Propulsion
Systems |
Artist
concept of a nuclear electric-propelled vehicle firing
banks of ion thrusters in order to circularize its orbit
around Mars.
|
There are many
technological obstacles that need to be overcome to make
the human exploration of Mars and the other planets in
our solar system a reality. One of the main obstacles
is the development of an efficient and safe propulsion
system. Because of the very large distances involved,
the need to reduce the mission duration for medical concerns,
and the weight limitations imposed by the existence of
a manned crew and their life support system, the propulsion
system we choose must be fast, cost-efficient, and as
safe as possible.
There are several
propulsion options, each with its own advantages and drawbacks.
The basic trade-off is between the rocket's thrust and
its fuel efficiency. High-thrust systems accelerate faster
but generally consume more fuel. Low-thrust systems take
longer to speed up but save on fuel. |
|
The Mars spacecraft would
either be launched into Earth orbit on a heavy lifting
rocket using chemical engines and then be separated from
that rocket; or, it would be assembled in low-Earth orbit
in pieces and then be sent to Mars. A trans-Mars injection
(TMI) burn would send the rocket on its way. Rocket engine
designs that currently use chemicals, such as the Space
Shuttle main engines, can be used to bring
the ship from Earth but cannot release enough energy to
make the long trip to Mars in an acceptable time frame.
A manned spacecraft would need to make the long trip to
Mars as quickly as possible to avoid exposing the crew
to the dangers of radiation and to too much time spent
in zero g. However, this would require the craft to carry
more supplies and equipment which would increase the weight
of the space craft, requiring even more energy. |
The function of
a rocket
engine is to apply force to the mass of the spacecraft
to get it to move through space. Rocket engines all work
the same way. The thrust or impulse provided by
the engine changes the speed or velocity of the
spacecraft. As the rocket fuel or propellant
is used up, the spaceship becomes lighter and,
thus, less force is necessary from that point forward.
Once in the vacuum of space, after you start moving, nothing
affects your flight except the gravitational pull of the
Earth, the Sun, and nearby planets (Isaac
Newton's laws of motion). The farther you
get from a planetary body, the less gravitational pull
is acting on the spacecraft. At a certain point between
the two planets, the gravitational pull of the planet
you have left behind (that is slowing you down) is replaced
by the gravitational pull of the planet you are approaching
(that will speed you up).
The term specific
impulse is used to define the relationship between
the thrust of a rocket engine and the weight of propellant
flow. This variable is used rather than the exhaust velocity
because it relates the thrust of an engine to the mass
of propellant and can be directly compared among different
propulsion alternatives. Specific impulse (thrust per
unit flow rate of propellant) is measured in seconds.
It is one of the elements of the rocket equation, that
allows engineers to choose between propulsion systems.
Specific impulse is represented in equations by the term
Isp. More powerful rocket engines will have a higher
thrust-to-weight ratio and, thus, a greater specific impulse.
Chemical
rockets have a comparatively low specific impulse,
or an Isp of 150-450, while nuclear thermal rockets engines
have an Isp of 825-925. The space shuttle main engines,
which are currently the best existing chemical rocket
engines, have the highest attained Isp of 455. Different
types of electrical rocket engines have even greater specific
impulses ranging from electrothermal rocket engines (800-1200)
to electromagnetic (2000-5000) to electrostatic or ion
engines (with an Isp of 3500-10000!).
Nuclear
Propulsion |
This nuclear
thermal rocket fires upon arrival at Mars to insert the
transfer vehicle into orbit. |
Two designs for rocket engines to Mars are currently under
consideration, the nuclear propulsion engine and the electrical
propulsion engine. Both of these engines are more advantageous
than the traditional chemical engine because of the large
increase in available energy. A nuclear thermal propulsion
system can carry a larger payload and accomplish its mission
in a reduced time frame. Conventional chemical rockets would
take too long to get to Mars. The traditional design approach
for a nuclear
thermal engine is the use of a solid core, heat exchanger
reactor. |
Liquid hydrogen is pumped
through extra-core components for cooling and then through
the reactor core to be heated and expanded through the
rocket nozzle to produce thrust. The main problem with
these engines is that the engine is heated by nuclear
radiation emanating from the core. The high temperatures
(2,500-3,000K) and huge power production can result in
neutron and x-ray leakages. As the primary transfer propulsion
system, the spacecraft's reactor would, for safety reasons,
remain inactive until departure from Earth orbit. In short,
nuclear propulsion can shorten interplanetary trip times
and can reduce the mass launched from Earth, but they
can be dangerous and certainly would elicit great concern
from environmental groups on the Earth. |
|
The basic criteria
for a propulsion system to be employed in the future exploration
of Mars are that:
- the technology employed should be mature and
flight-tested
- the reliability of the engine must be of a high degree
to assure maximum safety of the crew
- its efficiency must allow for a sizable payload,
a modest Earth-to-orbit mass, a short travel time, flexibility
in selection of the mission parameters, flight plan
changes during flight, ample accommodations for the
crew, and opportunities for scientific observations
- and in the case of a nuclear system, the operation
and testing of the reactor should not present an undue
hazard or a cause for concern on Earth and in space
|
Electrical
Propulsion
The electrical propulsion system is an alternative to the
nuclear thermal system. Of the four requirements mentioned
previously, the electric propulsion system meets all of
them. Various types of electrical propulsion have been developed,
but the one that currently satisfies the requirements of
a propulsion system for interplanetary travel is the ion
propulsion system . |
|
The ion propulsion system has
the best efficiency among the electric propulsion systems,
and it is one of the most developed systems currently available.
