Skip Navigation
 
ACF
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™  |  Print      


U.S. Capitol image

Main Menu


 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families

Office of Refugee Resettlement





EXPIRED



Notice of Final Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Formula Allocations for Targeted Assistance Program Grants to States for Services to Refugees.

AGENCY: Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), ACF, HHS

ACTION: Notice of final Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 formula allocations for Targeted Assistance Program (TAP) grants to States for services to refugees in local areas of high need.1

[CFDA No. 93.584, Refugee and Entrant Assistance – Targeted Assistance Grants]

SUMMARY: This final notice announces the availability of funds and award procedures for FY 2007 Targeted Assistance Program (TAP) grants to States for services to refugees under the Refugee Resettlement Program (RRP). These grants are for service provision in localities with large refugee populations, high refugee concentrations, high use of public assistance, and where specific needs exist for supplementation of currently available resources.

Qualification of counties for eligibility for TAP grants is determined once every three years as stated initially in the FY 1999 Notice of Final Availability of Targeted Assistance Allocations to States, which was published in the Federal Register on March 10, 1999 (64 FR 11927). The FY 2005 – FY 2007 three-year project cycle began in FY 2005. FY 2005 was the year for the re-qualification of counties for the three-year project cycle (FY 2005, FY 2006, and FY 2007) for TAP funds.

The notice of final FY 2007 TAP grants includes forty-seven of the forty-eight counties qualified in FY 2005. One county, Davidson County in Tennessee, withdrew from the TAP. The State of Tennessee informed ORR of its desire to voluntarily withdraw from the program after the FY 2005 awards were issued. Qualifications of the 47 remaining counties were based on the arrivals of refugees (see Footnote 1, eligible populations) during the five-year period from FY 2002 through FY 2006 (October 1, 2001 – September 30, 2006). The FY 2007 TAP populations, TAP allocations by State, and targeted assistance areas in the 26 States eligible for TAP funds are listed in this final notice in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3.

TAP APPLICATION DEADLINE: September 21, 2007

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Do, Division of Budget, Policy and Data Analysis (DBPDA), (202) 401-4579, or email at Kdo@acf.hhs.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Purpose and Scope

This notice announces the final allocations for FY 2007 funds for TAP grants for services to refugees (see Footnote 1 for eligible populations) in counties where, because of factors such as unusually large refugee populations, high refugee concentrations, and high use of public assistance, there exists and can be demonstrated a specific need for supplementation of resources for services to this population.

The Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) has $48,590,000 in FY 2007 funds for the Targeted Assistance Program (TAP) as part of the FY 2007 appropriation under the Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110-5)(H.R.J. Res. 20).

The FY 2007 Senate Committee Report (S. Rep. No. 109-287) reads as follows with respect to Refugee and Entrant Assistance:

“…The Committee recommends $599,935,000 for fiscal year 2007 for refugee and entrant assistance. The comparable funding level for fiscal year 2006 is $569,432,000 and the budget request includes $614,935,000 for this program…”

“…In order to carry out the refugee and entrant assistance program, the Committee recommends $282,333,000 for transitional and medical assistance including State administration and the voluntary agency program, $9,816,000 for victims of trafficking; $149,610,000 for social services; $4,748,000 for preventive health; and $48,590,000 for targeted assistance…”

The FY 2007 House Committee Report (H.R. Rep. No. 109-515) reads as follows with respect to Refugee and Entrant Assistance:

“…The Committee recommends $604,329,000 for refugee assistance programs. This is $34,506,000 more than the fiscal year 2006 funding level and $10,606,000 less than the budget request…”

“…The Committee recommends $154,004,000 for social services. This is the same as the fiscal year 2006 funding level and $4,394,000 more than the budget request…”

“…The Committee recommends $48,590,000 for the targeted assistance program. This is the same as both the fiscal year 2006 funding level and the budget request. These grants provide assistance to areas with high concentrations of refugees…”

The Director of ORR proposes to use the $48,590,000 in targeted assistance funds as follows:

  • $43,731,000 will be allocated to States under the five-year (October 1, 2001 – September 30, 2006) population formula, as set forth in this final notice.
  • $4,859,000 (10 percent of the total) will be used to award discretionary grants to States under continuation grant awards.

The purpose of TAP grants is to provide, through a process of local planning and implementation, direct services intended to result in the economic self-sufficiency and reduced welfare dependency of refugees through job placements.

TAP reflects the requirements of section 412(c)(2)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), (8 U.S.C.§ 1522(c)(2)(B)), which provides that targeted assistance grants shall be made available “(i) primarily for the purpose of facilitating refugee employment and achievement of self-sufficiency, (ii) in a manner that does not supplant other refugee program funds and that assures that not less than 95 percent of the amount of the grant award is made available to the county or other local entity.”

II. Authorization

Targeted assistance projects are funded under the authority of section 412(c)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as amended by the Refugee Assistance Extension Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-605), (8 U.S.C. § 1522(c)(2)(B)), section 501(a) of the Refugee Education Assistance Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-422), (8 U.S.C. § 1522 note), insofar as it incorporates by reference with respect to Cuban and Haitian entrants the authorities pertaining to assistance for refugees established by section 412(c)(2) of the INA, as cited above; section 584(c) of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1988, as included in the FY 1988 Continuing Resolution (Pub. L. 100-202), insofar as it incorporates by reference with respect to certain Amerasians from Viet Nam the authorities pertaining to assistance for refugees established by section 412(c)(2) of the INA, as cited above, including certain Amerasians from Viet Nam who are U.S. citizens, as provided under title II of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Acts, 1989 (Pub. L. 100-461), 1990 (Pub. L. 101-167), and 1991 (Pub. L. 101-513); section 107(b)(1)(A) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-386), as amended by the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2003 (Pub. L. 108-193), insofar as it states that a victim of a severe form of trafficking and certain other specified family members shall be eligible for Federally funded or administered benefits and services to the same extent as a refugee.

III. Client and Service Priorities

TAP funding must be used to assist refugee families to achieve economic independence. To this end, States and counties are required to ensure that a coherent family self-sufficiency plan (FSSP), or individual employability plan (IEP) is developed for each eligible family that addresses the family’s needs from time of arrival until attainment of economic independence (see 45 CFR 400.79, 400.156(g), and 400.317). Each FSSP or IEP should address a family’s needs for both employment-related services and other needed social services. The plan must include: (1) a determination of the income level a family would have to earn to exceed its cash grant and move into self-support without suffering a monetary penalty; (2) a strategy and timetable for obtaining that level of family income through the placement in employment of sufficient numbers of employable family members at sufficient wage levels; (3) employability plans for every employable member of the family; and (4) a plan to address the family’s social services needs that may be barriers to self-sufficiency. In local jurisdictions that have targeted assistance and refugee social services programs, one FSSP may be developed for a family that incorporates both targeted assistance and refugee social services.

Services funded through TAP are required to focus primarily on those refugees who, either because of their protracted use of public assistance or difficulty in securing employment, continue to need services beyond the initial years of resettlement. States may not provide services funded under this notice, except for referral and interpreter services, to refugees who have been in the United States for more than 60 months (five years) (see 45 CFR 400.315).

In accordance with 45 CFR 400.314, States are required to provide targeted assistance services to refugees in the following order of priority, except in certain individual extreme circumstances: (a) refugees who are cash assistance recipients, particularly long-term recipients; (b) unemployed refugees who are not receiving cash assistance; and (c) employed refugees in need of services to retain employment or to attain economic independence.

In addition to the statutory requirement that TAP funds be used “primarily for the purpose of facilitating refugee employment” (section 412(c)(2)(B)(i) of the INA), funds awarded under TAP are intended to help fulfill the Congressional intent that “employable refugees should be placed on jobs as soon as possible after their arrival in the United States” (section 412(a)(1)(B)(i) of the INA). Therefore, in accordance with 45 CFR 400.313, TAP funds must be used primarily for employability services designed to enable refugees to obtain jobs with less than one year’s participation in TAP in order to achieve economic self-sufficiency as soon as possible. Targeted assistance services may continue to be provided after a refugee has entered a job to help the refugee retain employment or move to a better job. TAP funds may not be used for long-term training programs, such as vocational training that lasts for more than a year or educational programs that are not intended to lead to employment within a year.

