Frequently Asked Questions on Establishing Corporate Names for NACO
- How much research is required when establishing a corporate
body from a publication not issued by the body itself?
Unless there are other bodies with the same or similar names in
the database against which a cataloger is searching or there is
some other compelling reason (e.g., the official name of the body
in question is likely to be in a language not represented in the
item (AACR2 24.3A and the LCRI), LC and PCC practice is to treat
the item being cataloged as a reference source. This means that
a cataloger may choose a form found in the item being cataloged
as the 1XX and/or choose a fuller form not found on the chief source
when there are variant forms in the item without performing additional
research.
This timesaving principle is based on AACR2 24.1A footnote 2, that
states:"Reference sources ... includes books and articles written
about a corporate body" and is further articulated in LCRI
24.4D. Although LCRI 24.2D is chiefly meant to be used when determining
when to use an initialism vs. a full form the statement: "When
a corporate name must be established for an item not issued by the
corporate body treat the item being cataloged as a reference source"
may be applied in all cases when establishing a corporate body.
- Why can't a cross reference for a subordinate body
be made through the parent body using the language form of the parent
body found on the item when the established form of the parent body
is in another language?
Example of an hypothetically established heading:
110 2 Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales (Chile)
410 2 Center for Social Science Research (Chile)
Example of a heading being created for a subordinate unit of
the above heading with usage found in the item in both Spanish and
English:
110 2 Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales (Chile).
$b Departamento de Estadísticas
410 2 Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales (Chile).
$b Dept. of Statistics
Why couldn't the cross reference for the entire name be given as
found on the item e.g.:
410 2 Center for Social Science Research (Chile). $b Dept.
of Statistics
The LC policy for contributing name authority records to the Name
Authority File is that an authorized form of each element in a corporate
hierarchy must be established.
This principle is stated in DCM Z1 Introduction, Name authority records
(NARs) section which states: "... make a name authority record
for any personal or corporate .. heading ... whether it is actually
first used as (or part of ) a main entry heading, a secondary entry
.. or in certain cross references (e.g., hierarchy 4XX references,
5XX references)..."
This LC/PCC policy is a parameter for contribution of authority records
to which all NACO participants agree. Once a heading is established
it is a violation of this policy to make cross references from unauthorized
forms of the elements in a hierarchical string. The foreign language
or variant form of a parent body is included as a cross reference
only on the NAR for the parent. Each additional subordinate unit must
then use the established forms of the heading even though the subordinate
unit variant can be given in the foreign language. LCRI 26.1 Forms
of References statement: "... construct a reference in the same
form in which it would be constructed if chosen as the heading ..."
is interpreted by LC/PCC policy to reinforce the principle of not
creating a cross-reference for a subordinate unit with unauthorized
forms of the parent units.
In other words, if in the example above there were no Spanish equivalent
for the subordinate body the heading would be established using the
established Spanish form of the parent body (subfield $a) and the
English form of the subordinate body (subfield $b) with 008/33 coded
provisional. The same principle is applied to the formulation of the
cross reference. The English form of the parent body is not authorized;
therefore, it may not be used to formulate a cross-reference.
- For conference headings when can the date be used
as part of the name?
LCRI 24.7A allows a date to be used as part of a conference only
when these are combined with an acronym or initialism. It is important
to discern when a name is a true acronym or initialism. For example:
Starch 2002, a name that appears on an item for a conference
on compound starches is neither an acronym nor an initialism, nor
may this be considered a conference name (Cf. LCRI 21.1B1). Even
when all letters are uppercased, unless these represent a corporate
body or are the initials for an event these may not be considered
conference names regardless if there is a date as part of the name.
Catalogers may be confusing the rule for Exhibitions, fairs, festivals,
etc. (AACR2 24.8) that calls for keeping a year if it is an integral
part of the name and does so without regard to whether or not the
name is an acronym or initialism.
- What is the LC/NACO policy regarding conference
names when a conference name was originally established as a one-time
event with the additions of date and place to the authority record,
but now it is clear that it is an ongoing conference? Is there an LCRI
that provides guidance for this situation?
This is an uncommon situation and generally it is LC/NACO
practice to change the existing conference heading by deleting the
qualifier, thus converting the heading into the form that is used
to represent an ongoing conference in the NACO Authority File. This
situation is not covered by an LCRI because the original heading is
treated as an “error” and is simply “corrected”
to reflect the change when evidence indicates that the conference
is ongoing.
- Should "see also" references to corporate
name forms that have not yet been used on a bibliographic record be
coded with subfield $w nnna ("do not make")? [cf. LCRI 26.3B-C]
Example:
110 2 $a Current Name
510 2 $w bnna $a Later Name, Unused On Bibliographic Records
110 2 $a Later Name, Unused On Bibliographic Records
410 2 $a LNUOB
510 2 $w a $a Current Name
No. Currently, LC's practice is to not to use the fourth
position code "a" in control subfield $w to suppress references
to established but unused forms of corporate headings that are not
used in LC’s catalogs. Because the authority file is shared
by so many libraries, it is recognized that other libraries might
indeed have used the heading. Many systems manage to handle blind
references without employing the subfield $w value. LCRI 26.3 B-C,
section b), which calls for coding these references "do not make,"
is obsolete and will be corrected when the larger LCRI is revised.
- What sources are recommended for determining
the official language of a country?
When the rules (e.g., AACR2 24.3A, 24.3E) call for establishing
a corporate name in the official language of the country, standard
reference sources such as current editions of the Europa World
Year Book or the Statesman's Year-Book as well as others
should be consulted. For cases that can't be determined from standard
reference sources, catalogers may consider contacting the embassy
or consulate and asking.
- When are cross references through a jurisdiction
(geographic name) made for corporate names?
Cross references through jurisdiction (i.e., 410 1) may be provided
when the 110 is entered under jurisdiction and there is a need to
provide references from variant forms, inverted forms (LCRI 26.3A3),
and/or to show hierarchy (AACR2 24.19A). However, a cross reference
through a jurisdiction for a corporate name entered in direct order
(i.e.,110 2) is not required unless it is a government body entered
independently (LCRI 26.3A7). There are other cases, such as when
a joint task force or committee is subordinate to government agencies
that are entered under jurisdictions, etc. (LCRI 24.15A) but generally
cross references through jurisdiction are not routinely made except
in the above cases.
- Is it true that cross references through jurisdictions
for local religious institutions are no longer made?
Yes, the practice for adding this cross reference for local
religious institutions was discontinued in 1994 in favor of following
AACR2 24.10B that requires adding a place name qualifier to the heading.
Note: LCRI 24.10 B, note 2, asks catalogers to delete these
cross references when found on NARs for churches if making other changes
to the record.
- Does AACR2 24.4B "Additions to corporate names"
apply to entities that have a "dot com" domain name extension as part
of the name? And, does AACR2 24.5C1 (regarding omission of terms indication
incorporation, etc.) apply?
In other words, do the extensions "dot com," "dot gov," "dot org," etc.,
connote "corporateness" sufficient to render it unnecessary to add a
qualifier or retain a term indicating incorporation?
Corporate body names that include a domain name extension "dot XXX"
fall under AACR2 24.4B and should be qualified appropriately. At first
glance it may seem that the presence of such domain name extensions
connote corporateness; however, this is not always true. In fact,
these names are very ambiguous and may represent:
- the name of a business enterprise, association, etc.
- the title of a Website or other resource, or
- an Internet address (e.g., a URL).
If it is determined that the name of the corporate body by which
it is most commonly identified (Cf. 24.1A) includes the domain extension,
apply AACR2 24.4B and its LCRI and add an appropriate qualifier, or
retain a term of incorporation per 24.5C1.
If the string is actually a title of a Website, a qualifier may
be needed in certain situations following LCRI 25.5B if needed to
break a conflict.
If it is simply an Internet address (and not the name of a corporate
body or title of a Website), then it is not a candidate for a name
authority record.
Examples of corporate body name headings:
AuctionWatch.com (Firm)
drkoop.com, Inc. (note the use of lowercase letters; this example
will be added to rule A.2A1 in the 2005 update to AACR2 which has
been modified to include guidance in cases of unusual capitalization
in corporate names)
It is not necessary to change existing headings already established
without the additional qualifier unless the heading must be changed
for another reason.
- How do we obtain verification for Canadian
corporate headings?
If Canadian CIP information showing the LAC form of the heading
is not available in the item, you may search OCLC to find
headings formulated by LAC on LAC-issued bibliographic records and
use these as authority in your 670
670 $a OCLC [date] $b (LAC hdg: ....... usage: .......)
Alternatively, you may search the LAC authority file in the AMICUS
database.
Note that it is not necessary to search both these sources. If
the corporate name heading is not found in one of these source or if it differs from the form found in the resource being cataloged NACO
catalogers should:
- Create an NAR for the heading.
- Fill in the LAC notification form at:
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/naco/LAC-nacohdgform.html (cf. DCM Z1, 1XX section).
- LAC will respond directly to the cataloger and may request changes to the 1XX or suggest additional cross references. Catalogers are reminded to add a 670 to the NAR to show
LAC was consulted.
For more information on Canadian names read the FAQ
when NARs ... LAC, NUC & CIP
|