skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 103302  
Title: Assessing the Competencies of Juries
Author(s): S D Penrod ; B L Cutler
Sponsoring Agency: US Dept of Justice
National Institute of Justice
United States

US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
United States
Publication Date: 1986
Pages: 17
Type: Literature reviews
Origin: United States
Language: English
Grant No.: 81-IJ-CX-0048; 84-IJ-CX-0010; SES-8411721
Annotation: Two bodies of empirical research into jury decisionmaking and competence are reviewed. The first examined the relationships between juror attitudes, demographic, and attitudinal characteristics to decisionmaking. The second examined assumptions about the nature and quality of decisionmaking and the effects of legal processes on it.
Abstract: Social, scientific, and psychological research indicates that juror attitudes and dispositional factors are related to verdict preferences; but these relationships typically are not strong and probably depend on the particular case and location of the trial. The other body of research has provided information on the problems jurors confront when applying legal instructions and evaluating evidence (e.g., using probabilistic information and eyewitness identifications). Research also has identified procedural domains, such as enjoinder and pretrial publicity effects, in which assumptions about juror behavior can be seriously questioned. While scientists are becoming increasingly involved in judicial processes, little of the research has yet found its way into the courts, with the exception of the use of pretrial surveys in motions to change venue and select jurors and a movement toward more simplified jury instructions. 111 references.
Main Term(s): Jury research
Index Term(s): Personality/ ; Demography ; Jury selection ; Juror characteristics ; Jury decisionmaking ; Juror instructional materials
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=103302

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder