skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 141700  
Title: FORENSIC SCIENCE: ROLE OF THE HEARSAY DOCTRINE IN LITIGATING FRYE CHALLENGES TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE
Journal: Criminal Law Bulletin  Volume:29  Issue:2  Dated:(March-April 1993)  Pages:158-167
Author(s): E J Imwinkelried
Sale: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States
Publication Date: 1993
Pages: 10
Type: Surveys
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This analysis of the hearsay rule in arguments regarding the admissibility of scientific evidence concludes that the hearsay rule need not preclude effective advocacy at hearings involving the Frye test relating to whether a theory or technique has attained a certain degree of acceptance or popularity within the pertinent scientific specialty.
Abstract: This issue arose after the National Academy of Sciences in 1992 issued a report critical of the methods used by DNA laboratories to compute the probability of a random match in DNA markers. Citing this report, some courts have excluded or criticized computations by DNA experts. Because a technical article or text is an assertive, out-of-court statement, it arguably constitutes hearsay evidence. Thus, an opposing attorney might object on the grounds that the judge's consideration of the document would void the hearsay rule. However, to some extent, the hearsay rule must give way at a Frye hearing, because each generation of experts builds on prior research by other experts. Given the nature of the Frye test, attorneys litigating a Frye hearing must be able to introduce texts and articles addressing the questions of the validity and acceptance of the scientific theory or technique. Footnotes
Main Term(s): Expert witnesses ; Hearsay evidence
Index Term(s): Rules of evidence ; US Supreme Court decisions ; DNA fingerprinting
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=141700

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder