SUBCOMMITTEE OF HEALTH, HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE, BEFORE CONGRESSMAN ROSTENSKOWSKI, DEC. 4, 1975, HEARINGS ON NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE. TESTIFIED ABOUT USING A NASAL DECONGESTANT NOSE DROPS COMBINED WITH PENICILLIN PRODUCING CURES OF VIRAL, BACTERIAL AND PROTOZOYA ILLNESSES IN SHORTER PERIODS OF TIME USING SMALLER QUANTITIES OF MEDICINE.

WRITTEN TESTIMONY BEFORE SELECT COMMITTEE ON AGING CHAIRED BY CHAIRMAN CLAUDE PEPPER SUGGESTING MORE EXTENSIVE USE OF THE ANTIBIOTICS IN CURING CANCER AND LEUKEMIA

WRITTEN TESTIMONY SUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH SUGGESTING THE USE OF ANTIBIOTICS APPLIED SYSTEMICALLY AND LOCALLY IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER AND LEUKEMIA. 1979.

ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH OF THE HOUSE AND SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEES, MAY 1984 SUGGESTING THAT MORE INTELLIGENT APPLICATION OF THE ANTIBIOTICS IN TREATING CANCER AND OTHER ILLNESSES WOULD RESULT IN THE CURE OF MORE ILLNESSES AND WOULD REDUCE HEALTH CARE COSTS.

ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEES ON HEALTH OF THE HEALTH AND SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE CHAIRED BY CONGRESSMAN NATCHER AND SENATOR LOWELL WEICKER, MAY 1985 MAY HAVE BEEN PUBLISHED IN 1985 AND 1986. SUGGESTED THAT WHEN ANY FORM OF CANCER OR LEUKEMIA WAS TREATED SYSTEMICALLY AND LOCALLY THAT HIGHER CURE RATES WOULD RESULT AND THE PROBABILITY OF REOCCURRENCE WOULD BE SUBSTANTIALLY REDUCED.

SHORT ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THE BEFORE A HOUSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH SUGGESTING THAT PHARMACISTS AND NURSE PRACTICONER’S SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO PRESCRIBE THE LOWE COST SAFE AND EFFECTIVE ANTIBIOTICS IN SMALL QUANTITY IN 1985 OR 1986.

IN THE 1990’S LECTURED A CONFERENCE OF DOCTORS EXPLAINING THAT THE ANTIBIOTICS HAD LONG BEEN KNOWN TO CURE VIRAL ORDINARY VIRAL ILLNESSES CITING GOODMAN’ PHARMACOLGY CO-AUTHORED AND CO-EDITED BY THE NIH SECOND EDITION 1955-1958 P.1388 -"THE ANTIBIOTICS PENICILLIN AND TETRACYCLINE CURE VIRAL ILLNESSES. SEE ALSO SPANISH PHARMACOPIAE 1993 EDITION: NASAL DECONGESTANT COMBINED WITH PENICILLIN CURES ALL RESPIRATORY ILLNESSES."

IN THE 1990’S WHEN DAVID KESSLER WAS COMMISSIONER OF THE FDA LECTURED ANOTHER CONFERENCE OF DOCTORS INDICATING THAT SYSTEMIC AND LOCAL ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY STRENGTHENED THE PATIENT’S IMMUNE SYSTEM AND WAS THE LEAST INVASIVE WAY TO TREAT MANY FORMS OF CANCER AND LEUKEMIA.

DISCUSSED MY IDEAS ON ECONOMICAL SAFE AND EFFECTIVE HEALTH REFORM MAKING BETTER USE OF THE ANTIBIOTICS WHEN I RAN FOR CITY COUNSEL IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND RECEIVED 50 VOTES ON VARIOUS LOCAL TELEVISION STATION.

BRIEF LECTURE BEFORE A CNN TELEVISION AUDIENCE INDICATING THAT THERE WAS AMPLE SOUND MEDICAL EVIDENCE THAT THE ANTIBIOTICS CURE RESPIRATORY VIRAL INFECTIONS.

TESIFIED BEFORE THE D.C. CITY COUNSEL ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS INDICATING THAT THE THE PROPER USE OF ANTIBIOTICS IN THE TREATMENT OF A WIDE RANGE OF ILLNESSES WOULD SAVE LIVES, REDUCE INFANT MORTALITY AND WOULD BE COST EFFICIENT.

LECTURED BRIEFLY AT AN INFORMAL CONFERENCE ON HIV AIDS CO-CHAIRED BY DR. FAUCI OF THE NAID URGING SYSTEMIC AND LOCAL NATIBIOTIC TREATMENT FOR AIDS PATIENTS SINCE THAT FORM OF THERAPY HAD PROVED EFFECTIVE IN TREATING BREAST CANCER AND BONE CANCER ACCORDING TO DR. BONADONNA AN NIH GRANTEE OF 20 YEARS AND THE JAPANESE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY INDICATING IN CHEM. ABSTRACTS APRIL 15, 1995: "PD-3. PENICILLIUM DIVERSUM 98% EFFECTIVE IN VITRO OR TEST TUBE AGAINST YOSHIDA SARCOMA (BONE CANCER)-THE HIGHEST RATING GIVEN ANY ANTICANCER AGENT. PENICILLIUM DIVERSUM IS PENICILLIN COMBINED WITH NAPHAZOLINE HCL. RIMIDOL MADE BY SQUIBB IN BRAZIL IS NAPHAZOLINE HCL IN 1% SOLUTION WHEN COMBINED WITH PENICILLIN IS SIMILAR TO PENICILLIN DIVERSUM. (THIS SAME FORMULA WAS DESCRIBED IN GOODMAN AND GILMAN’S PHARMACOLOGY AS A CURE FOR ASTHMA ON PAGES 1346- 1347. IN MY TESTIMONY BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH OF THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE I INDICATED THAT WHEN THIS FORMULA WAS TESTED IN BRAZIL THAT IT CURED ASTHMA IN ONE DAYS TIME. (THE NIH TODAY SAYS THAT THE ANTIBIOTICS CAN NOT CURE VIRUSES AND THAT THERE IS NO CURE FOR ASTHMA. THEREFORE "ANTIVIRAL THERAPY" FOR ASTHMA CONTINUES AT $5,000 DOLLARS PER YEAR UNTIL THE PATIENT SUCCUMBS TO ASTHMA. DR. FAUCI IGNORED MY COMMENTS AND REINSTATED NIH TESTS FOR INTERFERON EVEN AS A TRIAL FOR AIDS THERAPY THOUGH INTERFERON HAD A CURE RATE OF 05% AGAINST ASTHMA.

