Buist, et al. (22) followed a group of `75 smokers attending a smoking cessation clinic and observed significant improvement in closing volume, closing capacity, and the slope of the alveolar plateau at 6 and 12 months in subjects who stopped smoking. McCarthy, et al. (105) found similar improvement in 131 subjects who stopped smoking; resumption of smoking led to subsequent development of abnormali- ties in the slope of the alveolar plateau and closing capacity. These findings are especially pertinent in view of the suggestion by Cosio, et al. (313 that some of the pathologic changes present when tests of small airway functions are abnormal can be reversed. As a group, ex-smokers usually perform better on conventional pulmonary function testing than smokers, but they do not perform as well as nonsmokers (67). Several studies have confirmed that there is improvement in performance on standard spirometric function tests following cessation of smoking in small numbers of patients (85, 115, 159), but there is still debate as to whether the normal decline in ventilatory function (i.e., FEV) is accelerated in ex-smokers as compared to nonsmokers. In the Framingham study, Ashley, et al. (8) observed that men and women who continued to smoke had a greater decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) than those who stopped; however, they could not demonstrate consistent changes in the FEVl following smoking cessation. They attributed this to the impreciseness and insensitivity of the FEVi measurement. In women ex-smokers, the decline in FVC was similar to that of female nonsmokers; in male ex- smokers, the decline in FVC was slightly greater than that of male nonsmokers. Fletcher, et al. (57) observed that cessation of smoking halved the rate of loss of FEV and returned the rate of decline in FEV to normal in "susceptible" smokers. However, the lost FEV was not recovered. Smoking cessation had no effect on the normal rate of decline in "unsusceptible" individuals. Similarly, in a two-year followup of 118 continuing ex-smokers, aged 27 to 56, Manfreda, et al. (100) noted that subjects who continued to refrain from smoking had a smaller decline in FEV&FVC ratio than did smokers; in the male ex- smokers, the decline in ventilatory function fell at about the same rate as that for nonsmokers. In summary, it is clear that smoking cessation leads to improved Performance on standard pulmonary function tests. However there is still debate as to whether the normal decline in ventilatory function is accelerated in ex-smokers as compared to nonsmokers. Lung Pathology Auerbach, et al. (10) studied the relationship between age, smoking habits, and emphysematous changes in whole lung sections obtained at autopsy from 1,443 males and 333 females. A total of `7,324 sections 1 mm thick were graded on a scale of 0 to 9 according to the severity of emphysema. No distinction was made between centrilobular and panlobular emphysema. The men were classified by age, type of smoking (pipe, cigar, or cigarette), and amount of cigarette smoking. Smoking habits were ascertained by interviews with relatives. Within each of the six smoking categories, the mean degree of emphysema increased with age. Adjusting the data for age revealed that the mean degree of emphysema was lowest among men who never smoked, was higher in pipe or cigar smokers, and highest among regular cigarette smokers. A dose-response relationship was found for the number of cigarettes smoked per day and the severity of emphysema. These data are presented in Tables 5 and 6. In a subsequent histologic study of tissue from 1,582 men and 368 women, Auerbach, et al. (9) were able to show that rupture of alveolar septa (emphysema) and fibrosis and thickening of the small arteries and arterioles were far greater in smokers than in nonsmokers and increased with increasing amount smoked (Tables 7 and 8). When these researchers examined former cigarette smokers, they found that those who had stopped more than 10 years