skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 166316  
Title: Justice, Democracy, and Impunity in Post-Genocide Rwanda: Searching for Solutions to Impossible Problems
Journal: Criminal Law Forum  Volume:7  Issue:3  Dated:(1996)  Pages:523-560
Author(s): W A Schabas
Publication Date: 1996
Pages: 38
Type: Legislation/policy analysis
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: Rwanda's experience in prosecuting genocide may form a new chapter in the area of impunity; the country has rejected more conciliatory approaches, such as an amnesty or a truth commission, and seems determined to try the more than 87,000 suspects in custody and to punish those who are found guilty.
Abstract: Rwanda's judicial system, however, is not capable of responding to the challenge. Given the number of judges, prosecutors, and courthouses, most suspects now in custody may die of old age before they ever get to court. Rwanda's National Assembly adopted legislation in August 1996 to deal with genocide and crimes against humanity committed between October 1990 and December 1994. The country began to try genocide suspects in late December 1996. Some of the first trials were marred by the absence of defense counsel and impetuous refusals by trial judges to grant adjournments so the accused could find lawyers or otherwise prepare their cases. In cases where defense counsel was present, hearings were more acceptable from a human rights standpoint and provided Rwanda's judicial system with a model on which to base future prosecutions. Some observers from the international media and the diplomatic corps were initially critical of the trials, but much of this dissatisfaction actually resulted from unfamiliarity with the inquisitorial system. Conditions of detention in Rwandan prisons and the International Criminal Tribunal established by the United Nations Security Council for Rwanda are discussed. 107 footnotes
Main Term(s): World criminology
Index Term(s): Ethnic groups ; Genocide ; Human rights violations ; Crime in foreign countries ; Foreign correctional facilities ; Politically motivated violent crimes ; Foreign criminal justice systems ; Foreign courts ; Foreign judicial systems ; Prison conditions ; Foreign offenders ; War crimes ; Africa
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=166316

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder