|
JULY 21, 2004
SCHAKOWSKY: BUSH ADMINISTRATION
MISSTATEMENT OF THE DAY -
TAX CUTS
WASHINGTON,
D.C. - U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) issued "The Bush Administration
Misstatement of the Day" on tax cuts.
Answering
a question yesterday (7/20/04) submitted online to the www.whitehouse.gov
website about why "average" Americans do not have more money in the Bush
economy, that the "only people who have more money are the people who already
had money," and that "it is only the rich getter richer," Treasury Secretary
John Snow replied:
The
President's tax cuts clearly benefited our economy, and helped every taxpayer
in this country. In fact, those at the lowest end of the income brackets
benefited the most from the tax cuts. (Treasury Secretary John Snow,
7/20/04)
However,
in an article published in the Wall Street Journal titled "So Far,
Economic Recovery Tilts To Highest-Income Americans" (7/20/04), Dean Maki,
a J.P. Morgan Chase (and former Federal Reserve) economist, states: "To
date, the [recovery's] primary beneficiaries have been upper-income households.
Two of the main factors supporting spending over the past year, tax
cuts and increases in [stock] wealth, have sharply benefited upper income
households relative to others."
The
article continues:
At
high-end Bulgari stores, meanwhile, consumers are gobbling up $5,000 Astrale
gold and diamond "cocktail" rings made for the right hand, a spokeswoman
says. The Italian company's U.S. revenue was up 22% in the first quarter.
Neiman Marcus Group Inc., flourishing on sales of pricey items like $500
Manolo Blahnik shoes, had a 13.5% year-over-year sales rise at stores open
at least a year.
By
contrast, such "same store" sales at Wal-Mart Stores Inc., retailer for
the masses, were up just 2.2% in June. Wal-Mart believes higher gasoline
costs are pinching its customers. At Payless ShoeSource Inc., which sells
items like $10.99 pumps, June same-store sales were 1% below a year earlier.
A
similar pattern shows up in cars. Luxury brands like BMW, Cadillac and
Lexus saw double-digit U.S. sales increases in June from a year earlier.
Sales of lower-tier brands such as Dodge, Pontiac and Mercury either declined
or grew in the low single digits.
So
Far, Economic Recovery Tilts
To
Highest-Income Americans
They
Gain More, Spend More;
With
Job Market Rising,
Will
Others Feel Rebound?
Mr.
Williams Waits for a Raise
By
JON E. HILSENRATH and SHOLNN FREEMAN
Staff
Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
July
20, 2004; Page A1
Joshua
Berry and Ricky Williams, both Houstonians, have seen two very different
economic recoveries.
Mr.
Berry, an entrepreneur, has profited handsomely from the stock market,
in the real-estate boom and by selling a business. Mr. Williams, an airline
baggage handler, has been waiting since 2001 for a pay raise.
With
the U.S. economy expanding and the labor market improving, it isn't clear
how well the Democrats' message of a divided America will resonate with
voters this fall. But many economists believe the economic recovery has
indeed taken two tracks, exemplified by the experiences of these two Texas
residents.
Upper-income
families, who pay the most in taxes and reaped the largest gains from the
tax cuts President Bush championed, drove a surge of consumer spending
a year ago that helped to rev up the recovery. Wealthier households also
have been big beneficiaries of the stronger stock market, higher corporate
profits, bigger dividend payments and the boom in housing.
Lower-
and middle-income households have benefited from some of these trends,
but not nearly as much. For them, paychecks and day-to-day living expenses
have a much bigger effect. Many have been squeezed, with wages under pressure
and with gasoline and food prices higher. The resulting two-tier recovery
is showing up in vivid detail in the way Americans are spending money.
Hotel
revenue was up 11% in the first five months of 2004 at luxury and upscale
chains, but up just 3% at economy chains, according to Smith Travel Research,
a market-research firm. At the five-star Broadmoor Hotel in Colorado Springs,
Colo., $600-a-night lakeside suites are sold out every day through mid-October.
At
high-end Bulgari stores, meanwhile, consumers are gobbling up $5,000 Astrale
gold and diamond "cocktail" rings made for the right hand, a spokeswoman
says. The Italian company's U.S. revenue was up 22% in the first quarter.
Neiman Marcus Group Inc., flourishing on sales of pricey items like $500
Manolo Blahnik shoes, had a 13.5% year-over-year sales rise at stores open
at least a year.
By
contrast, such "same store" sales at Wal-Mart Stores Inc., retailer for
the masses, were up just 2.2% in June. Wal-Mart believes higher gasoline
costs are pinching its customers. At Payless ShoeSource Inc., which sells
items like $10.99 pumps, June same-store sales were 1% below a year earlier.
A
similar pattern shows up in cars. Luxury brands like BMW, Cadillac and
Lexus saw double-digit U.S. sales increases in June from a year earlier.