prior to death had less marked pathologic changes than those who had stopped less than 10 years before death. But even in those who had stopped for more than 10 years, there was a greater degree of pathological change in those who had been smoking more than one pack per day than in those who had been smoking less than one pack per day (Table 9). In a clinicopathologic study of 196 men and 46 women, Mitchell, et al. (107') found that the total exposure to cigarettes was related to clinical symptoms of chronic airway obstruction and to both alveolar and airway pathologic features. The severity of pathologic change was related to the amount of smoking. Several recent studies have shown evidence of small airway abnormalities in young smokers. Casio, et al. (37) found squamous metaplasia of the airway epithelium as well as chronic inflammatory infiltrate and a slight increase in the connective tissue in the walls of the small airways. Kleinerman and Rice (83) found significantly more emphysema, parenchymal pigment, and chronic bronchiolitis in the lungs of smokers as compared to age-matched nonsmokers (median age 27.5 years). In summary, cigarette smokers demonstrate more frequent abnor- malities in macroscopic and microscopic lung sections at autopsy than do nonsmokers. Furthermore, there is a dose-response relationship between these changes and the intensity of smoking. Histologic evidence of small airways pathology was more common in cigarette smokers than in age-matched nonsmokers in an autopsy study of sudden-death victims. 6-24 TABLE 5.-Degree of emphysema in current smokew and in nonsmokers according to age groups Subjects CUlTWIt who never pipe or smoked cigar regularly smokem Current cigarette smoke& < "zt +1t l-2t 2+ t 70 or older co.75 l-1.75 22.75 u.75 p4.75 5-6.75 7-9.00 Totals Mean SD a4l.75 l-l.75 2275 m-69 3-3.75 . 44.75 rx.75 7-9.00 Totals Mean SD o-O.75 l-l.75 22.75 3-3.75 4-4.75 5-6.75 7-9.00 Totals Mean SD 53 2 - - - - - - 55 0.10 0.04 35 1 2 2 - - - - 40 0.39 0.13 68 4 5 4 - - - - 81 0.50 0.39 18 12 11 4 1 2 1 5 - - - - - - - 31 23 0.83 0.13 129 026 17 4 8 1 3 4 2 2 - 1 - - - - - 30 12 0.95 0.16 1.90 0.34 21 2 28 10 22 13 8 5 2 1 1 - - - - a 1.66 0.11 31 215 0.17 - 45 2 24 130 50 8 4 3 iii 237 0.16 256 0.07 - - - 4 5 37 9 42 3 11 1 8 1 5 - - 19 107 3.53 0.35 ii 293 020 3.33 0.15 - 2 40 38 11 9 12 112 3.63 0.17 - 5 56 38 7 5 1 - 112 2.86 0.10 - 1 23 24 9 1 4 -ii 3.37 0.20 - 44 3.91 0.27 *Subjecta who amoked regularly up to time of terminal illnear W=kagw&y. ~LHtCX Auerbsch. 0. (10) b3king and the Pathogenesis of Lung Damage In recent years, numerous investigators have examined the mecha- nisms by which smoking might induce lung damage. Three major Pathogenetic possibilities by which smoking may damage the lungs 6-25 TABLE C.-Age-standardized percentage distribution of male subjects in each of four smoking categories according to degree of emphysema Degree of emphysema Subjects current who never pipe or smoked Gw regularly smokem (W cv Current cigarette smokers (%) 2 Pk. Pk. Pk. Pk. Number of subjects 175 141 66 115 440 216 Emphysema Fibrosis Thickening of Wt.&Ok3 Thickening of arteries 0.09 0.90 1.43 1.92 2.17 227 0.40 1.1 278 3.73 4.06 4.26 0.10 1.11 1.35 1.66 1.82 1.89 0.02 0.23 0.42 0.68 0.83 0.90 NOTE: Numerical value8 were determined by rating each lung section on 841% of C-4 for emphysema urd thickening of arterioles. LL? for fibrosis, and CL3 for thickening of art&en. SOURCE: Auerbach, 0. (9) have been scrutinized. They are: (1) altering protease-antiprotease balance in the lungs, (2) compromising immune mechanisms, and (3) interfering with pulmonary clearance mechanisms. Proteolytic Lung Damage Emphysema is characterized by irreversible destruction of alveolar septal tissue. If severe, this disruption may result in loss of elastic 6-26 TABLE S.-Means of the numerical values given lung sections at autopsy of female current smokers and nonsmokers, standardized for age Subjects who never smoked regularly Current cigarette smokers