LOW COST SAFE & EFFECTIVE CURES FOR VARIOUS ILLNESSES INCLUDING HIV I AND III AIDS - Written Testimony before Subcommittee Health House Ways and Means Com. Samuel B. Wallace 1221 M St. 417, Washington D.C. 20005

The Importance of the Antibiotic Medicines in Health Care Reform can not be better illustrated than by the example of HIV I and III AIDS Therapy. Where alternatives to Antibiotics not only fail to cure that Disease but in the process increase the costs of unsuccessful Health Care ten thousandfold!

HIV I AIDS which was discovered in Japan in 1977 and is common to many parts of the world including South Africa where it is the dominant form. HIV AIDS I has been cured in Japan ,the United States, Italy and elsewhere with the common Antibiotics such as Penicillin and the Antineoplasm Antibiotics. One case of the Antibiotics curing HIV I AIDS was reported in the British Journal of Hematology 1984, V. 58, 723-7: "Successful Chemotherapy with (the Antibiotic) Deoxycoformycin (which is similar in structure to Adriamycin or Doxorubicin) in Adult T Cell Lymphoma-Leukemia." (A Retrovirus similar to the HIV I and III AIDS VIRUS)

The Cure of HIV I AIDS with Antibiotics such as Penicillin, Tetracycline, Bestatiin etc. has also been reported for thousands of Clinical Trials in Japan and it is often cured with the common Antibiotics even in the United States and Europe particularly among Medical Students and Nursing Students where it is called "Cat Fever"which is acquired by catabolizing or dissecting cats. It is also known as Cat Leukemia and is cured with Antibiotics by Veterinarians.

Although, it is not commonly known to the medical science there is important evidence from the scientific literature and from the science that suggests that HIV III AIDS has also been cured with the Common Antibiotics such as Penicillin, Tetracycline, Streptomycin, Bestatin as well as the Antineo-plasmic Agent Adriamycin also called Doxorubicin.1/ AZT and the weak Protease Inhibitors (Antibiotic derivatives) on the other-hand have been admitted by their manufacturers as not being a Cure for HIV AIDS. It seems rather obvious, then, that Public Policy should be directed toward the application of the Antibiotics which CURE HIV I AND III AIDS rather than promulgating the use of the Non-Curative AZT and the relatively ineffective Protease Inhibitors which its makers admit do not Cure HIV I or III because failure to Cure AIDS can harm many.,

Eventhough thousands of Clinical Studies have been reported in Japan indicating that the ordinary Antibiotics: Penicillin and Tetracycline cure HIV I Leukemia better known as HIV I AIDS. It is better to use more systemic Antibiotic therapies because HIV III is more of a systemic Disease which is initiated in the Macrophage which also acts as a reservoir for the infection and because HIV III destroys both the Immune and Metabolic Systems, Cures 2,3,4 described below follow a more "systemic and local" approach directed to the Innate Immune System: i. e. -Macrophage –Direct Activation of the Enzyme Complement C-3 Pathway. (Complement and Macrophage both have Epinephrine Receptors.)

It was in Reported by the United Nations and the WHO and in an Article in the New York Times dated: April 6, 2000 that when the simple Antibiotic Bacitran was applied to Patients infected with AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa that the mortality rate for those AIDS Patients was reduced by 50%. It is said that this Antibiotic Curative Therapy in Africa cost $8.dollars per patient. The following Cures are more effective in actually curing HIV I and III AIDS and are Safe Antibiotic AIDS Therapies that rely heavily on the AIDS Patients" Natural Innate Nonspecific Immune System. Universally acknowledged to be the First Line of Defense against all illness. Those Therapies should produce a Cure Rate of better than 80% rather than merely slowing its culmination as is the case with AZT and the weak Protease (Enzyme Inhibitors) Normal times of Cure should be two weeks at a cost of pennies per patient!

1. An ordinary course of Penicillin or Tetracycline in 500mg units three times per day over a two week period Cures HIV I and sometimes HIV III AIDS.

2. Penicillin K or Tetracycline combined with the Nasal Decongestant containing synthetic epinephrine such as Neosynephrine made in the USA and Rimidol made by Squibb in Brazil.

3. Injection of Penicillin or Tetracycline or those Antibiotics combined with synthetic epinephrine into the surface of the bones of the four limbs and into surface of the cranium.

4. Capsules of Penicillin or Tetracycline that also contain small quantities of Synthetic Epinephrine at 1% Solution.

All the last three of the four Antibiotic AIDS Therapies cure HIV I and III AIDS in five to 14 days. And all of these Curative Therapies cost less than $8.00 dollars per patient and produce a Cure Rate approaching 90% because those therapies avail themselves of the Patients’ Innate nonspecific Immune System universally recognized as the Patient’s First Line of Defense against Infection.

While ordinarily Injection of Antibiotics into the veins is considered sound "Systemic" Therapy,that form of Therapy treats the Immune System through Venular Blood System largely neglecting the glandular system. It is significant, that Penicillin and Tetracycline Nasal Decongest-ant Nose Drops That I Rediscovered in Brazil in 1969 or 1970 whose effectiveness against Bacteria, Viruses etc. I reported in Testimony before the Subcommittee on Health of the House Ways and Means Committee Dec. 4, 1975 is the best Curative Therapy for HIV I and III because a very wide range of illnesses were cured in a far shorter period of time with ten percent of the PDR’s recommended Curative Dosage. This Antibiotic Therapy was described in Goodman and Gilman’s: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 1955-1958 Edition, P. 1346-47: "A Cure for Asthma: Penicillin and a Nasal Decongestant" as well as the Spanish Pharmacopiae 1993 edition: "Nasal Decongestant Cures Respiratory Illnesses" which shows that such Therapy is the most effective "systemic" therapy for a wide range of Viral and Bacterial Illnesses. And should always be used in "Systemic" Therapy for all forms of Cancer and Leukemia. That application of Antibiotic Nose Drops is the best form of "Systemic" Therapy is also shown because:

(1) Application of the Antibiotic Nose Drops treats the entire glandular system to which the Lungs are attached as well as the entire Blood system through which Blood passes through the Lungs to the heart. Therefore, that form of treatment is truly "Systemic" in that it enters all the Immune Systems.

(2) This is also proven by empirical evidence because as is indicated in the Spanish Pharmacopiae 1993: "A Nasal Decongestant Nose Drops combined with Penicillin Cures Respiratory Infections."

(3) My Empirical tests in Brazil indicate that it cures a wide range of Bacterial and Viral Illnesses. And that it reduces severe bacterial and viral fevers as soon as it is applied as Nose Drops. And it uses only ten percent of the normal initial curative dosage as recommended by the PDR which is 500 mg Penicillin for the treatment of Pneumonia, for example. The Nose Drops produce the same curative effect with only 50 mg. of Penicillin. It is proved that that the curative process is begun immediately. because only the Activation of Blood Serum Complement can so swiftly reduce fevers.

