*Pages 1--1 from  Microsoft Word - 16293*
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA  00-  201 
 Before  the  Federal  Communications  Commission 
 Washington,  D.  C.  20554 


 In  re  Application  of  )  ) 
 ALISON  C.  POLLARD/  ZETA  )  File  No.  07724-  CL-  P1-  95  TRUST  PARTNERSHIP  ) 
 )  For  Phase  I  Cellular  Unserved  Area,  ) 
 Market  No.  393(  B),  Idaho  6  -  Clark  RSA  ) 
 ORDER 


 Adopted:  February  2,  2000  Released:  February  4,  2000 
 By  the  Chief,  Policy  and  Rules  Branch,  Commercial  Wireless  Division,  Wireless  Telecommunications  Bureau: 


 1.  On  January  23,  1997,  Idaho  6-  Clark  Limited  Partnership  filed  a  petition  to  deny  the  above-captioned  application  of  Alison  C.  Pollard/  Zeta  Trust  Partnership,  and  on  February  7,  1997,  GAP  Cellular 
 L.  C.  also  filed  a  petition  to  deny  the  above-  captioned  applications  (collectively  “Petitions”).  On  February  6,  1997,  however,  the  Narrowband  Branch,  1  on  its  own  motion,  dismissed  the  application  as  defective.  2  We 
 therefore  dismiss  the  Petitions  as  moot. 
 2.  Accordingly,  IT  IS  ORDERED  that,  pursuant  to  section  4(  i)  of  the  Communications  Act,  as  amended,  47  U.  S.  C  §  154(  i),  and  sections  0.331  and  22.130  of  the  Commission's  rules,  47  C.  F.  R  §§  0.331, 
 22.130,  the  petitions  to  deny  filed  by  Idaho  6  –  Clark  Limited  Partnership  on  January  23,  1997  and  by  GAP  Cellular,  L.  C.  on  February  7,  1997  ARE  DISMISSED  as  moot. 


 FEDERAL  COMMUNICATIONS  COMMISSION 
 Paul  D’Ari  Chief,  Policy  and  Rules  Branch 
 Commercial  Wireless  Division  Wireless  Telecommunications  Bureau 


 1  The  Commercial  Wireless  Division’s  Narrowband  Branch  and  Broadband  Branch  later  were  merged 
 into  the  Licensing  and  Technical  Analysis  Branch. 


 2  See  Letter  from  Stephen  L.  Markendorff,  Chief,  Broadband  Branch,  to  Bennet  &  Bennet,  PLLC,  dated 
 February  6,  1997. 
1