Process Test 2

INITIATIVE DEFINITION BY08
Initiative Definition BY08
Template Name	IT Investment BY2008
Investment Name
Investment Revision Number	3
Is this investment a consolidated business case?	No
Point of Contact
Revision Comment
Class	IT
Full UPI Code	000-00-00-00-00-0000-00
PY Full UPI Code	000-00-00-00-00-0000-00-000-000
Four Digit UPI Code	0000
Two Digit UPI Code	00
OMB Investment Type	02 - Non-Major Investment
Budget Cycle Status:	Secretarial Submission
Exhibit 53 Part	IT Investments by Mission Area
OMB Exhibit 53 Major Mission Area
OMB Short Description

I.A: OVERVIEW BY08
Descriptive Information BY08
Date of Submission
Agency	Department of Commerce
Bureau
Name of this Capital Asset
Full UPI Code
What kind of investment will this be in this Budget Year?	Full Acquisition
What was the first budget year this investment was submitted to OMB?
Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this closes in part or in whole an identified agency performance gap:
There is a brief Summary that goes here. (2500 chars)
Screening Questions BY08
Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?	Yes
If "yes," what was the date of this approval?	7/3/2006
Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?	Yes
Contact information of Project Manager?

Project Manager Name
Project Manager Phone Number
Project Manager E-mail
Identify the Product or Program Manager
Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project.	Yes
Will this investment include electronic assets (including computers)?	Yes
Is this investment for new construction or major retrofit of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to non-IT assets only)	Yes
If "yes," is an ESPC or UESC being used to help fund this investment?
If "yes," will this investment meet sustainable design principles?
If "yes," is it designed to be 30% more energy efficient than relevant code?
Does this investment directly support one of the PMA initiatives?	Yes
If "yes," check all of the PMA initiatives that apply:	Broadening Health Insurance Coverage through State Initiatives, Budget Performance Integration, Competitive Sourcing, Coordination of VA and DoD Programs and Systems, Eliminating Improper Payments, Expanded E-Government, Faith Based and Community, Financial Performance, Housing and Urban Development Management and Performance, Human Capital, Privatization of Military Housing, R and D Investment Criteria, Real Property Asset Management, Right Sized Overseas Presence
Briefly describe how this asset directly supports the identified initiative(s)?
Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)? (For more information about the PART, visit www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part.)
Does this investment address a weakness found during the PART Review?
If "yes," what is the name of the PARTed program?
If "yes," what PART rating did it receive?
Is this investment for information technology?	Yes
IT Screening Questions BY08
If the answer to Question: "Is this investment for information technology?" was "Yes," complete this sub-section. If the answer is "No," do not answer this sub-section.
What is the level of the IT Project? (per CIO Council PM Guidance)	Level 1
What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per CIO Council's PM Guidance):	(1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment
Is this investment identified as "high risk" on the Q4 - FY 2006 agency high risk report (per OMB's "high risk" memo)?	No
Is this a financial management system?
If "yes", does this investment address a FFMIA compliance area?
If "yes," which FFMIA compliance area?
If "no," what does it address?
If "yes," please identify the system name(s) and system acronym(s) as reported in the most recent financial systems inventory update required by Circular A-11 section 52
Provide the Percent Budget Formulation (BF) for the budget year
Provide the Percent Budget Execution (BE) for the budget year
Percent Financial - means an estimated percentage of the total IT Investment budget authority associated with the financial components. See the financial systems definition (section 53.4) for a description of financial functions. Exclude information about budget formulation and execution activities when determining this.
Provide the Percentage Financial Management for the budget year
What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2008 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%)
For budget year, what percentage of the total investment is for hardware acquisition?
For budget year, what percentage of the total investment is for software acquisition?
For budget year, what percentage of the total investment is for services acquisition?
For budget year, what percentage of the total investment is for other services?
If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities?	Yes
Contact information of individual responsible for privacy related questions:

Privacy Officer Name
Privacy Officer Phone Number
Privacy Officer Title
Privacy Officer E-mail
Are the records produced by this investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval?	Yes

I.A.1 DOC SUPPLEMENTAL

Exhibit 53 Fields

FEA BRM

BRM FEA Code

Line Of Business

BRM FEA Code

Sub Function

Primary Mapping to BRM

If this investment supports homeland security, Indicate by corresponding number which homeland security mission area(s) this investment supports?

DOC Detailed Description

Project Description and Justification:

DOC Assumption, Constraints, Critical Dependencies

What assumptions are made about this investment and why?

Identify the critical dependencies, and constraints of this investment.

I.B: SUMMARY OF SPENDING BY08

Summary of Spending BY08

Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated "Government FTE Cost," and should be excluded from the amounts shown for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." The "TOTAL" estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report.

SUMMARY OF SPENDING FOR PROJECT STAGES

* Costs in thousands

	PY - 1 and Earlier	PY 2006	CY 2007	BY 2008	BY + 1 2009	BY + 2 2010	BY + 3 2011	BY + 4 and Beyond	Total
Planning
Budgetary Resources	20	10	10	10	10	0	0	0	60
Outlays	2000	1000	1000	0	0	0	0	0	4000
Acquisition
Budgetary Resources	20	10	10	10	10	0	0	0	60
Outlays	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Subtotal Planning & Acquisition
Budgetary Resources	40	20	20	20	20	0	0	0	120
Outlays	2000	1000	1000	0	0	0	0	0	4000
Operations & Maintenance
Budgetary Resources	20	10	10	10	10	0	0	0	60
Outlays	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
TOTAL
Budgetary Resources	60	30	30	30	30	0	0	0	180
Outlays	2000	1000	1000	0	0	0	0	0	4000
Government FTE Costs
Budgetary Resources	320	160	160	160	160	0	0	0	960
Planning
Budgetary Resources	200	100	100	100	100	0	0	0	600
Acquisition
Budgetary Resources	100	50	50	50	50	0	0	0	300
Maintenance
Budgetary Resources	20	10	10	10	10	0	0	0	60

Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing partner and partner agencies). Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented.

Full Time Equivalents BY08

Use the following table to provide the number of Government Full Time Equivalents (FTE) represented by the Government FTE Costs in the Summary of Spending Table. Numbers should be entered in decimal format for each of the categories listed.

FTE Table

	PY - 6 2000	PY - 5 2001	PY - 4 2002	PY - 3 2003	PY - 2 2004	PY - 1 2005	PY 2006	CY 2007	BY 2008	BY + 1 2009	BY + 2 2010	BY + 3 2011	BY + 4 2012	BY + 5 2013	BY + 6 2014	BY + 7 2015	BY + 8 2016	Total
Financial Management	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Security	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Program Management	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
IT	0	0	0	0	0	0	15	15	15	3.25	4.5	0	0	0	0	0	0	52.75
Other	0	0	0	10	10	10	10	10	10	10	10	0	0	0	0	0	0	80
Total*	0	0	0	10	10	10	25	25	25	13.25	14.5	0	0	0	0	0	0	132.75

*This row represents the 'Number of FTE represented by cost' from Summary of Spending table and will be sent to OMB.

Funding Questions BY08
Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's?	Yes
How many and in what year?
If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2007 President's budget request, briefly explain those changes.
.
Funding Sources BY08