The main difference between an ion thruster and other electrical,
nuclear, or chemical systems is that the exhaust particles
of the rocket are not accelerated by heat energy but by
electrical energy. This accounts for electrical propulsion
systems reaching higher exhaust velocities than any of the
other available propulsion systems. |
Ion engine in testing at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
|
The ion
engine , also called the electrostatic engine,
obtains the highest degree of conversion of electric power
into thrust and has the longest operational lifetime. It
works on the principle of ionizing the propellant gas through
direct electron bombardment or radio frequency fields to
increase the temperature of the gas and cause thrust.
|
Gas
enters the ionization chamber to increase its temperature.
This increase in temperature is done via the ionization
process. The gas is bombarded with positive ions from
the power source; and, before the gas reaches the nozzle,
the accelerated mass of ionized gas is injected with electrons
and thrust is obtained.
In an electric
engine, the energy needed to accelerate the particles
of propellant is provided by an onboard electric power
supply connected to both the ionization chamber and the
neutralizer at the rocket nozzle. As with solar sails,
solar ion engines are mainly practical in the inner solar
system, where ample sunlight is available. For more distant
missions, it is, in principle , possible to drive
an ion engine by a small onboard nuclear reactor.
VASIMR
|
Veteran astronaut Franklin Chang-Diaz leads a team at
NASA's Johnson Space Center that is developing a rocket
engine using plasma heating and magnetic containment technologies
derived from nuclear fusion research. Chang-Diaz is
a plasma physicist and shuttle astronaut who has pursued
this idea for more than 20 years. |
|
Called VASIMR
(variable specific impulse magneto-plasma rocket),
the engine features a modulated ("tunable")
exhaust permitting high-thrust operation during departure
from and arrival in planetary orbit and gradual shift
to continuous low-thrust operation between planets. This
results in a highly efficient, potentially very fast propulsion
system. This engine could permit both slow, high-payload
cargo missions and fast, low-payload crew missions using
the same rocket engine. The engine consists of three magnetic
cells.
The propellant,
hydrogen, is first ionized by radio waves and is then
guided into a central chamber threaded with magnetic fields.
There the particles spiral around the magnetic-field lines
with a certain natural frequency. By bombarding the particles
with radio waves of the same frequency, the system heats
them to 10 million degrees Kelvin
. A magnetic nozzle converts the spiraling motion
into axial motion, producing thrust. By regulating the
manner of heating and adjusting a magnetic choke, the
spacecraft pilot can control the exhaust rate. The mechanism
is analogous to a car gearshift. Closing down the choke
puts the rocket into high gear: it reduces the number
of particles exiting but keeps their temperature high.
Opening up corresponds to low gear: high thrust but low
efficiency. A spacecraft would use low gear and an afterburner
to climb out of Earth orbit and then shift up for the
interplanetary cruise. A Mars mission would need a 10-megawatt
device. |
|
In the accompanying image, the large yellow tanks are
the hydrogen tanks. The plasma sources and heaters for the
thrusters are located just forward of the nozzles. The power
to drive the radio frequency antennas comes from three nuclear
reactors located at the ends of the booms. |
One
feature of this spacecraft is, if difficulties occur within
15 days of Earth departure, it can return to Earth in
75 days (assuming a fully functional propulsion system).
A second abort scenario, in which the accidental loss
of all propellant is assumed, can return the crew to Earth
in 180 days. In addition, during faster propulsion periods,
there could be a slight amount of artificial
gravity created. Finally, the plasma engine would generate
a magnetic field around the ship, which could help to
protect the crew from radiation exposure similar to the
way the Earth's magnetic field protects us from harmful
solar flares and the resulting radiation.
Questions
to think about:
- Which of the three types
of engines would you choose for your rocket design?
Why?
- What are some of the benefits
and drawbacks of each type of rocket?
|
Next... Living
off the Land (pg. 15 of 17) |
|
|