skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 103281  
Title: Response to the Home Office Green Paper on Intermittent Custody
Corporate Author: Prison Reform Trust
United Kingdom
Publication Date: 1984
Pages: 11
Type: Legislative hearings/committee prints/reports
Origin: United Kingdom
Language: English
Annotation: This paper outlines the Prison Reform Trust's objections to the Home Office proposal of using intermittent custody -- day release, day imprisonment, or weekend imprisonment -- to relieve overcrowding in short-term prisons and reduce excessive use of custody.
Abstract: According to the Home Office, intermittent custody would be a version of custody which would rank above community service, probation, and attendance center orders. The Trust's comments address the relationship between intermittent custody and suspended sentences, incentives for offenders to comply, the experiences of Holland and Belgium with similar programs, the impact on young offenders, selection criteria, and costs. The paper concludes that intermittent custody would divert very few offenders from full-time prison and could actually increase the burden on local prisons with offenders who breached the terms of intermittent custody. The Trust also believes that intermittent custody would devalue existing sanctions; lower the custody threshold; and discriminate against the homeless, women, and the unemployed. Finally, this option would be very costly and not deter crimes for which prison is too harsh a penalty.
Main Term(s): Intermittent sentences
Index Term(s): Weekend sentences ; Sentencing reform ; Great Britain
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=103281

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder