skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 177174  
Title: Surviving Electronic Monitoring in England and Wales: Lessons Learnt From the First Trials
Journal: Legal and Criminological Psychology  Volume:4 (February 1999)  Pages:33 to 43
Author(s): C Nee
Publication Date: 99
Pages: 11
Origin: United Kingdom
Language: English
Annotation: This article considers findings from government trials of electronic monitoring in England and Wales, and the extent to which these were considered in the design of a new curfew order with electronic monitoring.
Abstract: The new curfew order became a sentencing option in three pilot areas in 1995. Its use and effectiveness in reducing offending behavior have been watched very closely by a variety of practitioners and policy makers within the criminal justice system. However, little attention has been given to the recommendations arising from the first government trials of electronic monitoring in 1989. Those highlighted the conditions to which monitored persons were subjected, and related problems. The article looks specifically at recommendations regarding information given to the candidate; appraisal of the dwelling in which monitoring is to take place and effects on cohabitees; minimum and maximum curfew hours; and the need to improve hardware and software associated with monitoring. It then considers the progress of the current curfew order, assesses whether suggested improvements have been made, and looks at the effects on the offender's ability to comply with the order. Notes, references
Main Term(s): Corrections in foreign countries
Index Term(s): Program evaluation ; Curfew ; Alternatives to institutionalization ; Supervised liberty ; Correctional reform ; Electronic monitoring of offenders ; House arrest ; England ; Wales
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=177174

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder