Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Follow Entry's Comments Via RSS

Do you want to know when a comment is added to this entry? Stay up-to-date:
Subscribe to this entry's comments via RSS.



Comments

Rajani in Canada writes:

Congratulations OBAMA and family.

We need permanent peace in Sri Lanka. Tamils are suffereing for far too long...too many innocent lives are lost. Pls act on this issues URGENTLY.

And may god bless you and your family.

Posted on Fri Jan 30, 2009

Ben in the United Kingdom writes:

1. withdrawing from Iraq and Afghanistan
2. pressing for a sustainable peace in the Middle East

Posted on Fri Jan 30, 2009

Joan in California writes:

I want the State to not underminde the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) keeping marriage between one man and one woman.

Posted on Thu Jan 29, 2009

Ward in California writes:

We need to stabilize the middle east (as best we can).

We need to focus on the global economy, we cannot afford to make the U.S.A. better economically while other worst off countries are getting poorer. This will only lead to strife against themselves and us.

We need to stop pushing ourselves over other countries, we are weakening and it will only look like we are grasping at straws if we do.

Posted on Thu Jan 29, 2009

Ron in New York writes:

Yes We Can....

Revive the USIA...export the best of American Cultural Life. The world is hungry for our music, art, style and hopefulness. Bring exiles from the darkness of former soviet states into the light of the American dream.

Globalize asset seizures and put trillions to work for peace, security, poverty reduction and global health.

Deal directly and honestly with world leaders. If they are corrupt, don't support them. Even if they look like the lesser of evils.

Tell Karzai to stop the family-owned narco-state business or leave.

Get on top of loose-nukes before we experience a nulear terrorist=attack (imagine 10/12 no matter the date).

When you see Human Rights violations, act quickly. Don't define the problem to death (ie: Genocide in Darfur).

Ensure State Department integrity and oversight in all intelligence and Justice agency operations. Clean up/out the CIA, NSA and Justice.

End corruption and transnational organized crime. They feed terrorism, conflict and instability

Best wishes to Secretary Clinton and Ambassadors Mitchell and Holbrooke!

Go State!

Go Team Obama!

Posted on Wed Jan 28, 2009

Richard in New York writes:

Our first objective should be to get Iraq to take over it's security so that we can draw down out troops from there & re-deploy them in Afganistan where we will need additional troops to improve security & defeat Al-Qaeda/Taliban.

We should help Pakistan militarily & financially to increase her strength to combat terrorism in the lawless tribal regions & work together with them to fight the terrorists.

Improve relations with Russia.

Deal firmly but fairly with Iran.

Reassure our friends in Europe & renew ou commitment to work with them on international issues.

Lastly we must deal immediately with the ever downward spiraling issue of African poverty. We must reach out to our friends & allies on the African continent & find new & creative ways to deal with poverty disease & violence.

Posted on Wed Jan 28, 2009

Dorjee in Washington writes:

One of the top priorities should be to deal with China in firm manner and to focus on bringing a concrete solution to the Tibet issue, time is running out as the Dalai Lama is getting older. Solving the Tibet issue will bring stability and respect from the world community towards China. Therefore it is critical for our administration to seek in engaging China to put serious efforts in resolving the Tibet issue without much more delay as it has been doing. Thank you!

Posted on Wed Jan 28, 2009

Sandra in Texas writes:

U.S.-Mexico border relations need a boost from the federal government --and I don't mean the Border Patrol or the FBI.

Local police agencies along the border need to be empowered to deal with transborder crimes.

Our local police need their intel, while they need our training and they are more than grateful to have some of the technology we no longer use. What we need to make it happen is for the U.S. State Department to empower our local police for them to jump into action.

Posted on Wed Jan 28, 2009

Joe in Tennessee writes:

Start thinking of Diplomatic Multi Cultural Children centers within the area of chaos and war. If we can raise the children to respect each other, the world will have a much better chance.

Palestine is a very good example...a major part of their problem is the fact they really don't know who they are as a people, therefore there is no solid identity beyond conflict with the outside world when not infighting. It is the only time cultural nationalistic problems are forgotten is with war and outside conflict. It produces an evil cycle of detachment and then enmeshment which produces a schizoid society. This is how they keep going with unity-non unity and never gelling as a multicultural society and Nation in which peace can occur. The only way any fanatical group can peacefully co-exist is with respect attached to a mutual denominator; in this case it can be with their children.

Prior to the war there was even a nature program involving Palestinian children and Israel children showing their mutual world they inhabit; there were no problems within the child social structure -- why?

If we are going to aid them, then they should school the children together, provide child care for working mothers without separation, etc...

There has to be some developmental structuring for the future of the country and if it has to be mandated, then so be it. Human needs are not that different from society to society and the children are the key to future peace in this world, yet we keep putting band aids on every aspect and no cures. We need cures that work...not constant aid.

Posted on Wed Jan 28, 2009

Xander in the Netherlands writes:

1)Coherent political talks between Hamas and Fatah before reopening peacetalks between Israel and the Palestinians

2) Involve Iran to improve stability in the Middle East

3) The cuurent financial crisis needs a firm and progressive "new order" Bretton Woods should no longer be the world standard and Keynes is perhaps not the entire way to go. America should appproach China to establish a new Bretton Woods in order to regulate the world economy better....

Posted on Wed Jan 28, 2009

Onur in Turkey writes:

The new president of the U.S. surely confronts many problems,including clashing in the middle east, economical crisis, U.S. citizens' health and other infrastructure problems, Iran's nuclear program, war in the Afghanistan and Iraq, the poor popularity of the U.S. in the world public opinion,extending humanitarian assistance to less fortunate,etc.

Of course all of aforesaid problems have to be handled with immediately but one of the that problems must be solved firstly. It is exactly the middle east question. This question is primus inter pares since childrens loss their lifes. No policy can have this right, and this is not be able to be expressed any policy. firstly lasting and enduring trace with no time limit must be signed between hamas and ısrael. In deed, Hamas rockets - - so called rockets -- don't be harmful for Israel in a large extent but they give up bombing Israel as soon as possible as this attempts cause the Israel attacks. Consequently, the new president must be dealt with this hainous issue

Posted on Wed Jan 28, 2009

Chris in Georgia writes:

The U.S. should be looking at ways to eliminate the conditions that foster extremism in the Mid-East and Central Asia.

Posted on Wed Jan 28, 2009

Edite in Canada writes:

It is exceedingly important for President Obama to initiate contact with Russian diplomats and Putin and Medvedev and inform them that the United States will not brook any further illegal military incursions into sovereign countries. Waiting for Russia to test his political bent, savvy and forcefulness by testing him with an unwanted political or military incident would not be a clever stance to adopt. Russians are noted for their knack of assessing the mettle of new American Presidents. The ascendancy of Barack Obama to the Presidency will provide ample capabilities and occasions for Russia to learn about how President Obama responds to military provocations.

Posted on Tue Jan 27, 2009

Mithila in Canada writes:

Please consider the sufferings and massacare of the innocent Sri Lankan Tamil population for the past 52 years. The actual truth of the situation has always been filttered to media and foreign embassies. If the UN and America go silent regarding the present condition of Sri Lankan Tamils,our race will become extinct. Even a woodpecker has a right to live in its habitat, but there is no peaceful place for Sri Lankan Tamils to inhabit. The Tamils that live in Sri Lankan government controled areas are scared to express themselves.

Please prioritize and act upon our current situation!

We have full HOPE and great expectations from your government.

Thanks.
Mithila

Posted on Tue Jan 27, 2009

Bruce R. in Florida writes:

Dear Hillary, I have voted Democratic my whole life and I have a concern. My concern is if President Obama will have high level talks with Iran. I am sure you are well aware there are major efforts to destabilize the Middle East directed from Iran presently with Hamas and Hezbollah. I believe top level talks will only give the Iranian leadership credence .As most of the Focus has been on the Israel Gaza Debacle. The Iranian government has been rounding up jailing, torturing, and God only knows what else to a small sect of roughly 300,000 harmless human beings known as the Bahai's. These people are being charged with basically Defaming the prophet because they believe they had a prophet return after Muhammed. Regardless of who came when there seem to be zero concern about what is happening to these people and I truly believe meeting with Ahmedinajad or Ayatollah Ali Khamenei would be at the same level as Chamberlain meeting with Hitler.For God's sake Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's Brother Hadi Khamenei made a public criticism and the Grand Ayatollah had the Police Beat him so severly he had to be hospitalized.Each day I hear comments from all these self rightous Middle Eastern dictators and Kings making comments about the Palestinian Rights of self determination and the Evil Israelis however,there citizens have no rights!!Dont get me wrong something needs to be resolved.I do not think that is possible with Hamas,Hezbollah,Iran and Syria at the wheel. Today, Twenty percent of the voting population of Israel is Arab and the key word is voting. Other than Israel, Lebanon, Turkey and maybe one more country I cannot remember there is no vote therefore no right to self determination. Ironically, Israeli Arabs who have the right to vote have more self determination than virtually all Arab citizens of all the Islamic Countries.

Thank You for your Time
Bruce

Posted on Tue Jan 27, 2009

Amanda in West Virginia writes:

@ Doug in Virginia -- Isn't it wonderful that our leaders give we, the people, a voice? It is a beautiful thing that our elected officials see it as important to get our opinions. It shouldn't scare you, it should remind you just how wonderful this country is.

Posted on Tue Jan 27, 2009

Marty in Washington, DC writes:

All countries must re-focus on the INTERNATIONAL TRADE OF APPLIED TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCES as a means to enact stronger economic relationships and eliminate the barriers that have stood between us.

WE MUST STRIVE TO overcome our differences and FIND THE COMMON GROUND. We must forge new avenues of trade and find mutually beneficial exchanges, across all borders. The world needs to work together to make one huge olive branch; to heal the sick, feed the starving and fuel the intellectual pyres of the gifted and capable, yet disadvantaged.

*WE MUST FIND and NURTURE THE EDISONs OF THE NEW MILLENIUM

These new "Thomas Edisons" must help us all develop the required technologies to improve the qulity of life for all humankind. We must develop electro-magnetic, synthetic and solar technologies. The international focus should be on collective solutions through well planned applications of resources and sciences. Our governments can no longer stand alone, in the way of internationally developed solutions. We face very real problems in this millennium. We need a 'next generation' of machinery to improve all transportation, reduce pollution worldwide, improve food distribution worldwide. Our applications of health sciences and supplies of safe power are being tested. The answers are in short supply and our international relations must not be a barrier to these much needed solutions. We MUST put away our differences and awaken the family of humankind, before a final call of survival passes before us. We NEED to form a better world, today, for the tomorrows of us all.

Posted on Tue Jan 27, 2009

Richard in California writes:

I believe that Israel has lost its moral compass. The current conflict in Gaza, in my opinion, is the result of a people being squeezed into what is actually a ghetto, a prison, then starved, and when they lash out by sending crude rockets at their tormentors, Israel launches a wholesale attack, killing 1,300 Palestinians to their 13.

Israel has been treating these people for decades in a way that intentionally fuels their anger. Hell! I'd strike back too! So would anyone in the same circumstances as Israel has placed the Palestinians!

We say they are allies? Well, this ex US Navy sailor has never forgotten or forgiven the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty. Israel doesn't even have the moral fortitude to apologize for that reprehensible action! We are and have always been their loyal "knee-jerk" ally, but they have not shown themselves to be ours. Not ever. What is wrong with this picture?

Posted on Tue Jan 27, 2009

MBF in Washington, DC writes:

You have to like this one: Brett in South Africa writes:

"I only hope that the U.S.A. will formulate a stronger strategy to pave a way to change the situation in my country."

Why can not the International community be more effective and those countries that have more to give fiscally as Russia, China and India? Where is their fair share of aid? China is only lending where oil is and moving population bases with it, including TV stations which teach langue skills of their nation and Russia is only occupied with selling arms to African nations. Why are we the only true source of hope? In all these decades without a Russian wolf to blame, why have not more countries gotten together to spread the wealth for human dignity? Greed and power is the real problem I guess.

Just remember, we can not provide what we do not have and unless America is going to turn into a giant Kibbutz, you are living on a cloud far and above the rest of Americans who honestly fell they should have gotten something in return for their investments on foreign soil. Not a loss of their American way of Life, which is happening one hundred percent due to the Global Economic ideology and fair market system which failed because it was not regulated properly. Where is the security in a capitilist system that is broke and non viable currency?

Our stewards sold out our security and live much better than most Americans they supposidly represent it seems...are you suffering Madame Secretary? Is the new President Suffering?

If our situation at home does not impact the people respresented and there is no empathy here, why provide for any other country? I bet I speak for a LOT of Americans who lost their jobs, homes and hope here...

Posted on Tue Jan 27, 2009

Brett in South Africa writes:

Madam Secretary

May I firstly congratulate you on your appointment, I strongly believe that you will charter a new way forward for the U.S.A. and the world at large.

I am Zimbabwean living in South Africa, not by choice, but exiled due to the situation in my country. As I speak, the talks have failed yet again. How can the world, continue to allow Mr. Mugabe to savagely dismantle the country. The SADCC community will not speak out against this dictator.

I only hope that the USA will formulate a stronger strategy to pave a way to change the situation in my country.

HELP!

May god bless you and the current administration.

Posted on Tue Jan 27, 2009

Sophia in Virginia writes:

The U.S. Foreign Policy that needs the greatest overhaul is the U.S. policy for Africa. The Obama Administration should stop patronizing and undermining Africa's own capacities and craft a policy that will allow the people of Africa to determine and craft their own social,economic and political programs.

Posted on Tue Jan 27, 2009

Patsy in U.S.A. writes:

To seek and truly see, with clear and compassionate eyes, those who suffer in our midst. As long as we choose to leave people behind there will be desperation and meanness in the world. Also, we must try to understand and respect others and try to mend our own ways before making judgments. The more we blame, the more we draw attention to our own faults. Life does not have to be this hard. Right now, there are plenty of resources to go around. Greed kills, yet I find the rich and famous being lauded every day on the "news." It's time for people of good conscience to stand up for what is right. Our survival as a species is not about boundaries, religions, old prejudices, it is about compassion, respect, maturity. It is about encouraging a culture of life, not death. It's about love, not fear.

Posted on Tue Jan 27, 2009

Johnathan in Canada writes:

I believe the Obama administration will gain much respect and legitimacy, if it puts its foot down on human rights abuses.

(1) It needs to come up with a comprehensive list of countries that are about to or are comitting genocide on its own people.

These countries include China,Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Burma. Impose sanctions on these countries, prevent any form of arms export etc, till they make radical improvements.

(2) Help bring peace to the Middle East, impose a two state solution. Give some level of access to Holy city for the Palestians. Try to bring Hamas to the negotiating table, provided it recognizes Israel's right to exist.

(3) Negotiate with Iran, try to peacefully disarm its nuclear capability through hard bargain Provide some international guarantee to protect its borders from incursion etc but also dismantle its international terror support networks.

Posted on Tue Jan 27, 2009

Kevin in Washington writes:

Secure a just and fair two state solution in the Middle East, between Israel, and the Palestinians

Work with the elected leaders of South America, including chavez, morales, et al, to create econonomic conditions which create markets for inter-american products
end the embargo of cuba

Posted on Tue Jan 27, 2009

Angel R. in Washington writes:

The only Middle East policy we should have is getting off of our dependence on their oil. This means investing in clean renewable energy here at home. There are too many hostile states in the middle east getting rich off of our hard earned cash. Meanwhile we are asking china for more and more loans. There is a reason why the states that matter in the Middle East don't meddle in the petty quarrels in their own back yard. When was the last time you saw the Suads make any real effor to resolve the various conflicts. These conflicts are hundreds if not thousands of years old and will probably continue indefinately. We as a nation need to stop being the world police, bring our boys home, and start rebuilding this nation piece by piece.

Posted on Mon Jan 26, 2009

Joe in Tennessee writes:

Quote by Abraham Lincoln: "America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Without America, how long will there be a Free World? Think about it.

-- All decisions must be provisional on reconstruction of the foundation of America first and foremost.

-- Free Trade markets must keep a fair basis, economic restructuring needs to be include provisional democratic laws for the people who accept our aid and a oversight of Companies who invest in new democracies or underdeveloped countries on an international level.

-- We care more about making laws regarding prisoners of war and rules of war than thousands who go abused in various manners internationally by corporate greed and are often treated worse than any Gitmo resident. Ever see a diamond mine? How does this happen? Why does it go on?

Note:
What does Air force One have to do with any of this Sammy? Agreed, the Presidency was not supposed to emanate a King over his surfs...George Washington made that clear...! In fact I had a hamburger Inauguration Day, not pheasant and fish and actually gave thanks to God for it...I was not aware that Lincolns meal was an Average Americans diet today!

Posted on Mon Jan 26, 2009

Evelyn writes:

There is no 'winning' in Afghanistan with the use of bombs and drones on the population. Before sending in more troops to kill and be killed, the first priority must be to make every diplomatic effort possible. We are now propping up an administration in Afghanistan that is ineffective and extremely corrupt, make the establishment of an honest and effective government the first priority. Second, put nation building in the hands of the people of Afghanistan, not in the reach of Western organizations and companies which take most of the money for themselves and their staffs so that very little gets to the people of Afghanistan. The way funds are handled now is a ripoff to the American taxpayers. I have been told stories of members of NGO's taking the best houses in Kabul and driving around in white SUVs in the midst of the poverty all around them. Third, have a dialogue with the Taliban. In order to eradicate them an entire generation of men educated in fundamental Islam while in Pakistan will have to be killed. Better to talk with them and try to re-educate them. I do not want 'Bush's' war in Afghanistan to become 'Obama's' war by continuing to be the quagmire it is now. Do not repeat history, no nation has been able to win in Afganistan for over 2000 years.

Posted on Mon Jan 26, 2009

Holly in California writes:

I would like to direct our dear Hilary's attention to what is going on in Middle East especially in Iran in regard to Women Rights issue. I have posted a note on my blog (black chador) for Madam Secretary. I love it if our top diplomat pays attention to women rights issues as she did when she was our first lady.

More power to Hilary.

Posted on Mon Jan 26, 2009

Lucio in New York writes:

Re: international health as a priority

I. Improve upon our leadership under PEPFAR.
i. take your time selecting a leader for the Office of the US Global AIDS Coordinator. As many organizations are requesting, setup an advisory committee composed of stakeholders, and delay this choice for a few weeks.
ii. get rid of restrictions on HIV-positive people traveling to the US

II. start planning for the G8 summit this summer, to launch HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE 2020, which Obama described as "a global effort to improve global health care and to train health care professionals to serve in the developing world."
i. again, setup an advisory committee composed of stakeholders to help plan this new initiative. Ensure organizations that stand up for human rights and for the "right to health" are included in said panel (e.g. Physicians for Human Rights, which has been lobbying on this issue of training health care workers for several years, and HIV/AIDS treatment activists).

Posted on Mon Jan 26, 2009

Hatem in Egypt writes:

Dear sirs,

You know what the priority should be in terms of the Middle East? Simply the implementation of international law and security council resolutions.

Resolutions which include that the annexing of Jerusalem is rejected by the UN, that Gaza and the West bank and all pre-1967 Arab land is under occupation and that inhabitants have a right to resist this occupation, that Israel as the occupier has a duty to protect the people it is occupying.

The new U.S. government should stop vetoing resolutions which the whole world wants passed.

Let us keep it simple, after all, who doesn't want international laws to be respected? Except of course those who are breaking them? War crimes have been and continue to be committed, including collective punishments, use of illegalised weapon systems etc...etc... ad nauseum.

We Arabs and Muslims understand that Israel's biggest issue is security, what we cannot understand is how poisoning water wells, and burning orchards and killing children (over 50% of all deaths in Gaza have been under the age of 17) improves security. Nor do we understand how the U.S., a country which consistently claims the moral high ground, can support, arm, defend and grant cover to Israel in its unrelenting massacre, humiliation and dehumanization of the Palestinians.

Bring back respect for international law.

Posted on Mon Jan 26, 2009

Hatem in Egypt writes:

Dear sirs,

For the sake of humanity, democracy, the credibility of international law and all that is decent, it is imperative that the new U.S. President and Government take a humane and fair look at what is happening in the occupied territories in Palestine.

Historically, the U.S. has provided unconditional, unquestioning support and umbrella coverage for whatever atrocities Israel has committed with impunity. This needs to change if the U.S. wishes for its image to improve and if President Obama is any different to his predecessors.

As an example of how twisted the truth has been remember that Gaza is legally "occupied territory" and its inhabitants have a legal right guranteed under international law to resist the occupation including the use of military means. These are not terrorists, these are a people under occupation, resisting this occupation, and they have the right to do so.

Imagine please for a minute that you are a Palestinian, living for the last 50 odd years in gaza or the west bank....what would you do, what are your options?

The new U.S. President has campaigned as an honest, decent man, not a cynic, not a realpolitik zealot, but a fair and balanced man, who seems at least to want to do the right things.

This is one right thing he must do.

Posted on Mon Jan 26, 2009

Sam in Virginia writes:

Tonight National Geographic aired a fantastic special on Air Force one. The producers of that show should be given some type of journalist award. A segment of the special dealt with the Presidents November 2003 Thanksgiving Day visit to Iraq. What struck me as odd was how concerned the President was about the SAM threat to the aircraft upon departure. He called his security specialist twice to inquire about the aircrafts altitude. No one should use the word scared when talking about the leader of the free world; but he was in my opinion overly concerned. My God if you don't feel safe on Air Force One, how the heck do you expect a 22 year old Marine to feel safe in a Hummer that's not up armored?

In addition the President was only in country a few hours, active duty and Foreign Service personnel are in country for a year or longer. The pilot of Air Force one said that only 5 individual knew about the flight; that's odd, according to the photographs in Elisabeth Bumiller's book, an American Life, the President took at least one VIP on this secret mission. That would have been an entirely different security piece. The troops in Iraq/Afghanistan should be brought home immediately! The focus should shift to protecting the Southwest Border of the United States. NATO is almost totally useless. US (NATO) soldiers should be sent back to the United States and expeditionary forces used to combat the war on terror. AFRICOM is stationed Germany because no country on the African continent wanted to support this base. The new President should unBRAC a base in the US to support AFRICOM. It would be a lot cheaper and the taxpayers could use dollars instead of Euros to finance this operation! Towards the end of the NETGEO special they showed President Obama exiting a suburban and boarding AF1. He was putting away his Blackberry. I wonder will he be able to use it in the White House.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2008/05/mil-080526-voa02.htm

http://washingtontimes.com/weblogs/potus-notes/2009/Jan/21/ex-bush-official-makes-case-for-no-obama-blackberr/

Posted on Mon Jan 26, 2009

Dave writes:

Develop a real, sincere, desire to advance what is in the best interest of the world as a whole, rather than those of sole benefit to the United States. If this is not our highest priority, how can we expect others to care for our well-being? We need to take the leadership role in developing this higher sense of a global community to ensure long-run peace and prosperity.

Posted on Mon Jan 26, 2009

Barry in Massachusetts writes:

With regard to Afghanistan, I don't have the answers, but I do wish that Mr. Obama, Secretary Clinton and Ambassador Holbrooke, would ALL meet and discuss it with Rory Stewart. Mr. Stewart has lived on 3 continents, he has served as a British Diplomat, an Iraq Deputy Governor for 2 provinces, has founded an NGO in Afghanistan -- where he currently resides, has written several books on the region and is the Director of the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.

Mr. Stewart's ideas and insights are not parallel to those of the Bush administration, to European governments with activities in Afghanistan, nor even to the proposals so far of the Obama administration. This is precisely why I think he should be engaged -- he has a great deal of knowledge of the region's history, it's culture, and more importantly, successful real world experience with the indigenous organizations, the power brokers as well as the common people, the life there. He understands the region, the limitations of external influence there, and has good ideas on how to actually make progress and get things done.

I think ideally he would be made part of the team, but at the very least, I think he should be engaged for significant discussions at the highest levels so that leaders at the White House and the State Department get the benefit of his learnings.

For a little look into what he has to say, you may review a lecture he gave on 11-13-2008 entitled "Afghanistan: The Places in Between". It's kind of a grand tour in about an hour, describing the people, the history, the folly of some current coalition initiatives there, and successful work that he has been doing, together with some hints on what the international community might do to improve their effectiveness there (no, it's not throw more money and troops at the problem).

8 Parts totalling roughly 1 hour:
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=8BBF3A522F7AFF5E

Posted on Sun Jan 25, 2009

Cynthia R. in Michigan writes:

I beleive one of the top priorities is to promote Human Rights and End Discrimination against women and children. Human Rights is a broad catagory that covers, child labor, torture, inhumane treatment, politial oppression, slave trafficing, religious persecution. We need to set an example and work toward engaging once again in the world not as a dominate force that says our way or the highway, but as an example and roll model. We can promote our country and our people to the world with a new scense of Nationalism not Isolationism and with respect to other cultures, countries and their heritage.

Posted on Sun Jan 25, 2009

Wendy in California writes:

One of our U.S.A. astronauts was asked, "What did you think when you looked back at our planet Earth from space?" He said, "What struck me when I looked back at our planet from space is that there aren't any lines on it."

Shocked, I became global in that instant. I know that we still live with the imaginary lines, but Prez O & SoS Hillary are both grok or deeply drink in the necessary conviction that respect is one of the greatest solvents of distrust and even hatred in the world.

No change or priority could possibly be greater than to treat every other human being on our tiny fragile beloved planet with respect.

Posted on Sun Jan 25, 2009

Ali in Jordan writes:

It is about time U.S. presidents take a new track towards the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Thru the years, the U.S. government was bias and blindly supporting Israel while neglecting Palestinian rights for self determination.

It is about time that U.S. President Obama, takes a serious step towards pushing Israel to end the occupation in the West Bank, remove the Sea, Land and Air embargo on Gaza, remove road blocks, illegal settelments and remove the Aparthied wall that is cutting Arab villages and towns into pieces. It is about time to start negotiating with Hamas and Fatah to establish a Just peace for all. I personaly think a one state solution is the only solution to this conflict.

