pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of brjopthalJournal URL: redirect3.cgi?&&auth=0t5_9CsQILbUBFJZma4uMDOBogycXxZsiBrx_X53g&reftype=publisher&artid=1722942&article-id=1722942&iid=139274&issue-id=139274&jid=152&journal-id=152&FROM=Article|Banner&TO=Publisher|Other|N%2FA&rendering-type=normal&&http://bjo.bmjjournals.com
Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 February; 83(2): 185–189.
PMCID: PMC1722942
Confocal microscopy in cornea guttata and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy
A. Chiou, S. Kaufman, R. Beuerman, T. Ohta, H. Soliman, and H. Kaufman
Louisiana State University Eye Center, New Orleans 70112-2234, USA.
Abstract
AIMS—To report the appearances of cornea guttata and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy from white light confocal microscopy.
METHODS—Seven eyes of four consecutive patients with cornea guttata were prospectively examined. Of the seven eyes, three also had corneal oedema (Fuchs' dystrophy). In vivo white light tandem scanning confocal microscopy was performed in all eyes. Results were compared with non-contact specular microscopy.
RESULTS—Specular microscopy was precluded by corneal oedema in one eye. In the remaining six eyes, it demonstrated typical changes including pleomorphism, polymegathism, and the presence of guttae appearing as dark bodies, some with a central bright reflex. In all seven eyes, confocal microscopy revealed the presence of round hyporeflective images with an occasional central highlight at the level of the endothelium. Changes in cell morphology and size were readily appreciated.
CONCLUSION—By comparison with specular microscopy, the hyporeflective images with an occasional central highlight seen on confocal microscopy are consistent with the presence of guttae. Confocal microscopy may confirm the diagnosis of cornea guttata and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy by demonstrating the presence of guttae. This technique is especially valuable in cases of corneal oedema, where specular microscopy may fail to visualise the endothelium. However, specular microscopy should remain the method of choice to evaluate the endothelium, principally because it is easier to use.

Keywords: confocal microscopy; cornea guttata; Fuchs' dystrophy
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (156K).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Waring, GO, 3rd; Rodrigues, MM; Laibson, PR. Corneal dystrophies. II. Endothelial dystrophies. Surv Ophthalmol. 1978 23(3):147–168.Nov–Dec; [PubMed]
  • Beuerman, RW. Confocal microscopy: into the clinic. Cornea. 1995 Jan;14(1):1–2. [PubMed]
  • Cavanagh, HD; Petroll, WM; Alizadeh, H; He, YG; McCulley, JP; Jester, JV. Clinical and diagnostic use of in vivo confocal microscopy in patients with corneal disease. Ophthalmology. 1993 Oct;100(10):1444–1454. [PubMed]
  • Cavanagh, HD; McCulley, JP. In vivo confocal microscopy and Acanthamoeba keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Feb;121(2):207–208. [PubMed]
  • Chew, SJ; Beuerman, RW; Assouline, M; Kaufman, HE; Barron, BA; Hill, JM. Early diagnosis of infectious keratitis with in vivo real time confocal microscopy. CLAO J. 1992 Jul;18(3):197–201. [PubMed]
  • Chiou, AG; Cadez, R; Böhnke, M. Diagnosis of Dieffenbachia induced corneal injury by confocal microscopy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Feb;81(2):168–169. [PubMed]
  • Florakis, GJ; Moazami, G; Schubert, H; Koester, CJ; Auran, JD. Scanning slit confocal microscopy of fungal keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Nov;115(11):1461–1463. [PubMed]
  • Kaufman, SC; Chew, SJ; Capps, SC; Beuerman, RW. Confocal microscopy of corneal penetration by tarantula hairs. Scanning. 1994 16(5):312–315.Sep–Oct; [PubMed]
  • Kaufman, SC; Beuerman, RW; Goldberg, D. A new form of primary, localized, corneal amyloidosis: a case report with confocal microscopy. Metab Pediatr Syst Ophthalmol. 1995;18(1-4):1–4. [PubMed]
  • Pfister, DR; Cameron, JD; Krachmer, JH; Holland, EJ. Confocal microscopy findings of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Feb;121(2):119–128. [PubMed]
  • Shah, GK; Pfister, D; Probst, LE; Ferrieri, P; Holland, E. Diagnosis of microsporidial keratitis by confocal microscopy and the chromatrope stain. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Jan;121(1):89–91. [PubMed]
  • Sutphin, JE; Kantor, AL; Mathers, WD; Mehaffey, MG. Evaluation of infectious crystalline keratitis with confocal microscopy in a case series. Cornea. 1997 Jan;16(1):21–26. [PubMed]
  • Kaufman, SC; Beuerman, RW; Kaufman, HE. Diagnosis of advanced Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy with the confocal microscope. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993 Nov 15;116(5):652–653. [PubMed]
  • Laing, RA; Leibowitz, HM; Oak, SS; Chang, R; Berrospi, AR; Theodore, J. Endothelial mosaic in Fuchs' dystrophy. A qualitative evaluation with the specular microscope. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981 Jan;99(1):80–83. [PubMed]
  • Bigar, F; Schimmelpfennig, B; Hürzeler, R. Cornea guttata in donor material. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978 Apr;96(4):653–655. [PubMed]
  • Waring, GO; Font, RL; Rodrigues, MM; Mulberger, RD. Alterations of Descemet's membrane in interstitial keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976 Jun;81(6):773–785. [PubMed]
  • Pouliquen, Y; Dhermy, P; Renard, G; Giraud, JP; Savoldelli, M. Combined macular dystrophy and cornea guttata: an electron microscopic study. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1980;212(3-4):149–158. [PubMed]
  • Cibis, GW; Krachmer, JA; Phelps, CD; Weingeist, TA. The clinical spectrum of posterior polymorphous dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977 Sep;95(9):1529–1537. [PubMed]
  • Brooks, AM; Grant, GB; Gillies, WE. The identification of corneal guttae. Cornea. 1991 May;10(3):249–260. [PubMed]
  • Krachmer, JH; Schnitzer, JI; Fratkin, J. Cornea pseudoguttata: a clinical and histopathologic description of endothelial cell edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981 Aug;99(8):1377–1381. [PubMed]
Figures and Tables
Figure 1  Figure 1  
Patient 1. Specular microscopy in a case of cornea guttata with asymmetric presentation. Dark round bodies are more predominant in the right eye (OD). OS indicates left eye.
Figure 2  Figure 2  
Patient 1. Confocal microscopy (magnification ×210) of the left eye. A few hyporeflective images with an occasional central highlight were seen at the level of the endothelium.
Figure 3  Figure 3  
Patient 1. Confocal microscopy (magnification ×210) of the right eye. Compared with the left eye, significantly more hyporeflective images were seen. Hyperreflective endothelial cells were found between the lesions.    (more ...)
Figure 4  Figure 4  
Patient 2. Specular microscopy in the right (OD) and left (OS) eyes in a case of bilateral corneal guttae and oedema (Fuchs' dystrophy).
Figure 5  Figure 5  
Patient 2. Confocal microscopy (magnification ×210) of the right eye. Hyporeflective images with a central highlight were seen in the endothelium.
Figure 6  Figure 6  
Patient 2. Confocal microscopy (magnification ×210) of the left eye. Confluent hyporeflective images with a sporadic central highlight were demonstrated.
Figure 7  Figure 7  
Patient 3. Specular microscopy in a case of bilateral cornea guttata. OD indicates right eye and OS indicates left eye.
Figure 8  Figure 8  
Patient 3. Confocal microscopy (magnification ×210) of the right eye. Hyporeflective images were seen in the endothelium.
Figure 9  Figure 9  
Patient 3. Confocal microscopy (magnification ×210) of the left eye. Hyporeflective images with a central highlight were demonstrated in the endothelium.
Figure 10  Figure 10  
Patient 4. Confocal microscopy (magnification ×210) revealed the presence of confluent hyporeflective images in the endothelium. Hyperreflective endothelial cells were found between the lesions. The hyperreflective image on the upper (more ...)