Summit focuses on common
challenges, opportunities facing
all co-op sectors
here is Teddy Roosevelt
when America needs
him? Glenn English,
CEO of the National
Rural Electric
Cooperative Association (NRECA),
raised this question during an address
that was one of the highlights of the first
National Cooperative Summit, held May
3 in Washington, D.C.
Roosevelt — the nation’s monopolybusting
president — would doubtless
be sorely aggrieved if he returned now
to see how business power has been
concentrated into fewer and fewer corporate
hands. This makes the role of
cooperatives more important than ever,
English noted. Three decades of corporate
mergers and deregulation have
resulted in the rise of a new class of
robber barons in some industries, he
said.
In the 1970s, there were more than
60 railroads competing with each other.
Then deregulation began, and today
there are but four national railroads,
English said. This has impacted rural
utilities by contributing to soaring
prices for coal.
“What would Teddy Roosevelt have
to say? This nation needs a good dose
of Teddy Roosevelt!” said English,
adding that NRECA has engaged in a
nine-year struggle on energy legislation
needed to help address some marketplace
imbalances. NRECA’s 900-plus
member co-ops provide electricity to 39
million people and are growing at twice
the rate of investor-owned utilities,
English said.
“Some say co-ops
should evolve into
hybrid businesses,
combining elements of
co-ops and investorowned
businesses.
Others urge members
to cash-in [selling or
converting their coops],
sacrificing the
good of the membership
for personal gain,”
he continued, sounding
highly skeptical of
such moves. Instead,
co-ops need to
recruit managers who
are “true believers in
co-op principles,”
English said.
“Co-ops represent the ultimate in
self-reliance; they let people do for
themselves,” he said. But new tools
must be developed to carry co-op ideas
and principles to millions more people
in America and around the world. Coops
are different from other businesses
because they have “heart and soul,”
English continued, and they are committed
to the concept of providing service
to their communities (the seventh
co-op principle).
English saluted the National
Cooperative Business Association
(NCBA) for hosting the Co-op Summit,
calling NCBA “the keeper of the flame
for the co-op movement.”
Summit’s cross-sector focus
The Co-op Summit brought together 300 national cooperative leaders for a
day-long series of seminars on topics
ranging from strategies for fighting coop
conversions to ways of improving
cooperative identification with consumers.
Some saw the summit as a first step
toward developing a cross-sector co-op
agenda to address common needs and
to begin flexing more co-op political
muscle, which has never been commensurate
with the impact co-ops have on
the national economy.
The Summit also had an international
flavor. More than 20 representatives
of the International Cooperative
Association attended the Summit, and
Dame Pauline Green, CEO of Cooperatives
UK, the United Kingdom’s
largest consumer cooperative, was a featured
plenary session speaker. She discussed
efforts to develop a common co-op “master brand” for the
cooperative, which includes
various types of businesses,
including food and drug
stores.
Green explained that the
pilot program in the U.K. was
aimed at creating a consistent
co-op identity around a common
logo and slogan. Overall,
she said, the pilot projects
have been successful, boosting
sales and customers and
increasing the profile of the
co-op stores. It is now up to
U.K. co-ops to decide
whether to adopt the brand
permanently.
Subsequent events have
proven that food, pharmacy
and travel stores all outperformed
control groups and
brand standards improved
across the board. As a result,
The Co-operative Group has
decided to roll out the new
identity campaign across more
than 3,400 outlets across the United
Kingdom. Many other U.K. cooperatives
are also adopting the common brand.
Other featured speakers included
Wisconsin Sen. Herb Kohl and Deputy
Agriculture Secretary Charles F."Chuck” Conner. Kohl hailed cooperatives
as “the good news in American
business” while Conner said without
co-ops “rural America would not be
what it is today.”
Conner: co-op identity
runs deep in rural America
Pinch hitting for Agriculture
Secretary Mike Johanns, who was called
away to crucial trade talks in Geneva,
Switzerland, at the last minute, Conner
noted that the Summit coincided with
an important anniversary. “USDA and
rural cooperatives are celebrating the
80th anniversary of a great partnership:
the Co-op Marketing Act, which
became law in 1926 and mandates that
USDA operate a co-op program.”
Conner noted that some have suggested
the Act be updated to expand the mission
to include all types of co-ops — an
idea that was popular with many of the
non-ag co-ops at the summit.
“Those of us who grew up in farm
country learned early on the value of
co-ops,” Conner said. “We got our
electricity from the REC, our phone
service from a rural telco, and did our
farm business down at the co-op. The
identification of co-ops with rural
America runs deep,” even extending to
the White House, he said.
“President Bush himself gets his
electricity down at the ranch from a
rural electric co-op,” Conner said. “He
also gets his water from a USDA Rural
Development-financed rural utility. You
can talk co-op in the Oval Office to this
President and be understood. That
hasn’t always been the case in the past.”
Of course, the cooperative movement
as a whole is much broader than
just rural America and agriculture,
Conner said, acknowledging and welcoming
the non-farm and non-rural cooperatives
present.
The mission of USDA Rural
Development, which administers
USDA’s rural business and cooperative
programs, is to increase economic
opportunity and improve the quality of
life in rural America. “You don’t need to
be a farmer, an REC or a telecom to do
business with us,” Conner said. “If you
are doing any kind of business in rural
America — whether it’s elder or farm
worker housing, or health care, or
schools or child care, or worker cooperatives
in any field, or making use of
our housing, community facilities and
business programs — we can provide
resources you can draw upon. We are
eager to work with you.
“We know we can’t stand still, and
neither can you. Rural America is
incredibly diverse. The rural economy
is highly diversified. The world is
changing. Your businesses — and our
mission — change with it.”
A better business model
NCBA President Paul Hazen kicked
off the Summit by proclaiming that U.S.
co-ops “aren’t simply an alternative
business model; they are a better business
model.” He offered reasons why:
- Cooperatives distribute capital widely
among average Americans, while
stock companies make the rich richer.
- Cooperatives keep capital in the
community, while stock companies
export it elsewhere.
- Cooperatives exemplify the “ownership
society,” while stock companies
concentrate ownership among the
investor class.
- Cooperative governance is open and
democratic, while stock company
governance is closed and easily
manipulated.
- Cooperatives have both economic
and social goals, while stock companies
are motivated solely to make
money for shareholders.
Cooperatives largely police themselves
while government must provide
extensive oversight and control over
stock companies, Hazen said. “As long
as the newspapers are full of scandals
involving investor-owned companies, as
long as a greedy few seek to convert coops
for personal gain and as long as
economic forces keep widening the gap
between rich and poor, I’ll keep saying
it. Co-ops are a better business model.”
Co-op program deserves support
Sen. Kohl, the ranking minority
member on the U.S. Senate Agriculture
Appropriations Subcommittee, said
cooperatives deserve greater attention
from the federal government for all
they do to foster economic development.
He noted that co-ops serve nearly
40 percent of Americans and pump at
least $200 billion into our economy
each year.
“Cooperatives are vital to our economy,
and they do it with a conscience
— a conscience that is centered on the
notion that we get more done by
working together,” Kohl said. “Yet,
while investor-owned businesses can
turn to the Commerce Department,
and small business has the Small
Business Administration, cooperatives
have just one office at the Department
of Agriculture, which makes it their
sole business to advocate for co-ops.”
He urged that a leader with strong coop
credentials be appointed to reinvigorate
USDA’s Cooperative Programs
office.
Kohl helped secure $4.5 million in
federal funding to establish a farmer
health care cooperative pilot project in
Wisconsin to increase access to affordable
health benefit plans. The funding
is being used to develop health care
purchasing alliances for Wisconsin
farmers and small businesses in the
state’s rural communities.
“If this program works in Wisconsin,
I see no reason why it can’t work in
other parts of the country,” Kohl said.
“It’s a textbook example of cooperatives
offering an innovative solution to a vexing
national problem.”
He also authored a bill that will result
in the expenditure of $500,000 to collect
data and research on the contributions
cooperatives make across our economy.
That program is being overseen by
USDA’s Cooperative Programs office.
The Summit concluded with a
roundtable of co-op CEOs moderated
by Hazen. The CEOs discussed the top
issues facing U.S. co-ops today, including
capital and equity needs, as well as
ideas for better co-op marketing.
Model co-op law examined
The continuing debate over the wisdom and need
for states to enact legislation authorizing the creation
of “cooperatives” with many characteristics of limited
liability companies was the focus of one Summit breakout
session. Donald Frederick, USDA Cooperative Programs
specialist in law and policy matters, reported
that four states (Wyoming, Minnesota, Iowa and Tennessee)
now have such laws and a fifth (Wisconsin)
was close to adopting one [it since has].
Thomas Geu, professor at the University of South
Dakota School of Law, discussed the project of the
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform
State Laws (NCCUSL) to draft a model statute in this
area. He explained that NCCUSL is a nonprofit association
of lawyers, appointed by the states, that researches,
drafts and promotes enactment of uniform state
laws in areas where it believes uniformity is desirable
and practical.
In the summer of 2003, NCCUSL created a drafting
committee to write a uniform cooperative associations
law in response to the Wyoming and Minnesota laws
that were already on the books at that time. Professor
Geu, who serves as the reporter (chief draftsperson)
for the committee, said that the committee has met
each fall and spring since then. In 2005, the original
scope of the project, agricultural cooperatives, was
broadened to include most lines of business. NCCUSL
plans to complete work on its uniform statute in the
summer of 2007 and submit it to the legislatures of the
states for possible enactment in their 2008 legislative
sessions.
The panel concluded with a discussion of key provisions
of the various pieces of legislation. Frederick
explained provisions of the existing state “LLC/Cooperative”
laws and questioned calling entities created
under these laws “cooperatives” when a substantial
portion of the ownership, control and financial rewards
can be bestowed on non-patron investor-owners. Professor
Geu responded by explaining how the NCCUSL
draft attempts to protect patron-member interests
while still creating flexibility and incentives for outsiders
to provide equity capital to cooperatives.