By Morton M. Kondracke,
Roll Call Executive Editor
A
different kind of agenda — different from the president’s State of the Union
address and the anticipated Democratic election year document — is scheduled
to be unveiled early next month to House Republicans: “The Suburban Agenda.”
It’s the work of a group
of 22 GOP Members from across the party’s ideological spectrum and led by
moderate Rep. Mark Kirk (Ill.), who’s also tried to sell it to President Bush’s
top political adviser, Karl Rove.
Instead of a laundry-list
policy agenda, Kirk told me in an interview, this agenda is designed to answer
the problems faced by a suburban family as it moves through its day.
Kirk represents Chicago’s
northern suburbs, and other members of the “suburban strategy caucus” represent
the suburbs of such cities as New York, Philadelphia, Seattle, Cleveland,
Atlanta and Denver.
There’s clearly strategic
political intent behind trying to build the 2006 GOP legislative strategy around
the suburbs: More than half of U.S. voters live in the ’burbs, and these places,
formerly Republican strongholds, have been trending Democratic in recent years.
As Fred Barnes pointed out
in the Weekly Standard earlier this month, what Kirk calls the “inburbs” of
major cities — as opposed to the more-distant exurbs — are increasingly
Democratic.
Kirk’s district was
represented in the 1960s by current Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and for
two decades by GOP Rep. John Porter. Kirk carried it with 64 percent of the vote
in 2004 — far better than the 47 percent President Bush won in the district.
In the 2005 Virginia
gubernatorial race, Democrat Tim Kaine won the close-in Washington, D.C.,
suburbs of Arlington, Alexandria and Fairfax by huge margins.
Of the 14 districts held
by GOP representatives but carried by Democratic nominee John Kerry (Mass.) in
2004, virtually all are suburban. At the same time, there are 12 suburban
districts held by Democrats that Bush carried. So it’s not a stretch to say that
suburban voters will decide who controls the House after this year’s elections.
Kirk and others in the
suburban caucus are scheduled to make the case for their agenda at the House GOP
Members’ retreat Feb. 9, which follows leadership elections Feb. 1.
Kirk had 20 issues of
concern to suburbanites tested in his district and rated by GOP pollster John
McLaughlin. McLaughlin is currently in the field with a more sophisticated poll
of other suburbs to determine, for example, whether voters are willing to pay
for proposals in the package.
At the end of the day,
there is a “laundry list” of proposals — “20 defining issues to win the suburbs
and keep our Republican majority,” Kirk calls it. But he insists that he got
there simply by tracing a day in suburbia.
“You wake up in the
morning and you might turn on the radio and hear about Iraq and the war on
terror and you want it solved, but then you think, ‘OK, I’ve got to get to
work,’” Kirk said.
“‘How long does it take to
get there? Am I going to drive by strip malls the whole way? Can’t we have more
open space?’” McLaughlin found that 83 percent of Kirk’s constituents support
limits on the lawsuits that delay Superfund environmental cleanups. Rep. Jim
Gerlach (R-Pa.) is the caucus’ open spaces presenter.
“I get to work,” Kirk
continued. “The average American has five jobs in a working life. If I switch, I
don’t want to be left high and dry without health insurance. Current COBRA regs
allow me to pay for only 18 months of coverage? Why not indefinite?”
Portability of health
insurance and expansion of health savings accounts got overwhelming support in
McLaughlin’s poll. Rep. Nancy Johnson (R-Conn.) is the caucus expert in that
area.
“Meanwhile, my kids went
to school. My wife has probably looked up to see whether there’s a pedophile in
our neighborhood, but why shouldn’t our school district be able to pay the
federal government $50 to background check on new teachers and coaches?
“Also, the suburbs have an
increased presence of youth gangs. In my district, Lake County, the 16th
wealthiest in the country, has identified 3,000 members of international gangs.
Why shouldn’t the federal Bureau of Alchohol, Tobacco and Firearms not also be
the Bureau of Gangs to help localities?
“We also need to clarify
the 4th Amendment, so that privacy rights do not extend to school lockers, to
make sure there are no weapons or drugs in school.” Rep. Dave Reichert (Wash.),
former sheriff of King County (Seattle), is the caucus’ lead advocate on youth
crime, which is also a theme of first lady Laura Bush.
Other items on the
suburban agenda include a federal requirement that all medical records be made
electronic by a certain date and a “401-Kids” tax-benefited savings plan
allowing parents to set up accounts that children could use for purposes other
than college tuition, which is now covered by 529 plans.
Kirk’s poll found strong
support for several kinds of tax credits — for first-time homebuyers, for
computers and tutors for children and for new-career training for adults.
Respondents also favored eliminating the estate tax.
Significantly, the entire
suburban agenda has not been costed-out and matched against the Republicans’
stated goal of closing the federal budget deficit.
The agenda is designed to
keep Republicans in power, but many of the items — electronic health records and
anti-gang measures, for sure — ought to be bipartisan. It wouldn’t be surprising
if there’s a bidding war for the support of the suburbs.
|