(4) Adriamycin has been designated by the American Cancer Society as the most effective Anticancer and Leukemia Agent, the Japanese Pharmaceutical Industry on the other hand showed in Chemical Abstracts April 15, 1985 that PD-3; Penicillin Diversum combining Synthetic Epinephrine or Napha-zoline Hcl in weak solution with Penicillin was 98% effective against Bone Cancer in vitro, the highest rating ever given an Anticancer Antibiotic in vitro!

(5) Other forms of Cancer stemming from HIV III AIDS, such as Karposi Sarcoma have been cured with the common Antibiotics such as Penicillin, Adriamycin and Bleomycin (a Penicillin complex compound) (It should be noted that these are forms of Cancer stemming from HIV AIDS, itself.)

(6) The Antibiotic Nasal Decongestant Nose Drops also act as an Amazing Immunological growth factor that can cause the Immature Stem Cells that proliferate in Leukemia Patients to begin growing once more which reverses the Leukemia proliferation process.

No other form of Systemic Therapy uses smaller quantities of Antibiotic to produce Cures in much shorter periods of time. See Testimony Samuel B. Wallace, Subcommittee of Health of the House Ways and Means Committee, Dec. 4^th, 1975. Therefore, the best systemic therapy particularly for HIV III AIDS Leukemia is the application of the Antibiotic Nasal Decongestant Nose Drops which treats the Lung Immune System, the most powerful Immune System in the human body because it is directly linked to both the Blood and Glandular Systems. This is confirmed by a prestigious Cancer Research Institute in Japan as well as by Dr. Bonadonna’s five year Clinical Studies for Breast Cancer.2/

The NIH influenced Practitioners have long treated the Bone Marrow Immune System which requires suppressing completely the AIDS Patient’s Immune System and in particular the T Cell system including the much needed T4 Cells particularly in AIDS Patients which HIV III severely diminishes or destroys. But some studies have shown that such transplants because of such adverse factors as MHC rejection that Bone Marrow Transplants are themselves often fatal, sometimes at the rate of almost 50% which approaches the unlawful DeVorkian Type Medicine!

In 1985, this author proposed an alternative to treating the Bone Marrow with medicines that were both safe and effective-namely, by Injecting Antibiotics into the Bone in my Testimony given before the Subcommittees on Health of the House and Senate Appropriations Committee May 1985. In that Testimony indicated that all forms of Cancer should be treated "Systemically" and Locally" with the Curative Antibiotics and that the Antibiotics should be Injected into the bones of Cancer Patients in order to thoroughly treat such Patients and in order to prevent future reoccurrence and metastasis, citing the ten year work of Dr. Umtae Kim of the Rosewell Institute, Buffalo, N.Y. Injection of Antibiotics into the bone is the safest way to Administer Antibiotics and can even be given to new-borns before their veins are fully matured. My own research indicates that Injection of Antibiotics into the Bones, thus treating the bone Marrow Immune System is second only to the Nasal Decongestant Nose Drops in terms of effectiveness. Thus, such treatment reduces a fever within approximately an hours time, while the Antibiotic Nasal Decongestant Nose Drops reduces the fever shortly after it is applied. Clinical Studies by Japanese Oncologists have proven that Injection of Antibiotics into the Bone is a very powerful and effective form of Cancer and Leukemia Therapy. Apparently, there were in 1999 in Japan 50 Clinical Trials where Injection of Antibiotics were given in the Treatment of Cancer and Leukemia. Therefore it would seem logical that this safe and effective Cancer and Leukemia Therapy would also prove effective against HIV III AIDS Leukemia which resides in the Bone Marrow as well of course in the Lymph Nodes, Blood and Glands. Therefore, the Best Form of Antibiotic "Local" Curative therapy for HIV III Patients is Injection into the four limbs and the surface of the cranium, as well as injection into the AIDS Patient’s Lymph Nodes because:

(1) It is in the Bone Marrow that Immune Cells normally grow and where obviously HIV Leukemia suppresses the growth of normal immune cells including the B, T and Macrophages and particularly the T4 Immune Cells which play an important role in the Regulation of the Immune Cells in the Immediate Immune Response as well as influencing the role of the circulatory Lymphocytes.(Susumi Tonegawa the Noble Laureate emphasized that without the T Cells even in the case B Cell and macrophage complement activity that those responses without the T Cell participation would fail. (See Scientific American , October 1985, Tonegawa on the Molecular activity of the Immune Cells, Page 128. Therefore Injection of Antibiotics into the Bone treats the HIV AIDS Infection in its locus.

(2) The Bone Marrow Immune System is the second only to the Lung Immune System in its power to begin the Immune Response and then effecting a Positive result, which is a Cure. For example, applying a Nasal Decongestant Antibiotic as Nose Drops to the Lung Immune System initiates the Curative Process immediately as is shown by its ability to reduce Bacterial and Viral Fevers which is accomplished almost immediately. Reduction of Fevers by Injection into the Bones is accomplished within one or two hours far shorter times than is normal which generally takes four to six hours. See the Medical Physiologist, Arthur Guyton.

(3) Injection of Antibiotics into the Bone thus Treating the Bone Marrow Immune System has proven to be one of the most effective ways to Treat and Cure various forms of Cancer and Leukemia. See Japanese Internet 1999 showing 50 Clinical Trials where Antibiotics cured various forms of Cancer and Leukemia.

The author and Medical Research Scientist has given some indication that HIV I and III Leukemia can be cured by Antibiotics and that Japanese Physicians have been treating and curing HIV I and III Leukemia or "AIDS" for many years. And their Ministry of Health Report indicating 600 cases of infection out of a 126 Million, the lowest rate of incidence for any modern nation in the world where international commerce is carried out, also proves that AIDS is cured in Japan where the doctors rely more heavily on Antibiotic Medicines than any other country on earth.

I pointed out above that "Systemic and Local" Antibiotic Therapy achieved by Dr. Bonadonna, Instituto Tumari that produced an 80% Cure Rate for Breast Cancer. See his Clinical Trials reported in Cancer Research, May 1988. And that a similar Antibiotic combined with an Immune Hormone cured HIV I and III reported in 1984 in The British Journal of Hematology V. 58, P. 272-279. I also pointed out that the Antibiotics had been used in some cases to treat and cure HIV Leukemia or AIDS in Europe and in the United States that doctors in Hospital or Clinics had encountered AID Strains resistant to Antibiotics a phenomenon that usually occurs where the same Antibiotic and the same disease have been recycled hundreds of times according to a biological study at Queens Hospital Sydney Australia.