Posted on Sun Jan 25, 2009

Paul in Florida writes:

I think a top priority should be to focus on the Middle East and our relations with them. I believe that Secretary Clinton and the Obama Administration will do a good job in focusing on building a good relationship there. Another issue that I think is very important is that the United States should focus on Womens rights and Womens issues across the world. The United States can be a great example to the rest of the world on this issue too.

Posted on Sun Jan 25, 2009

Doug in Virginia writes:

I'm seriously concerned about the future of the country, if the State Department wants to know what I think the top priority ought to be. Don't we pay you guys to figure that out?

Posted on Sat Jan 24, 2009

Nick in France writes:

The government has already identified Afghanistan and the Middle East as essential areas of activity.

I would ask that the administration engage constructively with the United Nations and its institutions. This would do much to recover the USA's reputation overseas.

The previous administration undermined the UN and the work it tries to do. It witheld funding from both the central body and its institutions, in particular UNESCO.

It would be nice to see the United States participating and negociating rather than imposing a vision in places where conditions simply do not allow its realisation. The UN is the only forum available for small developing nations to be heard. Many of the ideas expressed may be "off the wall" and informed by ideologies at odds with those commonly held by Americans. However to simply denounce them as "corrupt and decadent" (as one of your ultracon citizens expressed it to me) serves no useful purpose.

It seems to me that much as the President engages in pragmatic negociations with the House and the Senate in the development of domestic policy, so it should be with the UN. This would mean fewer useless declarations from the UN and fewer vetos from the US. Which, in turn would hugely enhance the international reputation of the US and bring about the re-emergance of the UN as a force for change and defence of human rights (which do not differ much from the bill of rights) on the world stage.

Posted on Sat Jan 24, 2009

Galal in Yemen writes:

I think it's necessary for Mr. Obama to focuse on the middle east as an essential part of the U.S. foreign policy. The dispute between Arabs and Israel is realy deserve such focuse. The former U.S. presidents faieled to reach any settlement. Instead of this they supported Israel. It'll be a remarkable shift for Mr. Obama to support the idea of " Palestinian State Establishment ", and to act as a fair broker with the two sides. The history will record this as it recorded that Obama was the first black who entered the white house.

Posted on Sat Jan 24, 2009

Joe in Tennessee writes:

I don't think this has been mentioned:

1. How about starting a new branch of the DOS to combine our aid within national borders. In Africa, as an example there are over 100 groups supporting AIDS there and much wasted double effort and cost. Everybody is rowing in the same direction, but in different boats that need be supported. If we are going to give 34 billion more and still be the major caretaker of peace in the world, would it not be beneficial to organize more productively?

2. Ambassadorships should be earned and not political favors. Why: It does not create due diligence or affirmation of truth in reports. How many times has this happened? Even in small areas as in the Philippines a few years back with the rhetoric of a political favor creating a riot.

It is not expanding the DOS in intelligence roles; but, will give credibility that actually reaches the President and Senate committees as to viability within any border.

Many of these major problems we note worldwide with terrorism are started by small groups. Why does it take so long to recognize organization of these groups? The provider does not want to hear of problems.

A prime example is within the problems encountered by hindsight in the Iraq war. When the Generals had to actually ask the boots to the ground AFTER 5 YEARS what was going on because of tainted information which caused misjudgments. Why? No officer wants to say they failed or want to apease their superiors.

The same does occur in many of our ally third world countries and smaller democratic and non democratic states where we have an Embassy. If the Ambassadorship is political in nature, then any information is automatically tainted to the provider. It is only natural is it not?

Posted on Sat Jan 24, 2009

Joe in Tennessee writes:

Hamas has no realistic history to begin with, what are they other than a far right PLO-PLF and whatever number of splinters? From 1954 onward the Palestinians have been a Nomadic people fighting to have anything at all. Starting wars with Jordan and Syria in their history, credibility give only with their aid of Lebanon, otherwise they are a nonexistent group of nomadic peoples who came from some historical time and place. They have not in modern times had any legitimate governing power. Arafat was only chosen as he was the best of the worst so to speak and commanded the largest group. An educated thug, no more, no less who was empowered indirectly in an international attempt to create a base government to deal with.

Here a bit of history which was just repeated, the only change is the country involved: 1960s:The Jordanian government moved to regain control over its territory, and the next day, King Hussein declared martial law.[7] By September 25, the Jordanian army achieved dominance in the fighting, and two days later Arafat and Hussein agreed to a series of ceasefires. The Jordanian army inflicted heavy casualties upon the Palestinians -- including civilians -- who suffered approximately 3,500 fatalities. Two thousand Fatah fighters managed to enter Syria. They crossed the border into Lebanon to join Fatah forces in that country, where they set up their new headquarters.[8] WOW, DOES THAT SOUND FAMILIAR but the irony is: their new headquarters were GIVEN TO THEM by the very people they are attacking.

1. Hamas won by threat and murder, no more, no less. They are NOT a representation of the Palestinian peoples. If you believe that, then why doesn't anyone want them? Why are the Palestinians here in America not Hamas? That is a very large misnomer which the Press created and is supported by most communist, Marxist and Islamic extremist. The Russian Strategic Center refers to Hamas as a borderline and perhaps misrepresented elected government which may be extreme; but, was legally elected. Perhaps you hold Russian view and do not have any democratic ideals; because, under Hamas you could not even shave your face, have your wife ask you for anything or let your children play with toys which were not condoned first. Is this democratic ideology? They murdered their way to victory.

2. The very history of the Palestinian people is one in which NO bordering country wanted them. They never had a realistic sovereign state to begin with. The idea of such was only to keep them from being incorporated into surounding borders and served individual nationalism. No one wanted them, as the Palestinians have repeatedly shown they will not bend or involve themselves in a productive manner as new citizens. It is the mercy of Israel they were given any land to begin with. Israel, by International law, did not have to honor or recognize Palestine to begin with ... The war was inevitable.

3. The question of Hamas vs. Fatah is almost irrelevant as no matter what center government may actually be with the Palestinian peoples, Hamas is not flexible and will continue to create grief on one border or another. My only concern is who is supplying them to continue the war. They do not have the money for arms purchase to begin with and nothing to trade in actuality -- which means there is a external provider which must be shut down...who is supplying them? Arms are not inexpensive.

I think one of the major problems which exist in our diplomacy is the lack of common sense, not education; we have a lot of very smart people working 24-7 to provide peaceful solutions but: Sometimes you are in the school yard with a bully and you cannot run. We complicate it for what purpose? How many people are hurt before the bully is put down and if we did care that much, why wait?

Some fires need to be put out quickly or they spread...

Posted on Sat Jan 24, 2009

David in Maine writes:

Stabilize our relationship with Russia and work toward the reduction of nuclear weapons.

Posted on Sat Jan 24, 2009

Efna in New York writes:

Please reinstall social Security benifits to government retirees. As long as their pensions are less than one hundred thousand dollars a year. Most older americans are not enjoying their later years. Need and want are monsters at their doors. The additional SS benifits would do much to enhance their last years.

Posted on Sat Jan 24, 2009

John in Greece writes:

@ Joe in Tennessee -- I think I understand what you're talking about Middle East and Hamas. I agree 99,9%. That's why I have only a 0,1% query concerning Hamas/Fatah:

Please do not misunderstand me -- cause I do not know the "area' so well. Recently, I read that sometimes ("regularly" and often) Hamas members become Fatah and Fatah members become Hamas, according to local political circumstances and climate, no matter if we think that they hate each other. I am not sure about these, that's why I ask you.

You may fight Hamas today and after some months you will have to face the fact that Hamas was Fatah and Fatah was Hamas? And then you have to fight from the beginning? If you add to all these the Hezbollah and many other terrorist groups around the world, then it's a chaos!

So, is it only a Hamas problem or is it a more general Arabic-Muslim "veto" against the existence of Israel and U.S.A.?

Posted on Sat Jan 24, 2009

Tom in Florida writes:

Help to establish a Palestinian state and to broker a just peace between Israel and the Palestinian people.

Withdraw all U.S. military forces from Iraq (no permanent U.S. bases).

Rapidly conclude the seven year long war in Afghanistan, and withdraw all U.S. military forces.

Work through the United Nations to end genocide in Africa and wherever else it occurs.

Begin to phase out all 700+ U.S. military bases on foreign soil.

Examine evidence to determine if crimes against humanity were committed by the Bush Administration in the run up to war, and during the war, with Iraq, and prosecute if evidence warrants.

Engage Iran and all nations through diplomacy, economy, education, culture and communication. Military action should ONLY be taken as the absolute last resort in the defense of our nation.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Jake in Tennessee writes:

Hamas is an elected government, elected by the Palestinians. The Palestinians decided their fate the day they voted Hamas into office.

Hamas is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, a banned group out of Egypt.

If Hamas would have not fired rockets at Israel, Israel would have not needed to attack Gaza. Israel should not and will not allow itself to be fired upon without response.

I wish Israel would have not stopped the fighting. The only thing Hamas is doing now is regrouping, rearming, and getting ready to fire on Israel once again. Hamas should be completly wiped out.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Joe in Tennessee writes:

Here is a bit to read: They will not even work with their own people...and they are dilusional in every respect:

Hamas dismisses reconciliation talks with Fatah..
Posted by: kdriggers on Jan 22 - 12:15
DAMASCUS, Syria -- A senior Hamas official has dismissed any reconciliation talks with the rival Fatah group.

His remarks Thursday followed claims by the militants that they emerged victorious after the group survived a relentless three-week offensive by Israel on the Gaza Strip.

Sami Khater, a member of the militant group's Damascus-based branch, says Arab and international donations to reconstruct the war-devastated Gaza should go directly to Hamas and not to rival Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, whose faction rules the West Bank.

Khater says Abbas and his Palestinian Authority cannot be trusted.

Khater says a Hamas delegation will travel to Cairo this weekend for talks with Egyptian mediators on ways to consolidate a Gaza cease-fire in place since last Sunday.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Joe in Tennessee writes:

This is only in response to the # of Israel/Palestine remarks:

The problem between Israel and Palestine is not with Palestine...this is the problem that many of you simply cannot understand! The Palestine government has made peace; it is Hamas who is ruining any degree of viable, lasting peace and Hamas IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PALISTINE GOVERNMENT!

I have strong doubts over the proposed individual killings by Israel soldiers to be honest as Hamas would sacrifice anyone; but, be assured, it was handled as a war and there is always collateral damage. The bleeding heart aspect is journalistic hubbub working in the favor of a Terrorist theology which needs elimination. Why give them any ammunition? Red press journalism seems to be alive and well again.

Agreed, no one wants to see anyone hurt, but if Egypt cared that much, they would have opened their borders before the war started. Egypt was asked to and knew in advance of what Israel was going to do, but they closed the borders. Why? They do not want Hamas in their land. Do not put this all on Israel, to do so it beyond blissful ignorance. Get rid of Hamas and there will be peace. There is not any other problem in the way.

Have any of you actually studied the histology of Palestine at all? What makes any of you feel that cultured civilizations want to live in an unsecure state? Stop making this some fantasy Nationalistic problem. It is a minority manipulating a majority by threat. There is no room for terrorist and Hamas is a terrorist organization. They do not represent the Palestinian peoples, but are given credence due to what?

The biggest hope for the Middle East is with Syria and Israel as business partners. Peace brings constructive gain and Syria may not want dependence on Iran and find Israel a much better ally internationally for their self benefit and solvency. .. To be honest, even in Iran, outside the religious zealots, there are businessmen who want to profit and flourish, not be ruled by a government who poses a defensive threat against the free world and limits their gain. Free Trade is one of the best answers...money is only a tool; but, needs to be used wisely...

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Jake in Tennessee writes:

Dissolve NATO.

Remove troops from places like Japan, SK, Germany, and the UK.

Assist Israel in finally destroying the HAMAS as so they never fire a single shot again.

Stay our nose out of others business, we should care less what happens to agressor states like Georgia.

Kosovo is not a country.

Our real enemies are China, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, we should treat them like it.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Helga in Nebraska writes:

Congratulation to President Obama and Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton!

Thank you for seeking the input of citizens/non-citizens and foreigners alike -- this is undoubtadly a FIRST and highly appreciated!

I have several points in mind -- please allow me to elaborate:

1 - After having watched helplessly the horrors in Gaza, to make sure the siege will be lifted ASAP!

2 - Make sure, humanitarian aid, medication and gas ect. will reach the population in Gaza and the checkpoints will be/remain OPEN!

3 - Israel needs to understand it will have to GIVE and not only TAKE, to fulfill obligations i.e removing ALL settlements from the West Bank in order to find a common denominator with her neighbours!

4 - Address the Israeli occupation -- work on lifting it!

5 - Please help establishing a VIABLE PALESTINIAN STATE! (CAVE: Netanyahu is ahead in the polls - he is against ANY kind of Palestinian state!)

6 - To assure, children will NEVER be incarcerated again by Israel (only yesterday kids as young as 12 were dragged out of their beds at 4am and taken away by the army - this is a CRIME!) PLEASE help to get those released and back to their families who are rotting in Israeli jails right now!!

7 - Talk with "enemies" like Hamas, Hizbullah, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea! It is always convenient to talk with friends, but an absolute MUST to communicate with enemies!

8 - Make Israel sign the NPT/NNPT and allow inspection of Dimona, the nuclear reactor!

9 - NO blank checks/automatic money-deliveries, NO arms to Israel anymore prior to recognizing ALL so-far-conveniently-ignored UN-Resolutions!

10 - ALWAYS(!) DIPLOMACY OVER FORCE!!

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Tenzin in California writes:

Human Rights for Tibetans in Tibet....

Also, Human Rights for our Chinese brothers and sisters in China.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Chester in Nebraska writes:

Correction in my previous comment.

If that is not done there can be no peace process.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Chester in Nebraska writes:

The top priority should be finding peace between Israel/Palestine.

President Obama, we need to step in and set the boundaries between Israel and Palestine. Israel needs to withdraw all checkpoints and settlements in Palestine in order for a peace process to take place. If that is done there can be no peace process. Let the Palestinians choose who is to be their leaders and let us try and work with whoever they may choose rather than condemning them.

These impediments include the assumption, implicit in Israel's occupation policy, that if no peace agreement is reached, the "default setting" of UN Security Council Resolution 242 is the indefinite continuation of Israel's occupation. If this reading were true, the resolution would actually be inviting an occupying power that wishes to retain its adversary's territory to do so simply by means of avoiding peace talks -- which is exactly what Israel has been doing. In fact, the introductory statement to Resolution 242 declares that territory cannot be acquired by war, implying that if the parties cannot reach agreement, the occupier must withdraw to the status quo ante: that, logically, is 242's default setting. Had there been a sincere intention on Israel's part to withdraw from the territories, surely forty years should have been more than enough time in which to reach an agreement.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Maureen in California writes:

With the new Administration, our unconditional support of Israel should be reexamined to recognize the humanitarian crisis in Palestine and our responsibility for this tragedy. The following actions need to be taken immediately to initiate this change:
- The U.S. should cease to automatically veto U.N. resolutions involving Israel.
- At least one half of the $3 billion in U.S. military aid for Israel should instead be directed to rebuild the damage and destruction caused by Israel in Gaza.

The humanitarian condition of the Palestinian civilians in Gaza is tragic and must be improved. The U.S. should not stand by and let Israel continue to force the Palestinian civilians to live in sub-human conditions. Continuing aid to Israel should be conditioned on providing basic needs, food, fuel and health care, for the innocent Palestinians.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

TNS in California writes:

Free Tibet and we will unclench our fists.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Yolanda in California writes:

Human rights in Tibet.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Anna in Washington, DC writes:

1. We must make sure that nuclear and chemical weapons do not fall into the hands of rogue states or terrorist groups. We should also focus on the proliferation of small arms.

2. Continue America's position as a leader in the global fight against HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases. Do more to let the American people know how they can help fight these diseases.

3. Afghanistan and Pakistan.

4. China. Maintain good relations while remembering that China seeks world dominance and like all nations will act in its own best interests. Work with China on North Korea.

5. Darfur. Never again!

6. Mexico and Canada. Remember our neighbors! We must be respectful to both of these nations. They are our partners and friends in many areas. The drug war in Mexico is escalating. Look at Tijuana. What is happening in Mexico has a more direct impact for us than what is happening in a lot of places that the U.S. has made foreign policy priorities in the past.

7. Work with NATO more. Support NATO as a strong Western alliance.

8. Push forward the two state solution for Israel and Palestine, but continue to support Israel's right to statehood and its security.

As others have said, this is just a start! Our prayers are with you, President Obama and Secretary Clinton. We are glad to have you here!

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Amanda in West Virginia writes:

@ Jonathan in Texas: You have a wonderful grasp of what Tuesday January 20, 2009 means to many people in this country. The negativity that arose during the election was fear. Fear of the unknown. The filth and hatred that has spewed from the dark corners of this nation are all based on ignorance. Unfortunately, much of that ignorance was fueled by some media outlets, such as Fox News. Fortunately for us and the world, the truth prevailed and Hope won. The night of Obama's acceptance speach, I watched my young son sleep through tears, knowing that opportunites unknown are now putty in his hands.

As for foreign policies: I believe that we need to reevaluate our many free-trade agreements as not all are in America's best interest. Companies have too much incentive to leave our soil for cheaper work and pay no penalties bringing their products back in.

Recognize Taiwan. It is the will of the people that we should acknowledge, not the angry fist of China.

Help Tibet free itself from that same angry fist.

Do not abandon Israel but at the same time, stop giving unquestioned support. We should be promoting peace, if Israel is not willing to live side by side with Palestine peacefully, they must pay the consequence.

There are many more but these are all I can come up with while at work :)

Much respect to Mr. Obama and Madame Secretary Clinton. May peace be with us all.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Dexter in Florida writes:

Make Georgia an active member of NATO to make Russia show their true face and agenda. Also provide Georgia with advanced medical technology and establish a forwarding location to send medical aid to countries in Africa suffering from desease and mal-nutrition.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Magdalena in Uruguay writes:

President of the Unites States of America, Mr Barack Obama, Congratulations! Now the world has renewed hopes of CHANGES not only in your country, but what YOU CAN do for the world, in which we ALL live and our children will inherit.

As we are confronted with the reality of the MULTIPLE signs of our PLANET being gravely ill, I would ask you to become also an EXAMPLE to other leaders of the world, in addressing the issues of what is causing the GLOBAL WARMING. With your wisdom and gifted ways of addressing people with the TRUTH, the world would listen to YOU. What an opportunity to BE HEARD and make a difference, in regard to the scientists' and Mr Gore's warnings. The oceans are already showing the ACIDITY that KILLS the corals, hence the fish and other events which eventually will affect all other creatures in a very sad way. Even the whales are already DYING, in Australia and in South America. Besides, the glaciers are melting in a dangerous manner -what will bring other harsh consequences to us ALL.

With respect, I put my trust in you, wishing you the very best in your endeavours and in every good thing you set your mind to achieve.

God bless you and your family. Best regards from this hopeful Uruguayan & new Australian.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Marianne in Florida writes:

Renew our respect in ourselves as a fair and peace loving people.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Harolynne in Greece writes:

I really hope that the US will now truly be a BALANCED partner in achieving Middle East peace. That means talking to and with Hamas as well as Fatah, the Israeli and other Arab governments in the region.

This will help keep us safe.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Hobbs in California writes:

Restore pride of being American again President Obama, get Osama with Pakistan people's help not government pressure, restore trust and respect in South America, encourage not bully China towards better human rights, expect progress to be slow, France wants a role, encourage it and have them mediate the Iran talks, embrace Russia without patronizing, give them due respect and economical incentives to move forward, France Russia and China are the key to Iran Syria and Lebanon, recognize Iran's eagerness to play a role and channel it towards a responsible & accountable one, world peace is amazingly within reach if Israel's delinquency is no longer blindly encouraged, America and Israel are better off recognizing the legitimacy of resistance to occupation which ends naturally by ending occupation, vs. labeling all as terrorists, a stronger United Nations means less need to use American military, bandage soft power through justice and philanthropy.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Dhondup in Bhutan writes:

All the best for the New American Administration.

As the most powerful nation on earth, its foreign policy must be conducted with compassion, humility and diplomacy aimed at helping every man kind in general and those in captivity in particular without consideration for political and economic expediance.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Tenzin in California writes:

President Obama opens a new and dynamic chapter in our history. As a Tibetan-American, I am very proud to witness this unprecendented event in our country. Relating to the question posed, I would strongly request our new President and his administration to elevate Tibetan issue in their top priorities.

I am very aware of the President's great respect and admiration for His Holiness the Dalai Lama and his nonviolent approach to address international issues including the Sino-Tibetan issues. I also know that many in his new cabinet share the same admiration and support for His Holiness the Dalai Lama's approach to resolve the issues.

Since 2001 his envoys and the Chinese counterparts met eight times to date but yielded no substantive outcome. Tibet has been under the Communist China's occupation for 50 years and more repressive policies have been implemented in Tibet to attack the person of His Holiness, the undisputed secular and political leader of the Tibetan people both inside and outside Tibet, and undermine the Tibetan identity, language, religion and culture. Tibetans are not only lacking in basic human rights but also under virtual military surveillance and crackdown.

Most importantly, the United States of America can make the Tibetan issue a top priority and ACTIVELY MEDIATE Sino-Tibetan dialogues leading to a genuine autonomy for the entire regions of Tibet to preserve the rich Tibetan civilization and save the endangered Tibetans. Time is of essence because the Dalai Lama is in advanced age and after him Tibet may erupt into violence due to hopelessness and become an unsolvable issue. That would be most unfortunate for all parties concerned. It is not late to save Tibet right now. We shall over come Tibetan issue. We should tell China to live and let live Tibetans giving them a genuine autonomy as Tibetans have presented in their recent memorandum.

Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009

Timothy in Ohio writes:

The top foreign policy objective of the United States, after ending the War in Iraq and reconfiguring the War in Afghanistan, is to reestablish the United States' diplomatic credibility around the world. We must work to regain old alliances that were broken during the Iraq War and strive to create new ones with countries whos alliance was once thought to be out of the question. Secretary Clinton is more than qualified to fulfill this object. I have full faith in her and our newly instated President and Vice President. Together, they can ensure a safer and more diplomatic United States of America and help restore our image around the globe.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Monda in the U.S.A. writes:

Congratulations, Madame Secretary. I wish you all the best in your new challenging job. And I am very confident you have what it takes. As a long time supporter of yours, it was with pride that I watched you today in your new home.

As far as foreign policy objective, I think the priority ought to be peace in the Middle East. To be able to achieve other goals in the region, the two state solution has to be the lasting foundation of a new era for that region (and in our best interest.) At the same time, a new dialogue has to start with Syria. Israel-Syria negotiations (through Turkey) have to go on (interrupted because of the Gaza situation.) It looks like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan are "re-aligned" into challenging/balancing Iran's power in the region. If we could break the Iran-Syria marriage of convenience, it would be to our advantage. Please finish what President Clinton started at Camp David.

... and yes, you can, Madame Secretary.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Teresa in California writes:

There has to be an organized approach to responding to and dealing with radicalized Muslims. The two new envoys, Holbrook and Mitchell are actually going to be working on the same problem but from different angles.

It will take time for the world to believe us as honest brokers, but as time moves on our influence to do good will grow.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Kathy in Connecticut writes:

Congratulations Madame Secretary,

I will say what might seem obvious, but it should be peace in the Middle East. The fighting has gone on long enough.

I do like what Secretary Clinton said today about diplomacy and development. Specifically, I do see development as the lever to world peace. We do need to help developing nations and we do need to become a nation of peace and not a nation of war, which I fear is hohw the world sees us.

An issue which is also closer to me personally is the situation in Cyprus. It has gone on for far too long and the island needs to be united.

My prayers and hopes are with the administration.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Jeri in Maryland writes:

This is very Cool, by the way!

I believe that the Obama Administration needs to re-establish our place in the world above all else. The last 8 years have been an era of flexing muscles rather than leading by example. America lost a lot of respect in the international community.

Clearly getting our troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan while still maintaining peace and integrity in those nations is key!

Peace in the middle east is always a wonderful goal - these countries have been battling since time began. Any small successes in the middle east would be a step in the right direction.

Developing and redeveloping relationships with countries and leaders throughout the world so that we can participate in dialogue about to resolve world hunger, poverty, abuse and health issues TOGETHER!

Thanks for asking!

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Dave in North Carolina writes:

Resolving the Israel/Palestine question. President Obama's decision to contact most of the regional key players on the first day was a good start but the United States has to answer two important questions. 1) Can we be an impartial broker between Israel and Palestine and, 2) do we really respect democracy? Until we can learn to discern the difference between constructive criticism and anti-Semitism we are hobbled... and Israel knows it. And, as for democracy, a cornerstone of our foreign policy since the end of World War II, if we truly respect the will of the people then we have to respect their bad decisions as well as their good. That includes acknowledging Hamas whether we find them detestable or not. If we can address these two important issues we can help Israel and Palestine forge a real and lasting peace. That is, of course, if that's what we really want for both of them.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Karma in North Carolina writes:

The Obama Presidency represents hope for the hopeless and justice for unjust. People around the world have great expectation from the new U.S. administration. One of the issues in the world today that has great potential for world peace is the Tibetan struggle. I would like to request President Obama and Secretary, Hilary Clinton to urge the Chinese leaders to enter into substantive negotiation with the Dalai Lama's representatives on the Memorandum the Exile Tibetan Administration has handed over to the Chinese leadership.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Tenzing in Canada writes:

"To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history; but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist"

With these words, I sincerely hope that President Obama will not forgot a distant people struggle for their Identity, Freedom and Human Rights.We the Tibetan people in exile and in Tibet hope that the President will play an active diplomatic role in resolving the Tibet issue.At the same time not being intimidated by a powerful China that freedom and human rights are pushed under the table.

As many nations continue to cave into kowtowing China for the benefit of trade and investment, I urge Pr.Obama to not forgot its ideal of freedom and human rights in any dealing with China.'change' must come by following its true meaning.Therefore, I personally have a great hope that the Obama Administration will play a positive and 'genuine' role in bringing peace and 'genuine autonomy' in Tibet.

"YES U CAN MISTER PRESIDENT "

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Amy in Washington, DC writes:

Bring back soft power! Our failed policies have bred a generation of extremeists with some valid reasons to hate America-- let's change that before it is too late.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Dennis in New York writes:

Autonomy for Tibet.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Julie in Illinois writes:

Perhaps you could use American workers and technology in a combined foreign policy/economic program.

You have Gaza which was devastated by the war, for example, which is totally dependent on Israel for all of its energy needs. Couldn't they use wind or solar power?

President Obama went to the plant where they build wind turbines and talked about how it's our future. Why not the future of others as well?.

How about offering Americans who are willing to go overseas to work in countries affected by wars or natural disasters, a job, using the bailout money, that would allow us to do service overseas, tax-free (as we give Blackwater employees to wage war, and as we gave people working the oil fields in Saudi Arabia in the 80's) to help rebuild these countries.

In addition, send over people that can assess the likelihood that alternative energy would work in their countries and offer our companies as a source for these new initiatives.

It would create jobs here, expand businesses, allow Americans to put on the best face of America and work with people of other cultures - building a mutual understanding for the future, give people who want to go overseas, as I would, the opportunity (because now you pretty much have to have a degree in International Studies to get a job with and aid agency - which is nonsense), and overall would show the world what America is all about.

Additionally, people who do this would come back with new skills and possibly ideas for new businesses.

Mother Theresa did a lot of good, and she didn't have experience in logistics or politics. She just did unto others as she would have them do unto her. She learned as she went along, as do all missionaries, journalists, and others who go overseas to conflict zones.

Just a thought.

Good luck.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

John in New York writes:

The topic priorities of this great country should be to give voice for those groups of people whose non-violence struggle for their freedom have been ignored. I know former President Clinton detached human rights issues from business deals with countries like China during his term. Make human rights issue as number one issue when it comes to talk with repressive regimes. And distribute the wealth of American liberty around the world. Yes you the Mr. President can do it.

Yes I believe in that change.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Dean in Illinois writes:

I think that Mrs. Clinton should work to re-establish the aura of the American. When I last traveled in Germany (after living there for several years) I was appaled that the people there had a exceptionally bad image of the american policies and of the Bush Administration. they remained in love with the americans as people but our impage had been terribly tarnished. I'd go out of my way to help in this if needed. It is the reason that we can no longer work economically or socially as well with our frienly nations as in the past.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Karma Z. in Virginia writes:

Among the top piorities for the new Secretary of Sate, Hillary, which might get brushed aside, but which should not be ignored is the question of Tibet under China. If real peace has any chance, it must begin from the roof of the world, Tibet, which has suffered so much under the tyranny of Communism. If President Obama is truly committed to peace and freedom in the world, he must turn a new page in Sino-U.S.A. relations, and challange Hu Jintao to sit and talk with the Dalai Lama.

America, the world is looking at you, but I want the president to take China to task on Tibet..... Mr. President open a U.S. consulate in Lhasa..... Ask the Dalai Lama what he really really want, and whether what he has been advocating is what the people of want...... This naturalized Tibetan-American is ready to serve your administration in any capacity..... All you have to do is let me know.

Best of luck.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Rajesh in Washington, DC writes:

I appeal to Obama administration to look far into the future and not to be overwhelmed by immediate problems. Recognize the dangers of Rising China. China's communist government poses the GREATEST threat to the supremacy of American powers. Chinese people are being kept in the dark and just take the example of censorship of President Obama's inaugural speech. China's leaders provide only selective information to the Chinese public. This is dangerous. As and when they want, they feed the people wrong information and raise their ugly nationalist feelings. Taming of China should be LONG term policy. It is bad for more than one billion chinese people and rest of the world. Monitoring Chinese agents in the country is very important.

Good luck to new administration.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Jim in Virginia writes:

The new adminsitration should seize the opportunity offered by this transition of power to reestablish our leadership position in the world. To do this, the administration should seek to reopen civil dialogues with our many multi-national partners and the various international organizations that exist. This approach will require an increase in both personnel and funding authorizations for the Department of State and the U.S. Agency for International Development.

Clearly there are significant challenges in every region of the world. While all are important, the administration cannot be driven to knee-jerk responses based upon video clips on the evening news. Rather, they should conduct a thorough review of vital U.S. interests and objectives, develop priorities and allocate resources. As has been demonstrated over the past 8 years, we cannot solve all of the world's problems on our own.

In summary, rebuild our shattered alliances and relations, enhance our diplomatic arms and conduct a sober assessment of where we can make a difference, then allocate the resources to address these situations.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Chand in New York writes:

The Obama Administration should make Human Rights in China a top priority. China is the biggest country in the world and how can we ethically and morally deal with them if they cannot treat their own citizens humanely? And most importantly, the Administration should make Tibet the top priority in this China dialogue. Tibetans have been brutally tortured and repressed for 50 years now and as the worlds leader, President Obama should not allow this to be taking place.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Tenzin in Washington writes:

In the light of recent repression in Tibet which killed many Tibetans and thousand went missing,
1. release all the Tibetan political prisoner.
2. Since Tibetan are not seeking independence, China must be pressed to give the geniune autonomy to practice their religion freely and protect their cultural heritage.
3. Release the Panchen Lama and tulku Tenzin delek.
4. Stop all the illegal mining and deforestation in Tibet
5. Remove all the police post from Tibetan monasteries.
6. stop forcing Tibetan manks to reeducation.
7. urge Chinese government to invite Dalai lama to Tibet and China as soon as possible.
lastly, regulate and thoroughly inspect all the products (made in China) that are coming to U.S. to avoid all those painful recent memories.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Norbu in New York writes:

The Tibetan issue!

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Nima in Washington, DC writes:

The Obama administration should prioritize a resolution to the Tibet issue.

Tibetans have the right to self-determination, in accordance with UN resolutions and international law.

The U.S. should support Tibetans in their quest for freedom and human rights because (i) it is the right thing to do, (ii) it advances U.S. goals and ideals, and (iii) it sends a message to other disaffected groups that nonviolence can resolve difficult problems.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Julie in Illinois writes:

In light of the recent incursion into Gaza, and the huge loss of life of the Palestinians, not to mention Amnesty Internationale's confirmation of the use of white phosphorous bombs in densely populated civilian areas, I suggest the following steps be taken to assist in establishing a lasting peace in Israel/Palestine.

1. Insist the blockade be lifted to allow humanitarian aid and items intrinsic to economic survival into Palestine immediately
2. Immediately halt the building of all settlements and begin the dismantling of all "outposts"
3. Immediately investigate whether the using of phosphorous bombs in civilian areas is a violation of the Arms Export Control Act and punish accordingly if it is.
4. Immediately work to engage Hamas and Fatah and get them on the same page - without both entities, there will never be peace
5. Immediately get assurances from both Hamas and Fatah that any violations of the ceasefire by militants on either side will result in arrests and trial in accordance with the Palestinian Constitution not tribal law
6. Freeze all aid and arms shipments to Israel until significant progress has been made towards the first two points
7. Engage the international community to provide security for the checkpoints and remove all access requests from Israeli control
8. Put the international community in charge of determining what aid gets into Gaza. It should not be an Israeli decision as they state they are no longer "occupying" the country.
9. Send Americans into Gaza to determine what aid we could provide to rebuild their country and help their people. I would suggest evaluating the role wind and solar power could play in the rebuilding process, so they are no longer completely dependent on fuel and electricity from Israel
10. Engage the Palestinian and Israeli business communities as they have the most at stake and are the best able to assist in rebuilding decisions

Also, the United States should immediately sign and ratify the Landmine Treaty and the Cluster Bomb Treaty and insist that Israel, our ally, do the same.

These are simple and fair steps to take to ensure that we are seen as honest brokers of peace. Blindly backing Israel, no matter what tey do, is never going to result in peace for them or a settling of the Palestinian issue.

It will also be a boon for our national security as our blind backing of Israel, a nuclear power that refuses to admit it has nuclear weapons, is seem by terror groups as a justification for their actions and is used as a recruiting tool.

I certainly hope we see a change in our policy towards Israel. Their actions have caused us most of the problems we have in the Middle East.

As for talking to terrorists, I think we discovered in Northern Ireland that without the UDP and th IRA on board, what peace there is would never have been achieved.

Learn a lesson from history. No war has ever ended without ALL parties involved in the peace.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Terrance in Missouri writes:

Issue 1. Palestinean State. Without a state there will be no peace between Israel and the Palestineans. Without this peace, there will be instability throughout the middle east. The entire public of the Arab and Persian worlds are tied into this issue. Solve the issue and there is no other central issue to consolidate middle eastern support against the U.S. The flow of oil is essential to the health of the global economy which we are a part of......Israel drains funding from us, produces nothing we require. If they are hindering the process...drop them from the friends and allies list....

