[New for the Democrats - Committee on Resources - U.S. Rep. Nick Rahall, Ranking Democrat - 1329 Longworth HOB - Washington, DC  20015]
  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE   CONTACT:  Kristen Bossi 
February 7, 2005 (202) 226-2311
 

PRESIDENT'S BUDGET SKIMPS ON CONSERVATION DOLLARS

FY06 Budget Request Paints this Administration As A Scrooge, Not a Steward

 
     WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Bush Administration's Fiscal Year 2006 natural resources budget request slashes conservation spending, rendering this Administration a "scrooge", according to U.S. Rep. Nick J. Rahall (D-WV). Rahall is the Ranking Democrat on the House Resources Committee which has jurisdiction over programs administered by the Department of the Interior.

     "The Administration’s claims to be stewards of our land are sadly laughable. A comparison of the Administration's actual budget request against the levels needed to fully fund American conservation programs reveals it to be a scrooge, not a steward," Rahall remarked.

     The Administration proposes to abandon the Stateside Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) Program altogether. For the last forty years, this grant program provided State and Local Parks and Recreation Directors desperately needed funding to help them preserve open space and develop recreational facilities.

     In addition, the President includes only $146 million for Federal side LWCF Programs, less than half of last year’s request. Taken together, the President proposes to meet about 16% of his promise to fully fund LWCF, and he consolidates control of that meager 16% firmly in Federal hands.

     "It is disingenuous, at best, to be selling the American people on a budget that claims to be protecting America, while the cuts in this budget violate our partnership with the States and threaten the future of America’s natural heritage," Rahall said.

     He continued, "The United States is in an entirely avoidable financial situation created by reckless tax cuts and the ballooning price tag of the war in Iraq. Despite statements to the contrary in the President's State of the Union address last week, this Administration and the Republican-controlled Congress are forcing future generations to pay for these mistakes.

     Rahall added, "Conserving and investing in that which is American - our national parks, forests and wildlife - should be a national priority. Setting such a low bar, as the President does, for protecting these treasures is a disgrace and an insult to this Nation's history and our values. It does not bode well for America’s future."

     Weighed on the scale of stewardship, the Administration achieves a ‘scrooge’ rating for the following programs:

  • While touting its commitment to ocean policy reform in its smoke and mirrors Ocean Action Plan, the Administration slashes $350 million from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association’s (NOAA) ocean related budget that is vital to protecting and repairing this resource.

 

  • The Economic Action Programs (EAP) for State and private forestry were zeroed out. EAP helps rural communities and businesses that rely on natural resources become more sustainable and self-sufficient, reducing the fuel hazards in high-risk areas and utilizing the wood removed to create jobs in wood products.

 

  • The Hazardous Fuels Reduction program authorized in the Healthy Forest Restoration Act will be cut by 36% below its Congressionally authorized level if the Bush Administration’s funding request is approved. They are requesting $492 million of the $760 million authorized.

 

  • Five years after his 2000 campaign promise to eliminate the National Parks maintenance backlog, the President has fallen $4 billion short of that $5 billion pledge, only keeping 20% of his promise. The Director of the National Park Service testified before Congress last year that the backlog has actually grown during the Bush Administration to close to $6 billion.

 

  • The Administration requests $64 million for the vital Endangered Species Act recovery program, $5.1 million less than the Congress provided in FY 2005. The proposed cuts would zero out important programs to keep species from going extinct including the recovery of freshwater mussels at the White Sulphur Springs National Fish Hatchery in my District, and the popular Upper Colorado Fish Recovery Program that assists in recovering four endangered fish.

     "The President touts his commitment toward an ownership society, and judging by today's spending proposal, he must intend to pad the profits of his campaign contributors, not to protect our natural resources heritage. The scrooge-like approach to conservation spending does not reflect the values of this nation," concluded Rahall.

 
- 30 -

Press Release            Press Release List            Press Release