It was obvious that as I had suggested in 1979 and 1985 that these two approaches to the treatment of HIV Leukemia had not only proved effective in the case of Dr. Bonadonna’s Treatment for Breast Cancer. But had later been reported as being effective for Bone Cancer Therapy. See "PD-3. Penicillium Diversum: 98% Effective in vitro the highest rating given any Antibiotic including the American Cancer Society’s favorite Antibiotic, Adriamycin.

I emphasized in my Testimony of 1985 that the "Rediscoveries" that I had made in Brazil in 1970 and reported to the Subcommittee of Health of the House Ways and Means Committee, Dec. 4^th, 1975 could be used to cure a very wide range of Viral, Bacterial and Protozoa Fevers and illnesses. See the Spanish Pharmacopiae 1993: "The Antibiotic Penicillin combined with a Nasal Decongestant (immune Hormone is A CURE FOR ALL RESPIRATORY ILLNESSES." My Report to Congress in December 4^th, 1975 had shown that using Penicillin combined with the Immune Hormone Naphazolene Hcl (now known as Penicillium Diversum) cured Bacterial, Viral and Protozoa Illnesses in one third time less and required ten percent of the normal curative dosage as indicated by the Physician’s Desk I Reference for Diseases that it indicated were curable by means of the Antibiotics. (Fifty milligrams of Penicillin rather than 500 Mg. As indicated by the Physican Desk Reference, for example.) And my "Rediscovery" of what is now called by Japanese Physicians: Naphazoline Hcl in 1% solution combined with Penicillin and administered as Nose Drops Is so effective that it could be tested in one days time against the rhino Virus illness, Asthma which it cures in one days time. Or tested in one days time against ALL VIRAL, BACTERIAL AND PROTOZOA ILLNESS FEVERS because it reduces a fever to normal levels as soon as it is applied as Nose Drops. A fact that I pointed out to NAIDS and to Dr. Fauci at an informal conference which was ignored when my Petition requesting one day tests was denied. That request was undoubtedly one of the least expensive requests ever made at the NIH and could have been conducted for less than one hundred dollars one hundred Patients at the NIH. Generally, similar Research Grants award the participating scientists millions and some times tens of millions of Dollars. That same formula Cures HIV I also called "Cat Leukemia" because Medical Students are infected dissecting or "catobolizing" Diseased Cats. Which in America is usually cured by a fifteen day course of Penicillin or Dioxicillin. And is cure by a Phenyephrine Hcl Nasal Decongestant similar to Naphazoline Hcl combined with Dioxcillin or Tetracycline or Penicillin IN FIVE DAYS.

Therefore, this Researcher had indicated a safe and effective low cost Cure for HIV I Leukemia or HIV I AIDS which could be readily duplicated by one day pilot tests or by full tests in five days. While the NIH, Buroughs Welcome now Welcome Galaxy and Hoffman LaRouche had offered expensive and ineffective nostrums which they admitted prolonged life but did not Cure HIV I or II Leukemia, Herpes, or even the relatively mild Asthma. In effect, they touted an ineffective treatment which they admitted did not cure mild viral illnesses including Asthma. HIV treatment costs the AIDS Patient or the U.S. Government TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS PER YEAR! Which was in sharp contrast to my proven Rediscovery which is Safe and Effective and costs mere pennies per patient: Penicillin or Tetracycline combined with a Nasal Decongestant containing Synthetic Epinephrine: Naphazoline Hcl 1% Sol or Phenylephrine Hcl in 1% sol.

The worldwide Medical Community, generally with the exception of Japan, has followed lockstep the NIH unsubstantiated hypothesis "the Antibiotics do not cure Viral Illnesses" and this despite the NIH’s own Medical Text: Goodman’s Pharmacology 1955-1958: Page 1388: "The Antibiotics Tetracycline and Penicillin cure Viral Illnesses." Even the prestigious World Health Organizstion or WHO has followed the NIH Guidelines with the exception of its actions within the U.N. of April 6, 2000 where is recommended the use of Ordinary Antibiotics to treat AIDS in Subhararian Africa after some studies indicated that mortality due to HIV had been reduced by 50% by use of Antibiotics to treat and cure AIDS at a cost of $8.00 a year per patient. However, contemporary Medical Science has within the past several years produced new evidence that proves the Antibiotics Cure Viral Illnesses including further evidence that they cure HIV I and III. And this by means of the Innate Immune System Research where normally the Macrophage upon contact with the Virus or other antigen activates Blood serum complement through the C-3 alternative pathway. I had proved in 1970 that this process can cause an instantaneous reduction of a Viral, Leukemia or AIDS Fever by the application Nasal Decongestant Penicillin Nose Drops sure evidence that the Macrophage, the principal immune cells that line the Lungs immediately and directly activate Blood Serum Complement before any circulating Immune Cells have time to act in a similar manner. Contemporary Science now indicates by vague indirect proofs of its own that the Antibiotics treating Patient’s Innate Immune System can activate complement and begin the curative process for various viruses including HIV I and III. That proof lies in the Discovery of Defensins which are natural Antibiotics which the human body, animals and plants produce. And by the recent Discovery of Alveolar Macrophages which are V iricidal and Antiturmor.

As I just indicated above Contemporary Science indicates to vague indirect proofs of its own that the Antibiotics treating Patient’s Innate Immune System can activate complement and begin the curative process for various viruses including HIV I and III.. That proof is the Discovery of Defensins which are the Antibiotics which human body, animals and plants produce. And the Discovery of Alveolar Macrophages which are tumidical as well as general Macrophage-Cancer-Leukemia Research.

The existence of Natural Human Antibiotics which are produced by myeloid precursor cells residing in the bone marrow and stored in the cytoplasm granules of mature cells that are capable of destroying bacteria and viruses is significant for several reasons:

First it destroys a fundamental fallacy of the NIH which contradicted its own Text Goodman & Gilman’s Pharmacology 2nd Ed. 1955-1958,Pharmaceutical Conferences in 1940 to 1950 and Armed Forces Records WWII and the American Cancer Society’s and Japanese Doctors success in treating and curing Cancer and Leukemia Viruses with the Antibiotics. This contradictory conduct by the NIH is the basis for its reliance on ineffective and unsafe Antiviral Agents which have displaced low cost Safe and Effective Antibiotic Medicines that have long cured HIV I and sometimes HIV III Leukemia. This NIH fallacy has resulted in the World-wide AIDS Epidemic which has been characterized as Security Issue by the United Nations and may have resulted in the infection more than 100 Million human beings.

