USDA Economic Research Service Briefing Room
" "  
" "

 
Briefing Rooms

Print this page Print | E-mail this page E-mail | Bookmark & ShareBookmark/share | Translate Translate | Text only Text only | resize text smallresize text mediumresize text large

Farm Income and Costs: 2009 Farm Sector Income Forecast

Contents
 

Net Farm Income Forecast To Be Down 20 Percent in 2009

Net farm income is forecast to be $71.2 billion in 2009, down $18.1 billion (20 percent) from the preliminary estimate of $89.3 billion for 2008. Still, $71.2 billion would be 9 percent above the average of $65 billion earned in the previous 10 years.

Net cash income, at $77.3 billion, is forecast down $16.1 billion (17 percent) from 2008 but still 7.6 percent above its 10-year average of $71.8 billion. Net cash income is projected to decline less than net farm income primarily because it reflects the sale of $1.8 billion in carryover stocks from 2008. Net farm income reflects only the earnings from production that occurred in the current year.

Highlights

  • After reaching record levels in 2008, all three measures of sector earnings are forecast to decline in 2009.

    - Net cash income would fall 17 percent, but remain above the previous 10-year average of $71.8 billion.

    - Net value-added and net farm income would also decline from record levels but remain well above previous 10-year averages.

  • Total expenses are forecast to decline for the first time since 2002.

    - The 2007 and 2008 increases in farm expenses, at $20.5 billion and $36.2 billion, respectively, were the largest year-over-year absolute changes on record.

    - The $13.5-billion decline in expenses projected for 2009 would still leave farm expenses 9 percent higher than in 2007.

  • The 2009 forecast would also be the first decline in crop receipts since 1999.

    - Crop receipts have increased by 20 percent or more in each of the last 2 years; at $162.4 billion, 2009 receipts would be the second highest on record.

  • Government payments are forecast to fall in 2009 to their lowest level since 1997.

    - Most of the decline from 2008 is due to lower projections for ad hoc and emergency assistance payments.

In 2008, the farm sector was whipsawed by highly volatile domestic and international macroeconomic forces. Prices of both farm commodities and farm production inputs spiked in the first half of the year and then plunged in the latter half. The U.S. farm sector is perhaps more intertwined with the world economy than ever. Demand arising from both the growing populations and rising incomes in other countries has expanded markets for farm commodities and increased competition for critical production inputs such as fuel, feed, and fertilizer.

Commodity production in 2009 can be forecast with some confidence, assuming that weather patterns adhere to recent trends. Local and regional production patterns have been established largely due to relatively constant soil attributes and weather conditions. The production decisions of individual farmers are limited by these characteristics and guided by good production practices, such as crop rotations to control disease and pests and to maintain soil fertility. Nonetheless, yields are a critical component of production levels, and production quantities are never precise until the harvest occurs.

In contrast, the forecasting of prices received and paid by farmers is highly uncertain. Volatile international markets can drive farm prices up and down, and have made farm income forecasts more treacherous of late.

The record net farm income in 2008 was driven by a large increase in the value of crop production that was only partially offset by rising costs of production for the farm sector. The value of crop production exceeded its previous record (set in 2007) by $31 billion, a 21-percent increase. Prices of major crops (corn, soybeans, wheat) trended upward in late 2007 and continued doing so in the first part of 2008 as the remainder of the 2007 harvest was marketed. These prices declined in the latter months as the 2008 harvests occurred, but remained high by historic standards. Exports were strong as a weak dollar relative to other currencies made U.S. commodities more competitive in international markets, and ending-year stocks of many commodities were low. Commodity prices trended downward late in 2008 as the national and world economies softened.

Monthly corn and soybean prices, 2008 d

Annual average prices for crops, 1990-2009f d

See monthly prices for crops and livestock.

See annual prices for commodities.

Corn production is projected to total 12-13 billion bushels in 2009, which would be the second highest on record. Soybean production is projected to be near 3 billion bushels and the fourth highest on record.

It is expected that 2009 will be another good year for the farm economy, bolstered by strong demand for feed crops, oilseeds, and food grains, though earnings will not equal those of 2007 and 2008. Net farm income, projected at $71.2 billion, would be the fifth largest on record, as would net cash income ($77.3 billion) and value added ($108.8 billion).

Most crop prices are expected to be substantially lower in the 2008/09 marketing year, which includes the 12 months following the 2008 harvest. Even with larger quantities of most grains and oilseeds available to market, lower prices will pull down receipts and production value from 2008's record level. A substantial reduction in milk prices will signal the same outcome for livestock commodities. Despite increases for red meat and poultry receipts, overall livestock receipts are projected down by nearly $11 billion in 2009.

On the input side, prices are also projected to be less than in 2008, particularly for most manufactured inputs, feed, and services such as repairs or transportation. Overall, the reduction in gross income will be larger than the reduction in costs, leaving all measures of income and output below the record levels established in the past 2 years.

Gross farm income and production expenses, 1990-2009f d

The value of crop production is expected to decline $20.7 billion in 2009, but still remain $10.6 billion above the value of crop production in 2007. The value of livestock production is expected to decline $11 billion, due to a $12-billion drop in dairy production. With farm production costs (most notably, feed, fertilizer and fuel) also projected down in 2009, net value added is forecast to be down $17.3 billion (12.6 percent).

Net value added, 1998-2009f d

Feed costs are a large component of livestock expenses, and the exceptionally high prices for feed crops in 2008 were pinching livestock producers. Rising costs cause livestock producers to eliminate their least productive animals and cut back in less profitable areas of their operations. In 2009, softening world economies will likely result in lower demand for the better cuts of meat, if not meat in general, and thus counter some of the benefits of less costly feed crops.

Net value added and net farm income have followed the value of commodity production over both the long term and in year-to-year fluctuations. Because farmers typically do not vary their production mix dramatically from year to year, purchases of production inputs have been relatively stable. Thus, the direction and magnitude of annual changes in the value of livestock production have arisen primarily from market prices for livestock and livestock products. On the other hand, variability in the value of crop production is determined by both market prices and production levels. Crop production varies with changes in yields due to weather, plant disease, and pests.

Value of crop production and livestock production, 1970-2009f d

See our glossary for definitions of terms.

See the official USDA estimates and forecast tables.

U.S. corn production, 1990-2009f d

U.S. soybean production, 1990-2009f d

Payments to stakeholders and net farm income, 1970-2009f d

Net farm income, 1998-2009f d

Declines in Cash Receipts Expected
for Almost All Crops in 2009

Annual receipts from food grains are expected to decline by almost 22 percent in 2009. This decline mostly reflects an anticipated 26-percent drop in wheat receipts, which are expected to account for almost 78 percent of food grain receipts in 2009. Much of the expected decline in wheat from 2008 to 2009 results from an almost $2-per-bushel decline in its annual average price. U.S. wheat exports are down as U.S. wheat farmers face large world supplies, especially from the EU-27, Canada, Russia, and Ukraine.

Feed crop receipts, which account for 32 percent of crop receipts, are expected to decline about 14.6 percent in 2009. The decline is led by a 15.6-percent decline in corn receipts, which accounted for an estimated 82.3 percent of feed crop receipts in 2008. The annual average price of feed corn is expected to decline 75 cents per bushel in 2009, reflecting weaker demand for corn in ethanol production and in export markets. Declines in 2009 cash receipts are also expected for hay (8.7 percent) and barley, oats, and sorghum (14 percent).

Oil crop receipts are expected to decline over 6.6 percent in 2009. This decline mostly reflects an expected 6.6-percent decline in soybean receipts. Soybeans are expected to account for almost 93 percent of oil crop receipts in 2009. Calendar-year prices for soybeans are expected to decline by almost $2 per bushel in 2009 and by almost $55 per ton for soybean meal. Sharp declines in petroleum prices have reduced the value of soybean oil in biodiesel production, lowering the premium food processors are willing to pay. Abundant global supplies of oilseeds and vegetable oils are weakening U.S. soybean exports. Additional supplies of domestic vegetable oils are easing demand for soybean oil. Soybean meal use has also been reduced by a surge in domestic canola meal use. Soybean meal exports have softened with rising supplies of soybean meal and competitive feed grains in India and Europe.

The largest percentage decline (23.7 percent) in cash receipts is expected for cotton lint and seed, due to both lower quantities sold and lower prices. Cotton is expected to account for 2.3 percent of 2009 crop receipts. Cotton production has declined as farmers have switched to other crops and as the slowdown in the world economy has decreased export demand for U.S. cotton.

