Skip to main contentAbout USAID Locations Our Work Public Affairs Careers Business / Policy
USAID: From The American People Transition Initiatives Young photographers offer outsiders a glimpse into community’s world  - Click to read this story
Transition Initiatives Home »
About Transition Initiatives »
Country Programs »
Focus Areas »
Summary of Program Activities »
Publications »
Staff »
Employment »
Links »
Frequently Asked Questions »
Site Map »
Transition Initiatives Country Programs: Colombia

OTI / Colombia Home

Program Description

Country Reports

 

Colombia Photo Gallery

Building Democracy in Colombia

Summary Page (Nov. 2000)

Search the Transition Initiatives site
Search



USAID/OTI Colombia Field Report

June 2000


Country Situation

The largest Colombian guerilla group, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (or FARC), continues to improve its enhanced position in the peace negotiations through a series of public relations victories. At the beginning of the month, the FARC made public its proposal for a "prisoner exchange" with the Government of Colombia (GOC). The FARC is estimated to hold as many as 500 police and soldiers, and the GOC is under great public pressure to accept a deal return these prisoners to the safety of their families. The GOC responded coolly to the proposal presented by the FARC, in part because accepting a deal could give the FARC the status of a legitimate belligerent force with rights under international law (currently they are considered a terrorist organization). Moreover, the FARC prisoners held by the GOC have been convicted of crimes, including terrorism, kidnapping and extortion. Releasing them would be viewed as undermining the justice system's ability to stand up to the armed factions currently operating with increasing impunity throughout the country.

The GOC and FARC are scheduled to exchange cease-fire proposals on July 3. Seeking to garner public support, the FARC has publicized theirs in advance. The FARC proposal states the guerrillas are willing to end attacks on police stations and military quarters, end kidnapping and extortion, and stay within certain areas of the country in exchange for significant changes to Plan Colombia, an end to military actions against them, and for $1,000,000 per month -- among other demands. Not surprisingly, the GOC is reluctant to subsidize the FARC or expand the area under its uncontested control. Until the GOC releases its proposal, however, the public is left with the impression that the FARC is moving ahead with new ideas (however unlikely it is that the FARC will implement them), while the GOC is at a loss over how to respond to the FARC propaganda.

Other initiatives made public and promoted by the FARC include: recommending its own coca-eradication program, which while still undefined, specifically does not involve the unpopular aerial spraying; promulgating Law 003 that declares a "war on corruption"; and meeting with women, minorities, leaders from the European Union and NGOs in its DMZ. Publicly, observers are saying GOC President Pastrana looks weak and inactive in comparison to seemingly active agenda of the FARC.

A number of recent developments have served to further damage President Pastrana's credibility in Colombia. Plan Colombia, which was the basis of Pastrana's campaign platform, is increasingly unpopular, particularly on the left. The Pastrana Administration's allegations that the FARC was involved in the necklace bombing that killed a poor rural woman last month, are now reportedly incorrect (see OTI Colombia's May 2000 report). In addition, a new scandal has surfaced. While running for President, Pastrana is said to have received large donations from a private firm Dragacol, which has recently been awarded a number of very large contracts by his administration -- contracts that investigators are alleging were not competed fairly and over-funded. This present scandal echos the corruption accusations that brought down then-President Ernesto Samper for allegedly accepting campaign funding from drug lords just four years ago. What impact this will have on the GOC's peace mission is unclear, but it will not help the process.

OTI Highlights

A. Narrative Summary

The OTI Team Leader for the Americas and the OTI Resident Manager met with stakeholders in Cali and in Valledupar to discuss future OTI and USAID programs, and to evaluate local initiatives already in place. The Resident Manager also visited Florencia, in the south, where there is a strong potential for additional USAID activity to assist people displaced by GOC coca-eradicating fumigations. OTI is continuing to assist the USAID mission develop the USAID response to the crisis of internal displacement, and is also working to establish its small grants for peace program with an eye to launching that initiative soon.

The USAID/Colombia Strategic Plan was approved in Washington on June 29, including the IDP portion, which OTI drafted for the Mission.

An implementation meeting was organized by USAID/OTI with UNHCR, ICRC and the GOC Red de Solidaridad Social (RSS), which is responsible for coordinating GOC assistance to IDPs. As the primary institutions supporting assistance to IDPs in Colombia, the agencies agreed to share information and coordinate implementation plans as these evolve, in order to increase synergies and decrease opportunities for redundancies. Additional meetings on specific topics will be scheduled, and new participants will be invited as appropriate.

B. Grants Activity Summary

OTI now has three grants being implemented in Colombia:

  • OTI is working with the Salesian Missions ($250,756) to provide scholarships for children from war zones who are at-risk of being recruited by armed actors; to make small productive loans to vulnerable populations; and to create small community projects for disadvantaged populations in Meta province. Eighteen new micro-credit loans were approved in June.
  • OTI has a grant with the International Committee of the Red Cross ($750,185) to implement community-building activities in contested areas and to help communities recover and rebuild after they are victims of the conflict. Forty-two small infrastructure grants have been approved to date. OTI is working out the administrative details with ICRC prior to extending this activity. The extension will include adding another year of operation, an additional $1.5 million in funding, and expanding the scope of operation to include urban projects.
  • OTI also supports the Javeriana University and Georgetown University ($195,625) as they work with the GOC to develop negotiating points for the peace talks with the FARC. OTI and the Javeriana are in close communication with regard to these points, which are being formulated to meet the needs of the GOC.

OTI has also obligated $800,000 for additional projects in Colombia, including $200,000 for small grants to NGOs or communities to support peace-building efforts. OTI is meeting with numerous local organizations with which it might partner in this effort and is working with IOM to develop an implementing mechanism for this activity.

NEXT STEPS/IMMEDIATE PRIORITIES

As the Plan Colombia money approaches, OTI will phase out direct operations while continuing to provide assistance to USAID/Colombia's IDP program, which will be funded through Plan Colombia.

In early July a meeting will be held in Madrid, Spain to plan an international response to Plan Colombia. It is expected that officials from interested countries attending the planning conference will no doubt rally support for various aspects of Plan Colombia and offer important new contributions to the many problems of Colombia.

Back to Top ^

 

About USAID

Our Work

Locations

Public Affairs

Careers

Business/Policy

 Digg this page : Share this page on StumbleUpon : Post This Page to Del.icio.us : Save this page to Reddit : Save this page to Yahoo MyWeb : Share this page on Facebook : Save this page to Newsvine : Save this page to Google Bookmarks : Save this page to Mixx : Save this page to Technorati : USAID RSS Feeds Star