skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 058505  
Title: DISTRICT JUSTICE SYSTEM IN PENNSYLVANIA - A NEED FOR CONTINUING INPROVEMENT
Author(s): M G CULLEN ; N SELLERS
Publication Date: 1978
Pages: 10
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: PROBLEMS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RELATIVE TO THE UNIFIED JUDICIAL SYSTEM WHICH NOW INCLUDES JUSTICES OF THE PEACE IN PENNSYLVANIA ARE PRESENTED; FURTHER CHANGES IN THE DISTRICT COURT SYSTEM ARE SUGGESTED.
Abstract: THE TERMS 'DISTRICT JUSTICE' AND 'DISTRICT COURT' DEVELOPED AS A RESULT OF THE ENABLING LEGISLATION AUTHORIZED BY CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES IN 1968. PRIOR TO THESE CHANGES, THERE WERE OVER 5,000 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE IN PENNSYLVANIA; NOW THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 500. DESPITE THE SOUND MOVE OF REORGANIZATION, THE DISTRICT COURT STILL REMAINS A QUASI-INDEPENDENT ENTITY, ONLY LOOSELY SUPERVISED AND SUPPORTED BY THE COUNTY COURT. IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT LEGISLATION BE ENACTED TO PROVIDE FOR STATEWIDE MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR OFFICE FACILITIES, FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPLIES, AND FOR DISTRICT COURT LIBRARIES AND PUBLICATIONS. IN ADDITION, TAX AUDITS SHOULD BE CONSOLIDATED. BECAUSE OF THE LARGE VOLUME OF MINOR OFFENSES, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT LESSER CRIMES BE DIVERTED FROM THE COMMON PLEAS COURTS TO THE DISTRICT COURTS, THIS COULD BE EFFECTED BY EITHER ENLARGING THE JUSTICES' CRIMINAL JURISDICTIONS, REDUCING SOME CRIMES TO SUMMARY LEVEL, OR ADOPTING A FORM OF DUAL JURISDICTION TO PERMIT ELECTION OF TRIAL IN THE DISTRICT COURTS. CASE LOADS WOULD NOT BE INCREASED SINCE THE DISTRICT COURTS ARE ALREADY CONDUCTING PRELIMINARY HEARINGS FOR OFFENSES BEYOND THEIR PRESENT SUMMARY JURISDICTION. IT IS ALSO SUGGESTED THAT THE SYSTEM OF PRELIMINARY ARRAIGNMENT BE ALTERED TO PERMIT THE ARRESTING OFFICER A WIDER AUTHORITY IN RELEASING DEFENDANTS UPON THEIR OWN RECOGNIZANCES, AS IT IS DONE IN GREAT BRITAIN. PRELIMINARY HEARINGS IN MISDEMEANOR CASES COULD BE SIMILARLY MODIFIED. FINALLY, JUST AS MINOR MISDEMEANORS SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE COURTS OF COMMON PLEAS, NONCRIMINAL PARKING ABUSES SHOULD ALSO BE TAKEN FROM THE MAGISTERIAL COURTS. ENFORCEMENT COULD BE EFFECTED BY PERMITTING THE LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES TO ISSUE AND ENFORCE PARKING TICKETS, WITH MORE SERIOUS OFFENDERS BEING PROSECUTED AS CRIMINALS IN THE DISTRICT COURTS. FOOTNOTES INCLUDED. (LWM)
Index Term(s): Court reorganization ; Justices of the peace ; State courts ; Court structure ; Pennsylvania
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=58505

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder