skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 131198  
Title: Deterrence Research and the 1978 National Research Council Report
Author(s): T B Marvell
Publication Date: 1990
Pages: 25
Type: Surveys
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: In 1978, the National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academy of Science issued a report which maintained that methodological problems in deterrence research prevented the use of existing research results as grounds for policy change. The NRC voiced several objections to macro research which found that arrest and imprisonment rates had deterrent impacts.
Abstract: The first objection was based on the risk of spurious correlation caused by the ratio variable of sanction variable to crime. The research also seemed to confound deterrence and incapacitation effects. Finally, numerous causal direction problems explained why more arrests, police presence, or imprisonment may or may not be affected by the crime rate. Recent research efforts in the area of deterrence are outlined and categorized according to basic research design (cross section versus time series analyses). The major issue faced by researchers is the ability to deal with simultaneity or likely reciprocal causation problems. Some of the procedures used to deal with simultaneity include lagged independent variables, attempts to explain away simultaneity, and simultaneous equations. The author recommends that criminology journals reject papers that do not explain how they deal with methodological problems and accept for publication short comments that criticize past articles for failing to include such explanations. 1 figure and 26 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Deterrence effectiveness ; Research design models
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=131198

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder