|
Fundamental Technologies
Ulysses HISCALE Pages
|
Note: Many of these pages cannot be read by Netscape Navigator;
please use Internet Explorer (sorry).
Ulysses HISCALE Data Analysis Handbook
List of Figures
- Figure 2.1 ISPM EDR record format
- Figure 4.1 HISCALE viewing cones with
respect to Ulysses spin axis
- Figure 4.2 LAN2A and LAN2B simplified
cross-sections
- Figure 4.3a LAN2A cross section
detail (M'F')
- Figure 4.3b LAN2B telescope assembly
WART cross section detail
- Figure 4.3c LAN2B assembly MF cross
section detail
- Figure 4.3d LAN2B telescope assembly,
exterior view MF-WART
- Figure 4.4 HISCALE instrument assembly
photograph
- Figure 4.4a LAN assembly field of view
drawing
- Figure 4.4b HISCALE assembly FOV drawing,
detail a
- Figure 4.4c HISCALE assembly FOV drawing,
detail b
- Figure 4.4d Outline flight model LAN
experiment, detail 1
- Figure 4.4e Outline flight model LAN
experiment, detail 2
- Figure 4.4f Outline of flight model LAN
experiment
- Figure 4.5 LAN attached to Ulysses, view 1
- Figure 4.6 LAN attached to Ulysses, view 2
- Figure 4.7 External view of LAN2A (M'F'),
view 1
- Figure 4.8 External view of LAN2A (M'F'),
view 2
- Figure 4.9 Assembly cross section of LAN2A
- Figure 4.10 Magnetic yoke section, type 1
- Figure 4.11 Magnetic yoke front view,
type 1
- Figure 4.12 Magnetic yoke section back
view, type 1
- Figure 4.13 Section of magnet yoke, type
1
- Figure 4.14 External view of LAN2B
(MF-WART)
- Figure 4.15 Section of LAN2B (aperture
sketch)
- Figure 4.16 Magnet yoke type 2, front
view
- Figure 4.17 Magnet yoke type 2: cross
section
- Figure 4.18 Magnetic yoke section, type
2, back view
- Figure 4.19 LEMS detector mount
- Figure 4.20 Notch in deflection system
- Figure 4.21 Section of detector housing
- Figure 4.22 Parts list, LAN2B assembly
- Figure 4.23 Foil assembly
- Figure 4.24 Foil mount
- Figure 4.25a HISCALE analog signal block diagram (restoration in progress)
- Figure 4.25b HISCALE digital
signal block diagram
- Figure 4.26 Energy losses in LEMS30
- Figure 4.27 Energy losses in LEMS120
- Figure 4.28 Energy losses in LEFS60
- Figure 4.29 Energy losses for LEFS150
- Figure 4.30 Composition aperture energy losses
- Figure 4.31 Delta E versus E for composition
aperture (WART)
- Figure 4.32 WART channel definitions
- Figure 4.33 Data system block diagram
- Figure 4.34 Data system software block
diagram
- Figure 4.35 Science data format
- Figure 4.36 EDR summary diagram
- Figure 4.37 EDR summary list
- Figure 4.38 Data input-output timing
diagram
- Figure 4.39 Status preamble definitions,
bytes 1-3
- Figure 4.40 Status preamble definitions,
bytes 4-6
- Figure 4.41 CA priority byte 4-81
- Figure 4.42a Status trailer format
- Figure 4.42b Status trailer format,
continued
- Figure 4.43 Digital housekeeping format,
channels 2-4
- Figure 4.44 Obtaining rate data values by
adding modulus
- Figure 4.45 Telemetry mode changes
- Figure 4.46 Sector definitions for 0£ LAG<TSPIN/8
- Figure 4.47 Sector definitions for
TSpin/8£ Lag<TSpin/4
- Figure 4.48 Sun sensor
configuration
- Figure 4.49 XBS geometry
- Figure 4.50 Sun sensor
electronics
- Figure 4.51 AME sun sensor
electronics
- Figure 4.52 SRP filter flow
chart
- Figure 4.53 Implementation of
the SSC
- Figure 4.54 Flow chart for the
reconstitution of the SRP
- Figure 4.55 Error of SRP, double crossing
- Figure 4.56 Error of SRP, single crossing
- Figure 4.57 Orientation of LAN2B magnet in
electron beam
- Figure 4.58 Schematic ISPM LAN2B telescope
- Figure 4.59 Determination of electronic
counting thresholds using a calibrated pulser
- Figure 4.60 LAN2B B detector electron
detection efficiency, energy=40 keV
- Figure 4.61 LAN2B B detector electron
detection efficiency, energy=100 keV
- Figure 4.62 LAN2B angular location of B
peak efficiency
- Figure 4.63 LAN2B B detector peak
electron efficiency as f (energy)
- Figure 4.64 Electron energy deposited
in detector F
- Figure 4.65 Electron detection
efficiency of detector F LAN2B as f (energy)
- Figure 4.66 Electron detection
efficiency 30° CCW
- Figure 4.67 Electron detection
efficiency 20° CCW
- Figure 4.68 Electron detection
efficiency 10° CCW
- Figure 4.69 Electron detection
efficiency 0°
- Figure 4.70 Electron detection
efficiency 10° CW
- Figure 4.71 Electron detection
efficiency 20° CW
- Figure 4.72 Electron detection
efficiency 30° W
- Figure 4.73 PHA matrix for
Rutgers Composition Aperture calibration
- Figure 4.74 LAN flight model
Rutgers beam calibration 4-141
- Figure 4.75 Plots of G vs. E for all
eight trials 4-143
- Figure 4.76a Spectra plots for the DE and two
LEFS channels using IDF.DAT G-factors
- Figure 4.76b Spectra plots for the same
time period using Trial 10 G-factors
- Figure 4.76c Spectra plots for the same
time period using Table 4.18 G-factors
- Figure 4.77a Ratio plots for all four energy
channels for a 32-day period
- Figure 4.77b Ratio plots for a later time
period in 1991
- Figure 4.77c Ratio plots including the
electron event around day 301
- Figure 4.77d Ratio plots for a 32-day
period in 1992
- Figure 4.78 A plot comparing Kohl's
electron efficiency study with the simulation
- Figure 4.79 Comparison of simulation
results to S/C data LEMS120
- Figure 4.80 Comparison of simulation
results to S/C data LEMS30
- Figure 4.81 Comparison of simulation
results to S/C data LEFS60
- Figure 4.82 Comparison of simulation
results to S/C data LEFS150
- Figure 4.83 Flow chart for RTG
simulation
- Figure 4.84 Cosmic ray case 2 and
case 3
- Figure 4.85 Cosmic ray case 1 and
total
- Figure 4.86 Calculations of
penetration geometry, part I
- Figure 4.87 Calculations of
penetration geometry, part II
- Figure 4.88 LAN "Rosetta Stone"
for sectors
- Figure 4.89 LAN detectors angular
response
- Figure 4.90 RTG response in
MFSA (M¢ detector)
- Figure 4.91 LAN RTG tests
- Figure 4.92 Solar polar temperature
conversion
- Figure 5.1 Variation of the background excess
over the values in Table 5.8 with latitude for all the main rate channels
- Figure 5.2 Preliminary attempts to fit a
latitude-dependent background level to the P7, P2, and DE2 channels
- Figure 5.3 Daily average P¢
3 and DE3 rates vs. heliolatitude
- Figure 5.4 Rates versus heliolatitude for
all HISCALE channels
- Figure 5.5 The HISCALE instrument (photo)
- Figure 5.6 Configuration of LAN detector
telescopes
- Figure 5.7 LEMS120 cover (outside)
- Figure 5.8 SEEPHA plot during 92049
calibration
- Figure 5.9 Enlargement of PHA matrix
- Figure 5.10 LANSPECT output for 92049
calibration
- Figure 5.11 COMP spectrum and
composition ratios
- Figure 5.12 Calibration plots of WART and DE
channels vs. time
- Figure 5.13 Calibration plots of P¢ and P channels vs. time 5-25
- Figure 5.14 Calibration in B, C, and D
channels vs. time
- Figure 5.15 Calibration count rates vs.
time since launch
- Figure 5.16 Best fits to He decay
- Figure 5.17 Best fits to RTG background
- Figure 5.18 PHA matrix for 92049
calibration
- Figure 5.19 PHA matrix for 92049
calibration
- Figure 5.20 Thirty-two channel
spectra for 5 calibrations
- Figure 5.21 PHA matrix for 92049
calibration
- Figure 5.22 SPECTIME output for 94091
- Figure 5.23 Z2 time plots during
calibrations
- Figure 5.24 Beginning of 93008
calibration
- Figure 5.25 Open/close cover times
vs. AU
- Figure 5.26 PHA matrix plot during polar
pass
- Figure A2-1 Look angles for the five
detector telescopes for the LAN experiment
- Figure A2-2 LAN360 plot for channel P6
for hours 22-24 UT on day 82, 1991
- Figure A2-3 Diagram showing the
16 sectors that are used to determine the anisotropies for the spacecraft X-Z plane, the
detectors from which the measurements are made, and their final location on the LAN360
plot
- Figure A2-4 LAN plot for WART
channels in the XY plane for hours 0-24 UT on day 33, 1992 when Ulysses entered the Jovian
magnetosphere
- Figure A2-5a LAN plot for channel
P5 for hours 14-24 UT on day 33, 1992
- Figure A2-5b Plot with smooth = 1
- Figure A2-5c Setting foilfact to
0.0 allows the ion anisotropies in this energy range after 2130 UT to be seen
- Figure A3-1 Ulysses CDR solar wind
plasma and magnetic field 98 244 Sep 1
- Figure A3-2 Ulysses CDR solar
wind plasma and magnetic field 98 260 Sep 17
- Figure A3-3 Ulysses CDR energetic
particles, low energy ions and cosmic ray 98 244 Sep 1
- Figure A3-4 Ulysses CDR
energetic particles, low energy ions and cosmic ray 98 260 Sep 17
- Figure A3-5 Ulysses CDR plasma wave
98 244 Sep 1
- Figure A3-6 Ulysses CDR plasma
wave 98 260 Sep 17
- Figure A3-7 Ulysses CDR solar wind ion
composition 98 244 Sep 1
- Figure A3-8 Ulysses CDR solar
wind ion composition 98 260 Sep 17
- Figure A4-1 ULS SFDU primary and
secondary header format
- Figure A4-2 ULS SFDU tertiary
header format
- Figure A4-3 Ulysses CDF File 1 format
- Figure A4-4 Ulysses CDF File 2 format
- Figure A6-1 HISCALE hourly average of spin
average rates, type 1, without QCA (E1' FP6')
- Figure A6-2 HISCALE hourly average of spin
average rates, type 2, without QCA (FP7' P5')
- Figure A6-3 HISCALE hourly average of spin
average rates, type 3, without QCA (P6' W3)
- Figure A6-4 HISCALE hourly average of spin
average rates, type 4, without QCA (W4 Z2)
- Figure A6-5 HISCALE hourly average of spin
average rates, type 5, without QCA (Z2A E3)
- Figure A6-6 HISCALE hourly average of spin
average rates, type 6, without QCA (E4 P2)
- Figure A6-7 HISCALE hourly average of spin
average rates, type 7, without QCA (P3 P8)
- Figure A6-8 HISCALE hourly average of
spin average rates, type 8, without QCA (DE1 C WARTC)
- Figure A6-9 HISCALE hourly average of
spin average rates, type 9, without QCA (D WARTD F')
- Figure A6-10 HISCALE hourly average of
spin average rates, type 10, without QCA (X-Ray P1 X-ray P2)
- Figure A6-11 HISCALE hourly average of spin
average rates, type 1, with QCA (E1' FP6')
- Figure A6-12 HISCALE hourly average of
spin average rates, type 2, with QCA (FP7' P5')
- Figure A6-13 HISCALE hourly average of
spin average rates, type 3, with QCA (P6' W3)
- Figure A6-14 HISCALE hourly average of spin
average rates, type 4, with QCA (W4 Z2)
- Figure A6-15 HISCALE hourly average of
spin average rates, type 5, with QCA (Z2A E3)
- Figure A6-16 HISCALE hourly average of
spin average rates, type 6, with QCA (E4 P2)
- Figure A6-17 HISCALE hourly average of spin
average rates, type 7, with QCA (P3 P8)
- Figure A6-18 HISCALE hourly average of
spin average rates, type 8, with QCA (DE1 C WARTC)
- Figure A6-19 HISCALE hourly average of
spin average rates, type 9, with QCA (D WARTD F')
- Figure A6-20 HISCALE hourly average of
spin average rates, type 10, with QCA (X-Ray P1 X-ray P2)
- Figure A7-1 ULS SFDU primary header
format
- Figure A7-2 ULS SFDU secondary header
format
- Figure A7-3 ULS SFDU tertiary header
format (EDR)
- Figure A7-4 ULS EDR record format
- Figure A7-5 EDR/MDR format layout
- Figure A7-6 EDR file structure
- Figure A8-1 SEDR tape layout
- Figure A8-2 Data block
- Figure A8-3 Scale Factor Block
- Figure A8-4 ULS SEDR primary and
secondary SFDU headers
- Figure A8-5 ULS SEDR tertiary SFDU
header
- Figure A9-1 The HISCALE instrument aboard the
Ulysses spacecraft
- Figure A9-2 Electrons entering the LEMS30
aperture are deflected into the back of the Composition Aperture
- Figure A9-3 Calculating G for simple geometries
- Figure A9-4 The detector is broken into finite
area elements, and the solid angle for each element is determined
- Figure A9-5 Part of a mechanical drawing used to
model the geometry
- Figure A9-6 The coordinate system adopted for this
study
- Figure A9-7a The modeled geometry as viewed
in the xy plane
- Figure A9-7b The modeled geometry as viewed in the
xz plane
- Figure A9-7c A three-dimensional view of
the geometry
- Figure A9-8 The detector is broken up into finite
area elements, and a starting coordinate assigned to each
- Figure A9-9 The coordinate systems adopted
by Kohl and Shodhan
- Figure A9-10 To determine the solid angle for a
particular area element, the electron is placed at the starting coordinate with given
starting angles, and its trajectory traced out one line segment at a time.
- Figure A9-11 For each area element, the
number of electrons that escape the system is shown.
- Figure A9-12 Trajectories of escaping particles
for selected energies. The starting coordinate is located at the center of the detector.
- Figure A9-13 A plot of G vs. E for the
Trial 10 B field
- Figure A9-14 Plots of G vs. E for all eight
trials
- Figure A9-15a Spectra plots for the DE and two
LEFS channels using IDF.DAT G-factors
- Figure A9-15b Spectra plots for the same time
period using Trial 10 G-factors
- Figure A9-15c Spectral plots for the same time
period using Table A9-3 G factors
- Figure A9-16a Ratio plots for all four energy
channels for a 32-day period
- Figure A9-16b Ratio plots for a later time in
period in 1991
- Figure A9-16c Ratio plots including the electron
event around day 301
- Figure A9-16d Ratio plots for a 32-day period in
1992
- Figure A9-17 A plot comparing Kohl's
electron efficiency study with the simulation
- Figure A9-18 Coordinate labels
- Figure A9-19 Plane labels
- Figure A9-20 Geometry of detector segmentation
- Figure A9-21 Definition of the translation
parameters
- Figure A9-22 Magnetic intensity map
- Figure A9-23 Results of the observed and
calculated values, Z = 0.0 (trials 6 and 10)
- Figure A9-24 Results of the observed and
calculated values, Z = 0.1 (trials 6 and 10)
- Figure A9-25 Results of the observed and
calculated values, Z = -0.1 (trials 6 and 10)
- Figure A9-26 Results of the observed and
calculated values, Z = 0.0 (trials 4 and 11)
- Figure A9-27 Results of the observed and
calculated values, Z = 0.1 (trials 4 and 11)
- Figure A9-28 Results of the observed and
