USGS
South Florida Information Access
SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
publications > paper > application of carbonate cyclostratigraphy and borehole geophysics to delineate porosity and preferential flow in the karst limestone of the Biscayne aquifer, SE Florida > pore classes

PORE CLASSES

Abstract
Introduction
Study Area & Methods
Environments
Cyclostratigraphy
>Pore Classes
Evidence for Flow-Zone Continuity
Discussion
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References Cited
Figures & Tables
PDF Version
The porosity and permeability in the Biscayne aquifer are related to lithofacies and have a predictable vertical distribution within the upward-shallowing cycles of the Fort Thompson Formation and the aggradational subtidal cycles of the Miami Limestone (Cunningham et al., 2004b, 2006). Each of the 15 lithofacies of the Fort Thompson Formation and Miami Limestone in the study area has been assigned to one of three pore classes (I, II, and III), as shown in Table 3. These lithofacies have rather unique stratigraphic spatial distributions, and porosity and permeability characteristics.

Pore class I commonly includes the lower part of many of the upward-shallowing cycles within the Fort Thompson Formation and upper aggradational subtidal cycle of the Miami Limestone, where the porosity and permeability are highest (Fig. 3 and Fig. 6; Table 3). Characteristic lithofacies associated with pore class I are (1) touching-vug pelecypod rudstone and floatstone, (2) sandy touching-vug pelecypod rudstone and floatstone, (3) peloidal packstone and grainstone, (4) coral framestone, and (5) laminated peloid packstone and grainstone lithofacies (Table 3). Pore types commonly associated with specific lithofacies include solution-enlarged fossil molds up to pebble size, irregular vugs of uncertain origin, and molds of burrows or roots, or irregular vugs surrounding casts of burrows or roots (Fig. 7). Touching-vugs are the most common type of effective porosity in this class, but conduit porosity also occurs as bedding-plane vugs and uncommon cavernous vugs (Cunningham et al., 2006). Atabular three-dimensional geometry regionally characterizes the touching-vug flow zones, which are constrained between cycle boundaries, based on porous-zone mapping in the Lake Belt area (e.g., Cunningham et al., 2004b, 2004c, 2006). Therefore, accurate cycle correlation can produce a realistic linkage of permeable or preferential groundwater flow zones. Groundwater flow in the touching-vug flow zones should not be conceptually viewed as the movement of groundwater through a system of large-scale pipes or underground stream conduits, but more of a stratiform passage formed by coalescence of vugs into a mostly tortuous path for the movement of groundwater flow from vug to vug (Fig. 3). Figure 6 best exemplifies the stratiform distribution of pore class I, notably in digital optical borehole images where the darkened area at the base of high-frequency cycle HFC2e2 represents touching-vug porosity (Fig. 7). Cunningham et al. (2004b, 2006) showed that pore class I has the highest porosity and permeability of the three pore classes defined herein.

digital image of a borehole wall that spans a highly porous and permeable stratiform groundwater flow zone at the base of highfrequency cycle HFC2e2 in injection well G-3816
Figure 7. Digital image of a borehole wall that spans a highly porous and permeable stratiform groundwater flow zone at the base of highfrequency cycle HFC2e2 in injection well G-3816 (Fig. 4 and Fig. 6). Note intraburrow and interburrow porosity at arrows. The dashed line marks the boundary and flooding surface that separates high-frequency cycles HFC2d and HFC2e2. [larger image]
Typically assigned to pore class II are the (1) skeletal packstone and grainstone, (2) sandy skeletal packstone and grainstone, (3) pelecypod floatstone and rudstone, (4) sandy pelecypod floatstone and rudstone, and (5) skeletal quartz sandstone lithofacies (Table 3). The first four lithofacies listed commonly occur in the upper part of upward-shallowing subtidal cycles and the middle part of the upward-shallowing paralic cycles (Fig. 3), and the last lithofacies is uncommon. Interparticle and separate-vug porosity characterize these lithofacies, which yield groundwater movement through vug-to-matrix-to-vug connections (Lucia, 1999). Diffuse-carbonate groundwater flow (cf. Shuster and White, 1971; Thrailkill, 1976) characterizes movement of groundwater in areas of the Biscayne aquifer characterized by pore class II (Fig. 3).

Usually assigned to pore class III are (1) mudstone and wackestone, (2) Planorbella floatstone and rudstone, (3) peloid wackestone and packstone, (4) conglomerate, and (5) pedogenic limestone lithofacies (Table 3). The first two lithofacies commonly cap upward-shallowing paralic cycles, and the third and fourth are representative of the lower aggradational subtidal cycle of the Miami Limestone (Fig. 3). Porosity types common to this pore class include thin, semivertical solution pipes, and fossil molds. The matrix porosity and permeability of these lithofacies are low (Table 3), and the solution pipes (small-scale conduits) and fossil molds are typically unconnected. Thus, these lithofacies tend to retard groundwater movement and are conceptualized as leaky, low-permeability units (Fig. 3). On a local scale, however, pore class III can comprise bedding-plane vugs, which may have sheet-like geometry and could represent major conduits that are highly permeable.

Table 3. Pore classes (I, II, III) related to aquifer attributes at the Northwest Well Field
Pore class Lithofacies Major pore type Approximate median whole-core porosity (Cunningham et al., 2004b) Median maximum horizontal air permeability (Cunningham et al., 2004b) Major groundwater-flow type and relative permeability
III Mudstone-wackestone, Planorbella floatstone-rudstone, peloidal wackestone-packstone, conglomerate, and pedogenic limestone Separate vugs including moldic porosity or thin vertical solution pipes or both Aggradational subtidal cycle = 16% and cycle top of upward-shallowing paralic cyles = 16% Aggradational subtidal cycle = 150 md and cycle top of upward-shallowing paralic cyles = 21 md Leaky, low permeability
II Skeletal packstone-grainstone, sandy skeletal packstone-grainstone, pelecypod floatstone-rudstone, sandy pelecypod floatstone-rudstone, and skeletal quartz sandstone Matrix porosity including interparticle porosity and separate vugs Middle or upper part of upward-shallowing cycles = 22% Middle or upper part of upward-shallowing cycles = 130 md Diffuse- carbonate flow, moderate permeability
I Touching-vug pelecypod floatstone-rudstone, sandy touching-vug pelecypod floatstone-rudstone, peloid packstone-grainstone, coral framestone, and laminated peloid packstone-grainstone Touching vug porosity including fossil-moldic, inter-burrow, burrow-moldic, and inter-root-cast, and root-moldic porosity, and irregular vugs; and conduit porosity including bedding-plane vugs and cavernous vugs Aggradational subtidal cycle = 47% and lower part of upward shallowing cycles = 37% Aggradational subtidal cycle = 1100 md and lower part of upward shallowing cycles = 1400 md Touching-vug and less common conduit flow, high permeability

< Cyclostratigraphy | Evidence for Flow-Zone Continuity >



| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/papers/porosity_flow/classes.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 12 April, 2007 @ 01:29 PM(TJE)