skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 086081  
Title: Estimating Cell Entries in Contingency Tables - Distributional Assumptions vs Marginal Constraints (From Inferring Individual Behavior Grouped Data, 1981, by John Wanat - See NCJ-86079)
Author(s): J Wanat
Corporate Author: University of Illinois at Chicago Circle
Dept of Political Science
United States
Sponsoring Agency: US Dept of Justice
Law Enforcement Assistance Admin
United States
Sale: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States
Publication Date: 1981
Pages: 17
Origin: United States
Language: English
Grant No.: 79-NI-AX-0058
Note: Available on microfiche as NCJ-86079
Annotation: This essay examines the expected values usually used in testing for independence in two-way contingency tables, which commonly involves using a chi-square test.
Abstract: The chi-square test usually involved in testing for independence in two-way contingency tables measures the goodness of fit between the observed data and the expected values. This study notes that the usually derived expected values in such analyses are based on assumptions about the distributional form and indistinguishability of the counted items, assumptions that may not always be reasonable. Then the paper presents an alternative method of estimating expected values, the most possible estimate approach, that does not rely on a priori assumptions about the distributional form or distinguishability of items being counted. Finally, by establishing that the most possible estimates approximate maximum likelihood estimates, the robustness of the standard ML estimator is demonstrated, and the researcher is thereby assured of safety in using it without attending to distributional assumptions. This analysis applies to 3x3 tables. Mathematical formulas, tabular data, and two bibliographic listings are provided. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Estimating methods
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=86081

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder