HISCALE Data Analysis Handbook

Fundamental Technologies

Ulysses HISCALE Pages

Note: Many of these pages cannot be read by Netscape Navigator; please use Internet Explorer (sorry).

Ulysses HISCALE Data Analysis Handbook

List of Figures

Figure 2.1 ISPM EDR record format
Figure 4.1 HISCALE viewing cones with respect to Ulysses spin axis
Figure 4.2 LAN2A and LAN2B simplified cross-sections
Figure 4.3a LAN2A cross section detail (M'F')
Figure 4.3b LAN2B telescope assembly WART cross section detail
Figure 4.3c LAN2B assembly MF cross section detail
Figure 4.3d LAN2B telescope assembly, exterior view MF-WART
Figure 4.4 HISCALE instrument assembly photograph
Figure 4.4a LAN assembly field of view drawing
Figure 4.4b HISCALE assembly FOV drawing, detail a
Figure 4.4c HISCALE assembly FOV drawing, detail b
Figure 4.4d Outline flight model LAN experiment, detail 1
Figure 4.4e Outline flight model LAN experiment, detail 2
Figure 4.4f Outline of flight model LAN experiment
Figure 4.5 LAN attached to Ulysses, view 1
Figure 4.6 LAN attached to Ulysses, view 2
Figure 4.7 External view of LAN2A (M'F'), view 1
Figure 4.8 External view of LAN2A (M'F'), view 2
Figure 4.9 Assembly cross section of LAN2A
Figure 4.10 Magnetic yoke section, type 1
Figure 4.11 Magnetic yoke front view, type 1
Figure 4.12 Magnetic yoke section back view, type 1
Figure 4.13 Section of magnet yoke, type 1
Figure 4.14 External view of LAN2B (MF-WART)
Figure 4.15 Section of LAN2B (aperture sketch)
Figure 4.16 Magnet yoke type 2, front view
Figure 4.17 Magnet yoke type 2: cross section
Figure 4.18 Magnetic yoke section, type 2, back view
Figure 4.19 LEMS detector mount
Figure 4.20 Notch in deflection system
Figure 4.21 Section of detector housing
Figure 4.22 Parts list, LAN2B assembly
Figure 4.23 Foil assembly
Figure 4.24 Foil mount
Figure 4.25a HISCALE analog signal block diagram (restoration in progress)
Figure 4.25b HISCALE digital signal block diagram
Figure 4.26 Energy losses in LEMS30
Figure 4.27 Energy losses in LEMS120
Figure 4.28 Energy losses in LEFS60
Figure 4.29 Energy losses for LEFS150
Figure 4.30 Composition aperture energy losses
Figure 4.31 Delta E versus E for composition aperture (WART)
Figure 4.32 WART channel definitions
Figure 4.33 Data system block diagram
Figure 4.34 Data system software block diagram
Figure 4.35 Science data format
Figure 4.36 EDR summary diagram
Figure 4.37 EDR summary list
Figure 4.38 Data input-output timing diagram
Figure 4.39 Status preamble definitions, bytes 1-3
Figure 4.40 Status preamble definitions, bytes 4-6
Figure 4.41 CA priority byte 4-81
Figure 4.42a Status trailer format
Figure 4.42b Status trailer format, continued
Figure 4.43 Digital housekeeping format, channels 2-4
Figure 4.44 Obtaining rate data values by adding modulus
Figure 4.45 Telemetry mode changes
Figure 4.46 Sector definitions for 0Ł LAG<TSPIN/8
Figure 4.47 Sector definitions for TSpin/8Ł Lag<TSpin/4
Figure 4.48 Sun sensor configuration
Figure 4.49 XBS geometry
Figure 4.50 Sun sensor electronics
Figure 4.51 AME sun sensor electronics
Figure 4.52 SRP filter flow chart
Figure 4.53 Implementation of the SSC
Figure 4.54 Flow chart for the reconstitution of the SRP
Figure 4.55 Error of SRP, double crossing
Figure 4.56 Error of SRP, single crossing
Figure 4.57 Orientation of LAN2B magnet in electron beam
Figure 4.58 Schematic ISPM LAN2B telescope
Figure 4.59 Determination of electronic counting thresholds using a calibrated pulser
Figure 4.60 LAN2B B detector electron detection efficiency, energy=40 keV
Figure 4.61 LAN2B B detector electron detection efficiency, energy=100 keV
Figure 4.62 LAN2B angular location of B peak efficiency
Figure 4.63 LAN2B B detector peak electron efficiency as f (energy)
Figure 4.64 Electron energy deposited in detector F
Figure 4.65 Electron detection efficiency of detector F LAN2B as f (energy)
Figure 4.66 Electron detection efficiency 30° CCW
Figure 4.67 Electron detection efficiency 20° CCW
Figure 4.68 Electron detection efficiency 10° CCW
Figure 4.69 Electron detection efficiency 0°
Figure 4.70 Electron detection efficiency 10° CW
Figure 4.71 Electron detection efficiency 20° CW
Figure 4.72 Electron detection efficiency 30° W
Figure 4.73 PHA matrix for Rutgers Composition Aperture calibration
Figure 4.74 LAN flight model Rutgers beam calibration 4-141
Figure 4.75 Plots of G vs. E for all eight trials 4-143
Figure 4.76a Spectra plots for the DE and two LEFS channels using IDF.DAT G-factors
Figure 4.76b Spectra plots for the same time period using Trial 10 G-factors
Figure 4.76c Spectra plots for the same time period using Table 4.18 G-factors
Figure 4.77a Ratio plots for all four energy channels for a 32-day period
Figure 4.77b Ratio plots for a later time period in 1991
Figure 4.77c Ratio plots including the electron event around day 301
Figure 4.77d Ratio plots for a 32-day period in 1992
Figure 4.78 A plot comparing Kohl's electron efficiency study with the simulation
Figure 4.79 Comparison of simulation results to S/C data – LEMS120
Figure 4.80 Comparison of simulation results to S/C data – LEMS30
Figure 4.81 Comparison of simulation results to S/C data – LEFS60
Figure 4.82 Comparison of simulation results to S/C data – LEFS150
Figure 4.83 Flow chart for RTG simulation
Figure 4.84 Cosmic ray case 2 and case 3
Figure 4.85 Cosmic ray case 1 and total
Figure 4.86 Calculations of penetration geometry, part I
Figure 4.87 Calculations of penetration geometry, part II
Figure 4.88 LAN "Rosetta Stone" for sectors
Figure 4.89 LAN detectors angular response
Figure 4.90 RTG response in MFSA (M˘ detector)
Figure 4.91 LAN RTG tests
Figure 4.92 Solar polar temperature conversion
Figure 5.1 Variation of the background excess over the values in Table 5.8 with latitude for all the main rate channels
Figure 5.2 Preliminary attempts to fit a latitude-dependent background level to the P7, P2, and DE2 channels
Figure 5.3 Daily average P˘ 3 and DE3 rates vs. heliolatitude
Figure 5.4 Rates versus heliolatitude for all HISCALE channels
Figure 5.5 The HISCALE instrument (photo)
Figure 5.6 Configuration of LAN detector telescopes
Figure 5.7 LEMS120 cover (outside)
Figure 5.8 SEEPHA plot during 92049 calibration
Figure 5.9 Enlargement of PHA matrix
Figure 5.10 LANSPECT output for 92049 calibration
Figure 5.11 COMP spectrum and composition ratios
Figure 5.12 Calibration plots of WART and DE channels vs. time
Figure 5.13 Calibration plots of P˘ and P channels vs. time 5-25
Figure 5.14 Calibration in B, C, and D channels vs. time
Figure 5.15 Calibration count rates vs. time since launch
Figure 5.16 Best fits to He decay
Figure 5.17 Best fits to RTG background
Figure 5.18 PHA matrix for 92049 calibration
Figure 5.19 PHA matrix for 92049 calibration
Figure 5.20 Thirty-two channel spectra for 5 calibrations
Figure 5.21 PHA matrix for 92049 calibration
Figure 5.22 SPECTIME output for 94091
Figure 5.23 Z2 time plots during calibrations
Figure 5.24 Beginning of 93008 calibration
Figure 5.25 Open/close cover times vs. AU
Figure 5.26 PHA matrix plot during polar pass
Figure A2-1 Look angles for the five detector telescopes for the LAN experiment
Figure A2-2 LAN360 plot for channel P6 for hours 22-24 UT on day 82, 1991
Figure A2-3 Diagram showing the 16 sectors that are used to determine the anisotropies for the spacecraft X-Z plane, the detectors from which the measurements are made, and their final location on the LAN360 plot
Figure A2-4 LAN plot for WART channels in the XY plane for hours 0-24 UT on day 33, 1992 when Ulysses entered the Jovian magnetosphere
Figure A2-5a LAN plot for channel P5 for hours 14-24 UT on day 33, 1992
Figure A2-5b Plot with smooth = 1
Figure A2-5c Setting foilfact to 0.0 allows the ion anisotropies in this energy range after 2130 UT to be seen
Figure A3-1 Ulysses CDR – solar wind plasma and magnetic field – 98 244 Sep 1
Figure A3-2 Ulysses CDR – solar wind plasma and magnetic field – 98 260 Sep 17
Figure A3-3 Ulysses CDR – energetic particles, low energy ions and cosmic ray – 98 244 Sep 1
Figure A3-4 Ulysses CDR – energetic particles, low energy ions and cosmic ray – 98 260 Sep 17
Figure A3-5 Ulysses CDR – plasma wave – 98 244 Sep 1
Figure A3-6 Ulysses CDR – plasma wave – 98 260 Sep 17
Figure A3-7 Ulysses CDR – solar wind ion composition – 98 244 Sep 1
Figure A3-8 Ulysses CDR – solar wind ion composition – 98 260 Sep 17
Figure A4-1 ULS SFDU primary and secondary header format
Figure A4-2 ULS SFDU tertiary header format
Figure A4-3 Ulysses CDF File 1 format
Figure A4-4 Ulysses CDF File 2 format
Figure A6-1 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 1, without QCA (E1' – FP6')
Figure A6-2 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 2, without QCA (FP7' – P5')
Figure A6-3 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 3, without QCA (P6' – W3)
Figure A6-4 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 4, without QCA (W4 – Z2)
Figure A6-5 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 5, without QCA (Z2A – E3)
Figure A6-6 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 6, without QCA (E4 – P2)
Figure A6-7 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 7, without QCA (P3 – P8)
Figure A6-8 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 8, without QCA (DE1 – C WARTC)
Figure A6-9 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 9, without QCA (D WARTD – F')
Figure A6-10 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 10, without QCA (X-Ray P1 – X-ray P2)
Figure A6-11 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 1, with QCA (E1' – FP6')
Figure A6-12 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 2, with QCA (FP7' – P5')
Figure A6-13 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 3, with QCA (P6' – W3)
Figure A6-14 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 4, with QCA (W4 – Z2)
Figure A6-15 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 5, with QCA (Z2A – E3)
Figure A6-16 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 6, with QCA (E4 – P2)
Figure A6-17 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 7, with QCA (P3 – P8)
Figure A6-18 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 8, with QCA (DE1 – C WARTC)
Figure A6-19 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 9, with QCA (D WARTD – F')
Figure A6-20 HISCALE hourly average of spin average rates, type 10, with QCA (X-Ray P1 – X-ray P2)
Figure A7-1 ULS SFDU primary header format
Figure A7-2 ULS SFDU secondary header format
Figure A7-3 ULS SFDU tertiary header format (EDR)
Figure A7-4 ULS EDR record format
Figure A7-5 EDR/MDR format layout
Figure A7-6 EDR file structure
Figure A8-1 SEDR tape layout
Figure A8-2 Data block
Figure A8-3 Scale Factor Block
Figure A8-4 ULS SEDR primary and secondary SFDU headers
Figure A8-5 ULS SEDR tertiary SFDU header
Figure A9-1 The HISCALE instrument aboard the Ulysses spacecraft
Figure A9-2 Electrons entering the LEMS30 aperture are deflected into the back of the Composition Aperture
Figure A9-3 Calculating G for simple geometries
Figure A9-4 The detector is broken into finite area elements, and the solid angle for each element is determined
Figure A9-5 Part of a mechanical drawing used to model the geometry
Figure A9-6 The coordinate system adopted for this study
Figure A9-7a The modeled geometry as viewed in the xy plane
Figure A9-7b The modeled geometry as viewed in the xz plane
Figure A9-7c A three-dimensional view of the geometry
Figure A9-8 The detector is broken up into finite area elements, and a starting coordinate assigned to each
Figure A9-9 The coordinate systems adopted by Kohl and Shodhan
Figure A9-10 To determine the solid angle for a particular area element, the electron is placed at the starting coordinate with given starting angles, and its trajectory traced out one line segment at a time.
Figure A9-11 For each area element, the number of electrons that escape the system is shown.
Figure A9-12 Trajectories of escaping particles for selected energies. The starting coordinate is located at the center of the detector.
Figure A9-13 A plot of G vs. E for the Trial 10 B field
Figure A9-14 Plots of G vs. E for all eight trials
Figure A9-15a Spectra plots for the DE and two LEFS channels using IDF.DAT G-factors
Figure A9-15b Spectra plots for the same time period using Trial 10 G-factors
Figure A9-15c Spectral plots for the same time period using Table A9-3 G factors
Figure A9-16a Ratio plots for all four energy channels for a 32-day period
Figure A9-16b Ratio plots for a later time in period in 1991
Figure A9-16c Ratio plots including the electron event around day 301
Figure A9-16d Ratio plots for a 32-day period in 1992
Figure A9-17 A plot comparing Kohl's electron efficiency study with the simulation
Figure A9-18 Coordinate labels
Figure A9-19 Plane labels
Figure A9-20 Geometry of detector segmentation
Figure A9-21 Definition of the translation parameters
Figure A9-22 Magnetic intensity map
Figure A9-23 Results of the observed and calculated values, Z = 0.0 (trials 6 and 10)
Figure A9-24 Results of the observed and calculated values, Z = 0.1 (trials 6 and 10)
Figure A9-25 Results of the observed and calculated values, Z = -0.1 (trials 6 and 10)
Figure A9-26 Results of the observed and calculated values, Z = 0.0 (trials 4 and 11)
Figure A9-27 Results of the observed and calculated values, Z = 0.1 (trials 4 and 11)
Figure A9-28 Results of the observed and calculated values, Z = -0.1 (trials 4 and 11)
Figure A9-29 Results of the observed and calculated values, Z = 0.0 (trials 5 and 12)
Figure A9-30 Results of the observed and calculated values, Z = 0.1 (trials 5 and 12)
Figure A9-31 Results of the observed and calculated values, Z = -0.1 (trials 5 and 12)
Figure A9-32 Results of the observed and calculated values, Z = 0.0 (trials 3 and 13)
Figure A9-33 Results of the observed and calculated values, Z = 0.1 (trials 3 and 13)
Figure A9-34 Results of the observed and calculated values, Z = -0.1 (trials 3 and 13)
Figure A9-35 X vs. Y for 20, 30, 40, and 50 keV electrons, maximum curvature A9-83
Figure A9-36 X vs. Y for 75, 100, 150, and 200 keV electrons, maximum curvature
Figure A9-37 X vs. Y for 250, 300, 350, and 400 keV electrons, maximum curvature
Figure A9-38 X vs. Y for 20, 30, 40, and 50 keV electrons, mid curvature
Figure A9-39 X vs. Y for 75, 100, 150, and 200 keV electrons, mid curvature
Figure A9-40 X vs. Y for 250, 300, 350, and 400 keV electrons, mid curvature
Figure A9-41 X vs. Y for 20, 30, 40, and 50 keV electrons, minimum curvature
Figure A9-42 X vs. Y for 75, 100, 150, and 200 keV electrons, minimum curvature
Figure A9-43 X vs. Y for 250, 300, 350, and 400 keV electrons, minimum curvature
Figure A9-44 Illustration of spectrum fitting
Figure A9-45 Efficiency vs. angle for Z = -0.5 cm
Figure A9-46 Efficiency vs. angle for Z = 0.0 cm
Figure A9-47 Efficiency vs. angle for Z = 0.3 cm
Figure A9-48 Efficiency vs. angle for Z = 0.6 cm
Figure A9-49 Efficiency vs. angle for Z = 1.0 cm
Figure A10-1 The Ulysses spacecraft
Figure A10-2 The outline of HISCALE telescopes
Figure A10-3 Trajectories of escaped electrons including specular backscattering of the energy for the center detector. Radzimski's backscattering coefficients are used.
Figure A10-4 View angle q = 0 deg., f = 90 deg.
Figure A10-5 View angle q = -20 deg., f = 80 deg.
Figure A10-6 The detector is divided into 21 small DA_i
Figure A10-7 The number of escapes at each DA_i for energy of 50 keV; Radzimski's h is used.
Figure A10-8 The geometric factor including specular backscattering; Radzimski's h is used.
Figure A10-9 The geometric factor including specular backscattering (both Radzimski's and Neubert's backscattering coefficients) and non-scattering.