Sales of lower-tier brands such as Dodge, Pontiac and Mercury either declined
or grew in the low single digits.
"To
date, the [recovery's] primary beneficiaries have been upper-income households,"
concludes Dean Maki, a J.P. Morgan Chase (and former Federal Reserve) economist
who has studied the ways that changes in wealth affect spending. In research
he sent to clients this month, Mr. Maki said, "Two of the main factors
supporting spending over the past year, tax cuts and increases in [stock]
wealth, have sharply benefited upper income households relative to others."
The
good times upper-income Americans are enjoying represent a bounce-back
from the hit that many of the wealthiest took after bonus income dried
up in 2001 and 2002 and stock options went sour. For example, Wall Street
compensation was up 16% in the first quarter from a year earlier, after
having fallen from stratospheric levels the three previous years, according
to the Securities Industry Association.
Longer-term
issues are also at work. Wage and income disparities between the rich and
poor have generally been widening for nearly 20 years. In 1980, the top
10% of households in income accounted for 33% of total household income,
according to economist Emmanuel Saez at University of California, Berkeley.
By 2000, that had risen to 44%. The figures exclude capital gains. Mr.
Saez says the concentration of income at the top dropped during the recession
but has probably started picking up again.
Some
economists believe the gap is driven wider by technological change and
by the economy's increasing openness to global competition. Technology
rewards skilled workers, and competition has generally punished the unskilled,
who are susceptible to the movement of work overseas. Both factors have
come into play in recent years as technology-driven productivity surged
and the U.S. trade deficit widened.
Meanwhile,
the U.S. has seen a big increase in the sheer number of affluent families.
In 2002, nearly 16 million U.S. households had annual incomes of more than
$100,000, up from a little more than five million 20 years ago, in inflation-adjusted
terms.
For
a sense of the divide, contrast the recovery experiences of Mr. Berry,
a businessman who earns a six-figure income, and Mr. Williams, the baggage
handler, who makes around $20 an hour for Southwest Airlines. Both have
been shopping this month at the River Oaks Chrysler-Jeep car dealership
in Houston.
Mr.
Berry, 34 years old, is president of a nurse staffing business called ShiftBay.com.
Last year, he and some partners sold a medical-supply business. Mr. Berry
says that together they saved more than $100,000 in taxes, thanks to a
reduction last year in the federal income-tax rate on long-term capital
gains.
Mr.
Berry also is in the process of selling his house, which he says has appreciated
by almost $100,000 over four years. And he says that while he lost a lot
of money in the stock-market downturn that began four years ago, he has
enjoyed hefty gains since the market turned up about 15 months ago. Mr.
Berry is choosing between sticking with Chrysler (he now drives a Jeep
Grand Cherokee) or trading up to a Cadillac, BMW or Mercedes-Benz.
Mr.
Williams, 52, hasn't benefited from the boom in the price of houses because
he doesn't own one. His pay hasn't budged since 2001, although he is expecting
a raise this month. Within a year, he expects his hourly pay to rise to
about $24.
Mr.
Williams's car lease (he, too, drives a Grand Cherokee) will be up in October,
and he has been scrambling to come up with a down payment for a new Chrysler
PT Cruiser. He was still $1,800 short last week. A Chrysler salesman was
able to make up part of the difference with an additional $1,000 rebate
targeted at returning lease customers, on top of $4,000 in manufacturer's
incentives already on the table.
"With
the economy the way it is, I've had to rob Peter to pay Paul, and then
sometimes rob them both," Mr. Williams says.
The
perception of a fast-lane/slow-lane recovery has become a central political
issue. This year's stronger job market has led Democrats to shift their
emphasis: away from the argument that Bush policies have failed to produce
jobs and toward the idea that the expansion's fruits haven't been widely
shared.
"They're
telling people this is the best economy we've had," Sen. John Kerry mockingly
told a riverbank crowd last Thursday evening in Charleston, W.Va., drawing
jeers. "What does it mean when you don't have any health care at all?"
Hands started popping up throughout the audience, as Mr. Kerry paused to
point to each one. "Too many people in Washington have no sense at all
about what's happening," he said. His running mate, Sen. John Edwards,
speaks of "Two Americas," one "that does the work, another America that
reaps the rewards."
Bush
critics have argued that the economy is producing jobs mainly in low-paying
industries like restaurants and temporary work. Mr. Bush counters that
his opponents have been pessimistically distorting the economic statistics,
ignoring the gains. The Bush campaign cites data from the Bureau of Labor
Statistics showing that in the past year, there has been more net employment
growth in occupations with above-average pay than in occupations with below-average
pay.
