U.S. Census Bureau
U.S. Department of Commerce News

         EMBARGOED UNTIL 10 A.M. EDT, SEPTEMBER 29, 1997 (MONDAY)         

Public Information Office					  CB97-162
301-457-3030/301-457-3670 (fax)
301-457-4067 (TDD)
e-mail: pio@census.gov

Income, Poverty and Health Insurance
301-763-8576

               Income Improves, Poverty Levels Stabilize, Health
                Insurance Coverage Slips, Census Bureau Reports

     Median household income increased in real terms between 1995 and 1996 for 
the second consecutive year, while the poverty rate and the number of people 
living in poverty remained statistically unchanged and the number of uninsured 
Americans, particularly children, rose, according to three reports released 
today by the Commerce Department's Census Bureau.

     The reports, "Money Income in the United States: 1996;" "Poverty in the
United States:  1996;" and "Health Insurance Coverage: 1996," also include 
data for states.  Both the income and poverty reports have additional data on 
the valuation of noncash benefits.

     Daniel Weinberg, chief of the Census Bureau's Housing and Household 
Economic Statistics Division, said the number of poor Americans in 1996 totaled 
36.5 million, representing 13.7 percent of the nation's total population. 
Weinberg said, neither figure was significantly different from the previous 
year's estimate.  In 1996, the average poverty threshold for a family of four 
was $16,036.

     "During this same period," Weinberg said, "the real median income of 
households rose by 1.2 percent, increasing from $35,082 to $35,492.  In 
addition, this was the third consecutive year in which there was no 
year-to-year change in overall income inequality."

     On the health-care front, the number of uninsured children under 18 grew 
to 10.6 million (14.8 percent) in 1996; both the number and percentage were 
statistically higher than the 1995 figures of 9.8 million and 13.8 percent, 
respectively.  Overall, an estimated 41.7 million, or 15.6 percent, of 
Americans had no health insurance during all of 1996.  This number was up 1.1 
million from the previous year, but the percentage was not statistically 
different.

     Almost no group of people showed changes in its poverty rate except for
the following: the rate declined significantly between 1995 and 1996 for 
persons living inside central cities (from 20.6 percent to 19.6 percent) and 
for male unrelated individuals (18.0 percent to 17.0 percent), while it 
increased for persons aged 60 to 64 (10.2 to 11.5 percent). 

     Between 1995 and 1996, there were no significant changes in poverty rates 
or numbers of poor among Whites, African Americans, Asians and Pacific 
Islanders or persons of Hispanic origin (who may be of any race).

     The real median incomes of several types of households have returned to or 
exceeded their pre-recessionary 1989 levels.  For example, the median income of 
married-couple households surpassed their 1989 level by 2.2 percent.  
Households in the Midwest and South, African American households, family 
households maintained by a woman with no husband present and households 
maintained by persons 55 to 64 years old all had incomes in 1996 comparable to 
their 1989 incomes (in 1996 dollars). 

     It was the second consecutive year that households inside metropolitan 
areas experienced an increase in real median income.  Before 1995, the income 
of these households had not increased since 1989.  For households inside 
central cities, it was the first annual increase in real median household 
income since 1988.

     The female-to-male earnings ratio reached a new high in 1996 for persons 
working full time and year-round.  The real median earnings for such women rose 
2.4 percent to $23,710, which represented about 74 percent of the median for 
such men ($32,144).  The last time men experienced an annual increase in median 
earnings was in 1991.  In fact, between 1993 and 1996, men's earnings declined 
by 2.6 percent.

     In 1996, more than one-half (53.1 percent) of the nation's 142.9 million 
workers had employment-based health insurance policies in their own name; this 
estimate did not reflect the fact that many workers are covered by an 
employment-based plan through another family member.

     Other highlights:

Poverty

   -	Based on comparisons of two-year moving averages (1994-95 and
	1995-96), the poverty rate dropped in five states (Indiana, 
	Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri and Texas) and increased in three 
	states (Arizona, Montana and Vermont).

   -	Using three-year averages (1994 to 1996), state poverty rates ranged
	from 6.5 percent in New Hampshire to 24.0 percent in New Mexico.

   -	Before 1994, the South had the highest regional poverty rate. Since
	that year the West has experienced a poverty rate not significantly 
	different from that of the South   15.4 percent for the West and 
	15.1 percent for the South in 1996.

   -	Neither the overall poverty rate for all children (20.5 percent), nor
	that for those aged 65 and over (10.8 percent), were statistically 
	different between 1995 and 1996.

   -	In 1996, 14.4 million people had incomes of less than half of their
	poverty threshold, up from 13.9 million in 1995. 

   -	Neither the number of poor nor the poverty rate for families showed
	significant change between 1995 and 1996; this was true regardless of 
	family type or race and ethnicity.

   -	In addition to the official income and poverty data released today,
	the Census Bureau also released income and poverty estimates based
	on 17 other definitions of income.

Income

   -	Based on comparisons of two-year moving averages (1994-95 and
	1995-96), real median household income increased significantly for
	nine states (Alaska, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Minnesota, New 
	York, North Carolina, Rhode Island and South Carolina) and 
	decreased for three states (New Mexico, Vermont and Wyoming).

   -	Using three-year averages (1994 to 1996), the median household income
	for Alaska ($50,000) was higher than that of the remaining 49
	states and the District of Columbia.

   -	The South was the only region to experience a significant year-to-year
	change in real median household income between 1995 and 1996. Real 
	median household income increased there from $31,856 in 1995 to $32,422
	in 1996. By comparison, the median household income in 1996 was $37,406
	in the Northeast, $37,125 in the West and $36,579 in the Midwest. (The 
	differences between the median household incomes of the Northeast,
	Midwest and West were not statistically significant.)

   -	This is the third consecutive year that family households have
	experienced an increase in real median income and the second 
	consecutive year for nonfamily households. In addition, this was the 
	third consecutive year that married-couple households experienced an 
	increase in median income.

   -	Households maintained by persons of Hispanic origin experienced a 
	5.8 percent increase in real median household income (to $24,906)
	offsetting the drop observed in 1995. The percentage changes in 
	household income of White ($37,161), African American ($23,482) 
	and Asian and Pacific Islander households ($43,276) were not 
	statistically different from 1995.

   -	Real per capita income increased significantly between 1995 and 1996,
	for Whites (1.8 percent to $19,181), African Americans (5.2
	percent to $11,899) and Hispanics (4.9 percent to $10,048). The 1996 
	per capita income of Asians and Pacific Islanders ($17,921)
	was statistically unchanged. (The differences between the 1995-1996
	percentage changes in per capita income among the race/ethnic origin 
	groups were not statistically significant. The differences between 
	the per capita incomes of Whites and of Asians and Pacific Islanders, 
	and between the total population and Asians and Pacific Islanders, 
	were also not statistically significant.)

Health Insurance

   -	Based on comparisons of two-year moving averages (1994-95 and
	1995-96), higher health insurance coverage rates were recorded for
	Alabama and Michigan. Meanwhile, coverage rates fell in six states: 
	Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, New Jersey, North Carolina and Tennessee.

   -	Using three-year averages between 1994 and 1996, the rates for the 
	uninsured ranged from 8.2 percent in Wisconsin to 24.3 percent in
	Texas.

   -	In 1996, the percentage of persons without health insurance by income
	ranged from 7.6 percent (among those in households with incomes of 
	$75,000 or more) to 24.3 percent (among those in households with 
	incomes less than $25,000).

   -	In 1996, most people (70.2 percent) were covered by a private
	insurance plan; 25.9 percent had government coverage, i.e.
	Medicare (13.2 percent), Medicaid (11.8 percent), and military 
	health care (3.3 percent). Many people had coverage by more than one 
	plan during the year.

   -	About 30.8 percent of the nation's poor (11.3 million) had no health
	insurance of any kind in 1996.

   -	Among the various race and ethnic groups, persons of Hispanic origin
	were the most likely to be without coverage throughout 1996.

     The data are from the March 1997 Current Population Survey.  As in all 
surveys, the data are subject to sampling variability and other sources of 
error.
-X-
The Census Bureau--pre-eminent collector and provider of timely, relevant, and 
quality data about the people and economy of the United States.  In over 100 
surveys annually and 20 censuses a decade, evolving from the first census in 
1790, the Census Bureau provides official information about America's people, 
businesses, industries and institutions.


Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Public Information Office
301-763-3030

Last Revised: April 11, 2001 at 08:16:16 AM

Skip this main site 
navigation menu Newsroom | News Releases | Broadcast Services | Tip Sheets | Facts for Features | Minority Links