calculated values, Z = -0.1 (trials 4 and 11)
- Figure A9-29 Results of the observed and
calculated values, Z = 0.0 (trials 5 and 12)
- Figure A9-30 Results of the observed and
calculated values, Z = 0.1 (trials 5 and 12)
- Figure A9-31 Results of the observed and
calculated values, Z = -0.1 (trials 5 and 12)
- Figure A9-32 Results of the observed and
calculated values, Z = 0.0 (trials 3 and 13)
- Figure A9-33 Results of the observed and
calculated values, Z = 0.1 (trials 3 and 13)
- Figure A9-34 Results of the observed and
calculated values, Z = -0.1 (trials 3 and 13)
- Figure A9-35 X vs. Y for 20, 30, 40, and
50 keV electrons, maximum curvature A9-83
- Figure A9-36 X vs. Y for 75, 100, 150,
and 200 keV electrons, maximum curvature
- Figure A9-37 X vs. Y for 250, 300, 350,
and 400 keV electrons, maximum curvature
- Figure A9-38 X vs. Y for 20, 30, 40, and
50 keV electrons, mid curvature
- Figure A9-39 X vs. Y for 75, 100, 150,
and 200 keV electrons, mid curvature
- Figure A9-40 X vs. Y for 250, 300, 350,
and 400 keV electrons, mid curvature
- Figure A9-41 X vs. Y for 20, 30, 40, and
50 keV electrons, minimum curvature
- Figure A9-42 X vs. Y for 75, 100, 150,
and 200 keV electrons, minimum curvature
- Figure A9-43 X vs. Y for 250, 300, 350,
and 400 keV electrons, minimum curvature
- Figure A9-44 Illustration of
spectrum fitting
- Figure A9-45 Efficiency vs. angle
for Z = -0.5 cm
- Figure A9-46 Efficiency vs. angle
for Z = 0.0 cm
- Figure A9-47 Efficiency vs. angle
for Z = 0.3 cm
- Figure A9-48 Efficiency vs. angle
for Z = 0.6 cm
- Figure A9-49 Efficiency vs. angle
for Z = 1.0 cm
- Figure A10-1 The Ulysses
spacecraft
- Figure A10-2 The outline of
HISCALE telescopes
- Figure A10-3 Trajectories of
escaped electrons including specular backscattering of the energy for the center detector.
Radzimski's backscattering coefficients are used.
- Figure A10-4 View angle q = 0 deg., f = 90 deg.
- Figure A10-5 View angle q = -20 deg., f = 80 deg.
- Figure A10-6 The detector is
divided into 21 small DAi
- Figure A10-7 The number of
escapes at each DAi for energy of 50 keV;
Radzimski's h is used.
- Figure A10-8 The geometric factor
including specular backscattering; Radzimski's h is used.
- Figure A10-9 The geometric factor
including specular backscattering (both Radzimski's and Neubert's backscattering
coefficients) and non-scattering.
- Figure A10-10 Backscattering
coefficient vs. energy, Radzimski model
- Figure A10-11 Backscattering
coefficient vs. energy, Neubert model
- Figure A10-12 Detector mosaic
- Figure A10-13 Coordinates used
- Figure A10-14 Geometry of surface
crossing I
- Figure A10-15 Geometry of surface
crossing II
- Figure A10-16 Geometry of surface
crossing III
- Figure A10-17a View angle of q = 0 deg., f = 90 deg. Radzimski's
backscattering coefficients are used.
- Figure A10-17b View angle of q = 0 deg., f = 90 deg. Radzimski's
backscattering coefficients are used.
- Figure A10-17c View angle of q = 0 deg., f = 90 deg. Radzimski's
backscattering coefficients are used.
- Figure A10-18a View angle of q = -20 deg., f = 80 deg. Radzimski's
backscattering coefficients are used.
- Figure A10-18b View angle of q = -20 deg., f = 80 deg. Radzimski's
backscattering coefficients are used.
- Figure A10-18c View angle of q = -20 deg., f = 80 deg. Radzimski's
backscattering coefficients are used.
- Figure A10-19a View
angle of q = 0 deg., f = 90 deg.
Neubert's backscattering coefficients are used.
- Figure A10-19b View
angle of q = 0 deg., f = 90 deg.
Neubert's backscattering coefficients are used.
- Figure A10-19c View
angle of q = 0 deg., f = 90 deg.
Neubert's backscattering coefficients are used.
- Figure A10-20a View
angle of q = -20 deg., f = 80 deg.
Neubert's backscattering coefficients are used.
- Figure A10-20b View
angle of q = -20 deg., f = 80 deg.
Neubert's backscattering coefficients are used.
- Figure A10-20c View
angle of q = -20 deg., f = 80 deg.
Neubert's backscattering coefficients are used.
- Figure A16-1 LAN PHA system
design
- Figure A16-2 PHAGEN process
flow
- Figure A16-3 LAN PHA
generator PHAGEN, top level process flow
- Figure A16-4 Process_events
flow diagram
- Figure A16-5 Process_mfsa
flow diagram
- Figure A16-6 LAN plots and
color displays
- Figure A16-7 Sample plots of
Track Sums and Lanspect
- Figure A16-8 Sample PHA matrix
plot
- Figure A16-9 Sample SEEMFSA
plot
- Figure A16-10 Sample SPECTIME
plot
- Figure A16-11 Sample SPECPLOT
output
- Figure A16-12 Rate channel
energy spectogram display
- Figure A16-13 The lantracks008 track definition file shown with the PHA matrix from 26
and 27 March 1991 (restoration in progress)
- Figure A16-14 Histograms
for each track of the number of counts as a function of displacement in D from the
centreline
- Figure A16-15 Schematic
illustration of the determination of the effective minimum energy of a track
- Figure A17-1 Log channel
- Figure A17-2 Thermal vac test
results for log E channel
- Figure A17-3 Log amp/sensistor
configuration
- Figure A17-4 Thermal
configuration modifications
- Figure A17-5a PHA width at 25
deg. C (heaters on)
- Figure A17-5b PHA width, heaters
off
- Figure A17-6 DC offset vs. temperature
- Figure A17-7 Relocation of S/C Therm 1
on LEMS/LEFS LINEAR board
- Figure A17-8 Analog wave forms
- Figure A17-9 SAMA output waveform for
2 of the crosstalk cases
- Figure A17-10 SAMA output waveform
when channel F is excited
- Figure A17-11a MUX configuration
with M' selected
- Figure A17-11b Equivalent circuit
assuming feedthrough capacitance
- Figure A17-12 Crosstalk-LOG C into
LOG D
- Figure A17-13 LAN pulser test
set-up
- Figure A17-14 Random pulser test
results
- Figure A17-15 Pile-up in D, no
effect in C
- Figure A17-16 Random pulser test
results for pile-down
- Figure A17-17 Pile-down in D,
little effect in C
- Figure A17-18 Pile-down in D
(similar to Figure A17-17) associated with a low value of C from the falling edge of the
main lobe
- Figure A18-1 Magnet field survey
mechanical setup
- Figure A18-2 Sketch to indicate axis
orientation with respect to magnets
- Figure A18-3 Sketch to indicate
yoke/electron beam orientation on electrostatic accelerator at NASA/GSFC
- Figure A18-4 Yoke SST 416/APL,
Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=+0.1"
- Figure A18-5 Yoke SST 416/APL,
Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0
- Figure A18-6 Yoke SST 416/APL,
Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=-0.1"
- Figure A18-7 Yoke SST 416/APL,
Configuration II, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=+0.1"
- Figure A18-8 Yoke SST 416/APL,
Configuration II, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0
- Figure A18-9 Yoke SST 416/APL,
Configuration II, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=-0.1"
- Figure A18-10 Yoke SST 416/APL,
Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=+0.1", graphical form
- Figure A18-11 Yoke SST 416/APL,
Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0, graphical form
- Figure A18-12 Yoke SST 416/APL,
Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=-0.1", graphical form
- Figure A18-13 Yoke SST 416/APL,
Configuration II, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=+0.1", graphical form