Figure A10-10 Backscattering coefficient vs. energy, Radzimski model
Figure A10-11 Backscattering coefficient vs. energy, Neubert model
Figure A10-12 Detector mosaic
Figure A10-13 Coordinates used
Figure A10-14 Geometry of surface crossing I
Figure A10-15 Geometry of surface crossing II
Figure A10-16 Geometry of surface crossing III
Figure A10-17a View angle of q = 0 deg., f = 90 deg. Radzimski's backscattering coefficients are used.
Figure A10-17b View angle of q = 0 deg., f = 90 deg. Radzimski's backscattering coefficients are used.
Figure A10-17c View angle of q = 0 deg., f = 90 deg. Radzimski's backscattering coefficients are used.
Figure A10-18a View angle of q = -20 deg., f = 80 deg. Radzimski's backscattering coefficients are used.
Figure A10-18b View angle of q = -20 deg., f = 80 deg. Radzimski's backscattering coefficients are used.
Figure A10-18c View angle of q = -20 deg., f = 80 deg. Radzimski's backscattering coefficients are used.
Figure A10-19a View angle of q = 0 deg., f = 90 deg. Neubert's backscattering coefficients are used.
Figure A10-19b View angle of q = 0 deg., f = 90 deg. Neubert's backscattering coefficients are used.
Figure A10-19c View angle of q = 0 deg., f = 90 deg. Neubert's backscattering coefficients are used.
Figure A10-20a View angle of q = -20 deg., f = 80 deg. Neubert's backscattering coefficients are used.
Figure A10-20b View angle of q = -20 deg., f = 80 deg. Neubert's backscattering coefficients are used.
Figure A10-20c View angle of q = -20 deg., f = 80 deg. Neubert's backscattering coefficients are used.
Figure A16-1 LAN PHA system design
Figure A16-2 PHAGEN process flow
Figure A16-3 LAN PHA generator PHAGEN, top level process flow
Figure A16-4 Process_events flow diagram
Figure A16-5 Process_mfsa flow diagram
Figure A16-6 LAN plots and color displays
Figure A16-7 Sample plots of Track Sums and Lanspect
Figure A16-8 Sample PHA matrix plot
Figure A16-9 Sample SEEMFSA plot
Figure A16-10 Sample SPECTIME plot
Figure A16-11 Sample SPECPLOT output
Figure A16-12 Rate channel energy spectogram display
Figure A16-13 The lantracks008 track definition file shown with the PHA matrix from 26 and 27 March 1991 (restoration in progress)
Figure A16-14 Histograms for each track of the number of counts as a function of displacement in D from the centreline
Figure A16-15 Schematic illustration of the determination of the effective minimum energy of a track
Figure A17-1 Log channel
Figure A17-2 Thermal vac test results for log E channel
Figure A17-3 Log amp/sensistor configuration
Figure A17-4 Thermal configuration modifications
Figure A17-5a PHA width at 25 deg. C (heaters on)
Figure A17-5b PHA width, heaters off
Figure A17-6 DC offset vs. temperature
Figure A17-7 Relocation of S/C Therm 1 on LEMS/LEFS LINEAR board
Figure A17-8 Analog wave forms
Figure A17-9 SAMA output waveform for 2 of the crosstalk cases
Figure A17-10 SAMA output waveform when channel F is excited
Figure A17-11a MUX configuration with M' selected
Figure A17-11b Equivalent circuit assuming feedthrough capacitance
Figure A17-12 Crosstalk-LOG C into LOG D
Figure A17-13 LAN pulser test set-up
Figure A17-14 Random pulser test results
Figure A17-15 Pile-up in D, no effect in C
Figure A17-16 Random pulser test results for pile-down
Figure A17-17 Pile-down in D, little effect in C
Figure A17-18 Pile-down in D (similar to Figure A17-17) associated with a low value of C from the falling edge of the main lobe
Figure A18-1 Magnet field survey mechanical setup
Figure A18-2 Sketch to indicate axis orientation with respect to magnets
Figure A18-3 Sketch to indicate yoke/electron beam orientation on electrostatic accelerator at NASA/GSFC
Figure A18-4 Yoke SST 416/APL, Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=+0.1"
Figure A18-5 Yoke SST 416/APL, Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0
Figure A18-6 Yoke SST 416/APL, Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=-0.1"
Figure A18-7 Yoke SST 416/APL, Configuration II, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=+0.1"
Figure A18-8 Yoke SST 416/APL, Configuration II, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0
Figure A18-9 Yoke SST 416/APL, Configuration II, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=-0.1"
