Security and Privacy Notice | |
The recommended equation for the thermal expansion coefficient of liquid uranium dioxide is based on the in-pile effective equation of state measurements of the vapor pressure, density, and isothermal compressibility of liquid (U, Pu)O2 by Breitung and Reil [1]. From these measurements, the density and thermal expansion coefficient as functions of temperature were obtained from the melting point to 7600 K. The equation of Breitung and Reil for the thermal expansion coefficient of UO2 and (U, Pu)O2 for mole fractions of Pu <= 0.25 is in good agreement with the equation for the thermal expansion coefficient of UO2 from experiments by Drotning [2], which had been recommended in the 1981 assessment by Fink et al [3,4].
The recommended equation for the instantaneous volumetric thermal expansion coefficient of UO2 as a function of temperature is:
Figure 1 |
Breitung and Reil determined experimental uncertainties from the uncertainty in the fuel mass (dm/m = 10%), the uncertainty in the test volume (dV/V = 2.5%), and the uncertainty in the fuel enthalpy (dh/h = 6%). From these uncertainties, they obtained upper and lower limiting cases which they used to define uncertainties in the parameters in Eq. (1). The liquid density at the melting point, 8860 kg×m-3, has an uncertainty of ± 120 kg×m-3. The slope of the density, (dr/dT) = 0.9285 kg×m-3×K-1, has uncertainties of + 0.036 kg×m-3×K-1 and - 0.135 kg×m-3×K-1. The upper and lower uncertainty limits calculated using the uncertainties in these parameters are shown in Figure 1. They correspond to uncertainties of:
+10% and -12% at 3120 K;
+10% and -13% at 3500 K;
+12% and -15% at 4500 K;
+13% and -17% at 5500 K;
+15% and -20% at 6500 K;
+18% and -27% at 7600 K.
Thermodynamic Relations
The instantaneous volumetric thermal expansion coefficient (alphaP)
is related to the density (r) by the thermodynamic relation:
where betaT is the isothermal compressibility and P is the vapor
pressure. The subscripts on the partial derivatives indicates
that they are along the saturation curve. Breitung and Reil [1]
state that the magnitude of the second term in Eq.(2) is much
smaller than the first term and only contributes a few percent
at 8000 K. This is because along the saturation curve, the volume
change due to the pressure change is much smaller than the corresponding
volume change due to thermal expansion. Thus, for UO2 and (U,Pu)O2
, the thermal expansion coefficient may be evaluated from the
density/temperature relation using the first term in Eq.(2).
The linear instantaneous thermal expansion coefficient is one
third of the instantaneous volumetric thermal expansion coefficient,
given by Eq.(1). Equations relating the instantaneous volumetric
thermal expansion coefficient and density to other expansion parameters
are given in the appendix, "Density and Thermal Expansion
Relations."
Comparison with Other Measurements and Assessments
Three experiments have provided data on the density and thermal
expansion of liquid UO2. Breitung and Reil [1] determined the density
of UO2 and (U,Pu)O2 from the melting point to 7600 K from measurements
of the pressure rise of a sealed capsule during a transient in-pile
pulse. Their vapor pressure measurements using ultrapure UO2,
reactor grade UO2, and reactor grade (U,Pu)O2 showed no significant
difference for the vapor pressures of all three fuel types.
Drotning [2] determined the density of UO2 with O/M ranging from
2.01 to 2.04 as a function of temperature using gamma ray attenuation
measurements. Christensen measured the thermal expansion of solid
and liquid UO2 and the volume change on melting using gamma radiographs
to determine the sample dimensions.
The variation of density with temperature from all three measurements
is in good agreement. The slope (dr/dT) used in
the first term of Eq. (2) is:
- 0.9285 kg m-3 K-1 (Breitung & Reil)
The thermal expansion of Drotning [2] was recommended in the 1981
assessment by Fink et al [3,4]. The instantaneous volumetric thermal
expansion coefficient calculated from Drotning's density equation
using the first term in Eq. (2) is:
where the thermal expansion coefficient (alphaP) is in K-1 and temperature
(T ) is in K. Values of thermal expansion calculated with
this equation are shown in Figure 1.
In their 1989 review of the data on density of liquid UO2,
Harding, Martin, and Potter [6] also recommend the change in density
with temperature measured by Drotning. However, they recommended
8640 ± 60 kg×m-3 for the liquid density at 3120 K.
So the thermal expansion coefficient calculated from the density
recommended by Harding et al. using the first term in Eq.(2) is:
where the volumetric thermal expansion coefficient (alphaP) is in
K-1 and temperature (T ) is in K. Because both Eq.(3)
and Eq.(4) are based on the variation of density with temperature
measured by Drotning, the values of the thermal expansion coefficient
calculated using Eq.(4) are almost identical to those calculated
using Eq.(3). Differences are 0.03% from the melting point to
4800 K, 0.04% from 4900 to 6600 K, and 0.05% from 6700 to 7600
K.
The instantaneous volumetric thermal expansion coefficient calculated
from the liquid density of Christensen and his change of density
with temperature is:
Discussion of the Recommended Equation
- 0.916 kg m-3 K-1 (Drotning)
- 0.918 kg m-3 K-1 (Christensen)
Figure 2 |
Figure 2 shows the deviations of the recommended thermal expansion coefficients of Breitung and Reil from the thermal expansion coefficients determined from measurements of Christensen [5] and of Drotning [2]. Percent deviations in Figure 2 are defined as:
Extrapolations of the thermal expansion coefficients from the low temperature measurements of Christensen and of Drotning to 7600 K show good agreement throughout the temperature range. Deviations of recommended values from those determined from measurements by Drotning range from -1.4% at the melting point to -2.5% at 7600 K. Christensen's values deviate from those of Breitung and Reil by 0.2% at the melting temperature and by 0.4% at 7600 K. Figure 2 shows that all deviations are well within the uncertainty limits given by Breitung and Reil.