In accordance with 45 CFR 400.317, if targeted assistance funds are used for the provision of English language training, such training must be provided in a concurrent, rather than sequential, time period with employment or with other employment-related activities.

A portion of a local area’s allocation may be used for services that are not directed toward the achievement of a specific employment objective in less than one year but that are essential to the adjustment of refugees in the community, provided such needs are clearly demonstrated and such use is approved by the State (see 45 CFR 400.316).

Reflecting section 412(a)(1)(A)(iv) of the INA, States must “ensure that women have the same opportunities as men to participate in training and instruction.” Additionally, in accordance with 45 CFR 400.317, services must be provided to the maximum extent feasible in a manner that includes the use of bilingual/bicultural women on service agency staff to ensure adequate service access by refugee women. The Director of ORR also strongly encourages the inclusion of refugee women in management and board positions in agencies that serve refugees. In order to facilitate refugee self-support, the Director also expects States to implement strategies that address simultaneously the employment potential of both male and female wage earners in a family unit. States and counties are expected to make every effort to obtain child care services, preferably subsidized child care, for children in order to allow women with children the opportunity to participate in employment services or to accept or retain employment. To accomplish this, child care may be treated as an employment-related service under the TAP.

Refugees who are participating in targeted assistance-funded or social services-funded employment services or have accepted employment are eligible for child care services for children. States and counties are expected to use child care funding from other publicly-administered programs such as child care services funded under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program or under the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) as a primary resource. States and counties are encouraged to work with service providers to ensure mainstream access for refugees to other publicly funded resources for child care. For an employed refugee, targeted assistance-funded child care should be limited to situations in which no other publicly funded child care funding is available. In these cases, child care services funded by targeted assistance should be limited to one year after the refugee becomes employed.

In accordance with 45 CFR 400.317, targeted assistance services must be provided in a manner that is culturally and linguistically compatible with a refugee’s language and cultural background, to the maximum extent feasible. In light of the increasingly diverse population of refugees who are resettling in this country, refugee service agencies will need to develop practical ways of providing culturally and linguistically appropriate services to a changing ethnic population. Services funded under this notice must be refugee-specific services that are designed specifically to meet refugee needs and are in keeping with the rules and objectives of the refugee program. Short-term vocational or job-skills training, on-the-job training (OJT), or English language training (ELT), however, need not be refugee-specific.

ORR strongly encourages States and counties when contracting for targeted assistance services, including employment services, to give consideration to the special strengths of mutual assistance associations (MAAs), whenever contract bidders are otherwise equally qualified, provided that the MAA has the capability to deliver services in a manner that is culturally and linguistically compatible with the background of the target population to be served. ORR also strongly encourages MAAs to ensure that their management and board composition reflect the major target populations to be served.

ORR defines MAAs as organizations with the following qualifications:

  1. The organization is legally incorporated as a non-profit organization; and
  2. Not less than 51 percent of the composition of the Board of Directors or governing board of the mutual assistance association is comprised of refugees or former refugees, including both refugee men and women.

Finally, in order to provide culturally and linguistically compatible services in as cost-efficient a manner as possible in time of limited resources, ORR strongly encourages States and counties to promote and give special consideration to the provision of services through coalitions of refugee service organizations, such as coalitions of MAAs, voluntary resettlement agencies, or a variety of service providers. ORR believes it is essential for refugee-serving organizations to form close partnerships in the provision of services to refugees in order to be able to respond adequately to a changing refugee environment. States and counties are encouraged to consider as eligible for TAP funds entities that are public or private non-profit agencies, which may include faith-based, refugee or community-based organizations. Additionally, coalition-building and consolidation of providers is particularly important in communities with multiple service providers in order to ensure better coordination of services and maximum use of funding for services by minimizing the funds used for multiple administrative overhead costs.

The award of TAP funds to States under this final notice will be contingent upon the completeness of a State’s TAP application as described in Section VIII, below.

IV. Discussion of Comments

ORR did not receive any comments for TAP.

V. Eligible Grantees

Eligible grantees are: (1) agencies of State governments that are responsible for the refugee program under 45 CFR 400.5 in States containing counties that qualify for FY 2007 targeted assistance awards; (2) a replacement designee appointed by the Director pursuant to 45 CFR 400.301(c); or (3) an agency that has Statewide responsibility for an alternative to the State-administered program in lieu of the State under a Wilson/Fish grant authorized by section 412(e)(7) of the INA. All such grantees will hereinafter be referred to as “the State.”

The Director of ORR determines the eligibility of counties for inclusion in the FY 2007 TAP on the basis of the method described in Section VI of this final notice.

The use of targeted assistance funds for services to Cuban and Haitian entrants is limited to States that have an approved State plan under the Cuban/Haitian Entrant Program (CHEP).

The State agency will submit a single TAP application to ORR on behalf of all county governments of the qualified counties in that State. Subsequent to the approval of the State agency’s application by ORR, local targeted assistance plans will be developed by the county government or other designated entity and submitted to the State agency.

A State with more than one qualified county is permitted, but not required, to determine the allocation amount for each qualified county within the State. However, if a State chooses to determine county allocations differently from those set forth in the TAP final notice, in accordance with 45 CFR 400.319, the FY 2007 TAP allocations final by the State must be based on the State’s population of refugees who arrived in the U.S. during the most recent five-year period, October 1, 2001, through September 30, 2006. A State may use public assistance usage data as an additional factor in the allocation of its targeted assistance funds if it so chooses; however, a State may not assign a greater weight to such data than it has assigned to population data in its allocation formula. In addition, if a State chooses to allocate its FY 2007 targeted assistance funds in a manner different from the formula set forth in the final notice, the FY 2007 TAP allocations and methodology final by the State must be included in the State's TAP application for ORR review and approval.

Applications submitted in response to the TAP final notice are not subject to review by State and area wide clearinghouses under Executive Order 12372, “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs.”

VI. Qualification and Allocation

For FY 2007, ORR continues using the formula that bases allocation of targeted assistance funds on the most current five-year refugee arrival data (see footnote, eligible population). Targeted assistance services are limited to the arrival population residing in qualified counties and who have been in the U.S. five years or less.

As stated in the FY 1999 notice of final availability of targeted assistance allocations to States, which was published on March 10, 1999 (64 FR 11927), the Director of ORR proposes to determine the qualification of counties for targeted assistance once every three years. The FY 2005 – FY 2007 three-year project cycle began in FY 2005. Forty-eight counties qualified in FY 2005. FY 2007 is the third year of the three-year project cycle for TAP funds. As previously stated, Davidson County, Tennessee, voluntarily withdrew from the program after the FY 2005 awards were issued.

Forty-seven of the 48 counties that qualified for FY 2005 TAP funds will continue to qualify for TAP FY 2007 funds on the basis of the most current five-year (October 1, 2001 – September 30, 2006) population, Table 1. Table 2 illustrates the final targeted assistance allocations by State; and Table 3 contains the targeted assistance areas in the twenty-six States eligible for the TAP.

A. Qualifying Counties

The Director of ORR determines the qualification of counties for targeted assistance once every three years. Since ORR determined the qualification of counties for targeted assistance in FY 2005, those qualifying counties that were eligible in FY 2005 – FY 2006 and listed in this TAP final notice as qualified to apply for FY 2007 TAP funding will remain qualified through the end of FY 2007. ORR does not plan to consider the eligibility of additional counties for TAP funding until FY 2008, when ORR will again review data on all counties that could potentially qualify for TAP funds. Until the next qualification of counties for TAP, ORR has decided to limit the number of qualified counties based on ranking order to the top 47 counties (Table 1) in order to target a sufficient level of funding to the most impacted counties. Davidson County, Tennessee withdrew from the TAP in FY 2005 after the TAP awards were issued. The TAP funds for Davidson County, Tennessee, were redistributed by formula to the 47 qualified counties in FY 2006 and in this final notice for FY 2007.

It is believed that a more frequent re-determination of county qualification for targeted assistance would not provide qualifying counties a sufficient period of time within a stable funding climate to adequately address the refugee impact in their counties, while a less frequent re-determination of county qualification would pose the risk of not considering new population impacts in a timely manner.

B. Allocation Formula

Of the funds available for FY 2007 for targeted assistance, $43,731,000 will be allocated by formula to States for qualified counties based on the initial arrivals in these counties during the five-year period from FYs 2002 through 2006 (October 1, 2001 – September 30, 2006). Data from the ORR Refugee Arrivals Data System (RADS) is used for the final allocation of funds for targeted assistance. This includes the total number of refugees, Cuban/Haitian entrants, parolees, and Amerasians from Viet Nam. Data on victims of severe forms of trafficking is from the certification and eligibility letters issued by ORR. Trafficking victims have been eligible for services since October 2000 and their family members since December 2003. Data on the number of asylees who have been served in FYs 2002 through 2006 through the refugee resettlement program or social service system are provided by States and matched against RADS. For FYs 2002 through 2006, Havana parolees were derived from actual data.

In FY 2007, ORR continues its process for data submission by States on the number of asylees or entrants served prior to issuance of the final allocations notice for formula TAP. On December 11, 2006, ORR sent State Letter 07-02 to States with instructions and information on a new ORR Data Submissions Website for States to submit data for TAP formula allocations. Prior to FY 2007, States submitted data to ORR electronically in an Excel file for data matching. This data submission method was problematic due to inconsistencies in the State submissions, including invalid data values in certain data fields, missing data, and confusion about how many years of data ought to be submitted. This method did not adequately allow ORR to screen submissions for errors and clarify the nature of the errors so that States had the opportunity to resubmit corrected files for more accurate data matching. The newly developed web-based data system has the capability for designated users from each State to upload State files, provide verification to States of receipt of the data, perform front-end editing to reject invalid data immediately after receipt with explanation of reasons for rejection, and allow States to resubmit corrected files. A format for the submission of entrant data and a format for submission of asylee data were provided to States on February 7, 2007, for data submission as prescribed on the ORR Data Submissions Website.

This new process ensures that States’ final data submission is complete and correctly formatted to maximize probability of matching. States were requested to submit data to ORR by March 2, 2007. Matches resulting from these data submissions were reflected in the Notice of Proposed Allocations for TAP published June 29, 2007. Designated State website users were informed by ORR on April 30, 2007, that they had another opportunity to submit data in the specified file formats for asylees, entrants and secondary migrants to the ORR Data Submission Website by 6:00 PM (EST), Tuesday, May 15, 2007. ORR accepted data from States until 6:00 PM (EST), May 15, 2007.

States’ data received in ORR by May 15, 2007, were matched against ORR’s RADS. The results of this match are reflected in the final notice of Formula Allocations for TAP Grants to States for services to refugees.

A county that did not agree with the ORR refugee population estimate for the 2007 final targeted assistance eligible population (see footnote, eligible population), and believed that its five-year population for FYs 2002 - 2006 was undercounted, was requested to submit to ORR a letter from each local voluntary agency that resettled refugees in the county that attests to the fact that the targeted assistance eligible population listed in an attachment to the letter were resettled as initial arrivals during the five-year period from FYs 2002 - 2006 in the county making the claim. ORR did not receive any documentation from States or Counties of additional eligible populations claimed for TAP funding.

In FY 2008, ORR will provide States with one opportunity to submit data to the ORR Data Submission Website prior to publication of the notice of final FY 2008 formula allocations for TAP grants so that the results of the data matching will be reflected in the final TAP allocations, consistent with States’ request to ORR to minimize changes and adjustments to formula allocations from the final to the final allocation amounts.

VII. Allocations

Table 1 lists the 47 qualifying TAP counties, the State, and the number of refugee arrivals (see footnote 1, eligible population) in those counties during the five-year period from October 1, 2001 - September 30, 2006.

Table 2 lists the final TAP allocations by State for FY 2007.

Table 3 lists the targeted assistance areas for FY 2007.

VIII. Application and Implementation Process

The deadline for submission of the FY 2007 TAP application will be September 21, 2007.

Application Content:

States that are currently operating under approved management plans for their FY 2005 and/or any revision for the FY 2006 TAP and wish to continue to do so without any changes may provide for their FY 2007 grants the following in lieu of resubmitting the full currently approved plan.

The State’s TAP application for FY 2007 funding shall provide:

  • Assurance that the State’s current management plan for the administration of TAP, as approved by ORR in FY 2005, and/or FY 2006 revision will continue to be in full force and effect for the FY 2007 TAP, subject to any additional assurances or revisions required by this notice that are not reflected in the current plan. Any final modifications to the approved plan that should be identified in the application are subject to ORR review and approval, e.g., if the State assumes local administration of the program or if the State chooses to determine county allocations differently. Any final changes must address and reference all appropriate portions of the FY 2005 application content requirements, and/or FY 2006 revision to ensure complete incorporation in the State’s management plan.
  • A line-item budget and justification for State administrative costs limited to a maximum of five percent of the total award to the State. Each total budget period funding amount requested must be necessary, reasonable, and allocable to the project.
  • All applicants must submit targeted assistance performance goals as described under Section IX.

Implementation Process

States may apply for and receive TAP grant awards on behalf of qualified counties in the State. A single allocation will be made to each State by ORR on the basis of an approved State application. The State agency will, in turn, receive, review, and determine the acceptability of individual county targeted assistance plans.

Pursuant to 45 CFR 400.210(b), FY 2007 targeted assistance funds must be obligated by the State agency no later than one year after the end of the Federal fiscal year in which the Department awarded the grant. Funds must be liquidated within two years after the end of the Federal fiscal year in which the Department awarded the grant. A State's final financial report on targeted assistance expenditures must be received no later than 90 days after the end of the two-year expenditure period. If final reports are not received on time, the Department will de-obligate any unexpended funds, including any un-liquidated obligations, on the basis of the State's last filed report.

The requirements regarding the discretionary portion of TAP will be addressed under a separate program announcement. Application for discretionary targeted assistance funds are, therefore, not subject to provisions contained in this notice but to other requirements that will be conveyed separately.

IX. Results or Benefits Expected

All TAP applicants must establish final targeted assistance performance goals for each of the six ORR performance outcome measures for each impacted county's final service contract(s) or sub-grants for the next contracting cycle. Final performance goals must be included in the application for each performance measure. The six ORR performance measures are: 1) entered employments, 2) cash assistance reductions due to employment, 3) cash assistance terminations due to employment, 4) 90-day employment retentions, 5) average wage at placement, and 6) job placements with available health benefits. TAP activity and progress achieved toward meeting performance outcome goals are to be reported quarterly on the ORR-6, the "Quarterly Performance Report."

States that are currently grantees for targeted assistance funds should base projected annual outcome goals on past performance. Current grantees should have adequate baseline data for all of the six ORR performance outcome measures based on a history of TAP experience.

All qualified counties within States that are current grantees are required to set final outcome goals for each of the six ORR performance outcome measures. Counties may use baseline data, as available, and current data as reported on the ORR-6 for social services program activity to assist them in the goal-setting process.

Final targeted assistance outcome goals should reflect improvement over past performance and strive for continuous improvement during the project period from one year to another.

Targeted assistance performance data are due quarterly, and the 4th quarter report is due November 15, 2007, for FY 2007, in conjunction with the ORR Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) cycle.

X. Budget and Budget Justification

TAP applications shall include line-item detail and detailed calculations for each budget object class identified on the Budget Information form (SF-424A). Detailed calculations must include estimation methods, quantities, unit costs, and other similar quantitative detail sufficient for the calculation to be duplicated. The detailed budget must also include a breakout by the funding sources identified in Block 15 of the SF-424. ORR is particularly interested in the following:

  • A line-item budget and justification for State administrative costs limited to a maximum of five percent of the total award to the State.
  • A narrative budget justification is required that describes how the categorical costs are derived. Discuss the necessity, reasonableness, and allocability of the final costs.
  • Each total budget period funding amount requested must be necessary, reasonable, and allocable to the project.
  • States that administer the program locally in lieu of the county, through a mutual agreement with the qualifying county, may request administrative costs that add up to, but may not exceed, 10 percent of the county's TAP allocation to the State's administrative budget.

XI. Reporting Requirements

States are required to submit quarterly reports on the outcomes of the TAP, using Schedule A and Schedule C of the ORR-6 Quarterly Performance Report (0970-0036).

XII. THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13)

All information collections within this program notice are approved under the following valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control numbers: 424 (0348-0043); 424A (0348-0044); 424B (0348-0040); Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (0348-0046); Financial Status Report (SF-269) (0348-0039) and ORR Quarterly Performance Report (0970-0036).

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

 

Date: August 21, 2007

 

_____________________________________

Martha E. Newton

Director

Office of Refugee Resettlement

_____________________________________________________

1 Individuals with the following immigration statuses are eligible for refugee social services: (1) refugees; (2) asylees; (3) Cuban and Haitian entrants; (4) certain Amerasians from Viet Nam; and (5) victims of a severe form of trafficking who receive certification or eligibility letters from ORR, and certain other specified family members of trafficking victims who receive “T-visas.” For details about these statuses, see 45 CFR 400.43, ORR State Letter 00-17, ORR State Letters #01-13, as modified by ORR State Letter #02-01, and ORR State Letter #04-12 at http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/orr/policy/index.htm#letter. For convenience, the term “refugee” is used in this notice to encompass all such eligible persons.



APPENDICES

Table 1 - Final Targeted Assistance Allocations by County: FY 2007

 


#

 

 


County

 

 


State

 

 


Refugees 1/

 

 


Entrants

 


Havana

Parolees 2/

 


Asylees

Traffickees

 

 

Total Arrivals

FY 2001--

FY 2005

$43,731,000


Total FY 2007

Allocation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Maricopa County

Arizona

5,478

805

15

178

6,476

$1,139,091

2

Los Angeles County

California

4,538

21

64

3,006

7,629

1,341,897

3

Sacramento County

California

8,677

0

4

153

8,834

1,553,851

4

San Diego County

California

3,465

18

11

956

4,450

782,729

5

Santa Clara County

California

1,841

0

2

443

2,286

402,094

6

Denver County 3/

Colorado

2,431

0

0

74

2,505

440,615

7

Broward County

Florida

372

886

1,318

2,946

5,522

971,288

8

Collier County

Florida

211

392

1,031

246

1,880

330,681

9

Dade County

Florida

6,587

23,176

36,680

7,130

73,573

12,941,066

10

Duval County

Florida

1,669

63

163

331

2,226

391,541

11

Hillsborough County

Florida

1,258

1,274

1,933

668

5,133

902,865

12

Orange County

Florida

636

433

671

2,625

4,365

767,778

13

Palm Beach County

Florida

349

1,271

1,454

1,942

5,016

882,285

14

DeKalb County

Georgia

4,999

111

19

157

5,286

929,777

15

Fulton County

Georgia

1,046

7

9

140

1,202

211,425

16

Ada County 3/

Idaho

1,572

0

1

4

1,577

277,385

17

Cook/Kane

Illinois

3,841

33

58

590

4,522

795,394

18

Polk County

Iowa

1,535

0

0

4

1,539

270,701

19

Jefferson County 3/

Kentucky

1,947

1,941

38

45

3,971

698,476

20

Baltimore County

Maryland

1,654

2

5

407

2,068

363,749

21

Montgomery/Prince George's

Maryland

1,354

5

14

2,139

3,512

617,741

22

Hampden County 3/

Massachusetts

1,833

0

1

14

1,848

325,053

23

Suffolk County 3/

Massachusetts

1,774

50

6

539

2,369

416,693

24

Ingham County

Michigan

951

732

22

 

1,705

299,900

25
Kent County Michigan

1,218

10

32

 

1,260

221,627

26
Hennepin/Ramsey Minnesota

15,527

0

1

118

15,646

2,752,041

27
City of St. Louis Missouri

2,237

0

8

60

2,305

405,436

28
Clark County 3/ Nevada

1,241

1,340

101

207

2,889

508,158

29
Erie County New York

2,215

471

3

10

2,699

474,739

30
Monroe County New York

1,463

319

6

8

1,796

315,906

31
New York New York

4,778

98

109

6,378

11,363

1,998,686

32
Oneida County New York

1,333

0

0

8

1,341

235,874

33
Onodaga County New York

1,841

737

8

1

2,587

455,038

34
Guilford County North Carolina

1,737

0

29

100

1,866

328,219

35
Mecklenberg County North Carolina

1,899

11

25

251

2,186

384,505

36
Cass 3/ North Dakota

719

0

0

6

725

127,523

37
Franklin County Ohio

3,825

2

4

636

4,467

785,720

38
Multnomah Oregon

6,212

619

14

164

7,009

1,232,843

39
Philadelphia County Pennsylvania

2,200

8

16

75

2,299

404,381

40
Minnehaha County 3/ South Dakota

983

0

4

12

999

175,718

41
Dallas/Tarrant Texas

4,806

8

49

607

5,470

962,141

42
Harris County Texas

4,417

1,483

27

478

6,405

1,126,603

43
Davis/Salt Lake Utah

2,822

4

1

120

2,947

518,360

44
Fairfax County Virginia

1,661

4

17

294

1,976

347,567

45
City of Richmond Virginia

898

12

6

6

922

162,174

46
King/Snohomish Washington

8,180

2

10

356

8,548

1,503,544

47
Spokane County Washington

1,419

0

0

3

1,422

250,122

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Total  

133,649

36,348

43,989

34,635

248,621

43,731,000

                 

 

1/ Includes Amerasian immigrants from Vietnam. Not adjusted for secondary migration.

 

2/ For all years, Havana parolees from actual data.

 

3/ Allocation to be awarded to a Wilson/Fish grantee, if approved by the Director.

 


back to top

Table 2 - Final Targeted Assistance Allocations By State
FY 2007


 

State

Total FY 2007

Allocation

 
 

Arizona

$1,139,091

California

4,080,571

Colorado

440,615

Florida

17,187,504

Georgia

1,141,202

Idaho

277,385

Illinois

795,394

Iowa

270,701

Kentucky

698,476

Maryland

981,490

Massachusetts

741,746

Michigan

521,527

Minnesota

2,752,041

Missouri

405,436

Nevada

508,158

New York

3,480,243

North Carolina

712,724

North Dakota

127,523

Ohio

785,720

Oregon

1,232,843

Pennsylvania

404,381

South Dakota

175,718

Texas

2,088,744

Utah

518,360

Virginia

509,741

Washington

1,753,666

 

   Total

$43,731,000


back to top

Table 3 - Targeted Assistance Areas, FY 2007

State

Targeted Assistance Area

Definition

 

 

 

Arizona

Maricopa County

 

California

Los Angeles County

 

California

Sacramento County

 

California

San Diego

 
California

Santa Clara County

 

Colorado

Denver County

 

Florida

Broward County

 

Florida

Collier County

 

Florida

Miami-Dade County

 

Florida

Duval County

 

Florida

Hillsborough County

 

Florida

Orange County

 

Florida

Palm Beach County

 

Georgia

DeKalb County

 
Georgia

Fulton County

 

Idaho

Ada County

 

Illinois

Cook and Kane Counties

 

Iowa

Polk County

 

Kentucky

Jefferson County

 

Maryland

Baltimore City/County

 

Maryland

Montgomery/Prince George's County

 

Massachusetts

Hampden County

 

Massachusetts

Suffolk County

 

Michigan

Ingham County

 
Michigan

Kent County

 

Minnesota

Hennepin/Ramsey

 

Missouri

City of St. Louis

 

Nevada

Clark County

 

New York

Erie County

 
New York

Monroe County

 
New York

New York …………..

Bronx, Kings, Queens, New York, and Richmond Counties

New York

Oneida County

 

New York

Onondaga County

 

North Carolina

Cuilford County

 

North Carolina

Mecklenberg County

 

North Dakota

Cass County

 

Ohio

Franklin County

 

Oregon

Multnomah ……………

Clackamas, Multnomah, and Washington Counties, Oregon, and Clark County, Washington

Pennsylvania

Philadelphia County

 

South Dakota

Minnehaha County

 

Texas

Dallas/Tarrant

 

Texas

Harris County

 

Utah

Davis/Salt Lake………..

Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah Counties

Virginia

Fairfax County …….

Arlington and Fairfax Counties and the cities of Falls Church, Fairfax, and Alexandria

Virginia

City of Richmond

 

Washington

King/Snohomish

 

Washington

Spokane County

 





EXPIRED