I hnd a very lntererting and  lnfowatiw tima

ln Wope. tho details of wMah all1 have to await the
the wben we o8n get togetha, 81~830 they are  far too
extenoive to QQV~ in a letter. Xou wlll, prhapts, 'ce
intoreatad, hoffavor, fnmwing that Wbge has obtaln&
a ncm-lbadsliqa ratio of pedigrotp involving the lnhsritanoe
of the oagauity to fernrsnt mdtoee. €&I is axpleining
it  on the baei8 of the exirtrrPae of three didinat ginma,
arysr one of wYah 18 saffiolent for the appearanoe of the
ubraotor.

This 18 fitom or ha8 the Sam motherris th&

Llndegren and f fimt dfeorcsd when \.je reported th mllbioae
oazler I amquite oertaixi that it will not hold up. In
faot, them if4 already good evidenoe that it omnot explain

that he did get it, Udng his method of laatin& WUOh J8
mwh nore foolproof than mr nethod lmofar na 1% gaarrrntser
that my non=4&m&AUan ratio8 me not due to ths breakdown
of matizg type.
a trivia5 problerp, 80mcithirg of whlah X needed vqy little
oonvlnulng. Hevorthelsso, it Is oomfortineg to have Vie results.

the available data.

&nmrtheless, the 1~OPt~t thiw i8

HI0 reaultb t%reforo  we khat it la not

X am Just toginnixg to ,got going onoe rmm and

rill oontinue to hamnr away at the "adaptha a8pBUk

-2

Sinaerely youe 61,