You Are Here: AHRQ Home > Clinical Information > EPC Evidence Reports > Total Knee Replacement (continued)

Total Knee Replacement

Summary (continued)

References

1. Orthopedic Network News. 2002 hip and knee implant review. CMS MedPar. Available at: www.OrthopedicNetworkNews.com. Accessed 9/8/03.

2. Acheson RM, Collart AB. New Haven survey of joint diseases. XVII. Relationship between some systemic characteristics and osteoarthrosis in a general population. Ann Rheum Dis 1975;34(5):379-87.

3. Peyron JG. Osteoarthritis. The epidemiologic viewpoint. Clin Orthop 1986;213:13-9.

4. Callahan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA, et al. Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. A meta-analysis postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. JAMA 1994;271(17):1349-57.

5. Tierney WM, Fitzgerald JF, Heck D, et al. Tricompartmental knee replacement: A comparison of orthopaedic surgeons' self reported performance rates with surgical indications, intraindications, and expected outcomes. Clin Orthop 1994;305:209-17.

6. Wright JG, Coyte P, Hawker G, et al. Variation in orthopedic surgeons' perceptions for and outcomes of knee replacement. Can Med Assoc J 1995;152:687-97.

7. Mancuso CA, Ranawat CS, Esdaile JM, et al. Indications for total hip and total knee arthroplasties. Results of orthopaedic surveys. J Arthroplasty 1996;11(1):34-46.

8. Coyte PC, Hawker G, Croxford R, et al. Variation in rheumatologists' and family physicians' perceptions of the indications for and outcomes of knee replacement surgery. J Rheumatol 1996;23(4):730-8.

9. Wright JG, Hawker GA, Bombardier C, et al. Physician enthusiasm as an explanation for area variation in the utilization of knee replacement surgery. Med Care 1999;37(9):946-56.

10. Malmlin LA, Melfi CA, Parchman ML, et al. Management of osteoarthritis of the knee by primary care physicians. Arch Fam Med 1998;7:563-7.

11. Bachmeier C, March L, Cross M, et al. A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001;9(2):137-46.

12. Baldwin J, Rubinstein RA Jr. The effect of bone quality on the outcome of ingrowth total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 1996;9(2):45-9; discussion 9-50.

13. Beaupre L, Davies D, Jones C, et al. Exercise combined with continuous passive motion or slider board therapy compared with exercise only: a randomized controlled trial of patients following total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther 2001;81(4):1029-37.

14. Bert J, Gross M, Kline C. Patient demand matching in total knee arthroplasty: is it necessary? Am J Knee Surg 2001;14(1):39-42.

15. Bert J, Gross M, Kline C. Outcome results after total knee arthroplasty: does the patient's physical and mental health improve? Am J Knee Surg 2000;13(4):223-7.

16. Bourne R, Rorabeck C, Vaz M, et al. Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella during total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1995;(321):156-61.

17. Brown T, Diduch D, Moskal J. Component size asymmetry in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 2001;14(2):81-4.

18. Bullens P, van Loon C, de Waal Malefijt M, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty 2001;16(6):740-7.

19. Saleh KJ, Radosevich DM, Kassim RA, et al. Comparison of commonly used orthopaedic outcome measures using palm-top computers and paper surveys. J Orthop Res 2002;20(6):1146-51.

20. Cloutier J, Sabouret P, Deghrar A. Total knee arthroplasty with retention of both cruciate ligaments. A 9 to 11 year follow-up study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2001;11(1):41-6.

21. Cohen R, Forrest C, Benjamin J. Safety and efficacy of bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997;12(5):497-502.

22. Deshmukh R, Hayes J, Pinder I. Does body weight influence outcome after total knee arthroplasty? A 1-year analysis. J Arthroplasty 2002;17(3):315-9.

23. Diduch D, Insall J, Scott W, et al. Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79(4):575-82.

24. Duffy G, Berry D, Rand J. Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1998; (356):66-72.

25. Elke R, Meier G, Warnke K, et al. Outcome analysis of total knee-replacements in patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus osteoarthritis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1995;114(6):330-4.

26. Evanich C, Tkach T, von Glinski S, et al. 6- to 10-year experience using countersunk metal-backed patellas. J Arthroplasty 1997;12(2):149-54.

27. Ewald F, Wright R, Poss R, et al. Kinematic total knee arthroplasty: a 10- to 14-year prospective follow-up review. J Arthroplasty 1999;14(4):473-80.

28. Fortin P, Clarke A, Joseph L, et al. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42(8):1722-8.

29. Gill G, Joshi A. Long-term results of cemented, posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. Am J Knee Surg 2001;14(4):209-14.

30. Gill G, Joshi A, Mills D. Total condylar knee arthroplasty. 16- to 21-year results. Clin Orthop 1999;(367):210-5.

31. Gioe T, Bowman K. A randomized comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components. Clin Orthop 2000;(380):108-15.

32. Griffin F, Scuderi G, Insall J, et al. Total knee arthroplasty in patients who were obese with 10 years followup. Clin Orthop 1998;(356):28-33.

33. Harwin S. Patellofemoral complications in symmetrical total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1998;13(7):753-62.

34. Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, et al. Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80(2):163-73.

35. Hasegawa M, Ohashi T, Uchida A. Heterotopic ossification around distal femur after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002;122(5):274-8.

36. Healy W, Iorio R, Ko J, et al. Impact of cost reduction programs on short-term patient outcome and hospital cost of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A(3):348-53.

37. Heck D, Robinson R, Partridge C, et al. Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1998;(356):93-110.

38. Hsu R, Tsai Y, Huang T, et al. Hybrid total knee arthroplasty: a 3- to 6-year outcome analysis. J Formos Med Assoc 1998;97(6):410-5.

39. Hube R, Sotereanos N, Reichel H. The midvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol 2002;10(3):235-44.

40. Ikejiani C, Leighton R, Petrie D. Comparison of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Can J Surg 2000;43(1):35-8.

41. Indelli P, Aglietti P, Buzzi R, et al. The Insall-Burstein II prosthesis: A 5- to 9-year follow-up study in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty 2002;17(5):544-9.

42. Jenny J, Jenny G. Preservation of anterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998;118(3):145-8.

43. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, et al. The effect of age on pain, function, and quality of life after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arch Intern Med 2001;161(3):454-60.

44. Jordan L, Olivo J, Voorhorst P. Survivorship analysis of cementless meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1997;(338):119-23.

45. Kiebzak G, Campbell M, Mauerhan D. The SF-36 general health status survey documents the burden of osteoarthritis and the benefits of total joint arthroplasty: But why should we use it? Am J Managed Care 2002;8(5):463-74.

46. Konig A, Kirschner S, Walther M, et al. Hybrid total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998;118(1-2):66-9.

47. Konig A, Scheidler M, Rader C, et al. The need for a dual rating system in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1997 Dec;(345):161-7.

48. Larson C, McDowell C, Lachiewicz P. One-peg versus three-peg patella component fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001 Nov;(392):94-100.

49. Lin Y, Su J, Lin G, et al. Impact of a clinical pathway for total knee arthroplasty. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2002;18(3):134-40.

50. Liu T, Chen S. Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty in a single procedure. Int Orthop 1998;22(6):390-3.

51. Lombardi Jr A, Mallory T, Fada R, et al. An algorithm for the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001;(392):75-87.

52. Malkani A, Rand J, Bryan R, et al. Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic condylar prosthesis. A ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 1995;77(3):423-31.

53. Martin S, McManus J, Scott R, et al. Press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. 5- to 9-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1997;12(6):603-14.

54. Matsueda M, Gustilo R. Subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2000;(371):161-8.

55. Meding J, Ritter M, Faris P, et al. Does the preoperative radiographic degree of osteoarthritis correlate to results in primary total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2001;16(1):13-6.

56. Miyasaka K, Ranawat C, Mullaji A. 10- to 20-year followup of total knee arthroplasty for valgus deformities. Clin Orthop 1997;(345):29-37.

57. Mokris J, Smith S, Anderson S. Primary total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis Total Knee Arthroplasty System: 3- to 6-year follow-up study of 105 knees. J Arthroplasty 1997;12(1):91-8.

58. Mont M, Yoon T, Krackow K, et al. Eliminating patellofemoral complications in total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiographic results of 121 consecutive cases using the Duracon system. J Arthroplasty 1999;14(4):446-55.

59. Moskal J, Diduch D. Postoperative radiographs after total knee arthroplasty: a cost-containment strategy. Am J Knee Surg 1998;11(2):89-93.

60. O'Rourke M, Callaghan J, Goetz D, et al. Osteolysis associated with a cemented modular posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee design : five to eight-year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 2002;84-A(8):1362-71.

61. Pereira D, Jaffe F, Ortiguera C. Posterior cruciate ligament-sparing versus posterior cruciate ligament-sacrificing arthroplasty. Functional results using the same prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 1998;13(2):138-44.

62. Ranawat C, Luessenhop C, Rodriguez J. The press-fit condylar modular total knee system. Four-to-six-year results with a posterior-cruciate-substituting design. J Bone Jt Surg Am 1997;79(3):342-8.

63. Rand J, Gustilo B. Comparison of inset and resurfacing patellar prostheses in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 1996;62 (Suppl 1):154-63.

64. Regner L, Carlsson L, Karrholm J, et al. Clinical and radiologic survivorship of cementless tibial components fixed with finned polyethylene pegs. J Arthroplasty 1997;12(7):751-8.

65. Rinta-Kiikka I, Savilahti S, Pajamaki J, et al. A five to seven years follow-up of 102 cementless Synatomic knee arthroplasties. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1996;85(1):77-85.

66. Ritter M, Worland R, Saliski J, et al. Flat-on-flat, nonconstrained, compression molded polyethylene total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1995; Dec(321):79-85.

67. Rodriguez J, Saddler S, Edelman S, et al. Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty in class 3 and 4 rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty 1996;11(2):141-5.

68. Schroder H, Berthelsen A, Hassani G, et al. Cementless porous-coated total knee arthroplasty: 10-year results in a consecutive series. J Arthroplasty 2001;16(5):559-67.