The average annual price for fruits and tree nuts is expected to decline by 8.2 percent from 2008. While quantities sold are relatively stable from 2008 to 2009 for most fruit and tree nut commodities, there will be fewer fresh oranges and grapefruit available. Overall, fruit and tree nut receipts are expected to account for 10.4 percent of 2009 crop receipts.

Vegetable and melon receipts are expected to decline over 4 percent from 2008 as fresh-market vegetable acreage and production decline. Given a smaller 2008 fall crop (which is marketed through the following summer), potatoes are also expected to incur a small decline in sales volume, with higher prices during the first half of the year giving way to lower values later in 2009. Cash receipts from the sale of vegetables for processing may increase in 2009 as processors offer higher contract prices to secure delivery. Quantities sold of dry beans are expected to exceed their 2008 levels by about 1 percent, but at reduced prices. In 2009, vegetables and melons are expected to account for 12.8 percent of total crop receipts.

All other crops are expected to increase their share of all crop receipts from 14.4 to 16 percent by maintaining relatively stable cash receipts from 2008-2009 in the face of declining receipts for most other crops. Greenhouse and nursery receipts and prices are expected to increase about 1.6 percent in 2009. Tobacco receipts are expected to increase almost 9 percent in 2009, partly due to an expected 3-cent-per-bushel increase in average tobacco price. Both cash receipts and annual average prices for sugarbeets and sugarcane are expected to increase in 2009.

Global Economic Uncertainty and Reduced Milk Prices Drive Animal Sector Receipts Down in 2009

The value of livestock, dairy, and poultry is forecast to be $131.9 billion in 2009, down 8 percent from 2008. Domestic and global consumers are being pinched by the global economic slowdown and high retail prices. This has reduced demand for livestock, poultry, and dairy products in domestic and international markets. The U.S. dollar, which started to strengthen relative to other currencies in late 2008, has also reduced projected exports of animal products.

The animal sector is projected to account for 44 percent of total agricultural cash receipts in 2009. This is nearly the same ratio as in 2008.

Soft consumer demand is expected to dramatically reduce milk prices for farmers in 2009. As a result, dairy cash receipts are projected to be down more than 35 percent from 2008 levels. While supplies are forecast to remain similar to last year, farm prices for milk are expected to decline significantly for much of the year. A slight price recovery is expected toward the end of 2009 as excess cows are liquidated. Weaker global demand for dairy products, a strengthening U.S. dollar, and improved dairy productivity in Australia and New Zealand are expected to stifle export growth in the dairy sector in 2009.

Cash receipts for cattle and calves are expected to move slightly upward to a nominal record high of $50.2 billion. Beef production is expected to maintain levels similar to 2008. Although falling crop prices have improved feedlot margins, weak beef demand will keep placements similar to 2008. Cow slaughter will continue to be higher than usual in 2009 as producers cull cows to increase herd efficiency. Cattle prices are expected to move slightly upward though weak retail demand will likely preclude a return to the record prices of recent years. Increased access to South Korean customers has edged projected beef exports slightly upward for 2009; however, widespread recession will limit gains.

Hog producers' cash receipts are expected to increase 3 percent to $16.4 billion in 2009. Supplies are forecast to be down slightly for the year, which will help boost prices above the low levels of late 2008. Although U.S. hog exports have been strong in recent years, they are expected to fall due to depressed consumer demand for animal protein in international markets.

Cash receipts for broilers are anticipated to be $24.4 billion in 2009, a 4-percent increase over 2008. Supplies are expected lower than 2008 due to reduced chick placements, raising prices about 6 percent. Global economic uncertainties are expected to diminish the previously strong broiler export demand, which will reduce leg quarter prices.

Cash receipts from egg production are expected to decrease around 4 percent in 2009. Lower farm prices in 2008 led to a reduction in the laying flock, which will decrease egg production during the first half of 2009. Supplies are expected to increase as layer placements increase during the second half of the year. Meanwhile, prices are expected to trend downward for most of the year due to reduced domestic demand. Lower prices are expected to help increase U.S. egg exports over 2008 levels.

Production Expenses Forecast To Achieve First Year-Over-Year Decline Since 2002

Following an expected increase of $36.2 billion (14.2 percent) in 2008 to a nominal record $290.6 billion, production expenses are forecast to decrease $13.5 billion (4.6 percent) in 2009 to $277.1 billion, the second highest level ever. This drop would be the first since 2002 and the largest nominal decline ever. Still, forecast expenses for 2009 would constitute a larger share of gross farm income—79 percent—than in 2008.