Second, the displacement of the low cost safe and effective Antibiotic Medicines by the NIH"s Unsafe and ineffective nostrums has resulted in the rise in the cost of Medicines from 5,000 fold to 20,000 fold and has produced many new categories of formally curable illnesses being reclassified as incurable.

Third, the failure to make available synthetic Antibiotic Medicines has resulted in unnecessary loss of human life. And now animal life with the whole sale destruction of livestock caused by fear of infected animals that are now not given precautionary Antibiotics.

Kazuyoshi Imaizumi , N. Hasegawa et al found that stimulation of the Alveolar Macrophage and Antigen Presenting Cells through the CD40 and CD40L complement receptors which expressed tumor cells could enhance the cytotoxic effect of macrophages and the Antitumor Immunity of the T Cells by investigating Antitumor activity against Lung Cancer cells. ("The Lungs usually express low antigenicity and it is difficult to induce lung-cancer specific cellular immunity. They found that when murine Alveolar Macrophage were incubated with antiCD40 IgM antibody or 3LLSA-Cd40L cells alone, that no tumoricidal activity was shown. However, when alveolar macrophages were incubated with IFN-y (Interferon) that both the CD40 and IFN-y activated the tumoricidal activity of the alveolar macrophage, but that macrophage of CD40 complement receptor mice showed no such enhancement of tumoricidal activity…American Physiological Society; March 8, 1999.

Interferon is one of the weakest stimulants of Macrophage (perhaps a 5% cure rate against Asthma as opposed to a 90% cure rate with the Antibiotic Penicillin (k) combined with Naphazolene Hcl in 1% solution. See also "PD-3: Penicillin Diversum=Naphazoline hcl combined Penicillin 98% effective in test tube against Yoshida Sarcoma or Bone Cancer Chem. Abstr. April 15, 1985.. See Congressional Testimony Samuel B. Wallace before,Congressman Rostenkowski of the House Ways and Means Committee, Dec. 4, 1975 where the author indicated that when a Nasal Decongestant containing the Immune Hormone synthetic Epinephrine combined with Penicillin and applied to the Lungs as Nose Drops that Bacterial, Viral and Protozoa Fevers were reduced to normal (which would include Cancer, Leukemia , HIV I and III AIDS Fevers which also demonstrates that Alveolar Macrophage tumoricidal activity is enhanced greatly by the application of the Nasal decongestant Antibiotic Nose Drops. See also the human body’s ability to manufacture new Antibiotics called "Defensins particularly after similar stimulation by antigen and the Nasal Decongestant Nose Drops.. Which is also readily confirmed by Immuno Assays as indicated by the observed activity of Neutrophils which contain four Defensin human protein (HPN 1,2,3 and 4) 30% to %0% See ASM Mews 5;56;315, 1990; R.I. Lehrer, Ganz and Selested. Who noted an increase in Cytokin NK-killer cells, an increase in Antibodies to viral antigen, and a decrease in the temperature of feverish mice and after Complement was activated and an increased pyrogens and Cytokins such as Interferon Gama (IFN-y.)

[Note: The Human Genome Project-the mapping of all known Human Gene sequences should be put in proper perspective. First, it should be recalled that a genetic predisposition to an illnesses does not mean the illnesses is incurable because genes by their nature are always changing. These changes in their structure caused by chemical or biological agents are commonly called mutat-ions in which the sequence of DNA coding is altered to produce a nucleotide sequence of mRNA which in turn codes an altered an altered polypeptide chain.)Thus, Genes are influenced by other components of the Immune Response. Therefore, a Genetic predisposition to a disease say caused by heredity is not a sentence to the inevitability to a disease or death because Genes are always changing and are subject to biochemical activity including that caused by medicines and Immunological responses to past illnesses. Second Genes do not act alone they act in conjunction with Immune Hormones, Enzymes, Immune Cells and Complement of which they are integral components, thirdly Antigen, B Cells, Antibodies, T Cells and Blood Serum Complement Protein and other Immune cells all act and are acted on by the genes. The latter fact being of great medical significance because though the genes cause the development of proteins such as the Antibiotics which act on the genes themselves. The Proteins are of greater importance in terms of the cure of the actual disease. Genes do not of themselves cure illnesses, they are instrumental along with Immune Hormones and Immune Cells in the process of synthesizing and augmenting the immune cells and Proteins that do in fact produce cures. Therefore to overemphasize the role of the genes is not good medicine because it distorts the curative process. Although the Genes do not of themselves produce cures, they are essential Components of the curative process and are markers for disease and by acting on the amino acids the precursors of Proteins, they do play an important role in the curative process. The Genes it must be emphasized do not directly Cure Illness or directly prevent Disease.]

The Amino acids are the building blocks of Protein that also help produce it at the site of ribosomes through the action of hormones, enzymes and low molecular weight RNA causing the release of ATP Energy in the Mitochondria Cells. This complex process is described at length in Albert Lehninger’s BIOCHEMISTRY, 2^nd Edition, 1978. Chapter 33: Translation: the Biosynthesis of Proteins P.929-954. This process is partially summarized in the same chapter on P. 952,Summary:

The synthesis of proteins from activated amino acids takes place on the surface of the ribosomes. Amino acids are first activated in cytoplasm by aminoacyl1-tRNA synthetases, which catalyze the formation of the amino esters of homologous tRNA; simultaneously, ATP is cleaved to AMP and pyrophosphate. The aminoacyl-RNA synthetasis are highly specific for both the amino acid and its corresponding tRNA…

The Genes by genetically coding the Amino Acid sequences in Proteins regulate the form and function of proteins that are reflections of those amino acid sequences. Genetic information is stored in the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), the informational macromolecule of the chromosomes.

"…This information instructs each cell to produce a characteristic set of proteins in accordance with the central statement of molecular genetics: i.e., genetic information flows in the direction DNA—RNA—protein. It is the sequence of amino acids in the polypeptide chain of each type of protein that is ultimately specified or coded by the sequence of nucleotide residues in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)> The segment of a DNA molecule specifying one complete polypeptide chain is called a cistron or gene. ….Gene normally remain in the chromosomes and do not directly serve as the coding templates during the biosynthesis of proteins, which takes place on the ribosomes. Instead the genetic message in the gene is first enzymatically transcribed to form a specific type of ribonucleic acid called messenger RNA [mRNA], whose nucleotide sequence is complementary to that of the DNA of the gene…..

As just described in my discussion of the Human Genome put in perspective above, I feel obliged to emphasize once more:

Genes are always changing and are subject to biochemical activity including that caused by Medicines and Immunological responses to past illnesses. Second Genes do not act alone they act in conjunction with Immune Hormones, Enzymes, Immune Cells and Complement of which they are integral components, thirdly Antigen, B Cells, Antibodies, T Cells and Blood Serum Complement Protein and other Immune cells all act and are acted on by the genes. The latter fact being of great medical significance because though the genes cause the development of Amino Acids which in turn synthesize Proteins such as the Antibiotics which act on the the Antigen and the Genes within the Antigen and within the Immune Cells themselves. For example in 1979 Dr. Hamao Umezawa proved that the Antibiotic Adriamycin altered the Genetic structure of Cancer and Leukemia Cells and the Patients Immune Cells. In fact the Antibiotic Proteins by their nature always alter the Genetic Structure of the Antigen and the affected Immune Cells.

Professor Lehninger in his text Biochemistry Chapter 3,Table 3-3, P. 64: Proteins and their Biological Function describes the Biological activity of Proteins including Hormones, Enzymes, Hemoglobins, including the protective proteins of Antibodies, Complement etc.

There are two basic forms of Immunity and Therapeutic Immune Response and the Acquired Response. The Innate Non-specific Immune Response which is basically Antigen Macrophage Activation of Blood Serum Complement through the its C-3 Complement Enzymatic Pathway. The Innate Immune Response is described universally as "the first defense against all disease."

However, all the very same Medical Textists go on to elaborate for the remainder of their text on the the Acquired Immune response which is Antigen Macrophage to B Cell –Antibody Activation of Blood Serum Complement or Antigen to T Cell to T4 & T8 Activation of Blo0od Serum Complement. My Research has emphasized the use of the Innate Immune Response which generally produces cures in shorter periods of time using smaller quantities of Curative Medicines which more often than not cost pennies per Patient. And therefore it is the Protein the Antibiotics properly applied Bacterial and Viral Illnesses. Therefore it is the Protein and not the Genes which actually cause the prevention and cure of the Disease.

Thus, it seems obvious that the Genetic Genome while admittedly important to medical research does not hold the key to discovering new Medicines capable of curing illnesses.

And obviously the Proteins which are the actual components of the Immune Cells and Antibiotics have historically proved capable of producing Cures and not unfulfilled promises.

DR HAMAO UMEZAWA DISCUSSED HIS DISCOVERIES OF IMMUNOMODULATORS (ANTIBIOTICS) FROM SECONDARY METABOLITES (NATURAL ANTIBIOTICS) DERIVED FROM PRIMARY NATURAL ANTIBITICS AND FROM ENZYME INHIBITORS (OFTEN ALSO ANTIBIOTICS) IN 1979. (HE USED THE SECOND AS EARLY AS 1953)

Dr. Hamao Umezawa, Ministry of Health Tokyo in 1980 indicated in a Research Paper titled: Screening of Small Molecular Products Modulating Immune Responses, P. 119:

"P119:Very low concentrations (0.001-0.1 ug/ml) of Bestatin seem to modulate the differentiation of Bone Marrow Stem Cells.

P123:..Clinical studies in the past two years in Japan have shown that daily oral administration of 30mg Bestatin increased the percentage of T Cells.Blumgren, H., (1979) Studies in the immuno-stiumlatory effect of Bestatin in vitro and in vivo. Bestatin Conference, March 30^th, 1979 in Tokyo, Japan.

P.123. In (another) Clinical Study Bestatin administered orally in dosages of 30mg daily eliminated carcinomas without relapse after thirty days…..(And)..during those studies doctors noted that the frequency of other infections decreased.

P. 124: Conclusion: (Paraphrased)Studies of various Antibiotics and various Enzyme Inhibitors have shown that microorganisms are the treasures of organic compounds which have various structures and various bioactivities. The Genetic studies on the biosynthesis will elucidate the mechanism by which the microorganism has gained the ability to produce so many secondary metabolites.. It is reasonable, therefore, to search for small molecular immunomodulators in microbial culture filtrates. I have established a method to find microbial products that can bind to immune cells. In fact, applying this screening method. I found small molecular immunomulators. Among them Bestatin which enhanced immune responses in mice, that have been shown to enhance the human defense system. Small molecular inhibitors do not seem to be antigenic, and are thought to be useful in analyzing the biochemical mechanisms of the immune response and to have potential activity in the treatment of Cancer."

Because of his discoveries in Cancer and Leukemia Medicine, his dedication, hard work and intelligent research which he was willing to share not only with his colleagues and students but to foreigners in conferences that he participated all over the world, I suggest that the United States Congress should use its influence to see that this great Doctor, Teacher and above all Medical researcher who in his research answered many of the questions that Researchers today are trying to discover is awarded the Nobel Prize for the first time in history,Posthumously,as the Medical Researcher of the past century.

It does seem logical from the standpoint of good medical science as Dr. Hamao Umezawa has shown that low cost Antibiotic Safe and Effective Innate Therapies which cure HIV I and III AIDS as well as a host of other Viral and Bacterial Diseases should be used as Curative Therapy before noncurative "antiviral agents" which cure nothing and cost fortunes are used for the treatment of the sick, here in America and throughout the world.

Failure to emphasize the Requirements of the FDA Act as amended by Senator Kefauver and signed by JFK. Which demonstrates that not only great harm can come to Patients but also that great Economic damage can be done to the richest nation on earth due to failure to enforce the requirements of the FDA Act of Safety and effectiveness. No one can argue against the proposition that the current use of AZT etc with its notorious severe side effects and the use of extremely weak "cocktail" combination of extremely weak Antibiotic derivatives shows that both patients and our national economy are severely injured by such blatant and unnecessary violations of the FDA which ignore good medical science and practice. The result is that HIV I and III Patients, here, and throughout the world are not being healed but the lives are being slightly prolonged as also happens to patients with Asthma for similar reasons. The cost of such spurious unorthodox treatments for many many illnesses including AIDS is often astronomical. NonAntibiotic Antiviral AIDS Therapy generally costs approximately 20,000 dollars per year as contrasted to the five dollars total cost of Antibiotic Medicines and perhaps $50 to $100 dollars per year for the Antibiotic Medicines that can produce safe and effective cures for AIDS, for example.

SECOND MAKING AVAILABLE CERTAIN SAFE AND EFFECTIVE MEDICINES FOR OVER THE COUNTER SALE BY LIFTING THE FDA IMPOSED REQUIREMENTS OF PRESCRIPTIONS CAN IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE AND REDUCE ITS COSTS.

