Judge Rasure/Selected Published Opinions
224 South Boulder Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74103 (918) 699-4000
 
 
Case
 
Issue(s)
In re Cerrudo, 214 B.R. 500 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1997) (Case No. 96-02334-R, Doc. 14) (ch. 7)
 
  • Reopening bankruptcy case to add unscheduled creditor; 11 U.S.C. §§ 350(b), 727(b), 523(a)(3).
In re Carrillo, 215 B.R. 212 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1997) (Case No. 96-05178-R, Doc. 60) (ch. 13)  
  • Burden of proof in objecting to claim.
  • Res judicata effect of confirmation of chapter 13 plan.
In re Lewis, 216 B.R. 644 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1998) (Case No. 97-01668-R, Doc. 30) (ch. 7)
 
  • Homestead; abandonment of homestead, exemption of proceeds; 31 O.S. §§1, 2.
In re Brashers, 216 B.R. 59 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1998) (Case No. 97-03396-R, Doc. 14) (ch. 7)
 
  • Unpaid income taxes not consumer debt for purpose of determining substantial abuse; 11 U.S.C. §§ 101(8), 707(b).
In re Segura, 218 B.R. 166 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1998) (Case No. 97-03289-R, Doc. 25) (ch. 13); superseded in part by Till v. SCS Credit Corp., 124 S.Ct. 1951 (2004).
 
  • Cramdown rate of interest in chapter 13 case (following Tenth Circuit); 11 U.S.C. 1325(a)(5).
  • Subsequently in Till, U.S. Supreme Court set cramdown rate as prime rate plus adjustment for risk of non-payment.
Bank One Columbus, N.A. v. Schad (In re Kountry Korner Store), 221 B.R. 265 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1998) (Adv. No. 96-0114-R, Doc. 29)(ch. 7)
 
  • Dischargeability of credit card debt; burden of proof; 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), (B) and (C).
In re Suddarth, 222 B.R. 352 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1998) (Case No. 97-04791-R, Doc. 22) (ch. 7), affd 232 B.R. 789 (N.D. Okla. 1999) (Doc. 31, Doc. 32), affd 201 F.3d 449 (10th Cir. 1999) (TABLE)  
  • Determination of validity of lien in contested matter; 11 U.S.C. § 362(d); Bankr. R. 7001.
  • Perfection of security interest in vehicle under Oklahoma law; sufficiency of lien entry form; 47 O.S. § 1110; 12A O.S. § 9-402(8).
In re Digital Impact, Inc., 223 B.R. 1 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1998) (Case No. 97-00806-R, Doc. 272) (ch. 11)

 
  • Plan confirmation requirements; 11 U.S.C. § 1129.
  • Classification of claims; full payment of administrative expenses; 11 U.S.C. §§ 503(b), 507(a), 1126(c), 1129(a)(9).
  • Subject matter jurisdiction; 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b).
  • Jurisdiction/power to order release of non-debtor third party; 11 U.S.C. § 524(e).
In re Richardson, 224 B.R. 804 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1998) (Case No. 98-01571-R, Doc. 16)(ch. 7)
 
  • Avoidance of judicial lien on Oklahoma homestead after amendment of Oklahoma law to allow judicial liens on homestead; 11 U.S.C. § 522(f); 12 O.S. Supp. 1997, § 706.
Spectrum Paint Co. v. Chambers (In re Chambers), 226 B.R. 915 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1998) (Adv. No. 97-0361, Doc. 22) (ch. 7)
 
  • Exception to discharge for embezzlement; 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4).
  • Application of Oklahoma Construction Trust Fund statute; 42 O.S. §§ 152, 153.
  • Automatic stay/criminal prosecution of debtor; 11 U.S.C. § 362(b).
In re Commercial Financial Services, Inc., 233 B.R. 885 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1999) (Case No. 98-05162-R, Doc. 707), affd by District Court (Doc. 2132), affd 246 F.3d 1291 (10th Cir. 2001) (Doc. 2930) (ch. 11)

Contested matters between CFS and Spangler, Phelps, Bachman.

