Wednesday, February 21, 2001 A Knotty Problem By Jennifer McKee Journal Staff Writer LOS ALAMOS - On its face, this sounds like a real yawner: Scientists discover how simple knots work. But go a little deeper, said Eli Ben-Naim, a physicist at Los Alamos National Laboratory who has, in fact, unraveled the secrets of simple knots, and you're talking about a model for the behavior of DNA strands, the structure of rubber, the insides of proteins. In short, he said, you're talking about a whole chapter of math, physics and biology interested in how long strings of things - anything from genetic material to the strings of molecules in plastics - tie themselves up and straighten themselves out again. Ben-Naim, fellow lab researcher Robert Ecke, and collaborator Zahir Daya, also at the lab, spent much of last summer watching knots unravel. In the process, they discovered several basic truths about knots - most notably, that infused with enough energy, every knot eventually unravels itself. They can predict how long such unraveling will take and have mapped several steps every unraveling knot eventually goes through, despite the fact that the unraveling itself is completely random. "There's some very generic behavior," Ben-Naim said. For these researchers, the discovery was science for science's sake, and not necessarily tied to any practical applications. But you never know what happens to knowledge, Ben-Naim said. "You put it out there," he said. "You don't know what people will do with it." Their findings were published in the American Physical Society's Physical Review Letters on Monday, although about 30 other researchers have already heard about their work and visited Los Alamos to watch the scientists duplicate it. Their data sprang from experiments amazingly simple and serendipitous. Ben-Naim's forte is the random movement of particles. Ecke had been talking to another scientist who spent decades studying proteins - which are long strings of molecules often tangling and detangling themselves. "I asked (Ecke) one day, 'Why don't we do this?' '' Ben-Naim said. Ben-Naim went to Metzger True Value Hardware in a Los Alamos strip mall and bought a spool of metal bead cord - the light metal chain that attaches pens to the bank counter. He picked up a Wal-Mart stopwatch and the two rigged up a simple vibrating board. They knotted the chain, placed it on the vibrating board and watched as the cords jiggled, jumped and wormed their way to knotlessness. They repeated the experiment hundreds of times, making sure their findings weren't a fluke. "That was the fun part," Ben-Naim said. The three are hardly the first to study knots and polymers. But the beauty of their experiment was how big and "watchable" it was. Most polymers, or strands of particles, are way too tiny to see with the naked eye and even too small to watch their behavior under a microscope, Ecke said. But this experiment was very obvious. You just watch the chain and time it as it unravels. No guesswork. The vibration is nothing more than energy, Ben-Naim said. And the metal chain is very much like the polymers and macromolecules the three were trying to understand, Ecke said. Macromolecules, like proteins or plastic, are strands of smaller molecules strung together like beads. Although they may look like strings under a microscope, they don't behave like a knotted shoestring. That's because the particles don't have any friction holding them together, Ecke said, just like the metal chains in their experiments. Believe it or not, Ben-Naim said, scientists have been trying to figure out knots for years. Their discovery comes as fresh insight for lots of scientists around the world. "Everybody who comes in has been fascinated with it," Ben-Naim said. Turns out, the three weren't the first to discover vibration's powerful effect on knots. Since news of their findings has spread, the lab researchers have learned that fishermen around the world traditionally throw their knotted ropes overboard. The vibration of the waves eventually works the knots out, Ben-Naim said. "So, we're not so smart."