Funding Sources

* Costs in thousands

FS Name: MAX Code	Row Type	PY - 6 2000	PY - 5 2001	PY - 4 2002	PY - 3 2003	PY - 2 2004	PY - 1 2005	PY 2006	CY 2007	BY 2008	BY + 1 2009	BY + 2 2010	BY + 3 2011	BY + 4 2012	BY + 5 2013	BY + 6 2014	BY + 7 2015	BY + 8 2016	Total
NOAA: ORF: 006-48-1450-0 On Ex.53: Yes	DME	0	0	0	0	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500	0	0	0	0	0	0	10500
	SS	0	0	0	0	500	500	500	500	500	500	500	0	0	0	0	0	0	3500
	Total	0	0	0	0	2000	2000	2000	2000	2000	2000	2000	0	0	0	0	0	0	14000
NOAA: PAC: 006-48-1460-0 On Ex.53: Yes	DME	0	0	0	0	0	0	1500	1500	1500	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	4500
	SS	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Total	0	0	0	0	0	0	1500	1500	1500	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	4500
Total Yearly Budgets	DME	0	0	0	0	1500	1500	3000	3000	3000	1500	1500	0	0	0	0	0	0	15000
	SS	0	0	0	0	500	500	500	500	500	500	500	0	0	0	0	0	0	3500
	Total	0	0	0	0	2000	2000	3500	3500	3500	2000	2000	0	0	0	0	0	0	18500

I.C: ACQUISITION/CONTRACT STRATEGY BY08

Contract/Task Order Table BY08

Complete the table for all (including all non-Federal) contracts and/or task orders currently in place or planned for this investment. Total Value should include all option years for each contract. Contracts and/or task orders completed do not need to be included.

Contract/Task Orders Table

Row Number

Contract or Task Order Number

Type of Contract/ Task Order

Has the contract been awarded?

If so what is the date of the award? If not, what is the planned award date?

Start date of Contract/ Task Order

End date of Contract/ Task Order

Total Value of Contract/ Task Order

Is this an Interagency Acquisition?

Is it performance based?

Competitively awarded?

What, if any, alternative financing option is being used?

Is EVM in the contract?

Does the contract include the required security and privacy clauses?

Name of CO

CO Contact information (phone/email)

Contracting Officer Certification Level

If N/A, has the agency determined the CO assigned has the competencies and skills necessary to support this acquisition?

1

12345 - 12345

Firm Fixed Price

Yes

7/4/2006

7/12/2006

7/30/2006

2000

Yes

Yes

Yes

ESPC

Yes

Yes

Taylor, Brenda

301-713-3514 / Brenda.Taylor@noaa.gov

Level 1

Yes

2

123545

ffp

3/3/2005

7/6/2006

1/1/2007

1500

Yes

Yes

NA

Sellow, Marlon H

202-482-0593 / msellow@doc.gov

Level 3

Contract/Task Order Questions BY08
If earned value is not required or will not be a contract requirement for any of the contracts or task orders above, explain why:
Do the contracts ensure Section 508 compliance?
Explain why (508 Compliance)?
Is there an acquisition plan which has been approved in accordance with agency requirements?	Yes
What is the date of your acquisition plan?	7/4/2006
If "no," will an acquisition plan be developed?
If "no," briefly explain why:

I.D: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION BY08

Performance Goals & Measures BY08

Agencies must use the Performance Goals and Measures Table below for reporting performance goals and measures for all non-IT investments and for existing IT investments that were initiated prior to FY 2005. The table can be extended to include measures for years beyond FY 2006.

Performance Goals and Measures

Fiscal Year	Strategic Goal(s) Supported	Performance Measure	Actual/baseline (from Previous Year)	Planned Performance Metric (Target)	Performance Metric Results (Actual)
2006	Text	text	text

FEA Performance Reference Model (PRM) BY08

FEA PRM

Fiscal Year	Measurement Area	Measurement Category	Measurement Grouping	Measurement Indicator	Baseline	Planned Improvement to the Baseline	Actual Results
2006	Mission and Business Results	Community and Social Services	Homeownership Promotion	test	There is wording that goes here.

All new IT investments initiated for FY 2005 and beyond must use Table 2 and are required to use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Please use Table 2 and the PRM to identify the performance information pertaining to this major IT investment. Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding ""Measurement Area"" and ""Measurement Grouping"" identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for at least four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at www.egov.gov.

I.E: SECURITY AND PRIVACY BY08
Costs & Risks BY08
In order to successfully address this area of the business case, each question below must be answered at the system/application level, not at a program or agency level. Systems supporting this investment on the planning and operational systems security tables should match the systems on the privacy table below. Systems on the Operational Security Table must be included on your agency FISMA system inventory and should be easily referenced in the inventory (i.e., should use the same name or identifier).
All systems supporting and/or part of this investment should be included in the tables below, inclusive of both agency owned systems and contractor systems. For IT investments under development, security and privacy planning must proceed in parallel with the development of the system/s to ensure IT security and privacy requirements and costs are identified and incorporated into the overall lifecycle of the system/s.
Please respond to the questions below and verify the system owner took the following actions:
Have the IT security costs for the system(s) been identified and integrated into the overall costs of the investment?
Provide the Percentage IT Security for the budget year
What is the total dollar amount allocated to IT security for this investment in this budget year? Please indicate whether an increase in IT security funding is requested to remediate IT security weaknesses, specifying the amount and a general description of the weakness.
Is identifying and assessing security and privacy risks a part of the overall risk management effort for each system supporting or part of this investment.	Yes
Security: Planning Systems BY08

Systems in Planning - Security

Name of System	Agency/ or Contractor Operated System?	Planned Operational Date	Planned or Actual C&A Completion Date
		7/1/2006	7/5/2006

Security: Operational Systems BY08
Investment C&A Status	00 - Systems within this investment have not been through the C&A process because the investment is not yet operational

Operational Systems - Security

Name of System	Agency/ or Contractor Operated System?	NIST FIPS 199 Risk Impact level	Has C&A been Completed, using NIST 800-37?	Date C&A Complete	What standards were used for the Security Controls tests?	Date Complete(d): Security Control Testing	Date the contingency plan tested
System Name	Contractor Only	Moderate	No	7/1/2006	NIST 800-26	7/5/2006	7/17/2006

Security: Weaknesses & Contractor Procedures BY08
Have any weaknesses, not yet remediated, related to any of the systems part of or supporting this investment been identified by the agency or IG?	Yes
If "yes," have those weaknesses been incorporated into the agency's plan of action and milestone process?	Yes
Indicate whether an increase in IT security funding is requested to remediate IT security weaknesses?
If "yes," specify the amount, provide a general description of the weakness, and explain how the funding request will remediate the weakness.
How are contractor security procedures monitored, verified, and validated by the agency for the contractor systems above?
Privacy: Planning & Operational Systems BY08

Planning & Operational Systems - Privacy

Name of System	Is this a new system?	Is there a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) that covers this system?	Is the PIA available to the public?	Is a System of Records Notice (SORN) required for this system?	Was a new or amended SORN published in FY 06?
System	No	No.	No, because a PIA is not yet required to be completed at this time.	Yes	Yes, because the existing Privacy Act system of records was substantially revised in FY 06.
system	Yes	No, because the system does not contain, process, or transmit personal identifying information.	Yes.	No	Yes, because this is a newly established Privacy Act system of records.

I.F: ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE (EA) BY08
General EA Questions BY08
In order to successfully address this area of the business case and capital asset plan you must ensure the investment is included in the agency's EA and Capital Planning and Investment Control (CPIC) process, and is mapped to and supports the FEA. You must also ensure the business case demonstrates the relationship between the investment and the business, performance, data, services, application, and technology layers of the agency's EA.
Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?	Yes
If "no," please explain why this investment is not included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?
Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?	Yes
If "yes," provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment.
If "no," please explain why this investment is not included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?
FEA SRM BY08
Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/.