 
  • Priority of contract termination pay claims of employees terminated post-petition; 11 U.S.C. §§ 503(b)(1)(A), 507(a)(1).
In re Commercial Financial Services, Inc., 238 B.R. 479 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1999) (Case No. 98-05162-R, Doc. 1212), appeal dismissed by District Court (Docs. 2193, 2427) (ch. 11)

Contested matters initiated by William Kuntz

 
  • Pleadings stricken for lack of standing to appear and be heard in chapter 11 case; U.S. Const. Art. 3, § 1, 11 U.S.C. § 1109(b).
Commercial Financial Services, Inc. v. Brady (In re Commercial Financial Services, Inc.), 239 B.R. 586 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1999) (Adv. No. 99-0038-R, Doc. 46), recommendation adopted by District Court (Doc. 56) (ch. 11)
 
  • Report and recommendation to District Court on motion to withdraw reference; 28 U.S.C. 157(d), Bankr. R. 5011, Dist. Ct. Misc. Order 128, Rules B6 and B14.
  • Core jurisdiction in action by debtor against employee for claims arising from postpetition conduct; 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3).
  • Entitlement to jury trial; U.S. Const. Amd. 7, 28 U.S.C. § 157(e).
In re Commercial Financial Services, Inc., 247 B.R. 828 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2000) (Case No. 98-05162-R, Doc. 1958) (ch. 11)

Contested matter initiated by debtors motion for protective order; objection by Chase

 
  • Rule 2004 discovery.
  • Protective Order; Bankr. R. 7026.
  • Bankruptcy court jurisdiction over records of debtor; 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(a), 1334(e); 11 U.S.C. § 541(a).
  • Third party efforts to obtain debtors records/information other than in bankruptcy proceeding subject to automatic stay; 11 U.S.C. § 362.
  • Post-closing jurisdiction of court.
  • Attorney-client privilege; work product doctrine; subject matter waiver; opinion v. non-opinion work product doctrine.
Commercial Financial Services, Inc. v. Jones (In re Commercial Financial Services, Inc.), 251 B.R. 397 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2000) (Adv. No. 99-0005-R, Doc. 22), recommendation adopted by District Court (Doc. 26)  
  • Report and recommendation to District Court on motion to withdraw reference; 28 U.S.C. §157(d); Bankr. R. 5011; Dist. Ct. Misc. Order 128, Rule B6.
  • Setoff, recoupment as claims against estate resulting in core jurisdiction, waiver of right to jury trial; 11 U.S.C. § 553; 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E).
  • Collection of debt owed to estate using trustees turnover power; 11 U.S.C. § 542(b).
  • Disallowance of claims; 11 U.S.C. § 502(d).
  • Abstention; 28 U.S.C. § 1334(c)(1).
Commercial Financial Services, Inc. v. Bartmann, et al. (In re Commercial Financial Services, Inc.), 251 B.R. 414 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2000) (Adv. No. 99-0006-R, Doc. 20), supplemented by Commercial Financial Services, Inc. v. Bartmann, et al. (In re Commercial Financial Services, Inc.), 255 B.R. 68 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2000) (Doc. 35), recommendation adopted by District Court (Doc 39)
 
  • Report and recommendation to District Court on motion to withdraw reference; 28 U.S.C. § 157(d); Bankr. R. 5011; Dist. Ct. Misc. Order 128, Rule B6.
  • Related to jurisdiction; 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b).
  • Right to jury trial; U.S. Const. Amd. 7.
  • Deferral of withdrawal of reference.
  • Collection of debt owed to estate using trustees turnover power; 11 U.S.C. § 542(b).
  • Disallowance of claims; 11 U.S.C. § 502(d).
  • Abstention; 28 U.S.C. § 1334(c)(1).

Supplement:

  • Reconsideration of report and recommendation in light of later occurring events.
  • Claims for indemnification and setoff invoked bankruptcy courts core jurisdiction, waived right to jury trial.
Snider v. Commercial Financial Services, Inc. (In re Commercial Financial Services, Inc.), 252 B.R. 516 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2000) (Adv. No. 99-0009-R) (Doc. 79), recommendation adopted by District Court (Doc. 145)  
  • Report and recommendation to District Court on motion to withdraw reference; 28 U.S.C. § 157(d); Bankr. R. 5011; Dist. Ct. Misc. Order 128, Rule B6.
  • Time in which to file motion to withdraw reference; Dist. Ct. Misc. Order 128, Rule B6(2).
  • Filing adversary proceeding against debtor in bankruptcy court invoked core jurisdiction of bankruptcy court and waived right to jury trial.
  • Suits against trustees; 28 U.S.C. § 959(a).
  • Claims made under Workers Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act are not personal injury claims requiring trial in district court; 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(5), 1411(a).
NationsBank, N.A. v. Commercial Financial Services, Inc. (In re Commercial Financial Services, Inc.), 268 B.R. 579 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2001) (Adv. No. 98356-R, Doc. 101)  
  • Bankr. R. 7001.
  • Constructive trust under Oklahoma law.
  • Subordination of claims for rescission of securities transactions; 11 U.S.C. § 510(b).
  • Particular debt instruments were securities; 11 U.S.C. § 101(49)(A).
  • Pleading fraud; Bankr. R. 9, 12; Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b), 12(b)(6).
  • Elements of fraud; Oklahoma common law.
  • Fraud in sale of securities, proximate cause; Restatement of Torts § 548A.
  • Resulting trust under Oklahoma law.
Ehrig v. United States (In re Ehrig), 308 B.R. 542 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2004) (Adv. No. 03-0142-R, Doc. 21)
 
  • Taxes for which a return, if required, was not filed within two years before bankruptcy were not dischargeable; 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(1)(B).
  • Substitute for return filed by IRS under 26 U.S.C. § 6020 was not a return.
  • Return filed by debtor subsequent to substitute for return and assessment of tax, but within two years of bankruptcy, served no purpose and thus was not a required return.
In re Manchester Gas Storage, Inc., 309 B.R. 354 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2004) (Case No. 00-04780-R, Doc. 501)
 
  • Objection to claims: standing-11 U.S.C. § 502(a); burden of proof - Bankr. R. 3001.
  • Contract enforcement under Oklahoma law: consideration; pre-existing duty rule; consideration for modification of a contract; promissory estoppel and unjust enrichment as substitutes for consideration; 15 O.S. § 106, 107, 114, 115.
  • Rejection of executory contract: distinction between rejection and termination of contract; approval of contract termination- 11 U.S.C. § 363; measure of rejection damages; mitigation of rejection damages.
  • Binding effect of confirmed plan.
  • Disallowance of claims for post-petition interest-11 U.S.C. § 502(b); exception for oversecured creditors11 U.S.C. § 506(b) and solvent chapter 7 estates-11 U.S.C. § 726(a)(5).
In re Bartmann, 320 B.R. 725 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2004) (Case No. 03-04975-R, Doc. 370)
 
  • Counsels duty to disclose compensation or retainer paid prepetition in contemplation of or in connection with bankruptcy case -11 U.S.C. § 329; Bankr. R. 2016.
  • Avoidance of transfers made in violation of order enjoining transfer of assets pending asset hearing.
  • Disinterestedness of counsel for trustee/DIP, duty to disclose potential conflicts of interest 11 U.S.C. §§ 101(14), 327; Bankr. R. 2014.
  • Effect of failing to obtain order approving retention of counsel for trustee/DIP on payment of compensation by estate -11 U.S.C. §§ 327, 330.
  • Requirement for court approval of payment of compensation from estate; disgorgement of unapproved postpetition payments - 11 U.S.C. § 330.
  • Disgorgement of excessive prepetition compensation - 11 U.S.C. § 329; Bankr. R. 2017.
Sheffield Steel Corp. v. HMK Enterprises, Inc., et al, (In re Sheffield Steel Corp.), 320 B.R. 405 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2004) (Adv. No. 03-0134-R, Doc. 59) (order denying motion to dismiss)
 
