Library of Congress September 11 Web Archive Collection This is an archived Web site from the Library of Congress. maximize
Back to previous page http://afterchaos.com/
Archived: Sep 13, 2002 at 10:16:31
Note: External links, forms and search boxes may not function within this collection
«« First « Previous # 17 of 17 Next » Last »»
10/09/2001   09/13/2002

afterchaos

inside who what how essays models theories profiles touch 


We will never forget; we will forgive

Looking for the essay on Sept11? Give a chance to world peace.

Looking for the archived 911 info page?

The 911 info page was first published Sept 11 around 10h30 am and updated round the clock until Sept 16 late pm on our new media portal :: netdiver.net :: what's new page, which reaches a worldwide audience.

As the time nears by, I am finally getting closure, my memory was locked up on some details and now, as I remember some, I am sharing these two moments with you. I do so, to encourage you to never give up on a trial, an adversity, a tragedy happening in your life or around you.

Change is possible - because there is always something that can be done. These two little moments, will demonstrate this first hand. Never, never, never give up.

As the communication network was shutting down, one of our friend who lives in Long Island mentioned being out of news and not knowing what was going on. I decided to use our e_list to start sharing news and needs that were channelled back to us. I remember him asking what could be done - and I said: *There has been a request for Gatorade to be sent to the rescue teams, due to intense heat and smell, water was not enough*. He said that he would go around and talk to shop owners and see what could be done.

Don't underestimate the power of one people to help. All the efforts were done by the decision of one individual at a time, to lend a hand... no matter how small or symbolic the gesture.

One person on a list was actually in a plane, 9 in line to leave Newark, when the first tower was hit. He actually used his wireless to download his email, read what was going on and actually relayed the news to the pilots in the plane. What he shared is in an incredible tale of human encouter whereas he ended-up spending the night with 8 complete strangers in a hotel room, all sleeping in the same bed, hugging each other, with the tv on all night.

The 911 info page was first published Sept 11 around 10h30 am and updated round the clock until Sept 16 late pm on netdiver what's new page, which reaches a worldwide audience.

For 5 days nonstop, we devoted all our time, often times through tears and heavy emotional strain to DO something to help. Within hours of the tragedy, the independent web content producers were organizing around the world and relaying news. But mostly, we were acknowledging and renewing a sacred bond: our humanity.

Having being involved in NYC for the past 7 years both on a professional and personal basis - we had first hand contacts, testimonials and news to relay and we are proud to have contributed in organizing the first relief efforts. It was an atoning effort. Whereas, searching for missing people and breaking news to family members that they had lost loved ones, was the most horrendous task I have ever done.

Through our extensive network, as new information was received, it was added to top of page in a priority order. When info became obsolete (usually within hours) it was then moved to another page. What remains is the archived page which is kept both as a memorial statement and a reference page.

Subsequently, we made a trip NYC on Sept 29/Oct 6. We did a photo essay (unpublished) of which this memorial picture is the first we show. It is one of an artist who draw from morning to dusk. It depicts the power of our human spirit over tragedy. We visited loved ones and friends, ground-zero, talked with eye witnesses, firemen, policemen, soldiers, attended funerals, received testimonials and saw first hand, the aftermath. Mostly, we were privileged to give our compassion and love to a stricken city.

There is much suffering in the world - I wish I could DO more to alleviated it. Join me in praying for world peace.

References:

One year later: September 11 and the Internet + A study (.pdf) on the impact and ensuing actions/reactions from internet users.

September 11.archive.org +

.......................................

Looking for past articles? Try the Essays archive.

:: Copyleft and the independent content producer

by sabin densmore

Abstract

The independent content producer faced with not making a profit and potential rip-off of his/her work via the internet has potential in the GNU public-license arena.

Context

How do we distribute our work technologically, and still create some kind of income for ourselves? How do we ensure that our rights to that work will not be violated? Should we make money every time someone reads/uses/listens to our product? Does it matter, really?

Organizations like BMG, RIAA, Sony and others have spent millions of dollars to date (and counting) on ensuring that the artists under their wings get proper recognition and kickback. At the same time, there are the little people who write software and articles, create designs and fan art that are also concerned with their rights and their profits.

There are examples of groups (mp3.com comes to mind) who are working out methods of ensuring that these content producers get properly credited and -- in some cases -- rewarded for their efforts. No matter the place, though, it's always a big discussion. Lots at stake, tons to talk about, no real answers. One constant rings through all the arguments, though: the internet has made copyright and intellectual property too difficult to manage, and will limit our ability as content producers to make money from our work. I don't believe that.

Content

First: the internet was designed to distribute data with no consideration as to that data's origination. Whether audio, video, graphic or text, created by the distributor or not, it's all composed of bits and bytes and flows back and forth as data.

Second: copyright is pretty cut and dry. If you can prove that you were the first person to create a work (audio, video, written or otherwise) or idea, then it's yours. Whether that work has been published (distributed to others) or not doesn't matter.

In my eyes, the two are not connected in such a way that one hampers or disturbs the other. Also, neither of them is particularly concerned with profitability of the work.

The internet has made it possible for the smalltime content producer to distribute their works for less money and to more people than was possible before. On the other side, it has also increased the distribution channels of large-company creations, wresting control from those companies. However, neither of the above changes the fact that a work -- created by someone -- is being distributed. Neither of the above changes the fact that the work is someone's intellectual property.

Larger companies don't seem to grasp that, however, and smaller content creators remain worried that someone will steal their ideas. I can understand that. There is some hope, though, for solving the copyright problem: copyleft. Simply put, it's a licensing method for software that requires the initial release to be free, and all subsequent releases to be free, as well. Programs like emacs, languages like perl and php, and operating systems (Linux, BSD) have all been released under this license. Furthermore, the creators of those technologies have all remained named in each subsequent release, ensuring that full credit is given.

If your product/work/text is so important, and people really need it, then charge a download fee. The point, though, is to not worry about what happens to it afterwards. How many of you have used the paperback exchange at a local library? Does Danielle Steele get commission for each book of hers you take out of the free box?

It's possible that at some point in time, all content will be released under some kind of public use license (David Bowie on copyright). All work could be altered in any way, as long as the original author/creator remains known. For that matter, all work can be altered now. It has always been possible to alter someone else's work. We have a word for it: plagiarism.

Conclusion

In other words, don't be so worried about it. For years it has been possible to rip off the independent content producer, the larger corporations. Nothing's changed. Except for the fact that now the independents can get their work out faster.

How to profit from that work is still up in the air, but the internet has also changed nothing about supply, demand and the appreciation that people have for quality ...

page up

 


inside

There is genius in persistence. It conquers all opposers. It gives confidence. It annihilates obstacles. Everybody believes in a determined man. People know that when he undertakes a thing, the battle is half won, for his rule is to accomplish whatever he sets out to do.

-- Orison Swett Marden

:: newsvaults

::

::

afterchaos copyright 2001 - 2002