Leadership Journal Archive
October 12, 2007 - January 19, 2008

June 3, 2008

Progress Made in Travel Security

I’m pleased and proud that today the Department is announcing a final rule and schedule for the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA). ESTA will add new security to the Visa Waiver Program (VWP), the program that lets millions of visitors from countries like the U.K., Japan, and France come to the U.S. without first getting a visa.

Three years ago, when the Policy office was created, one of the first things we looked at was the VWP landscape. There were voices seeking to close the program down. They pointed out, correctly, that the VWP was the product of an earlier age. If you’re most worried about foreign visitors becoming illegal immigrants, then it makes sense to relax visa requirements from other developed countries. If you’re worried about terrorism, though, it doesn’t make sense to admit any visitors without an opportunity to screen them first. Just because a country is economically developed and has a friendly government doesn’t mean there are no terrorists in that country willing to attack us.

That was one view, and a reasonable one. At the same time, we heard voices calling for expansion of the program, in part because it increasingly did not reflect the world in which we live. Some of our best allies – and some of the most rapidly developing economies -- are in Eastern Europe, and they don’t have VWP status.

Our solution was to expand the program – but only after dramatically improving the security guarantees that it requires.

ESTA is one of those guarantees. It is an electronic website where visitors to the U.S., many of whom have already gone on line to make a reservation with their airline, will now do the same with the United States. Instead of filling out a form on the plane, to be handed in at the immigration booth, visitors will supply the same information electronically and in advance of travel. From the traveler’s point of view, it means no more having to beg or borrow a pen from the flight attendant. Plus, if there are any admission problems, they can be resolved before the flight.

From DHS’s perspective, we have the information in advance – in time to make decisions about the tiny handful of travelers who pose security concerns. Plus, we don’t have to try to decipher everyone’s handwriting on the forms. It’s a win-win, particularly because the travel authorization will be good for two years.

Of course, no policy achievement in Washington is complete without press that doesn’t quite get it right. To be clear, this is not a visa; it is a substitute for forms that visa waiver travelers already fill out, and it is based on an Australian reporting system that has never been seen as a visa by other countries. Nor does it require 72 hours notice for travel to the U.S. It is recommended that individuals who plan to travel under the VWP apply for their ESTA as early as possible so as to avoid last minute problems. ESTA has been designed to accept applications for last minute and emergency travel. [*]

The system is now scheduled to be fully applicable to all VWP travelers in January 2009. That opens the way to admitting new members from Eastern Europe and elsewhere (assuming the other security requirements are met) – and substantially improving security – all in less than four years. It’s not often that officials get to see a policy initiative go from “glint in the eye” to interagency agreement, legislative authorization, and full implementation, all in their term of office. I’m deeply pleased and grateful to all the decision makers and participants who embraced our vision of a VWP that is both more secure and more broadly based.

Stewart Baker
Assistant Secretary for Policy

[* update: Changed last sentence from: "We will have a means to apply up to the time of travel in emergency case."]

Labels: ,

6 Comments:

  • Boring....

    By Anonymous Jeff O, At June 3, 2008 6:06 PM  

  • I think this is a very poor idea.
    Reciprocity will surely follow.
    Ruining a decent bilateral agreement will certainly result in retaliation. More isolation is the result. The economy will suffer as a result.
    This is exactly more of what we need less of. Do you realize many people voluntarily simply will not come here due to this? US Visit program is not enough? What is this country coming to? The terrorists have won. We have achieved a closed society.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At June 3, 2008 7:34 PM  

  • For one this is an attempt by the DHS to circumnaviagte the Visa Waiver Program which has always been in the care of the State Dept, a power grab so to speak. The ESTA is not a replacement for the VWP.

    Secondly the system requires online access....on servers as vulnerable as the next guys. There is nothing to a stop a denial of service attack affecting the site, maybe from China? Just a thought. Like all technological things, this needs testing and a five month testing period is way too short.

    Good luck, I expect it to fail, especially when the EU commission reigns in the Eastern European states that have made agreements with the US without the EUs consent. Expect heads to roll.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At June 5, 2008 8:59 PM  

  • I understand the described benefits:
    "Instead of filling out a form on the plane...
    resolved before the flight.
    we have the information in advance
    don’t have to try to decipher handwriting...."

    Here's what I don't quite understand: "...the travel authorization will be good for two years."

    Huh? You mean if I fly again a few months later, I don't have to do this again? That can't be true, because you say this is the new I-94. Neither would you get the prescreening benefit of knowing I'm arriving days before i deplane. And can my admission to the USA be assured, since I might have overstayed the previous visit?

    So in what sense, exactly, is my use of the program one time "good for two years"?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At June 10, 2008 9:46 AM  

  • The 9/11 terrorist had VALID ID. What good does this program do except to increase the amount of smoke and mirrors we currently get from DHS?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At June 14, 2008 9:59 AM  

  • The most important focus of the Patriot Act and homeland security is to protect Americans. We have the luxury of being the best country in the world, and we must, above all else, continue to guard ourselves against those who will take the very freedom away from us that made this country great. I think we should support our nation's leaders in this continued struggle, keeping in ming the balance of the government's power over the people, and its duty to protect its citizens. I tossed a brick in support of this issue at bricktoss.com.

    By Anonymous Pepper, At June 16, 2008 9:14 PM  



Create a Link

<< Home