2. Solve the Iranian-Nuclear issue. With the Palestinean issue unresolved and Israel suggesting they have WMD with the means and doctrine to use it....that instability within the security environment of the middle east. There is no counterbalance to Israel's power. Not sure how to end this issue...Israel destroys their WMD, allow another nation-state to counterbalance Israel, or we extend our nuclear umbrella to protect middle eastern nations if Israel were to initiate hostilities with WMD. From a security perspective of a have - not...the situation is not acceptable.

3. Keep North Korea in the box. Follow the path the U.S. has followed through numeerous administrations (regardless of party) until they implode or agree to become part of South Korea. Work the issue so it is a soft implode with preparations for global humanitarian support.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Ursula in Washington writes:

The comments already made on this topic reflect the wide range of daunting foreign policy and national security challenges that the Obama administration will need to tackle. To meet them, they will need to marshal substantial resources, and one of the most powerful is international education. It is through international education that we can establish a lasting foundation for dialogue and partnership with the rest of the world and create the conditions for lasting global peace, security, and well-being. As the Obama administration charts the challenging course of restoring America?s global reputation and extending a hand of partnership around the world, it should act decisively to elevate international education and exchange as a priority. There are a few key ways to do this: by ensuring that more Americans have an opportunity to study abroad -- deepening our cross-cultural awareness, foreign-language ability and international skills is an imperative in dealing with today's global problems; by restoring America's welcome to foreign students and scholars from around the world ? these are the next generation of foreign leaders, teachers, and innovators; and by strengthening international exchange and volunteer-service programs like the Peace Corps. For much more on this topic, see a report issued by NAFSA: Association of International Educators on public diplomacy: http://www.nafsa.org/pdpaper08

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Miranda in Illinois writes:

A brief note--my area of study is the Middle East, so my suggestions will be biased toward that area. Iraq policy seems to be already on a path, and I don't know enough about Afghanistan to discuss it, so those obvious issues will be set aside.

The obvious one is Israel-Palestine. Beyond resolution of the conflict itself, as many have noted, the international perception that Israel is the tail wagging the U.S.'s dog has only grown in recent years; this can be alleviated both by a shift in American policy toward Israel (away from such blatant partisanship and more toward a mediating role) and by a new American willingness to engage--cautiously--with Israel's enemies.

The recent abdication (relatively speaking) of American hegemony in the region has begun to give rise to new, local mediators in the form of Turkey and Qatar. This should be encouraged, and the State department should coordinate with these countries where appropriate and beneficial. If the desire really is to have a functioning, self-ruling Middle East, rather than a continuation of colonial dependencies and resource-driven U.S. authority, then countries in the region will have to be capable of autonomous resolution of international disputes. Furthermore, issues such as Israel's continued occupation of the Golan Heights may be more easily resolved through a regional mediator like Turkey than through the U.S., with its baggage on the subject and loaded relationships with both countries.

On a general, philosophical level, the State Department must work to move away from the "clash of civilizations" perspective that has often dominated American conversations about the GWOT and the Arab World.

Stepping outside the regional focus, the State Dept. should do what it can to encourage the emergence of similar leaders in Africa. This phenomenon sort of exists (South Africa), but these countries are so embattled in their own development struggles that it is difficult for them to look far outside their borders. It may be (I have neither the data nor the econometric skills to prove this, but Paul Collier probably would have something to say about it) that investing in countries that are closer to the brink of prosperity, in the hopes that they can begin to spread progress or at least intervene in tragedy around their neighborhood, proves to be the highest-yield investment.

Finally, human trafficking is an under-discussed and ignored phenomenon around the world. I would speculate (in fact, I am speculating) that many of the loopholes that make this practice possible are potentially very convenient for terrorists and arms smugglers, and that attention to the issue could be beneficial from a human rights perspective, a defense perspective, and a development perspective.

Good luck!

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Bhuchung in Virginia writes:

As a proud Tibetan American I welcome Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. I believe there is an opportunity for the Obama Administration to show to the American people and the international community that the United States can play its rightful role as the leader of the world, with dignity and respect.

In terms of foreign policy priorities, I would hope that we will strongly support H.H. the Dalai Lama's initiative for a peaceful resolution of the Tibetan problem. Tibet is my country of origin and I care about its fate. I know that Secretary Clinton cares about Tibet, too. We need to see more concerted effort from the United States. I am glad that the Obama Administration "will work to ensure that China plays by international rules." We need to see that in action on Tibet.

I wish Secretary Clinton all success.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Thomas in Tennessee writes:

In addition to replacing the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan with peace, the top objectives of the Obama Administration should be:

* Working to create a lasting peace between Israel and Palestine.
* Working to create a lasting peace between India and Pakistan regarding Kashmir.
* Working to resolve the continuing crisis in Darfur.
* Supporting and strengthening democratic institutions in Africa, Latin America, and Eastern Europe as an alternative to pre-emptive war.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Fred F. in New York writes:

1. Over a decade of engagement has not resulted in better relations with, or a less dangerous North Korea. The new Administration should push for the collapse of the North Korean Government or at the very least stop talking with them. No good can come from negotiations with these thugs. Not during Bush's term. Not during Clinton's either.

2. The U.S. should formally recognize Taiwan.

3. Stop giving Russia about $1 billion in aid each year.

4. Stop stepping in to aid every nation's population. That is their own Government's responsibility. If the government fail in this responsibility (like Zimbabwe) then their leaders should be pursued in the International courts or other...

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

REG in the United Kingdom writes:

The United States of America should embrace and commit to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as the basis for diplomatic initiatives relating to Palestine and Israel.

Of particular relevance is Article 2:

"Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in
this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race,
colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion,
national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the
political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or
territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent,
trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of
sovereignty."

As well as Article 7:

"All are equal before the law and are entitled without any
discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to
equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this
Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination."

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Zach in Georgia writes:

I'm a 17 year old high school student who has been working as an abolitionist since I was 12. I believe it is time to end our toleration of the sale of human beings. The abolition of modern day slavery must be a priority of the Department of State and every branch of the U.S. government. It should be considered as we evaluate our trade partners, designate funds for local community initiatives and it should be a priority for U.S. based corporations. Hundreds of thousands of students around the world have joined me in the fight against slavery through Loose Change to Loosen Chains and we have raised more than a half a million dollars to prevent slavery, rescue the enslaved and help them begin their new lives. I hope the Obama Administration will join us in the fight.

I have also launched an effort called Generation Change to help other students scale up their efforts to improve the world. This includes mobilizing students to fight malaria, bring fresh water to Africa, increase the literacy rate in America, help the homeless and sick in our communities and fight for the rights of women and children around the globe. We are the someone and today is the day!

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Alforhil in Florida writes:

Hillary ! Welcome to state department. Wish you the best and hope you will help forge better relations amongs nations around the world.

I hope you will tackle pakistan as one of the major threats to its neighbours, and the major breeding ground for terrorists. Please DO NOT put any stock on ISI. They created Taliban and they have been on a mission of hatred to destabilise both India and Afganisthan. Please examine the close nexus on ISI and chinese interests. Please make this among your top priority along with trying to bring some sort of peace to palestine and israel. Appeasing or legitimizing hamaz or hezbollah is not going to do it for sure..

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Andrew in the United Kingdom writes:

The first priority should be the reigning in of Russia -- probably by aiding Europe in gaining more autonomy in energy policy.

The second should be pressure Israel into realising that it is a tiny country almost completely surrounded by larger countries that it has angered and humiliated for 40+ years. Only when Israel recognises the reality of its own situation will it begin to adopt a Realpolitik and negotiate with its neighbours and others on realistic terms. As it is, the U.S.A. props it up whenever propping is needed, and the results are not good for anyone, not even for Israel, which someday must cut the umbilical cord that ties it to the U.S.

Third, the U.S.A. should as quickly as possible adopt clear, simple, and fair immigration procedures that recognise the value of immigrants to the U.S.A. and that recognise that the U.S.A. is still the most desirable destination in the world. If we are serious about exporting the American Dream, we can start by importing people who already dream it and now want to achieve it. As it is, our policies are too often self-contrdictory, almost always arbitrary, many-times cruel, and generally do nothing to improve the reputation of the U.S.A. around the world.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Sylvanna in New York writes:

Mexico is a growing problem day by day. Not only for the people living inside of Mexico in fear, but also for the U.S.A. who is of course its northern neighbor. I am half Mexican, the majority of my family lives in a small mountain town that has recently be overrun with drug gangs...and I am therefore very close to the situation by way of weekly phone calls. Something must be done to help establish democratic rule throughout that will work to eradicate the drug cartels and rampant corruption that threatens not only the daily lives of Mexicans and foreigners living and visiting Mexico, but also its neighboring countries.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Bob in Kansas writes:

Reform the United Nations so that it no longer ignores the plight of oppressed people around the world. There is no excuse for the UN's lack of action in the Sudan and Burma, for example.

Posted on Thu Jan 22, 2009

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 Next