- Figure A18-14 Yoke SST 416/APL,
Configuration II, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0, graphical form
- Figure A18-15 Yoke SST 416/APL,
Configuration II, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=-0.1", graphical form
- Figure A18-16 Yoke SST 416/UCB,
Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0
- Figure A18-17 Yoke SST 416/UCB,
Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0, graphical form
- Figure A18-18 Carpenter 49/APL,
Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0
- Figure A18-19 Carpenter 49/APL,
Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0, graphical form
- Figure A18-20 Carpenter 49, Mod 1,
Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0
- Figure A18-21 Carpenter 49, Mod 1,
Configuration II, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0
- Figure A18-22 Carpenter 49, Mod 1,
Configuration I, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0, graphical form
- Figure A18-23 Carpenter 49, Mod 1,
Configuration II, Magnets 1 and 2, Y=0, graphical form
- Figure A18-24 Carpenter 49, Mod 1,
Configuration I, z = -3/16
- Figure A18-25 Carpenter 49, Mod 1,
Configuration I, z = 0
- Figure A18-26 Carpenter 49, Mod 1,
Configuration I, z = +3/16
- Figure A18-27 Carpenter 49, Mod 1,
Configuration II, y = 0, z = -3/16
- Figure A18-28 Carpenter 49, Mod 1,
Configuration II, y = 5/32, z = 0
- Figure A18-29 Carpenter 49, Mod 1,
Configuration II, y = 0, z = 0
- Figure A18-30 Carpenter 49, Mod 1,
Configuration II, y = -5/32, z = 0
- Figure A18-31 Carpenter 49, Mod 1,
Configuration II, y = 5/32, z = 3/16
- Figure A18-32 Carpenter 49, Mod 1,
Configuration II, y = 0, z = 3/16
- Figure A18-33 Carpenter 49, Mod 1,
Configuration II, y = -5/32, z = -3/16
- Figure A18-34 Carpenter 49, Mod 1,
Configuration II, y = 0, z = 0; screen ~3.8" out
- Figure A18-35 Carpenter 49, Mod II,
Flight Configuration, y = +.1"
- Figure A18-36 Carpenter 49, Mod II,
Flight Configuration, y = 0
- Figure A18-37 Carpenter 49, Mod II,
Flight Configuration, y = -.1"
- Figure A18-38 Carpenter 49, Mod II,
Flight Configuration, y = +.1", graphical form
- Figure A18-39 Carpenter 49, Mod II,
Flight Configuration, y = 0, graphical form
- Figure A18-40 Carpenter 49, Mod II,
Flight Configuration, y = -.1", graphical form
- Figure A18-41 Deflected Electron Beam
Image, Carpenter 49, Mod II, Configuration I, z = 0
- Figure A18-42 Deflected Electron Beam
Image, Carpenter 49, Mod II, Configuration I, z = 5/16
- Figure A18-43 Magnetic Field Intensity
Along Central Axis as a Function of Magnet Pairs
- Figure A18-44 Magnetic Field Intensity
Along Central Axis as a Function of Magnet/Pole-Piece Configuration
- Figure A18-45 Magnetic Field Intensity
Along Central Axis as a Function of Yoke Material and Design
- Figure A18-46 Location of deflected
electron beam image. Comparison of Yoke C49/Mod I, Configuration I & II, target: x=0,
y=0, z=-3/16
- Figure A18-47 Location of deflected
electron beam image. Comparison of Yoke C49/Mod I, Configuration I & II, target: x=0,
y=0, z=0
- Figure A18-48 Location of deflected
electron beam image. Comparison of Yoke C49/Mod I, Configuration I & II, target: x=0,
y=0, z=+3/16
- Figure A18-49 Location of deflected
electron beam image. Comparison of Mod I and II for Yoke C49, Configuration I, target:
x=0, y=0, z=0.
- Figure A18-50 Location of deflected
electron beam image. Yoke C49/Mod I, Configuration II. Target screen moved back 0.375
inches.
- Figure A18-51 Electron trajectories -
80 keV, Yoke C49/Mod I, Configuration II
- Figure A18-52 Electron trajectories -
145 keV, Yoke C49, ModI, Configuration II
- Figure A18-53 Solar Polar yoke
Updated 11/18/02, T. Hunt-Ward