Today as I pointed out in House Testimony of 1985, Doctors enjoy an undeserved monopoly in being permitted to solely prescribe medications for the sick when for example students of Pharmacy study medicines and their effects for a period of five years as opposed to the two years of the study the medical students who are really being prepared to be a surgeons rather than a Medical Doctors. Likewise experienced Nurse Practitioners and well educated Respiratory Therapist knowledgeable about Antibiotic Respiratory Therapy are also precluded from prescribing safe and effective cures for even Asthma which causes the cost of medicine to be raised 5,000 fold and again places the patient in a position where he must continue to go to the doctor until he finally succumbs to the a disease readily cured by Antibiotics. Again the doctor being the sole person authorized to prescribe medications is allows him to exercise an actual monopoly powers. And as such he may well be techniquely in violation of our Antitrust laws. Particularly when he uses noncurative medicines in place of low cost antibiotic medicines in order to enhance his own income by perineal treatment readily cured by the Antibiotics within a few days or less.

These problems have become so great in terms of their economic and medical impact that just recently it was reported in the New York Time May 11, 2001 that the Insurance Companies are proposing that Allergy Drugs be sold over the counter without a prescription because the heavily touted prescription drugs are placing a 4.7 Billion dollar burden on the Insurance Industry. I had proposed to David Mathews, the Secretary of HEW that the FDA should lift the prescription requirements of low cost safe and effective Antibiotics in small quantities for such medicines as Penicillin and Tetracycline which are known to be very safe and effective and nontoxic. My Petition was opposed at the Administrative Level and never resolved in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The Defendants had stated falsely "the Antibiotics due not cure Viral Illnesses" and my own testimony about empirical results that I had obtained in Brazil 1969-1974 against a wide range of viral and bacterial illnesses was not considered sufficient. I was not aware at the time that the NIH was in opposition to the very Medical Text it co-authored 1955-1958,Goodman and Gilman's Pharmacology 2nd Ed., 1958, P. 1388 or Pharmaceutical Conference Records and Armed Forces Medical Records which also indicated the Antibiotics cured Viral Illnesses. The NIH’s position was also in direct opposition to the American Cancer Society’s Text: "Oncology" which indicated that hundreds of Antibiotics were capable of Curing Cancer and Leukemia caused by various Viruses.

"In an escalating battle between Insurance Companies and Drug Manufacturers over the rising cost of prescription medicines. One of the nation's largest health insurers,(Wellpoint Health Networks) will argue today at a federal (FDA) hearing that Claritin, the top-selling prescription allergy drug, and two of its competitors should be sold over the counter. (parenthesis added)....The insurer also says that the drugs, which are heavily promoted in television commercials ..had a combined sale in the United States of $4.7 billion dollars last year, are putting a growing financial burden on the health care system."

"Prescription durg costs are increasing at a rate that is not sustainable," said Dr. Robert C. Seidman, Wellpoint's chief pharmacy officer. "We filed this petition to make health care more affordable."

As a Senior Citizen on Social Security, I recently faced a similar problem. I finally found a doctor who would prescribe an Antibiotic for Arthritis, my previous doctor having left this country to return to France several years ago. However, the cost for that Medicine was ten dollars per tablet of minocyclin antibiotic which has also been shown to be effective against artheritis. And then discovered that even the common Antibiotic Tetracylcine recom-mended by Dr. Brown of the Artheritis Clinic in Arlington now cost as much as ten dollars per capsule which I also could not afford. Tetracycline I have is manufactured and sold in countries like Brazil and Costa Rica and Mexico at a cost of pennies per capsule. I could for example journey to Mexico and the money it cost to travel from Washington to Mexico would be less than the money that I would pay for ten capsules of Tetracycline. Those same Medicines would be manufactured by American Pharmaceutical Countries in those countries! Obviously, if a multibillion dollar Health Care Insurer can not afford the current price of Pharmaceuticals, then certainly a poor citizen on Social Security can not. It als o seems obvious that the Pharmaceutical Companies that do business in Central and South America meet their profit margins required to remain in business in those countries. And one wonders whether a Pharmaceutical Company that raise the costs of medicine from 25 cents a capsule to ten dollars a capsule an increase of 40,000 per cent is not making unconscionable profits according to Antitrust Standards? I suggested that it was in proceedings against the NIH from 1995 to 1999. And I estimated that the failure to use low cost safe and effective Antibiotics against a wide array of Viral Illnesses cost the U.SA. 300 Billion per year! Unfortunately, our court system however, did not consider that and the number of lives lost significant.

A saving of three hundred billion per year in high medical costs by the FDA lifting prescription requirements for the low cost Safe and Effective common Antibiotics would allow the present administration to cut taxes and would lift an economic burden imposed on the entire American Industry by ever soaring Health Care costs that they are often required to underwrite. Joseph Califano for example, who once reformed Chrysler Car Corporation’s Health System Administratively, still found that Automobiles produced in Canada by that corporation’s plants in Canada still cost ten percent more. The Canandian Health System relys more heavily on Antibiotics than does our own. And in Puerto Rico in a study for the Health Finance Administration, Miss Pagan indicated that the Puerto Rican Health Care System operated at ten percent per person of the American Public Health System. Thus, Puerto Ricans who are much poorer than Americans whose doctors attend American Medical Schools through the more extensive use of Antibiotic Medicines in their therapy-particularly for viral illnesses including Cancer and Leukemia. The Puerto Rican Health System is not only much more effective and efficient than the American Public Health Care System their Public Health System results in better qualifty health care and greater longevity. Interestingly enough it was reported in a recent RAND Corporation Study that the United States despite spending more person than any country in the world rank 37^th in terms of the qualitity of care its citizens received in comparison to the quality of care and the resultant longevity of citizens of other countries. Obviously, then Americans are not getting what they pay for in terms of the quality of the the Health Care that they receive.

It has been argued by the Pharmaceutical Industry that lifting the prescription drug requirement for antiallergy drugs and by inference Antibiotic Medicines woulld disadvantage the Pharmaceutical Industry which has a right to charge as much for its medicines and nostrums as the market will bear. Unfortunately, this is an oversimplification because in the process of touting the more expensive and ineffective panaceas rather than the Curative Antibiotics, that Industry together with the Gene Tech Industry, particularly in touting the ineffective and sometimes dangerous antiviral agents such as AZT, Interleukin-2, Intereferon for the treatment of diseases that those products can not cure has in many instances violated many laws of this country including the laws prohibiting false advertising, fraudulent practices of selling ineffective products when there were low cost safe and effective Antibiotic alternatives about which they had full knowledge, which most legal experts believe would come under the category of a per se violation of our nation’s antitrust laws. Those same corporations by continuing to tout AZT for eample, as a therapy for HIV I and III AIDS, AZT and even the weak Enzyme Inhibiting socalled "cocktail" when there are Safe and Effective Antibiotic alternatives not only violate the Safety and Effectiveness requirements of the FDA Act but even go so far as to violate the Dr. Divorkian Laws etc. So it is possible for the federal government to impose legal sanctions and to discourage such blatant examples of industry wide price fixing which enormously raises the price of even the Antibiotic Medicines. And if the Pharmaceutical Industry insists on continuing to sell Antibiotics at inordiantelyand unconscionably high prices to the consumer in its Medicare and Medicaid Programs, the government might well consider the establishment of a government run Antibiotic Productive Facility much like our national Post Office. Because the government should not be subisidizing blatant fraud and price gauging.

It is also noteworthy that the Antitrust laws apply to Pharmaceutical Companies in Europe and that many violations of Antitrust Laws here are also a violation of similar Antitrust Laws in Europe.

Recently one rather large Pharmaceutical conglamerate which manufactures Antibiotics that have cured HIV I AIDS offered 200 Million dollars to fight HIV I AIDS in South Africa with the noncurative Antiviral Agents such as AZT and the other combinations which do not cure AIDS where the HIV I strain of AIDS is dominant. And the United States under the Bush Administration has pledged 200 Million dollars to fight AIDS in the developing countries. The sum of 200 hundred million dollars that that Pharmaceutical Company promised to contribute to the South African government to use Noncurative AIDS Medicines, if the Antibiotics particularly combined with the Nasal Decongestant Synthetic Epinephrine such as Naphazoline Hcl in 1% solution applied as Nose Drops three times per day for five days would if applied to the entire population cure AIDS in the entire country for a few million dollars. Since such Antibiotics HIV I treatment and cure costs pennies per patient. And in fact HIV I and III not AIDS could be virutually eliminated from all the countries of Africa if the entire population of Africa were treated with the same Antibiotic Nasal Decongestant Nose Drops for less than the 200 Million Dollars that a leading manufacturer of Antibiotics pledged in its "noncurative" "fight" against AIDS. This Congress might well ask that Manufacturer of Antibiotics why it was pledging so much for ineffective panaceas in South Africa but not making its curative Antibiotics available to the people it pretended to help. And that company might be asked was this offer made for purposes of evading taxes?Similarly, the United States Congress might require the American Pharmaceutical Industry to contribute to the costs of distribution of medicines to the poor in India where the Antibiotics are manufactured more cheaply but where the average Indian laborer can not afford even one tablet of Penicillin because it costs more than a days wages. Such an approach would actually save the American Pharmaceutical Companies much money in that it could be the basis of removing possible liability for what may well be a major Antitrust conspiracy to raise the price and fix the prices of Medicines world-wide. And because the false information that that industry has spread world wide that the Antibiotics do not cure Viral Illnesses despite their ability to cure the most virulent of the viruses Cancer and Leukemia and their fraudulent use of non-curative Viral Agents has contributed much to the spread of HIV AIDS all over the world.

The Congress might also consider the question of should our Patent Laws be revised so for example, exemptions to disclosure can be waived for major epidemics for which new medicines and new uses of old medicines are discoveed. True Health Care Reform common sense and good medical science and recent history has demonstrated requires the appropriate Curative Antibiotic Medicines today as it did in the time of Senator Kefauver.

____________________

1/ Clinical Studies of the common Antibiotics such as Tetracycline and its special form Dioxicillin have produced Cures of HIV Leukemia. See for example Biomed. Pharmacological Therapy 1990; 44(2): 93-101. Randomized controlled study of Chemoimmuntherapy with Bestatin in acute Leukemia; Ota K, Ogawa, N. Nagoya Memorial Hospital, Japan. Rinsho Ketseuki, 1998 July;39(7);487-92: ,"Effective Pentostatin-based Treatment of Adult T Cell Leukemia and severe artheritis." "Patients given Pentostatin and achieved complete remission." Molecular Cell Biochem. 1993 Feb 17;119(1-2):35-41: "Mechanistic Effect of Kijimicin on Inhibition of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Replication." By Yamauchi, t. Nakamura, M, Honama, H. Kawashima, K. Ohno, T. Biomed Pharmacological Therapy, 1991;45(2-3): 55-60:Review of Ubenimex (Bestatin) Immunomodulating Agent with low toxicity brings about signifigant imrovements in the Immune Response. (Bestatin is composed of an Antibiotic combined with Napohazolene Hcl in weak solution as is Doxorubicin also called Adriamycin.) For other Scientific Evidence of the Curative Properties of Penicillin See Med Trop ___1998,58(3),297-306: Article in French by Saissy, J.M., Ducouran, J.P., Tchoua, R, Diatta, B.,..l’Hospital d’Instruction des Armees Bel..Mande, France: (paraphrased with direct quote: (For a) a Staphalocus Infection combined with AIDS:"Treatment is Antibiotic Therapy with Penicillin M...." PROGNOSIS IS GENERALLY FAVORABLE EVEN IN HIV INFECTED PATIENTS." A somewhat delphic statement which may indicate that the HIV AIDS and streptococus, treated with Penicillin survived both Infections. Far more relevant is the number of studies indicating that a patient with AIDS and Karpi sarcoma (Cancer) treated with a Common antibiotic or a an AntiCancer Drug was cured of the Karposi Sarcoma Cancer. And even when death did ensue ultimately from AIDS, there is the strong possibility that had the Antibiotic Therapy continued in the AIDS Patients treated for a short period of time with the Curative Antibiotic might well have survived AIDS if treated with the Antibiotic "Systemically and Locally" for a far longer period time. See Dr. Bonadonna’s 80% Cure Rate for Breast Cancer Treated "Systemically and Locally)

2/ In May 1988, Dr. Bonadonna, a Surgeon at Instituto Tumari, Milan, Italy and also an NIH Grantee indicated in Cancer Research May 1988 Treating Breast Cancer "Systemically" and Locally", produced over a five year period higher Cure Rates than with Surgery or Radiation. That modality of Breast Cancer Antibiotic Therapy has produced Cure Rates as high as 80% but has not been applied to other forms of Cancer and Leukemia by the NIH. Dr. Bonadonna, an NCI Grantee, proved that when Breast Cancer is treated systemically and locally , a higher cure rate resulted than could be achieved when Surgery or Radiation is applied. It would seem cogent to also apply Systemic and Local Therapy to HIV AIDS Patients to prevent relapses and "latent metastasis" leaving a possible reservoir of AIDS infection in the supposedly cured AIDS Patient, see Umtae Kim, the Routes of Invasion and Routes of Reoccurrence and Metastasis are similar. They are Blood, Glandular, (and Bone Marrow.) Therefore common sense and sound Smedical practice would suggest that in order to prevent "latent" reoccurrence or continued development of the HIV III AIDS Virus that "Systemic " and "Local" Antibiotic Curative Therapy is required.