After rising $97 billion from 2002 to 2008, total farm expenses are forecast to fall in 2009. d

Ten of the 17 expense categories projected by ERS are forecast to fall in 2009. Feed, fertilizer, fuels, and oils should drop by more than $3 billion apiece. Sizeable reductions in prices paid for inputs, especially a projected 31-percent fall in prices paid for fuels, are behind the lower expenses. After rising almost 16 percent in 2008, prices paid for production inputs, interest, taxes, and wages (PITW) should drop more than 3 percent in 2009, the first decrease since 2002. After rising $7.1 billion (19 percent) in 2008 and $17.2 billion (61 percent) over the last 3 years, feed expenses are expected to drop $4.4 billion (9.7 percent) in 2009. The decrease is due primarily to a projected 9.4-percent fall in prices paid for feed. Prices paid for complete feeds, the largest component of feed used, have fallen 26 percent since they peaked in August 2008. Since corn accounts for around 90 percent of feed grains used for feed and soymeal is the principal oil crop product used as feed, prices paid for feed depend mainly on the prices for these commodities. The forecast 2009 calendar-year average prices of both are down 16 percent. On the quantity side, the number of grain-consuming animal units (GCAUs) is forecast down 1.5 percent. Cattle-on-feed are expected to be lower in each quarter in 2009 than in 2008. Net placements will be up but total supply should decline. Pork and broiler production are each forecast down around 1.5 percent. Milk production is expected to increase 0.5 percent.

Livestock and poultry purchases are forecast to rise $336 million (1.9 percent) in 2009. Since cattle and calf purchases account for more than 75 percent of this expense, this market has the biggest effect on livestock and poultry purchases. The current economic downturn has weakened beef demand, offsetting the positive effects of lower grain prices. Prices paid for feeder steers in 2009 are expected to remain almost exactly the same as in 2008. (A projected rise in steer prices in the 4th quarter of 2009 balances lower prices in the first 3 quarters.) An expected reduction in cattle inventory during 2009 will lower available supply. The price for milk cow replacements was trending down in late 2008 as a large number of cows were being sent to slaughter because of projected low milk prices in 2009. The annual average farm prices for hogs and broilers are forecast to rise in 2009.

After rising $15 billion (39 percent) in 2008 to $53.8 billion, the principal crop-related expenses are forecast to fall $3.7 billion (6.8 percent) to $50.1 billion in 2009. One indicator of crop-related expenses--acres planted of the principal 14 field crops--is projected to decrease 1.7 percent in 2009. Production of vegetables and fruits/nuts will also decrease.

Seed and fertilizer expenses rose rapidly from 2002 to 2008, while pesticides increased gradually d

Following an increase of $3.4 billion (28 percent) in 2008, seed expenses are forecast to rise $400 million (3 percent) in 2009. Seed prices have been rising rapidly since 2000 because of biotechnology advancements and the resultant improved yield potential (Crop Production Cost and Outlook, FAPRI). Prices paid for seeds increased an estimated 27 percent in 2008, and are expected to rise another 7 percent in 2009.

It is difficult to predict how fertilizer expenses will be divided between 2008 and 2009. They will certainly be up markedly in 2008, as prices paid for fertilizers rose 68 percent, and they will probably fall in 2009, as prices paid are projected to decline almost 9 percent. Farmers who did not prepurchase fertilizer in late 2007 could not avoid the runup in fertilizer prices during the first half of 2008. However, as prices continued to rise through September, farmers probably curtailed purchases. This tendency was reinforced by plummeting wholesale fertilizer prices during the last 3 months of the year. Many farmers probably held off purchasing fertilizer as they waited for retail prices to come down. The volatility in commodity prices and the credit market has made farmers cautious. At the same time, suppliers, who had bought their fertilizer inventories at the higher prices, have been reticent to lower the prices they offer to farmers. In addition, many fertilizer dealers have been requiring full cash payments. Farmers will eventually need to buy fertilizer, but the timing and the purchase prices are indeterminate at the moment. A sudden, large-scale surge in purchases during the spring would create greater demand than usual. Further, because of the current dropoff in demand, some fertilizer production plants have been closed, so the supply of fertilizers may be constricted when producers try to purchase for the 2009 crop year. These factors could keep retail prices from falling to the same extent that wholesale prices have.

