Next: Error Analysis
Up: GRAVITY FIELD IMPROVEMENT
Previous: Orbit performance measured by
Since we have used nearly all the available MGS data, the only
quasi-independent data are the S Band data from the Viking Orbiters
and Mariner 9. It is a necessary condition that the new models including
MGS data obtain comparable fits to solutions based solely on the
historical data, for instance the
GMM-1[29], and Mars50c[30] solutions. Both
GMM-1 and Mars50c are 50x50 solutions.
A series of test arcs of the Mariner 9 and Viking Orbiter data
were selected for each distinct orbital inclination and periapse
altitude. The orbit geometry and the number of test arcs selected
are listed in Table 9. All the orbits were highly eccentric, and
the orbit periods ranged from 12 to 24 hours[13].
Two observations are readily apparent upon examination of the RMS
of fit for these test arcs. First, the RMS of fit for all the new
models with MGS is broadly similar to the GMM-1 and Mars50c models.
In fact, for the low altitude periapse data (300 km), the fit to
the Viking-1 and Viking-2 data is superior with the MGS derived
models. Even the models that exclude all the historical data
(MGM0964C18 and MGM0964C20) fit these low altitude data better
than GMM-1 and Mars50c. The second observation pertains to
the fit to the high altitude periapse data, in particular those
from Mariner 9 and Viking Orbiter 1. Here the fits are degraded
with the MGS derived models, compared to GMM-1 and Mars50c.
So these results suggest an inconsistency in the long-wavelength
gravity field to which MGS and the Viking Orbiters and Mariner 9
are sensitive. This inconsistency may reflect a discordance
in reference frames, and an inadequacy in the 1991 IAU planet orientation
model[17]. New solutions for the Mars orientation are available
based on simultaneous analysis of Viking Lander and Pathfinder tracking
which could be used instead of the 1991 IAU model.
Table 9: Mariner 9 and Viking Orbiter Orbit Summary |
Spacecraft |
Periapse |
Inclination |
No. of Test |
|
Ht. (km) |
(deg) |
Arcs |
Mariner 9 |
1600 |
64 |
6 |
Viking-1 |
1500 |
39 |
6 |
Viking-1 |
300 |
39 |
4 |
Viking-2 |
1500 |
55 & 75 |
2 |
Viking-2 |
800 |
80 |
7 |
Viking-2 |
300 |
80 |
9 |
Table 10: Mariner 9 and Viking Orbiter: RMS Summary |
Orbit |
Gravity Models:
(RMS of fit in mm/s) |
|
GMM-1 |
Mars50c |
0890 |
0890I |
0964C5A |
0964C18 |
0964C20 |
Mariner 9 |
1.52 |
1.47 |
1.96 |
2.72 |
1.93 |
1.73 |
1.89 |
VO-1, 1500 km |
2.36 |
2.42 |
2.35 |
2.56 |
4.20 |
4.20 |
4.03 |
VO-1, 300 km |
1.77 |
1.55 |
1.48 |
1.63 |
1.74 |
1.54 |
1.62 |
VO-2, 1500 km |
1.93 |
2.19 |
1.54 |
1.56 |
1.67 |
1.97 |
1.82 |
VO-2 800 km |
1.84 |
1.80 |
1.79 |
1.85 |
2.82 |
2.41 |
2.00 |
VO-2 300 km |
1.16 |
1.17 |
0.90 |
0.86 |
0.84 |
0.78 |
0.78 |
Next: Error Analysis
Up: GRAVITY FIELD IMPROVEMENT
Previous: Orbit performance measured by
Shelley Rowton
1999-10-20