69. Sextro G, Berry D, Rand J. Total knee arthroplasty using cruciate-retaining kinematic condylar prosthesis. Clin Orthop 2001 Jul;388:33-40.

70. Stickles B, Phillips L, Brox W, et al. Defining the relationship between obesity and total joint arthroplasty. Obes Res 2001;9(3):219-23.

71. Title C, Rodriguez J, Ranawat C. Posterior cruciate-sacrificing versus posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: a study of clinical and functional outcomes in matched patients. J Arthroplasty 2001;16(4):409-14.

72. Ververeli P, Sutton D, Hearn S, et al. Continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty. Analysis of cost and benefits. Clin Orthop 1995 Dec;(321):208-15.

73. Worland R, Arredondo J, Angles F, et al. Home continuous passive motion machine versus professional physical therapy following total knee replacement. J Arthroplasty 1998;13(7):784-7.

74. Yang K, Yeo S, Lee B, et al. Total knee arthroplasty in diabetic patients: a study of 109 consecutive cases. J Arthroplasty 2001;16(1):102-6.

75. Saleh KJ, Dykes DC, Tweedie RL, et al. Functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty revision: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2002;17(8):967-77.

76. Gofton WT, Tsigaras H, Butler RA, et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty: fixation with modular stems. Clin Orthop 2002;(404):158-68.

77. Nazarian DG, Mehta S, Booth RE Jr. A comparison of stemmed and unstemmed components in revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2002;(404):256-62.

78. Brooks DH, Fehring TK, Griffin WL, et al. Polyethylene exchange only for prosthetic knee instability. Clin Orthop 2002;(405):182-8.

79. Springer BD, Hanssen AD, Sim FH, et al. The kinematic rotating hinge prosthesis for complex knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001;(392):283-91.

80. Benjamin J, Engh G, Parsley B, et al. Morselized bone grafting of defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001;(392):62-7.

81. Parvizi J, Seel MJ, Hanssen AD, et al. Patellar component resection arthroplasty for the severely compromised patella. Clin Orthop 2002;(397):356-61.

82. Lonner JH, Lotke PA, Kim J, et al. Impaction grafting and wire mesh for uncontained defects in revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2002;(404):145-51.

83. Jones RE, Skedros JG, Chan AJ, et al. Total knee arthroplasty using the S-ROM mobile-bearing hinge prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 2001;16(3):279-87.

84. Christensen CP, Crawford JJ, Olin MD, et al. Revision of the stiff total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002;17(4):409-15.

85. Hanssen AD. Bone-grafting for severe patellar bone loss during revision knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83-A(2):171-6.

86. Babis GC, Trousdale RT, Morrey BF. The effectiveness of isolated tibial insert exchange in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A(1):64-8.

87. Leopold SS, Silverton CD, Barden RM, et al. Isolated revision of the patellar component in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A(1):41-7.

88. Miller M, Benjamin JB, Marson B, et al. The effect of implant constraint on results of conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2002;25(12):1353-7; discussion 1357.

89. Werle JR, Goodman SB, Imrie SN. Revision total knee arthroplasty using large distal femoral augments for severe metaphyseal bone deficiency: a preliminary study. Orthopedics 2002;25(3):325-7.

90. Dunlop DD, Song J, Manheim LM, et al. Racial disparities in joint replacement use among older adults. Med Care 2003;41(2):288-98.

91. Wilson MG, May DS, Kelly JJ. Racial differences in the use of total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis among older Americans. Ethn Dis 1994;4(1):57-67.

92. Escarce JJ, Epstein KR, Colby DC, et al. Racial differences in the elderly's use of medical procedures and diagnostic tests. Am J Public Health 1993;83(7):948-54.

93. Katz B, Freund D, Heck D, et al. Demographic variation in the rate of knee replacement: a multi-year analysis. Health Serv Res 1996;31(2):125-40.

94. Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, et al. Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty.[comment]. N Engl J Med 2000;342(14):1016-22.

95. McBean AM, Gornick M. Differences by race in the rates of procedures performed in hospitals for Medicare beneficiaries. Health Care Financ Rev 1994 Summer;15(4):77-90.

96. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989 Nov;(248):13-4.

97. Alicea J. Scoring systems and their validation for the arthritic knee. In: Insall JN, Churchill SN, eds. Surgery of the Knee, 3rd ed. New York: Livingston; 2001:1507-15.

98. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988;15(12):1833-40.

99. Leclere JR, Gent M, Hirst J, et al. The incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism during and after prophylaxis with enoxaparin: a multi-institutional cohort study of patients who underwent hip or knee arthroplasty. Canadian Collaborative Group. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158(8):873-8.

100. Mauerhan DR, Nelson CL, Smith DL, et al. Prophylaxis against infection in total joint arthroplasty. One day of cefuroxime compared with three days of cefazolin. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994 Jan; 76(1):39-45.

Return to Contents

AHRQ Publication Number 04-E006-1
Current as of December 2003

Internet Citation:

Total Knee Replacement. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 86. AHRQ Publication Number 04-E006-1, December 2003. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/kneesum.htm