Figure A18-10 Yoke SST 416/APL, Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=+0.1", graphical form
Figure A18-11 Yoke SST 416/APL, Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0, graphical form
Figure A18-12 Yoke SST 416/APL, Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=-0.1", graphical form
Figure A18-13 Yoke SST 416/APL, Configuration II, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=+0.1", graphical form
Figure A18-14 Yoke SST 416/APL, Configuration II, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0, graphical form
Figure A18-15 Yoke SST 416/APL, Configuration II, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=-0.1", graphical form
Figure A18-16 Yoke SST 416/UCB, Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0
Figure A18-17 Yoke SST 416/UCB, Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0, graphical form
Figure A18-18 Carpenter 49/APL, Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0
Figure A18-19 Carpenter 49/APL, Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0, graphical form
Figure A18-20 Carpenter 49, Mod 1, Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0
Figure A18-21 Carpenter 49, Mod 1, Configuration II, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0
Figure A18-22 Carpenter 49, Mod 1, Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0, graphical form
Figure A18-23 Carpenter 49, Mod 1, Configuration II, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0, graphical form
Figure A18-24 Carpenter 49, Mod 1, Configuration I, z = -3/16
Figure A18-25 Carpenter 49, Mod 1, Configuration I, z = 0
Figure A18-26 Carpenter 49, Mod 1, Configuration I, z = +3/16
Figure A18-27 Carpenter 49, Mod 1, Configuration II, y = 0, z = -3/16
Figure A18-28 Carpenter 49, Mod 1, Configuration II, y = 5/32, z = 0
Figure A18-29 Carpenter 49, Mod 1, Configuration II, y = 0, z = 0
Figure A18-30 Carpenter 49, Mod 1, Configuration II, y = -5/32, z = 0
Figure A18-31 Carpenter 49, Mod 1, Configuration II, y = 5/32, z = 3/16
Figure A18-32 Carpenter 49, Mod 1, Configuration II, y = 0, z = 3/16
Figure A18-33 Carpenter 49, Mod 1, Configuration II, y = -5/32, z = -3/16
Figure A18-34 Carpenter 49, Mod 1, Configuration II, y = 0, z = 0; screen ~3.8" out
Figure A18-35 Carpenter 49, Mod II, Flight Configuration, y = +.1"
Figure A18-36 Carpenter 49, Mod II, Flight Configuration, y = 0
Figure A18-37 Carpenter 49, Mod II, Flight Configuration, y = -.1"
Figure A18-38 Carpenter 49, Mod II, Flight Configuration, y = +.1", graphical form
Figure A18-39 Carpenter 49, Mod II, Flight Configuration, y = 0, graphical form
Figure A18-40 Carpenter 49, Mod II, Flight Configuration, y = -.1", graphical form
Figure A18-41 Deflected Electron Beam Image, Carpenter 49, Mod II, Configuration I, z = 0
Figure A18-42 Deflected Electron Beam Image, Carpenter 49, Mod II, Configuration I, z = 5/16
Figure A18-43 Magnetic Field Intensity Along Central Axis as a Function of Magnet Pairs
Figure A18-44 Magnetic Field Intensity Along Central Axis as a Function of Magnet/Pole-Piece Configuration
Figure A18-45 Magnetic Field Intensity Along Central Axis as a Function of Yoke Material and Design
Figure A18-46 Location of deflected electron beam image. Comparison of Yoke C49/Mod I, Configuration I & II, target: x=0, y=0, z=-3/16
Figure A18-47 Location of deflected electron beam image. Comparison of Yoke C49/Mod I, Configuration I & II, target: x=0, y=0, z=0
Figure A18-48 Location of deflected electron beam image. Comparison of Yoke C49/Mod I, Configuration I & II, target: x=0, y=0, z=+3/16
Figure A18-49 Location of deflected electron beam image. Comparison of Mod I and II for Yoke C49, Configuration I, target: x=0, y=0, z=0.
Figure A18-50 Location of deflected electron beam image. Yoke C49/Mod I, Configuration II. Target screen moved back 0.375 inches.
Figure A18-51 Electron trajectories - 80 keV, Yoke C49/Mod I, Configuration II
Figure A18-52 Electron trajectories - 145 keV, Yoke C49, ModI, Configuration II
Figure A18-53 Solar Polar yoke

Return to HISCALE Data Analysis Handbook Table of Contents.
Return to HISCALE Data Production Center Main Page.

Updated 11/18/02, T. Hunt-Ward