Service Component Reference Model (SRM) Table

Agency Component Name	Agency Component Description	FEA SRM Service Type	FEA SRM Component	FEA Service Component Reused Name	FEA Service Component Reused UPI	Internal or External Reuse?	BY Funding Percentage
		Asset / Materials Management	Asset Cataloging / Identification	Ad Hoc	006-01-01-01-01-0000-00	Internal	5
		Asset / Materials Management	Asset Transfer, Allocation, and Maintenance			No Reuse	15

Use existing SRM Components or identify as "NEW". A "NEW" component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM.

A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission.

'Internal' reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. 'External' reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government.

Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for the service.

FEA TRM BY08

To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment.

Technical Reference Model (TRM) Table

FEA SRM Component	FEA TRM Service Area	FEA TRM Service Category	FEA TRM Service Standard	Service Specification (i.e. vendor or product name)
Activity-Based Management	Component Framework	Business Logic	Platform Dependent
Asset Cataloging / Identification	Component Framework	Data Interchange	Data Exchange
NEW	Service Interface and Integration	Interface	Service Discovery	Text Text Text

Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications
In the Service Specification field, Agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate.
Reuse & Information Sharing BY08
Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?	Yes
If "yes," please describe how the application will leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government.
Does this investment provide the public with access to a government automated information system?
If "yes," does customer access require specific software (e.g., a specific web browser version)?
If "yes," provide the specific product name(s) and version number(s) of the required software and the date when the public will be able to access this investment by any software (i.e. to ensure equitable and timely access of government information and services).
FEA Primary Mapping BY08

FEA Primary Mapping

Reference Model:	SRM
Service Domain:	Customer Services
Service Type:	Customer Preferences
Service Component:	Subscriptions
Mapping Code:	702521

II: PLANNING, ACQUISITION, MIXED LIFE-CYCLE

Instructions

Part II should be completed only for investments identified as "Planning" or "Full Acquisition," or "Mixed Life-Cycle" investments in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above.

II.A: ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS BY08
Analysis Background BY08
In selecting the best capital asset, you should identify and consider at least three viable alternatives, in addition to the current baseline, i.e., the status quo. Use OMB Circular A- 94 for all investments, and the Clinger Cohen Act of 1996 for IT investments, to determine the criteria you should use in your Benefit/Cost Analysis.
Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this project?	Yes
If "yes," what is the date of the analysis?	7/4/2006
If "no," what is the anticipated date this analysis will be completed?
If no analysis is planned, please briefly explain why:
Alternatives Table BY08
Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:

Alternatives Analysis Results

Send to OMB	Alternative Analyzed	Description of Alternative	Risk Adjusted Lifecycle Costs estimate	Risk Adjusted Lifecycle Benefits estimate
True	alternative 1		0	0
True	Alternative 2		10	12
True	Alternative 3		1500	2000
True	Baseline	Status Quo.	150	200

Selected Alternative BY08

Which alternative was selected by the Initiative Governance process and why was it chosen?

What specific qualitative benefits will be realized?

II.B: RISK MANAGEMENT BY08
Risk Management Plan BY08
You should have performed a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of this investment's life-cycle, developed a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment's life-cycle.
Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?	Yes
What is the date of the risk management plan?	7/3/2006
Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?	Yes
If "yes," describe any significant changes to the Risk Management Plan:
If there currently is no risk plan, will a plan be developed?	Yes
If "yes," what is the planned completion date of the risk plan?	7/30/2006
If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks?
Briefly describe how investment risks are reflected in the life cycle cost estimate and investment schedule:
Investment Risks BY08
Identify and prioritize the top risks of this investment along with their probability and impact.

II.C: COST AND SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE BY08
Earned Value BY08
EVM is required only on DME portions of investments. For mixed lifecycle investments, O&M milestones should still be included in the table (Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline). This table should accurately reflect the milestones in the initial baseline, as well as milestones in the current baseline.
Does the earned value management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard - 748?	Yes
Answer the following questions about current cumulative cost and schedule performance. The numbers reported below should reflect current actual information. (Per OMB requirements Cost/Schedule Performance information should include both Government and Contractor Costs):
What is the Planned Value (PV)?	12
What is the Earned Value (EV)?	12
What is the actual cost of work performed (AC)?	12
What costs are included in the reported Cost/Schedule Performance information (Government Only/Contractor Only/Both)?	Contractor Only
EVMS "As of" date:	7/9/2006
What is the calculated Schedule Performance Index (SPI = EV/PV)?	0.90
What is the schedule variance (SV = EV-PV)?	0.80
What is the calculated Cost Performance Index (CPI = EV/AC)?	1.20
What is the cost variance (CV = EV-AC)?	-10
Cost/Schedule Variance BY08
Is the CV% or SV% greater than 10%? (CV%= CV/EV x 100; SV%= SV/PV x 100)	Yes
If "yes," was it the CV or SV or both?	Both
If "yes," explain the variance:
If "yes," what corrective actions are being taken?
What is the most current "Estimate at Completion"?	1500
Performance Baseline BY08
Have any significant changes been made to the baseline during the past fiscal year?	Yes
If "yes," when was it approved by OMB?	7/1/2006
Complete the following table to compare actual performance against the current performance baseline and to the initial performance baseline. In the Current Baseline section, for all milestones listed, you should provide both the baseline and actual completion dates (e.g., "03/23/2003"/ "04/28/2004") and the baseline and actual total costs (in $ Millions). In the event that a milestone is not found in both the initial and current baseline, leave the associated cells blank. Note that the 'Description of Milestone' and 'Percent Complete' fields are required. Indicate 0 for any milestone no longer active.

Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline

Milestone Number	Description of Milestone	Initial Baseline		Current Baseline				Current Baseline Variance		Percent Complete
		Planned Completion Date	Total Cost (Estimated)	Completion Date		Total Cost		Schedule (# days)	Cost
				Planned	Actual	Planned	Actual
01	Parent Milestone 1	01/01/2002	$1.000	01/01/2002	01/01/2002	$1.500	$1.500	0	$0.000	100%
02	Parent Milestone 2	01/01/2003	$0.650	01/01/2003	01/01/2002	$0.500	$1.500	365	($1.000)	100%
3.0	Milestone 3	07/18/2006	$1.500	07/18/2006		$1.500	$0.000	0		%
Project Totals		07/18/2006	$3.150	07/18/2006	01/01/2002	$3.500	$3.000	365	$0.001	57.14

III: OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

Instructions

Part III should be completed only for investments identified as "Operation and Maintenance" (Steady State) in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above.

III.A: RISK MANAGEMENT BY08
Risk Management Plan BY08
You should have performed a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of this investment's life-cycle, developed a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment's life-cycle.
Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?	Yes
What is the date of the risk management plan?	7/3/2006
Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?	Yes
If "yes," describe any significant changes to the Risk Management Plan:
If there currently is no risk plan, will a plan be developed?	Yes
If "yes," what is the planned completion date of the risk plan?	7/30/2006
If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks?

III.B: COST AND SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE BY08
Operational Analysis BY08
Was operational analysis conducted?	Yes
If "yes," provide the date the operational analysis was completed.	7/3/2006
Please provide a brief summary of the operational analysis results.
If "no," please explain why it was not conducted and if there are any plans to conduct operational analysis in the future:
Performance Baseline BY08
Complete the following table to compare actual cost performance against the planned cost performance baseline. Milestones reported may include specific individual scheduled preventative and predictable corrective maintenance activities, or may be the total of planned annual operation and maintenance efforts.
What costs are included in the reported Cost/Schedule Performance information (Government Only/Contractor Only/Both)?	Contractor Only

Comparison of Plan vs. Actual Performance Table

Milestone Number	Description of Milestone	Planned		Actual		Variance
		Completion Date	Total Cost	Completion Date	Total Cost	Schedule (# days)	Cost
01	Parent Milestone 1	01/01/2003	$0.500		$0.000	0
02	Parent Milestone 2	01/01/2003	$0.500		$0.000	0
Project Totals		01/01/2003	$0.500		$0.000	0	$0.000

IV: E-GOV AND LINES OF BUSINESS

Instructions

Part IV should be completed only for investments identified as an E-Gov initiative or a Line of Business(LOB), i.e., selected the "E-Gov and LOB Oversight" choice in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above. Investments identified as "E-Gov and LOB Oversight" will complete only Parts I and IV of the exhibit 300.

IV.A: E-GOV AND LINES OF BUSINESS OVERSIGHT BY08

Partners BY08

Multi-agency initiatives, such as E-Gov and LOB initiatives, should develop a joint exhibit 300.

As a joint exhibit 300, please identify the agency stakeholders. Provide the partner agency and partner agency approval date for this joint exhibit 300.

Stakeholder Table

Partner Agency Name

Partner Agency

Joint Exhibit Approval Date

Partnering Strategies BY08

Provide the partnering strategies you are implementing with the participating agencies and organizations. Identify all partner agency capital assets supporting the common solution; Managing Partner capital assets should also be included in this joint exhibit 300. These capital assets should be included in the Summary of Spending table of Part I, Section B. (Partner Agency Asset UPIs should also appear on the Partner Agency's exhibit 53)

Partner Capital Assets within this Investment

Partner Agency Name

Partner Agency

Partner Agency Asset Title

Partner Agency Exhibit 53 UPI (BY2008)

Partner Funding BY08

For jointly funded initiative activities, provide in the "Partner Funding Strategies Table": the name(s) of partner agencies; the UPI of the partner agency investments; and the partner agency contributions for CY and BY. Please indicate partner contribution amounts (in-kind contributions should also be included in this amount) and fee-for-service amounts. (Partner Agency Asset UPIs should also appear on the Partner Agency's exhibit 53. For non-IT fee-for-service amounts the Partner exhibit 53 UPI can be left blank)

Partner Funding Strategies

Partner Agency Name

Partner Agency

Partner exhibit 53 UPI (BY2008)

CY Contribution

CY Fee-for-Service

BY Contribution

BY Fee-for-Service

Analysis Background BY08
An Alternatives Analysis for E-Gov and LOB initiatives should also be obtained. At least three viable alternatives, in addition to the current baseline (i.e., the status quo), should be included in the joint exhibit 300. Use OMB Circular A-94 for all investments, and the Clinger Cohen Act of 1996 for IT investments, to determine the criteria you should use in your Benefit/Cost Analysis.
Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this project?	Yes
If "yes," what is the date of the analysis?	7/4/2006
If "no," what is the anticipated date this analysis will be completed?
If no analysis is planned, please briefly explain why:
Alternatives Table BY08
Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:

Alternatives Analysis Results

Send to OMB	Alternative Analyzed	Description of Alternative	Risk Adjusted Lifecycle Costs estimate	Risk Adjusted Lifecycle Benefits estimate
True	alternative 1		0	0
True	Alternative 2		10	12
True	Alternative 3		1500	2000
True	Baseline	Status Quo.	150	200

Selected Alternative BY08

Which alternative was selected by the Initiative Governance process and why was it chosen?

What specific qualitative benefits will be realized?

Quantitative Benefits BY08

What specific quantitative benefits will be realized (using current dollars) Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:

Federal Quantitative Benefits

	Budgeted Cost Savings	Cost Avoidance	Justification for Budgeted Cost Savings	Justification for Cost Avoidance
PY - 6 2000	0	0
PY - 5 2001	0	0
PY - 4 2002	0	0
PY - 3 2003	0	0
PY - 2 2004	0	0
PY - 1 2005	0	0
PY 2006	0	0
CY 2007	0	0
BY 2008	0	0
BY + 1 2009	0	0
BY + 2 2010	0	0
BY + 3 2011	0	0
BY + 4 2012	0	0
BY + 5 2013	0	0
BY + 6 2014	0	0
BY + 7 2015	0	0
BY + 8 2016	0	0
Total LLC Benefit	0	0

IV.B: RISK MANAGEMENT BY08
Risk Management Plan BY08
You should have performed a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of this investment's life-cycle, developed a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment's life-cycle.
Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?	Yes
What is the date of the risk management plan?	7/3/2006
Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?	Yes
If "yes," describe any significant changes to the Risk Management Plan:
If there currently is no risk plan, will a plan be developed?	Yes
If "yes," what is the planned completion date of the risk plan?	7/30/2006
If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks?
Investment Risks BY08

IV.C: COST AND SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE BY08
Earned Value BY08
You should also periodically be measuring the performance of operational assets against the baseline established during the planning or full acquisition phase (i.e., operational analysis), and be properly operating and maintaining the asset to maximize its useful life. Operational analysis may identify the need to redesign or modify an asset by identifying previously undetected faults in design, construction, or installation/integration, highlighting whether actual operation and maintenance costs vary significantly from budgeted costs, or documenting that the asset is failing to meet program requirements.
EVM is required only on DME portions of investments. For mixed lifecycle investments, O&M milestones should still be included in the table (Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline). This table should accurately reflect the milestones in the initial baseline, as well as milestones in the current baseline.
Answer the following questions about the status of this investment. Include information on all appropriate capital assets supporting this investment except for assets in which the performance information is reported in a separate exhibit 300.
Are you using EVM to manage this investment?
If "no," explain plans to implement EVM:
Please provide a brief summary of the operational analysis results.
This sub-sections questions are NOT applicable for capital assets with ONLY O&M
Answer the following questions about current cumulative cost and schedule performance. The numbers reported below should reflect current actual information. (Per OMB requirements Cost/Schedule Performance information should include both Government and Contractor Costs):
What costs are included in the reported Cost/Schedule Performance information (Government Only/Contractor Only/Both)?	Contractor Only
EVMS "As of" date:	7/9/2006
What is the Planned Value (PV)?	12
What is the Earned Value (EV)?	12
What is the actual cost of work performed (AC)?	12
What is the calculated Schedule Performance Index (SPI = EV/PV)?	0.90
What is the schedule variance (SV = EV-PV)?	0.80
What is the calculated Cost Performance Index (CPI = EV/AC)?	1.20
What is the cost variance (CV = EV-AC)?	-10
Does the earned value management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard - 748?	Yes
Cost/Schedule Variance BY08
Is the CV% or SV% greater than 10%? (CV%= CV/EV x 100; SV%= SV/PV x 100)	Yes
If "yes," was it the CV or SV or both?	Both
If "yes," explain the variance:
If "yes," what corrective actions are being taken?
What is the most current "Estimate at Completion"?	1500
Performance Baseline BY08
Have any significant changes been made to the baseline during the past fiscal year?	Yes
Complete the following table to compare actual performance against the current performance baseline and to the initial performance baseline. In the Current Baseline section, for all milestones listed, you should provide both the baseline and actual completion dates (e.g., "03/23/2003"/ "04/28/2004") and the baseline and actual total costs (in $ Millions). In the event that a milestone is not found in both the initial and current baseline, leave the associated cells blank. Note that the 'Description of Milestone' and 'Percent Complete' fields are required. Indicate 0 for any milestone no longer active.
If "yes," when was it approved by OMB?	7/1/2006

Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline (EGov)

Milestone Number	Description of Milestone	Initial Baseline		Current Baseline				Current Baseline Variance		Percent Complete	Agency Responsible For Activity
		Planned Completion Date	Total Cost (Estimated)	Completion Date		Total Cost		Schedule (# days)	Cost
				Planned	Actual	Planned	Actual
Project Totals			$0.000			$0.000	$0.000	0	$0.000