NASA Technical Reports Server
+ Visit NASA.gov
+ Contact NASA
ABOUT NTRS SEARCH NTRS NTRS NEWS HELP FEEDBACK ORDER NASA INFO.
  + Home
SEARCH NTRS
Navigattion Search Options
Collection > NASA 

Author > Oleson, Steve 

NASA Center > Glenn Research Center 

Publication Year > 1991-2000 > 1999 

Subject > S-U > Spacecraft Propulsion And Power 

Availability Options > Online > PDF 

Item/Media Type > NASA Report > Technical Memorandum (TM) 
Item/Media Type > Technical Report 


Note: Start a new navigation search by selecting a link above

Image of Earth and the Proteus research aircraft with spiral galaxy in background and the words 'Aerospace Information for a Changing World' Visit the STI Program Web Site
SEARCH NTRS

    Previous Record | Next Record + Back to Results

  + Printer Friendly
Title: Advanced Electric Propulsion for Space Solar Power Satellites
Author(s): Oleson, Steve
Abstract: The sun tower concept of collecting solar energy in space and beaming it down for commercial use will require very affordable in-space as well as earth-to-orbit transportation. Advanced electric propulsion using a 200 kW power and propulsion system added to the sun tower nodes can provide a factor of two reduction in the required number of launch vehicles when compared to in-space cryogenic chemical systems. In addition, the total time required to launch and deliver the complete sun tower system is of the same order of magnitude using high power electric propulsion or cryogenic chemical propulsion: around one year. Advanced electric propulsion can also be used to minimize the stationkeeping propulsion system mass for this unique space platform. 50 to 100 kW class Hall, ion, magnetoplasmadynamic, and pulsed inductive thrusters are compared. High power Hall thruster technology provides the best mix of launches saved and shortest ground to Geosynchronous Earth Orbital Environment (GEO) delivery time of all the systems, including chemical. More detailed studies comparing launch vehicle costs, transfer operations costs, and propulsion system costs and complexities must be made to down-select a technology. The concept of adding electric propulsion to the sun tower nodes was compared to a concept using re-useable electric propulsion tugs for Low Earth Orbital Environment (LEO) to GEO transfer. While the tug concept would reduce the total number of required propulsion systems, more launchers and notably longer LEO to GEO and complete sun tower ground to GEO times would be required. The tugs would also need more complex, longer life propulsion systems and the ability to dock with sun tower nodes.
NASA Center: Glenn Research Center
Publication Date: August 1999
Document Source: CASI
Online Source: View PDF File
Document ID: 19990116847
Publication Information: Number of Pages = 16
Report Number: AIAA Paper 99-2872; E-11833; NAS 1.15:209307; NASA/TM-1999-209307
Contract-Grant-Task Number: RTOP 632-1B-1B
Price Code: A03
Meeting Information: Joint Propulsion, 35th, 20-24 Jun. 1999, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Keywords: SOLAR POWER SATELLITES; PROPULSION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE; ELECTRIC PROPULSION; SOLID PROPELLANT ROCKET ENGINES; SOLAR ENERGY; LOW EARTH ORBITS; HIGH THRUST; EARTH ORBITAL ENVIRONMENTS; SPACE PLATFORMS; CRYOGENICS; ROCKET LAUNCHING;
Accessibility: Unclassified; No Copyright; Unlimited; Publicly available;
Updated/Added to NTRS: 2005-08-25

+ Back to Top

USAGov logoExternal Site
+ Sponsored by the NASA Scientific and Technical
   Information Program

+ 2004 Vision for Space Exploration
+ Freedom of Information Act
+ NASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices
+ NASA Disclaimers, Copyright Notice,
   and Terms and Conditions of Use


NASA

NASA Official: Calvin Mackey
Page Curator: NASA Center for AeroSpace Information (help@sti.nasa.gov)
Last Updated: July 5, 2007