Fertilizer expenses were a greater concern to crop farmers than fuel costs in 2008 as they were expected to rise $10.8 billion (64 percent), due primarily to the increase in fertilizer prices. Fertilizer expenses are forecast to fall $3.5 billion (12 percent) in 2009, due again to the movement in fertilizer prices. Another factor that points to lower fertilizer prices in 2009 is that the cost of natural gas, the primary source for nitrogen fertilizers, is forecast to decline in the fourth quarter of 2008 and fall 38 percent in 2009. Total applications in 2009 (acreage for principal crops times per-acre application rates) are forecast down 0.8 percent.

Pesticide expenses are forecast to fall $685 million (6.2 percent) in 2009. Prices paid for pesticides should fall by a little more than 2 percent in 2009. Pesticide use is forecast down 0.3 percent in 2009.

Fuel and oil expenses are forecast to decrease $5.4 billion (33 percent) in 2009. Like fertilizer prices, fuel prices have risen dramatically since 2002. Annual average fuel prices have registered six straight double-digit percentage increases and, since 2002, are projected to have risen more than 200 percent through the end of 2008. Prices paid for fuels have fallen since July 2008, however. By the end of December 2008, fuel prices stood 31 percent lower than in December 2007. In mid-January, the price of crude oil was below $40 per barrel, down from nearly $150 per barrel in July (see: www.oil-price.net). This fall in prices during the latter part of 2008 is significant because questions about the timing of input purchases on the 2008 Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) showed farmers purchasing 50 percent of their fuels in the third and fourth quarters. Refiner acquisition cost is projected to remain around $40 throughout 2009, a drop of 57 percent from 2008. Lower planted acreage in 2009 will likely prompt a reduction in fuel use during the year.

Payments to Stakeholders (Providers of Hired Labor,
Rented Land, and Debt Capital)

Payments to stakeholders are projected to increase around $800 million (1.7 percent) in 2009 and are expected to constitute 41 percent of net value added, up significantly from 2008. Stakeholder payments as a percent of total expenses have been dropping since 1984 when they peaked at 26.5 percent. In 2009, the ratio should rise slightly to 17.6 percent.

Following a $1.1-billion (5-percent) rise in 2008, employee compensation (hired labor) is forecast to fall around $100 million (0.4 percent) in 2009. Farm wage rates are projected to be nearly the same in 2009 as in 2008. Fruit/nut, vegetable, dairy, and greenhouse/nursery operations are the heaviest users of hired labor. The production of fruits and nuts is slated to fall in 2009. Vegetable production will likely remain about the same, while diary and greenhouse/nursery production should be up a small amount.

Net rent to nonoperator landlords is expected to rise around $700 million (7 percent) in 2009. The 2009 increase would be the result of an 8-percent increase in cash rent, an 11-percent drop in share rent, and a 12-percent decline in landlord government payments.

In 2009, interest expenses are forecast up $200 million. Total end-of-year debt will be 1.0 percent higher as real estate debt is forecast up $3.2 billion (2.5 percent) and nonreal estate debt is expected to decrease around $800 million (0.8 percent). Annual average interest rates on both outstanding real and nonreal estate farm loans in 2009 are expected to be the same as rates in 2008.

Government Payments Forecast at $11.4 Billion

Direct government payments are expected to total $11.4 billion in 2009, down from the $12.4 billion paid out in 2008. This level would be 27 percent below the 5-year average for 2004-08. Direct payments under the Direct and Countercyclical Program are forecast at $4.89 billion for 2009, almost a 5- percent decrease from the average for the previous 5 years. This decrease is primarily attributed to producers giving up a portion of their direct payments upon enrolling in the Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 2009. This program was recently authorized by the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (2008 Farm Act), whereby direct payments in 2009 will be reduced by 20 percent for ACRE enrollees, even though few if any ACRE payments will actually be made in this calendar year. In general, direct payment rates are fixed in legislation and are not affected by the level of program crop prices. The small fluctuations across calendar years are the result of changes in the number of farmers taking advantage of optional advanced payment in December, affecting the share of the payment rolled into the following calendar year. As of last December, very few advanced payments were made.

Countercyclical payments are forecast to increase from $720 million in 2008 to $1.2 billion in 2009. The drop in cotton prices in the latter half of 2008 is responsible for this projected increase in program payments. Since 2006, only upland cotton and peanuts have received countercyclical payments. Under the 2008 Farm Bill, the timing of countercyclical payments will change. For crop years 2008 through 2010, producers will receive two countercyclical payments. A partial payment will be made after 180 days of the marketing year and the final payment will be made beginning the following October 1 st.

Marketing loan benefits—including loan deficiency payments, marketing loan gains, and certificate exchange gains—are projected at $685 million in 2009, up from $90 million in 2008. In 2009, upland cotton producers will realize almost 99 percent of the total marketing loan benefits. The other crops receiving marketing loan benefits are wool, mohair, and pelts. Although prices have declined from their peaks in 2008, marketing loan benefits are still not available to the remaining program crops at current price levels.

The Milk Income Loss Contract Program (MILC) compensates dairy producers when domestic milk prices fall below a specified level. High prices in 2008 meant that less than $1 million in MILC payments went to producers. For 2009, current economic uncertainties appear to be reducing demand for dairy products; falling milk prices are forecast to generate $700 million in MILC payments to producers this year.

Forecast at $360 million in 2009, Tobacco Transition Payment Program (TTP) payments are expected to be one-third less than in 2008. Payments reported here include both CCC payments and lump-sum payments. Begun in 2005, this program provides annual payments over a 10-year period to eligible quota holders and producers of tobacco. Since the inception of the program, lump sum payments to individuals have been made through agreements with third parties in return for the producers' and quota owners' rights to the 10-year TTP payment stream. While significant lump-sum payments were made in 2005 and 2006, producers continued to participate in these buyout agreements in 2007. As a result, actual TTP payments to producers are expected to continue declining beyond 2009, albeit at a decreasing rate.

Conservation programs include all conservation programs operated by the Farm Service Agency and the Natural Resources Conservation Service that provide direct payments to participating producers that adopt approved conservation practices. Estimated conservation payments of $3.2 billion in 2009 reflect programs being brought up toward funding levels authorized by current legislation.

Ad hoc and emergency disaster program payments are forecast to be $260 million in 2009. Disaster payments appropriated under Title IX – Agricultural Assistance - of the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007, were largely paid out in 2008. As a result, these payments are projected to drop by 90 percent in 2009. The 2008 Farm Act created a permanent fund for disaster assistance, the Agricultural Disaster Relief Trust Fund. Producers in disaster counties who are eligible for Supplemental Revenue Assistance (SURE) payments made from this trust fund will begin receiving payments in calendar year 2010.

Government payments, 1999-2009f d

Farm Income Forecasts Grow More Refined Over 19 Months

The periodic farm income forecasts and estimates published by ERS over the course of a crop year (5 over a span of 19 months) can vary markedly from one release to the next. For example, the first forecast of 2009 income (in February 2009) undergoes painstaking refinement as new information becomes available. Release dates for the updated forecasts correspond with the availability of seasonal data and annual survey results. For example, an August 2009 update of annual crop values benefits from preliminary output and yield numbers as reported by producers in the field. Likewise, production expenses can be extrapolated from prior-year expense data and several months of current-year input prices. Additional refinements in November and the following February (2010) incorporate harvest, sales, and inventory data. Ultimately, an August 2010 estimate of 2009 farm income will be published.

Individual components of the farm income accounts adhere to different timetables and are subject to varying degrees of uncertainty. For instance, crop inventory adjustment is a residual component of total supply (production and beginning-of-year stocks) and use (domestic and exports). Farm household income is contingent on many factors (amount of off-farm work hours and wage rates) that transcend crop and livestock numbers. Government payments—which are a function of prices, production, eligibility rules, and ad hoc disaster legislation—are also hard to forecast with any certainty, and that uncertainty compounds the margin of error that measures like net cash income are subject to from first forecast to final estimate.

Crop and livestock receipt forecasts tighten significantly as additional price and output data become available during the forecast period. As a result, by harvest time, the relative error (between forecast and actual totals) is generally less than 2 percent for total cash income and less than 5 percent for net farm income. Of course, in absolute terms this can amount to as much as $4 billion across the farm sector.

See glossary.

 

 

 

For more information, contact: Roger Strickland

Web administration: webadmin@ers.usda.gov

Updated date: February 12, 2009