pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of tobcontJournal URL: redirect3.cgi?&&auth=0fOjCRqujDZc9lBLSDEBIt5S6BLU2xWW7IlVgRAHd&reftype=publisher&artid=1747836&article-id=1747836&iid=140146&issue-id=140146&jid=180&journal-id=180&FROM=Article|Banner&TO=Publisher|Other|N%2FA&rendering-type=normal&&http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/
Tob Control. 2004 March; 13(1): 57–63.
doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.004275.
PMCID: PMC1747836
"Creative solutions": selling cigarettes in a smoke-free world
E Smith and R Malone
Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA. Email: libbys/at/itsa.ucsf.edu
Abstract
Objective: To analyse the development and execution of the "Creative Solutions" Benson & Hedges advertising campaign to understand its social, political, and commercial implications.

Methods: Searches of the Philip Morris documents and Legacy Tobacco Documents websites for relevant materials; Lexis/Nexis searches of major news and business publications; and denotative and connotative analyses of the advertising imagery.

Results: Philip Morris developed the Creative Solutions campaign in an effort to directly confront the successes of the tobacco control movement in establishing new laws and norms that promoted clean indoor air. The campaign's imagery attempted to help smokers and potential smokers overcome the physical and social downsides of smoking cigarettes by managing risk and resolving internal conflict. The slogans suggested a variety of ways for smokers to respond to restrictions on their habit. The campaign also featured information about the Accommodation Program, Philip Morris's attempt to organise opposition to clean indoor air laws.

Conclusion: The campaign was a commercial failure, with little impact on sales of the brand. Philip Morris got some exposure for the Accommodation Program and its anti-regulatory position. The lack of commercial response to the ads suggests that they were unable to successfully resolve the contradictions that smokers were increasingly experiencing and confirms the power of changing social norms to counter tobacco industry tactics.

Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (496K).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Smith, Elizabeth A; Malone, Ruth E. Altria means tobacco: Philip Morris's identity crisis. Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):553–556. [PubMed]
  • Malone, RE; Balbach, ED. Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire? Tob Control. 2000 Sep;9(3):334–338. [PubMed]
  • Warner, KE. Tobacco industry response to public health concern: a content analysis of cigarette ads. Health Educ Q. 1985 12(2):115–127.Summer; [PubMed]
  • Pollay, RW. Targeting youth and concerned smokers: evidence from Canadian tobacco industry documents. Tob Control. 2000 Jun;9(2):136–147. [PubMed]
  • Pollay, RW; Dewhirst, T. The dark side of marketing seemingly "Light" cigarettes: successful images and failed fact. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 Suppl 1:I18–I31. [PubMed]
  • Samuels, BE; Begay, ME; Hazan, AR; Glantz, SA. Philip Morris's failed experiment in Pittsburgh. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1992 17(2):329–351.Summer; [PubMed]
  • Smith, EA; Malone, RE. Thinking the "unthinkable": why Philip Morris considered quitting. Tob Control. 2003 Jun;12(2):208–213. [PubMed]
  • Chapman, S. Advertising and psychotropic drugs: the place of myth in ideological reproduction. Soc Sci Med [Med Psychol Med Sociol]. 1979 Nov;13A(6):751–764. [PubMed]