  • Standard for motion to dismiss - Bankr. R. 7012; Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b).
  • Directors liability for declaring and causing corporation to pay illegal dividend (Delaware law).
  • Shareholders liability for receipt of illegal dividend (Delaware law).
  • Statute of limitations on claim for recovery of illegal dividend (Delaware law).
  • Equitable tolling of statute of limitations for corporations claims of breach of fiduciary duty against officers or directors upon finding of self-dealing and fraudulent concealment (Delaware law).
  • Aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty (Delaware law).
  • Effect of allegations of self-dealing or gross negligence on business judgment rule (Delaware law).
Sheffield Steel Corp. v. HMK Enterprises, Inc., et al, (In re Sheffield Steel Corp.), 320 B.R. 423 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2004) (Adv. No. 03-0134-R, Doc. 65) (order denying motion for summary judgment)
 
  • Summary judgment standard and burdens - Bankr. R. 7056; Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.
  • Denying or deferring consideration of summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f) when affidavits are unavailable.
  • Avoidance of fraudulent transfers under Oklahoma law - 24 O.S. §§ 116, 117; reasonably equivalent value.
  • Fraudulent transfer - insolvency - balance sheet test using going concern value vs. liquidation value. 24 O.S. § 117.
  • Fraudulent transfer - unreasonably small assets. 24 O.S. § 116.
  • Avoidance of fraudulent transfer to extent recovery would benefit the estate; amount of claim of triggering creditor irrelevant; assessing benefit to estate after confirmation of plan - 11 U.S.C. §§ 544, 550.
  • Avoidance of transfer of illegal dividend (Delaware law); statutory safe harbor defense.
  • Estoppel defense to fraudulent transfer claim.
In re Git-N-Go, Inc., 321 B.R.54 (N.D. Okla. 2004) (Case No. 04-10509-R, Doc. 89) (order denying employment of counsel to DIP)  
  • Disinterestedness of counsel and conflicts of interest - 11 U.S.C. §§ 101(14), 327.
  • Ability of DIP to waive conflict of proposed counsel.
In re Git-N-Go, Inc., 322 B.R.164 (N.D. Okla. 2004) (Case No. 04-10509-R, Doc. 1084) (order denying motion for administrative claim)  
  • Distinction between postpetition contracts which require notice and court approval to be enforceable - 11 U.S.C. § 363(b)(1) - and those which are ordinary course - 11 U.S.C. § 363(c); horizontal and vertical tests.
  • Postpetition contracts constituting compromise and settlement of claim which require notice and court approval to be enforceable. Bankr. R. 9019.
Sharp v. Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. (In re Commercial Financial Services, Inc.), 322 B.R. 440 (N.D. Okla. 2003) (Adv. No. 03-0008-R, Doc. 26) (order denying motion to dismiss and granting leave to amend)
 
  • Purpose and application of Bankr. R. 9; Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b) (pleading fraud with particularity).
  • Application of Rule 9(b) to fraudulent transfer claims.
  • Sufficiency of insolvency allegations.
  • Form of fraudulent transfer complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 84.
  • Sufficiency of allegations made on information and belief.
  • Sufficiency of Section 502(d) claim; 11 U.S.C. § 502(d); Bankr. R. 7018; Fed.R.Civ.P. 18(b).
Malloy v. Hawk, et al. (In re 4 Front Petroleum), 345 B.R. 744 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2006) (Adv. No. 06-1170-R, Doc. 49) (Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Abstention and Remand to State Court)  
  • Elements of mandatory abstention - 11 U.S.C. § 1334(c)(2).
  • Core v. related to proceedings - 11 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1)-(3).
  • Remand v. dismissal of removed proceeding subject to mandatory abstention.
Sharp v. Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. and Chase Securities, Inc.(In re Commercial Financial Services, Inc.), 350 B.R. 520 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2005) (Adv. No. 03-0008-R, Doc. 272) (Order Denying Defendants Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiffs Expert Carmen R. Eggleston)
 
  • Application of FRE 702 and 703 and Daubert and Kumho cases to determine whether proposed expert testimony should be admitted.
  • Approaches to evaluating a going concern and placing a value on particular assets and liabilities in determining whether debtor was insolvent at time of alleged fraudulent transfers.
  • Amendment to and supplement of expert reports pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e).
Sharp v. Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. and Chase Securities, Inc., 350 B.R. 559 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2005) (Adv. No. 03-0008-R, Doc. 273) (Order Denying Defendants Motion Pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 104, 702 and 703 to Exclude Proposed Expert Testimony of Louise Epstein on Reasonably Equivalent Value)  
  • Application of FRE 702 and 703 and Daubert and Kumho cases to determine whether proposed expert is qualified to testify and whether testimony is relevant and reliable.
  • Evaluation of methodology of proposed expert in valuing charged off accounts acquired by debtor to assess whether debtor received reasonably equivalent value for price paid by debtor for accounts.
  • Approaches to determining reasonably equivalent value as that term is used in 11 U.S.C. § 548.
Owens v. Bolger (In re Bolger), 351 B.R. 165 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2006) (Adv. No. 06-1038-R, Doc. 17) (Memorandum Opinion)  
  • Application of Oklahoma Construction Trust Fund Statutes - 42 O.S. §§ 152, 153
  • Non-dischargeability of debt arising from lienable claims under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4).
  • Circumstances under which a creditor may recover attorney fees and costs for prevailing in Section 523(a)(4) litigation.
In re Hentges, 351 B.R. 758(Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2006) (Invol. No. 05-30076, Doc. 65) (Order Denying Application of Counsel of Involuntary Debtor for Compensation and Reimbursement of Attorneys Fees)  
  • Application of 11 U.S.C. § 303(i)(1) (recovery of fees by alleged debtor upon dismissal of involuntary petition)
  • Application of 11 U.S.C. § 303(i)(2) (damages for filing involuntary petition in bad faith)
  • Various tests for determining whether involuntary petition was filed in bad faith.
In re Hentges, 352 B.R. 487 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2006) (Invol. No. 05-30076, Doc. 89) (Order Denying Motion to Modify April 18, 2006 Order)  
  • Inherent power and discretion of court to comment on attorney performance in cases before the court
  • Application of 15 O.S. § 338 (exoneration of guarantee))
  • ORPC 3.1 -Meritorious Claims and Contentions
  • ORPC 3.3 - Candor to the Tribunal
  • Fed. R. Bank. P. 9011
In re Hentges, 350 B.R. 586 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2006) (Invol. No. 06-10451-R, Doc. 46) (Memorandum Opinion)  
  • Eligibility of petitioning creditors to file involuntary petition under 11 U.S.C. § 303(b); debts not subject to bona fide dispute.
  • Recoupment claim or compulsory counterclaim as a basis for bona fide dispute.
  • Standard for entering an order for relief under 11 U.S.C. § 303(h); not paying undisputed debts as they become due; totality of the circumstances test.
  • Effect of dismissal of previous case without prejudice - Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
  • Application of claim preclusion and issue preclusion; finality of order not diminished by unresolved collateral issues.
Kopp v. United States (In re Kopp) , 355 B.R. 296, 2006 WL 3350766 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2006) (Adv. No. 06-1182, Doc. 12) (Order Denying United States’ Motion to Dismiss and Order Abstaining From Determining Legality and Amount of Tax Assessment Under Section 505)  
  • Standard for determining whether case is moot.
  • Bankruptcy court’s power to review tax claims under 11 U.S.C. § 505.
  • Abstention from determining tax claim under 11 U.S.C. § 505.

In re Kendall, 380 B.R. 37 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2007) (Case No. 07-10800-R, Doc. 69) (Memorandum Opinion)

 
  • Allowance of claims, and burdens of production and proof relevant to objections to claims - 11 U.S.C. § 502(b) and Bankruptcy Rules 3001(c) and (f).
  • Establishing claim in absence of prima facie presumption accorded by Bankruptcy Rule 3001(f).
  • Establishing ownership of assigned claim.
Affordable Bail Bonds, Inc. V. Thompson (In re Thompson), 2007 WL 2738171 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2007) (Adv. No. 07-1016-R, Doc. 20) (Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying Plaintiffs’ Cross Motion for Summary Judgment)  
  • Dischargeability of debt to bail bondsman arising from the debtor’s breach of agreement to indemnify bondsman against forfeiture of bail bond - 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(7).
DM 3808    
Copyright © 2006 United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Oklahoma.
All rights reserved