Campaigning
in Wisconsin last week, Mr. Bush spoke of a local family of six who benefited
from elements of his tax package aimed at lower- and middle-income families,
such as the child tax credit. "Oh, some of the sophisticates will say that
$2,700 doesn't matter to the Muellers: 'It doesn't sound like a lot to
me,' " Mr. Bush said. "It is a lot to them. That's what counts."
Polls
suggest that Americans aren't giving the president full credit for an economic
recovery, and the class divide in this recovery may help explain that.
A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll in late June found that 45% of Americans
approved of his handling of the economy, while 49% didn't.
Mr.
Maki of J.P. Morgan Chase estimates that in terms of dollars saved, the
top 20% of households by income got 77% of the benefit of the 2003 tax
cuts, and roughly 50% of the 2001 tax cuts. And of stocks held by households,
roughly 75% are owned by the top 20% of those households. That made them
prime beneficiaries of last year's stock-market rally, although also big
sufferers from the stock carnage from 2000 to 2002.
The
affluent also benefit more from stock dividends, on which the federal income-tax
rate was cut last year retroactive to the start of 2003. Total dividend
payments have risen 11% to $3 billion since the end of 2002, estimates
Berkeley's Mr. Saez. Higher-income households also are larger beneficiaries
of the surge in corporate earnings, which helps to drive dividend and stock
returns. The level of corporate profits has risen 42% since the last recession,
which ended in the final quarter of 2001. Wage and salary income is up
just 6.3% in that time. Meanwhile, housing values have appreciated fastest
in the most affluent regions during the past three years, according to
research by Fiserv CSW Inc., which tracks home prices.
Many
economists say the lopsided recovery is now at a critical juncture. The
impetus from new tax cuts has largely passed, and the stock market has
lost momentum, two factors that could slow the pace of higher-income people's
spending in the months ahead. As a result, the time has come for the recovery
either to broaden out to more-modest income groups -- or possibly lose
momentum.
The
late 1990s showed that lower-wage workers benefit when unemployment falls,
as the tighter labor market helps underpin wages across income categories.
With the job market improving, there is a chance this could happen again,
but the outlook is still highly uncertain. Payroll employment has increased
by 1.5 million since last August. And some companies that cater to the
mass market say they have noticed the turnaround. "We had a terrific Fourth
of July weekend," says Wayne Wielgus, a senior vice president at Choice
Hotels International Inc., which serves low- and middle-income travelers
with brands like EconoLodge and Comfort Inn.
But
some economists worry that the early stage of the recovery for low- to
middle-income families is being squeezed by continuing pressure on wages
and purchasing power. Average hourly earnings have risen at just a 1.9%
annual rate since the job market started improving notably last August.
Meanwhile, the consumer-price index -- driven by higher food and gasoline
prices -- has risen at a 3.3% annual pace. The average worker's purchasing
power, in other words, has declined even as more people have been finding
jobs since August.
Weekly
earnings for production workers and nonsupervisors at service companies,
adjusted for inflation, were down 2.6% in June from a year earlier. This
slip might be transitory, and it wasn't anywhere near the drops of 5% to
7.5% registered in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Still, it was the largest
decline since 1991, and it is a shift from the late 1990s and even the
2001 recession, when real wages were increasing.
As
a result, after rising last year, the University of Michigan's consumer
confidence index for lower-income households is off 12% so far this year.
Confidence among the affluent is lower as well, but by a smaller 6.7%.
The
recovering job market and an easing of food- and gasoline-price increases
could reverse some of today's pressures. But these aren't the only issues
hanging over lower-income households. Many are also highly exposed to rising
interest rates, says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Economy.com, because
these households were more likely to take out adjustable-rate mortgages
to squeeze into an ever-pricier housing market. For those who don't own
homes, the chances of buying have become more remote as house prices have
soared. "Lower- and middle-income groups are going to remain under significant
pressure," Mr. Zandi says.
Many
in this group are also getting squeezed as health-care costs rise and companies
seek to shift the burden to workers. From 2000 to 2003, employees' average
annual out-of-pocket expenses for family medical premiums rose 49% to $2,412,
according to an employer survey by Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit
research group in Menlo Park, Calif.
Becky
Salas, a 32-year-old vocational nurse in San Antonio, says her family is
still pinching pennies, even though she believes an economic recovery is
taking hold now. Two years ago, she and her husband stopped using credit
cards. Expensive toys for her children, movies at theaters and meals at
McDonald's also are out. "Easily we could spend $20 at McDonald's for just
one meal," Ms. Salas says. And "we can go fly a kite, instead of going
to an expensive theater where the kids are going to yell and scream and
won't enjoy it anyway."
Corrections
& Amplifications:
Total
dividend payments to investors have risen 11%, or the equivalent of $3
billion, since the end of 2002. The article above incorrectly stated that
dividend payments have risen 11% to $3 billion since the end of 2002.
|
|