skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 123664  
Title: Police Professionalism and the Rights of Criminal Defendants
Journal: Criminal Law Bulletin  Volume:26  Issue:2  Dated:(March-April 1990)  Pages:155-166
Author(s): C E Smith
Sale: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States
Publication Date: 1990
Pages: 12
Type: Legislation/policy analysis
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This article discusses the relationship between police professionalism and judicial decisions affecting the rights of criminal defendants.
Abstract: U.S. Supreme Court justices in the Warren era of the 1960's made landmark decisions that protected citizens' rights in the criminal justice process, based on extensive documentation of police abuses of those rights. This ushered in a period of police reform that stimulated professionalized law enforcement agencies. The Court's current conservative majority apparently lacks any memory of "unprofessional" police conduct. Their decisions have relaxed requirements for police conduct and will probably continue to do so in the future. Greater responsibility will be placed on State governments, local authorities, and the police themselves to ensure that police misconduct does not occur; however, in the absence of judicial action to curb police misconduct, it is less likely that it will be curbed by other forces. The immediate future does not look promising for the clarification and protection of fourth, fifth, and sixth amendment rights from intrusion by police officers. 47 footnotes. (Author abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Police legal limitations
Index Term(s): US Supreme Court decisions ; Police professionalism
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=123664

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder