon and Cre-lox.
    Plant J 1995, 7: 687–701. MEDLINE Cited by
    The authors use site-specific recombination to generate two chromosomal inversions in Arabidopsis. The smaller of the two inversions is transmitted to progeny. A novel marker, P–R-Lc, which confers a deeply pigmented hirsute phenotype, is used to detect plants that do not harbor Ac or cre.
    Return to citation reference [1] [2]

  27. •• Machida Y , Onouchi H , Torikai S , Kudo M , Koizumi J , Machida C : Use of site-specific recombination systems for isolation of mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana: the tagging/deletion strategy. In Modification of Gene Expression and Non-Mendelian Inheritance. Proceedings of the US–Japanese Joint Meeting. Edited by Oono K, Takaiwa F. Mito: Sato Press, 1995, 199–223.
    These authors employ a strategy that selects chromosomal deletions, but not inversions. Inclusion of rare endonuclease sites facilitates physical mapping of the distance between recombination sites.
    Return to citation reference [1] [2]

  28. •• Qin M , Lee E , Zankel T , Ow DW :
    Site-specific cleavage of chromosomes in vitrothrough Cre-lox recombination.
    Nucleic Acids Res 1995, 23: 1923–1927. MEDLINE Cited by
    Demonstrates the use of in vitro inter-molecular recombination for retrieving chromosome segments.
    Return to citation reference [1]

  29. Lichtenstein C , Barrena E :
    Prospects for reverse genetics in plants using recombination.
    Plant Mol Biol 1993, 21: 5–11. Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  30. Risseeuw E , Offringa R , Franke-Van Dijk MEI , Hooykaas PJ :
    Targeted recombination in plants using Agrobacteriumcoincides with additional rearrangements at the target locus.
    Plant J 1995, 7: 109–119. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  31. Puchta H , Swoboda P , Hohn B :
    Induction of intrachromosomal homologous recombination in whole plants.
    Plant J 1995, 7: 203–210. Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  32. • Miao ZH , Lam E :
    Targeted disruption of the TGA3 locus in Arabidopsis thaliana.
    Plant J 1995, 7: 359–365. MEDLINE Cited by
    First example of the successful disruption of a non-selectable plant gene by targeted insertion. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis protoplasts was followed by PCR screening to detect cell lines resulting from the homologous insertion of DNA. Two hemizygous disruption lines were isolated, but they failed to regenerate into plants.
    Return to citation reference [1]

  33. Futch DG : A study of speciation in south pacific population of Drosophila ananassae. In Studies in Genetics no 6615. Edited by Wheeler M. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1966, 79–120.
    Return to citation reference [1]

  34. Tanksley SD , Bernatzky R , Lapitan NL , Prince JP :
    Conservation of gene repertoire but not gene order in pepper and tomato.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988, 85: 6419–6423. Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  35. Hulbert SH , Richter TE , Axtell JD , Bennetzen JL :
    Genetic mapping and characterization of sorghum and related crops by means of maize DNA probes.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990, 87: 4251–4255. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  36. Whitkus R , Doebley J , Lee M :
    Comparative genome mapping of sorhgum and maize.
    Genetics 1992, 132: 1119–1130. MEDLINE Cited by
    Return to citation reference [1]

  37. •• Moore G , Devos KM , Wang Z , Gale MD :
    Grasses, line up and form a circle.
    Curr Biol 1995, 5: 737–739. Full text MEDLINE Cited by
    The comparative mapping of six major grass species shows that their genomes are composed of different arrangements of 19 basic linkage blocks, each consisting of large segments of the chromosome.
    Return to citation reference [1]

 Author Contacts 


David W Ow, Plant Gene Expression Center, USDA-ARS and University of California at Berkeley, 800 Buchanan Street, Albany, California 94710, USA; e-mail: ow@mendel.berkeley.edu
Return to author list
 Copyright 
Copyright © 1996 Current Opinions


Click here for more details
BioMedNet
Home
Journal
Collection

My BMN

Help System

Send Feedback to BMN

Information for Advertisers© Elsevier Science Limited 2000