Skip Navigation | |
July 12, 2000 | |
|
SUMMARY
The Stamp Out Breast Cancer Act (Public Law 105-41) authorized a special postage stamp for first-class mail. The United States Postal Service set the price of this stamp (called a semipostal) at 40 cents, 7 cents above the regular rate of 33 cents, and the authority to issue this stamp expires on July 28, 2000. Amounts above the regular postal rate collected from sales of the special stamp are later transferred to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Defense (DoD) to spend for breast cancer research (after accounting for the Postal Service's administrative costs). H.R. 4437 would extend this program for two years after enactment of the bill, or until July 29, 2002, whichever is later. In addition, the bill would require the General Accounting Office (GAO) to prepare a report on the breast cancer stamp.
The bill also would authorize the Postal Service to issue additional semipostals, involving issues and federal agencies that the service would determine, for a ten-year period after the first such semipostal is issued. Over that period, the bill would direct GAO to prepare two reports on the extended semipostal program.
Over the 2000-2005 period, CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 4437 would
result in a negligible net effect on direct spending. In addition, the
GAO report would cost about $300,000 in 2002, assuming the availability
of appropriated funds. Because enactment of the bill would affect direct
spending, pay-as-you-go procedures would apply. H.R. 4437 contains no intergovernmental
or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) and would not affect the budgets of state, local, or tribal governments.
ESTIMATED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
The estimated budgetary impact of H.R. 4437 is shown in the following
table. The costs of this legislation fall within budget functions 050 (national
defense), 370 (commerce and housing credit), and 550 (health).
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | ||
|
|||||||
CHANGES IN DIRECT SPENDINGa | |||||||
Off-Budget Effects | |||||||
Net Impact on the Postal Service | |||||||
Estimated Budget Authority | -1 | -2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
Estimated Outlays | -1 | -2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
On-Budget Effects | |||||||
Net Impact on NIH and DoD | |||||||
Estimated Budget Authority | 0 | -2 | -2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
Estimated Outlays | 0 | -2 | -2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
Total Changes | |||||||
Estimated Budget Authority | -1 | -4 | -1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
Estimated Outlays | -1 | -4 | -1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
|
|||||||
a. In addition to the effects on direct spending shown in the table, GAO would have to spend about $300,000 in appropriated funds in 2002 to prepare a report required by the bill. | |||||||
|
BASIS OF ESTIMATE
For this estimate, CBO assumes that the bill will be enacted by August
1, 2000.
Extension of Breast Cancer Stamp
Since the program's inception in July 1998, sales of these stamps have resulted in collections of about $15 million for breast cancer research. CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 4437 would increase such collections by the Postal Service by about $1 million in fiscal year 2000, $5 million in 2001, and $4 million in 2002. After covering its administrative costs, the Postal Service would transfer the collections to NIH and DoD in April and November of each year. Thus, the net impact on the Postal Service over the 2000-2005 period would be zero. Spending and receipts of the Postal Service are defined as off-budget.
We estimate that enacting H.R. 4437 would increase NIH and DoD collections
by $3 million in 2001, $5 million in 2002, and $2 million in 2003. Spending
of these collections by those two agencies would be about $1 million in
fiscal year 2001, $3 million a year in 2002 and 2003, $2 million in 2004,
and about $1 million in 2005. Thus, the changes in spending would sum to
the changes in collections but outlays would lag behind collections. CBO
estimates that the change in net outlays for NIH and DoD over the 2000-2005
period would be near zero.
Additional Semipostals
CBO has no basis for predicting the extent to which the
Postal Service would issue additional semipostals under H.R. 4437. However,
the budgetary impact of each semipostal would be similar to that of the
breast cancer stamp. The net budgetary effects of any additional semipostals
would be near zero because amounts collected above regular postal rates
would eventually be spent.
GAO Report
Based on information from GAO, we estimate that each of
the three reports required by the bill would cost about $300,000, assuming
appropriation of the necessary amounts. We expect the report on the breast
cancer stamp to be completed in fiscal year 2002 and the other two reports
to be completed sometime after 2005.
PAY-AS-YOU-GO CONSIDERATIONS
The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act sets up pay-as-you-go
procedures for legislation affecting direct spending or receipts. Because
cash flows of the Postal Service are categorized as off-budget, only the
transfer and spending of these funds by NIH and DoD under H.R. 4437 would
be subject to pay-as-you-go procedures. Over the 2000-2005 period, such
spending would sum to near zero. The bill's pay-as-you-go effects are summarized
in the following table.
|
|||||||||||
By Fiscal Year, in Millions
of Dollars
|
|||||||||||
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | |
|
|||||||||||
Changes in outlays | 0 | -2 | -2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Changes in receipts | Not applicable | ||||||||||
|
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND PRIVATE-SECTOR IMPACT
H.R. 4437 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as
defined in UMRA and would not affect the budgets of state, local, or tribal
governments.
PREVIOUS CBO ESTIMATE
On June 27, 2000, CBO transmitted a cost estimate for
S. 2386, the Breast Cancer Research Stamp Reauthorization Act of 2000,
as ordered reported by the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs on
June 14, 2000. That legislation would extend the Stamp Out Breast Cancer
Act for two years but would not authorize additional semipostals or require
GAO reports.
ESTIMATE PREPARED BY:
Federal Costs: Mark Grabowicz
Impact on State, Local, and Tribal Governments: Susan
Sieg
Impact on the Private Sector: John Harris
ESTIMATE APPROVED BY:
Robert A. Sunshine
Assistant Director for Budget Analysis