pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of jcellbiolhis Article at jcb.orgThe Rockefeller University PressInstructions to AuthorsContactEditorsThe Journal of Cell Biology
J Cell Biol. 1969 October 1; 43(1): 40–50.
PMCID: PMC2107850
CHROMOSOME MICROMANIPULATION
III. Spindle Fiber Tension and the Reorientation of Mal-Oriented Chromosomes
R. Bruce Nicklas and Carol A. Koch
From the Department of Zoology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706
Received March 6, 1969; Revised May 19, 1969.
Abstract
Kinetochore reorientation is the critical process ensuring normal chromosome distribution. Reorientation has been studied in living grasshopper spermatocytes, in which bivalents with both chromosomes oriented to the same pole (unipolar orientation) occur but are unstable: sooner or later one chromosome reorients, the stable, bipolar orientation results, and normal anaphase segregation to opposite poles follows. One possible source of stability in bipolar orientations is the normal spindle forces toward opposite poles, which slightly stretch the bivalent. This tension is lacking in unipolar orientations because all the chromosomal spindle fibers and spindle forces are directed toward one pole. The possible role of tension has been tested directly by micromanipulation of bivalents in unipolar orientation to artificially create the missing tension. Without exception, such bivalents never reorient before the tension is released; a total time "under tension" of over 5 hr has been accumulated in experiments on eight bivalents in eight cells. In control experiments these same bivalents reoriented from a unipolar orientation within 16 min, on the average, in the absence of tension. Controlled reorientation and chromosome segregation can be explained from the results of these and related experiments.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (917K).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • BAUER, H; DIETZ, R; ROEBBELEN, C. [Spermatocyte division of Tipulae. III. Movement behavior of chromosomes in translocation heterozygotes of Tipula oleracea.]. Chromosoma. 1961;12:116–189. [PubMed]
  • BLOOM, W; ZIRKLE, RE; URETZ, RB. Irradiation of parts of individual cells. III. Effects of chromosomal and extrachromosomal irradiation on chromosome movements. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1955 Feb 3;59(4):503–513. [PubMed]
  • DEITZ, R. Die Spermatocytenteilungen der Tipuliden. II. Graphische Analyse der Chromosomenbewegung während der Prometaphase I im Leben. Chromosoma. 1956;8(2):183–211. [PubMed]
  • DIETZ, R. Multiple Geschlechtschromosomen bei den cypriden Ostracoden, ihre Evolution und ihr Teilungsverhalten. Chromosoma. 1958;9(5):359–440. [PubMed]
  • Hewitt, G; Schroeter, G. Population cytology of Oedaleonotus. I. The karyotypic facies of Oedaleonotus enigma (Scudder). Chromosoma. 1968;25(2):121–140. [PubMed]
  • Lawrence, CW. The Orientation of Multiple Associations Resulting from Interchange Heterozygosity. Genetics. 1963 Mar;48(3):347–350. [PubMed]
  • Luykx, P. Kinetochore-to-pole connections during prometaphase of the meiotic divisions in Urechis eggs. Exp Cell Res. 1965 Sep;39(2):658–668. [PubMed]
  • NICKLAS, RB. Recurrent pole-to-pole movements of the sex chromosome during prometaphase I in Melanoplus differentialis spermatocytes. Chromosoma. 1961;12:97–115. [PubMed]
  • Nicklas, RB. Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis. Chromosoma. 1967;21(1):17–50. [PubMed]
  • Nicklas, RB; Staehly, CA. Chromosome micromanipulation. I. The mechanics of chromosome attachment to the spindle. Chromosoma. 1967;21(1):1–16. [PubMed]