pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of qualhcJournal URL: redirect3.cgi?&&auth=0fi8y7MMuLZJBImI7nN7WQ_OQ3LcPeBcS65AiG5AP&reftype=publisher&artid=2483602&article-id=2483602&iid=169600&issue-id=169600&jid=175&journal-id=175&FROM=Article|Banner&TO=Publisher|Other|N%2FA&rendering-type=normal&&http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=175&action=archive
Qual Health Care. 1998 September; 7(3): 142–148.
PMCID: PMC2483602
Health authority commissioning for quality in contraception services
M. Newman, M. Bardsley, D. Morgan, and B. Jacobson
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the commissioning of contraception services by London health authorities with accepted models of good practice. DESIGN: Combined interview and postal surveys of all health authorities and National Health Service (NHS) trusts responsible for running family planning clinics in the Greater London area. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health authority commissioning was assessed on the presence of four key elements of good practice--strategies, coordination, service specifications, and quality standards in contracts--by monitoring activity and quality. RESULTS: Less than half the health authorities surveyed had written strategies or service specifications for contraception services. Arrangements for coordination of services were limited and monitoring was underdeveloped. CONCLUSION: The process of commissioning services for contraception seems to be relatively underdeveloped despite the importance of health problems associated with unplanned pregnancy in London. These findings raise questions about the capacity of health authorities to improve the quality of these services through the commissioning process.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (95K).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Jones, EF; Forrest, JD; Goldman, N; Henshaw, SK; Lincoln, R; Rosoff, JI; Westoff, CF; Wulf, D. Teenage pregnancy in developed countries: determinants and policy implications. Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 17(2):53–63.Mar–Apr; [PubMed]
  • Hughes, D; McGuire, A. The cost-effectiveness of family planning service provision. J Public Health Med. 1996 Jun;18(2):189–196. [PubMed]
  • McConnell, R; Magnotti, R. Screening for insecticide overexposure under field conditions: a reevaluation of the tintometric cholinesterase kit. Am J Public Health. 1994 Mar;84(3):479–481. [PubMed]
  • Trussell, J; Leveque, JA; Koenig, JD; London, R; Borden, S; Henneberry, J; LaGuardia, KD; Stewart, F; Wilson, TG; Wysocki, S, et al. The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods. Am J Public Health. 1995 Apr;85(4):494–503. [PubMed]
  • de Wildt, G; Bhopal, R; Lavender, M. Research into purchasing health care: time to face the challenge. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Dec;50(6):611–612. [PubMed]
  • Smith, C. Measuring quality in contraceptive services. Qual Health Care. 1997 Jun;6(2):59. [PubMed]
  • Adler, MW. Sexual health--a Health of the Nation failure. BMJ. 1997 Jun 14;314(7096):1743–1747. [PubMed]
  • Sivin, I. International experience with NORPLANT and NORPLANT-2 contraceptives. Stud Fam Plann. 1988 19(2):81–94.Mar–Apr; [PubMed]
  • Chi, IC. The TCu-380A (AG), MLCu375, and Nova-T IUDs and the IUD daily releasing 20 micrograms levonorgestrel--four pillars of IUD contraception for the nineties and beyond? Contraception. 1993 Apr;47(4):325–347. [PubMed]
  • Gill, M. Purchasing for quality: still in the starting blocks? Qual Health Care. 1993 Sep;2(3):179–182. [PubMed]
  • Robinson, R. The impact of the NHS reforms 1991-1995: a review of research evidence. J Public Health Med. 1996 Sep;18(3):337–342. [PubMed]
  • Webb, E; Naish, J; MacFarlane, A. Planning and commissioning of health services for children and young people. J Public Health Med. 1996 Jun;18(2):217–220. [PubMed]